Watson's weekly Jeffersonian. (Atlanta, Ga.) 1907-1907, October 17, 1907, Image 1
fw NISON’S WEEKLY i
K 1 JEFFERSONIAN bW
oS| EDITED BY
y THOS. E. WATSON x y
Vol. 11. No. 38.
A MIGHTY POWER—LEARN HOW TO DIRECT IT
(&\LLOT
• •» l£: I
wptti/ -.
Ow^■ ■ ,/z ' %
I MOI ! "
■ ff "IMwB
' • a
We do not ask the Farmers' Union to go Into politics as a body pledged to support certain candidates for office, but we do say that each and
every member of ths Union has the right to vote. It is therefore your duty to use that ballot for your own interests, your wife and your children.
In other words, vote out of office small peanut politicians of the Livingston* type who betray and forget about you, after you have elected them to office.
—GORDON NYE,
Relief ‘Before Injury Asked by Central "Railroad.
“In this suit the Central of Geor
gia! Railroad is not fighting confisca
tion, as it alleges. It is fighting reg
ulation by the State.”—Judge James
K. Hines.
“The Central of Georgia is seek
ing relief from the court before it
has yet suffered an injury.”—At
torney W. A. Wimbish.
These two statements made Thurs
day morning by attorneys represent
ing the State of Georgia in its main
tenance of a 2 1-2 cents passenger
fare against the efforts of the Central
of Georgia road is now making in
the United States court to have that
reduced fare annulled through proc
ess of injunction, epitomize the ar
gument that the State has offered both
on the side of established laws and
common justice.
\ Thursday was by far the most not
jrole day of this far-reaching suit.
(The speeches of Judges Hines and At
torney Wimbish were not only master
works of comprehensive argument and
subtle legal knowledge, but they were
also vindications of the officials of
• %
Atlanta, Ga., Thursday, October 17, 1907.
the State and clear expositions of the
State’s policy in regulating corporate
interests. Leading members of the
bar sat throughout the arguments as
if they were in school again learning
the law. People who may have doubt
ed the wisdom and justice of the pres
ent administration in pressing public
rights agair.st individual monopolies
went away with full and intense con
viction on the reasons and rights of
this activity.
Judge Hines began the argument
for the State Thursday, and Mr.
Wimbish was concluding it when
court adjourned until Friday. For
the first time Thursday morning ex-
Senator Spooner, representing the
road, began to take notes.
After having show the futility of
the contention, as made by opposing
counsel, that the governor would ex
ercise no discretionary power in exe
cuting the order of the Railroad Com
mission, Judge Harris called atten
tion to the glaring error in a quota
tion the road ’• counsel had made from
the Candlor-Overvtreet aat The bill
filed by the road quotes the act as
reading: “An action for recovery
shall be brought in the name of the
State by direction of the governor.”
This is an incorrect quotation. The
Candler-Overstreet bill reads, as a
matter of fact, thus: “An action may
be brought . . . and shall be
brought in the name of the State by
direction of the governor.”
“Under this reading,” said Judge
Harris, “it is foolish to contend that
a thousand suits a day might be
brought against a railroad. No sane
official would fall into such stupidity.
The object of the bill is clearly to
enforce the law in a wise and effect
ive manner. It means this and noth
ing further.”
Slurs Repudiated.
Judge Harris repudiated the slurs
that have been cast upon the Rail
road Commission and the good faith
of tlie administration. “It is the wish
of the commission and all other offi
cials,” he declared, “that corporate
enterprises, together with all others
in Georgia, shall prosper. But they
Price Five Cents.
shall not fatten through tyrannies
upon the people of the State.”
In answering the allegations of Mr.
Law ton, that for twenty-seven years
the railroads of Georgia had been
persecuted by the commission, and in
■ some instances driven into bank
ruptcy, Judge Hines’ remarks were
particularly interesting.
As to Bankrupting Roads.
“In the first place,” he said, “the
Central of Georgia has not been in
existence twenty-seven years. That
much of the statement is a remark
able bit of extravagance. As to the
charge that the commission has driven
roads tp bankruptcy, why hasn’t coun
sel cited some examples of his claim f
The Central of Georgia Railroad went
into bankruptcy through gross mis
management. It was the victim of
financial debauchment, a spectacular
picture of frenzied finance. Dishon
esty and not the Railroad Commission
thrust this road into bankruptcy.”
In the crowded United States court
room ex-Senator John C. Spooner, all
(Continued o* Page Twelve.)