Watson's weekly Jeffersonian. (Atlanta, Ga.) 1907-1907, October 24, 1907, Page PAGE SEVEN, Image 7
stands firm. He is the colossus of
the cotton world.
His effort to secure a just and
equitable price for his property is
right and reasonable. In his fight
to protect the product of his toil, he
has, with insignificant exception, the
sympathy of the whole world. If he
yields; if he is intimidated or bul
lied or coerced into relinquishing his
property; if he agrees to accept for
it a lower price than its worth, he
has only himself to blame.
If the farmers who hold cotton de
cline to sell at the price the man who
owns no cotton quotes to a purchaser
on the cotton exchange, the exchange
gambler and the world will have to
come to the farmer’s price.
When the farmer sells, he has the
goods to deliver. When the specu
lator sells, he hopes to be able to
buy cotton at a lower sgice than the
one he quotes in order to complete
his trade.
All must come at last to the actual
producer—the cotton farmer. He
holds the key to the situation. He
possesses the goods which the world
demands. If he will recognize the
futility of exchange made prices, re
fuse to be bound by them, learn how
the prices of his commodities are
juggled and realize that the man
who sells what he does not possess
is not in any respect in his position,
he will continue to stand firm. Even
the cotton speculator who has sold
“futures” must eventually become
a purchaser.
That the farmers of the south will
stand like a rock wall against these
onslaughts upon their property and
their living, there seems /to be no
present reason to doubt.
They have learned the lessons of
experience and they are going to
profit by them. —Atlanta Constitu
tion.
COTTON GROWERS AND SPEC
ULATOR.
Because the first three frosts of
the cotton year were not destructive,
the cotton speculators proceeded to
mark down contracts from 20 to 30
points, and in New York spot cot>
ton, middling was quoted down 25
points. Middling cotton is now sell
ing close to 11 cents —too close to
admit of the payment of that sum
at the farm or nearest shipping sta
tion.
The fight between the cotton grow
er and the speculator has begun, and
behind the speculator stands the
eastern or foreign spinner. The spec
ulator arjd the foreign spiner are. try
ing to rob the cotton farmer of legit
imate profit. They want all the prof
its that the staple affords, and if
they can keep the farmer financial
ly weak and dependent they will be
especially gratified. For that means
that he cannot accumulate a surplus,
and if he cannot build up a surplus
he will continue to be the football
year after yepr of the speculator and
spinner.
The farmer should have the sup
port of all interests in the south in
this critical stage of the price-mak
ing period. The home bank, the home
supply house, the insurance agents
and all other homo agencies with
whom the farmer deals should extend
to him all possible support while he
is conducting a hard fight with the
speculator and spinner. The slow
marketing of cotton is essential, and
those who can hold even a single
bale will aid all growers to obtain
a fair and reasonable price for their
cotton. The holding and warehousing
of cotton at this season of the year
is the farmer’s best line of defense,
and every friend he has should come
to his aid at this stage of the cot
ton year.—Age-Herald.
MRS. ROSE PASTOR STOKES ON
LABOR PROBLEM.
How shall we solve the problem of
- poverty among the working men and
working women!
Give to the workers the full value
of the product of their labor; in oth
er words, promote economic justice.
There are about 80,000,000 people in
America; 70,000,000 of these 80.000,-
000 constitute the working class, and
by working class I mean the class
which produces all wealth, from
Presidents and Managers of great in
dustries to those working as unskilled
laborers for the lowest wage.
The rest of the 80,000,000 compose
what may be called the mere capital
ist class; those who, through monop
olization of the land and machinery
of production, without access to which
the other 70,000,000 cannot live, are
able to live in idleness and luxury on
the produce of the workers’ toil-,
while the workers,jthus despoiled, live
in poverty and partial slavery.
Os all the new wealth created each
year the majority of the wealth pro
ducers receive but a bare subsistence
wage, while the idlers spend the
workers* wealth in palaces, yachts,
fine clothes and endless luxuries.
There are thousands and scores of
thousands of people in America who
work hard both mentally and physi
cally exploiting other men’s labor,
and believe they are entitled to all
they manage to take; such as spec
ulators in stocks, lands or any hu
man necessity.
The burglar works quite as hard
mentally and physieallv in planning
the housebreaking and carrying out
his plan; for it must be no slight
mental strain to plan the best ways
of getting into a house at night or to
fix upon a house; and no slight phy
sical exertion to do away with the
resistance cf intricate locks and
alarm-ariving glass windows. A man’s
physical being must be taxed to the
utmost to gather together the silver
and other valuables after he has
broken into the house ; and to make
his escape. He never dreams of ar
guing that he works hard, and should
therefore be entitled to the silver.
Besides taking away from him
what he got through much hard la
bor, we lock him up. Society recog
nizes the parasitism of the house
breaker in spite of all his bard work;
but in the case of the other burglar—
the speculator—though public senti
ment is growing apace in that direc
tion, we have not vet come to see
clearly that, though between the two
there may be difference in kind, there
is far less difference in degree than
is commonly supposed. *
Superficial reform movements have
proved unable to cope with the prob
lem. The doling, out of alms to the
poor through charities is proving not
only futile so far as the. problem of
the poor is concerned, but wften
harmful as well.
Not only does the money-powerful
part of society create poverty, but
after making the poor, it also, through
WATSON’S WEEKLY JEFFERSONIAN.
its charities, robs them of self-re
spect by causing the poor to believe
that they are getting something for
nothing. Very harming are also these
“charities” of the rich, because, by
their attitude, they blind the people
to the real causes of poverty. The
fact that women in the upper classes,
with few exceptions, do not know
that the wealth they receive is creat
ed by labor, does not make it less de
plorable that in returning through
“charities” a. little of that wealth
to the working people, they believe
themselves to be rendering a real ser
vice to the community. Dividends
and other forms of unearned profits
can be put to greatest usefulness to
day only by being used in aid of
such causes as have for their aim
and purpose the searching out and
eradication of that injustice in so
ciety, which makes possible dividends
and other forms of unearned prof
its.
THE PEOPLE VICE TRUST AND
CORPORATIVE RULE.
The last decade has proven con
clusively that the people will never
be able to throw off the yoke of
tyrannical, oppressive and despoiling
misrule of the trusts and privileged
corporations, unless they (the people)
unite. By people, I mean those that
honestly and faithfully respect and
abide by just laws; that desire and
advocate equal justice, liberty and
opportunites for all, but special priv
ileges to none.
The people have been deceived and
misled so often, that they are filled
with distrust, and almost discourag
ed; and in time have become scat
tered in numerous, practically, in
significant and impotent squads, that
it would seem to require, almost, a
miracle to ever get them together
again; which is absolutely necessary.
Who is to bring this about! The
leaders of the different reform fac
tions must do it. They must first
unite or agree with each other. They
must shelve or table, for the time
being, every blessed principle, no
matter how good or desirable, upon
which they are not practically a unit.
They must realize fully that, “The
welfare of the people is the highest
law.” They must exercise the high
est order of manhood, patriotism and
self-denial. They must put aside
even the last vestige of personal or
party consideration. They must con
sider that the next campaign may
mean the last stand of freemen;
that a victory of the present ruling
power may sweep away forever even
the least semblance of a government
by, cf, and for the people.
Alas! I am only an insignificant
member of that great mass, referred
to, sometimes, as The Common Herd,
and yet, I dare say, that in 19C-8 the
candidacy for any important office,
at the hands of any of the reform
factions, will carry with it a mighty
fearful responsibility; yea! the can
didates may bring down upon them
selves the curses, instead of bless
ings, of generations to come. May I
be pardoned for naming three men
among the reformers, who stand
most prominent before the peo
ple, and vho could and should take
the initiative toward bringing about
that grand, desirable, necessary and
praiseworthy union of, practically,
all the reform leaders and the peo-
ple! Indeed, I am firmly convinced
their efferl& would be crowned with
success. Those, men are Wm. J. Bry
an, Wm. R. Hearst and Thomas E.
Watson. Will they do it! Tn be
half of the people; yea! by all that
is good and holy, I implore them to
do it.
Once upon a time someone said (I
forget who), “I would rather be
right than to be president.” God
grant those three men that kind of
a spirit. Surely, it will be far no
bler, more honorable and praisewor
thy, to be instrumental in bringing
about the union of the people than
being the candidate of any faction.
It is truly said, “Where there’s a
will, there’s away.” Surely, an
honest and earnest will should not be
wanting in any cf the reform lead
ers : provided they are honest and
sincere friends of the people. Aa to
• the way, I am clear in my mind how
that glorious, desirable, praiseworthy,
and positively necessary union of the
leaders and the people could and
should be accomplished; but will de
fer it for some other time, as I am
not sure that even this, my little say,
will ever see daylight, That is, be
published.
As to myself, I do not seek not|»-
riety, honor, office, or money; but,
with all my heart and soul, I pray
for and desire to see the people at
last united and win in order to es
tablish and perpetuate (which, in
fact, we have never had) a govern
ment by, of, and for the people.
DIXIT.
PREDATORY AND PRODUCTIVE
WEALTH.
(Charles Emory Smith, Before Am
erican Bankers’ Association, Septem
ber 24.)
There is a predatory wealth and
there is productive wealth—the
wealth that preys like a cormorant <>n
the vitals of the people, and the
wealth that develops resources and
employs labor and builds up indus
try. The country is tired of the mul
ti-millionaires, who swell their ill
gotten fortunes .in the unscrupulous
exercise of corporate power to palm
off paper values for solid worth or
who flaunt their ostentatious wealth
in tawdry display or in worse mor
als. But it ought to have only ap
probation for the thousands of rich
men, rich in purpose as well as in
purse, who honorably employ their
wealth in a manner which hurts no
body and helps wherever it reaches.
The captains of industry, the
chieftains of railroads and the mas
ters of markets are placed in posi
tions where they exercise a poten
tial, almost a controlling, influ
ence for the weal or woe of
the land.d They can appease pub
lic feeling or they can excite it They
can make content or they can make
discontent. They can establish and
preserve the conditions of prosperity
or they can prolong the agitation and
magnify the menaces - which disturb
confidence and produce disquiet It
is for them to administer their great
trusts in obedience to law, in the
spirit of justice, in what in the long
run is equally for the interest of
their stockholders and of the public,
and thus they will promote mutual
respect, good understanding and gen
eral business tranquillity and assur
ance.
PAGE SEVEN