The Southern field and fireside. (Augusta, Ga.) 1859-1864, October 15, 1859, Page 166, Image 6
166
AGRICULTURAL.
DANIEL LEE, IS. D., Editor.
SATURDAY, OCTOBER 15, 1859.
PLAGIARISM IN THE PATENT OFFICE
REPORTS.
A writer in the Washington States , published
at the federal metropolis, is giving column after
column of extracts from English works on agri
culture, which the Agricultural Clerk in the Pa
tent office has copied, and palmed off on the
Commissioner, the Secretary of the Interior, and
Congress, as the production of his own gifted
intellect, and original matter. Webster defines
plagiarism to be “literary theft,” or stealing: and
it is certainly the meanest kind of stealing when
practiced systematically, as in the agricultural
reports so largely printed and distributed by
the general government. The Agricultural press
may well inquire whether Congress is under any
constitutional obligations to disgrace the agri
cultural intelligence of the whole country, by
publishing as American , such literary stealings
as the following?
D. J. R—The proper pe
riod- for moving grass, so
as to secure the largest
amount of nutrient proper
ties within it, being thus
determined, the next con
sideration is the preserva
tion of those useful qualities
in the hay. Experiments
show, that out of the varions
constituents of which this
crop Is composed, the mu
cilago, starch, gluten, and
sugar (which are soluble in
water) are alone retained in
the body of an animal for
the purposes of life, the bit
ter extractive and saline
matters being considered as 1
assisting or modifying the i
functions of digestion rather
than as being truly nutri
tive parts of the compound,
and being voided with the
woody fibre, Ac.
bre, &c.
The above is a fair sample of the plagiarism
of the whole essay of Mr. Browne— a perform
ance that any school boy ten years old might
have copied from an English work as well as he.
American honesty and capacity are most in
geniously affected by giving the civilized world
to understand that the United States can pro
duce nothing of their Own worth reading in re
lation to their most important material interests;
and therefore their annual agricultural reports
emanating from Congre33, are made up partly
of silly questions, asking old women and men to
guess as to the number of geese in different
States, and partly of matter copied from different
authors without a particle of acknowledgement-
We have generally treated these Patent Office
reports as standing far below criticism ; yet we
must express our regret that the Department of
the Interior should be willing to bring discredit
on American Agriculture by publishing as “sta
tistics,” and “original” matter that betrays
equal ignorance, error and deception. In the
report for 1854, page 95, Mr. Browne, when de
scribing Bird Island guauo, says: “ From care
ful analyses, it has been ascertained that this
substance is by far the richest source of phos
phoric acid for the farmer yet discovered, as it
contains eighty-four per cent, of dry superphos
phate of lime."
If Mr. B. had only a smattering of chemical
knowledge, or ever studied agricultural text
books at all, he would know that if the birds
or other animals which furnish this Bird
Island guano, subsisted exclusively on bones,
their excrements would contain no super-phos
phate of lime; for the obvious reason that bones
yield no super-phosphate until treated with
strong acids, like the oil of vitriol. On page 97
of the same volume, Mr. Browne says: “ All
guanos liave'a general character running through
them. For instance, they invariably contain
feathers and comminuted shells; water of
course; organic matter always; super-phosphate
never ; and nitrogen or ammonia invariably.”
Such are the palpable contradictions in these
public official documents, compiled by an ignor
ant, yankee schoolmaster, who really knows
nothing of agricultural science, and therefore,
copies from different works the most discordant
statements, without the feeblest conception
whether they are true or false. But as the last
Commissioner of Patents, and the politicians in
Congress know as little of rural sciences as Mr.
Browne, he’has played off his shameless hum
bugs for six years past, and possibly may do so
for six years to come. His remarkable success
has naturally produced many imitators. The
Baltimore Rural Register of the first instant cop
ies from the late transactions of the New Hamp
shire State Agricultural Society, several columns
from "the constituents necessary for the soil,”
being an "Assay from the pen of Dr. Wji. Pres
cott." This easay of Dr. P. follows one from
our own pen, first published ten years ago, foun
ded on much personal and laborious research,
as nearly as these two paragraphs, with slight
verbal changes: \
Dr. Lee. Phosphoric
acid, ammonia, and potash
are doubtless the most im
portant elements in guano,
and these substances are
least abundant in nearly all
cultivated lands. If we
study the natural products
of the earth in connection
with the elements of fertili
ty, we shall find that large,
long-lived and thrifty forest
trees grow only in soils
which are rich in potash.—
When the farmer has occa- <
Sion to burn maple, elm, oak,
walnut, hickory, beech, and i
other hard-wood forest i
trees, he finds them rich in
this alkali; and he also
finds that soils which pro
duce this kind of timber are
always good for agricultural
purposes. Their produc
tiveness is not to be ascribed
to potash alone, for all the
other elements ofcropsarc e
qually present in unavailable
form; but the existence of an
abundance of magnifleentfor
«'t potash-yielding trecswill
never deceive the farmer as i
to the natural capabilities of
the soil. Hence, when a
farmer can learn what a-
gQTCKEM JPiU&ll Ml YX&3BBX3NB.
Engllshman.—The pro
i per season for mowing the
t grass, so as to secure the
largest amount of nutrient
i properties within it, being
- thus determined, the next
• consideration is—the pres
i ervation of these useful
i qualities in the hay.
Experiments show that
out of the various constitu
ents of which grass is com
posed, the mucilage, starch,
gluten, and sugar (which
are soluble in water) are
alone retained in the body
of an animal for the purpo
ses oi life, the bitter extrac
tive and saline matters being
considered as assisting or
modifying the functions of
digestion, rather than as be
ing truly nutritive parts of
the compound., ami being
voided with the woody fi-
Dr.Preseett.—Phosphor
ic acid, ammt%ia and potash
are the substanitss that are
least abundant inSearly all
cultivated lands, if we
study the natural presets
of the earth in connected
with the elements of fertill
ty, we shall find that large,
long-lived and thrifty forest
trees' grow only in soils
which are rich in potash.—
When the farmer has occa
sion to bum maple, elm,
oak, walnut, birch, and oth
er hard-wood forest trees,
he finds them rich in this
alkali; and he also finds
that soils that produce this
kind of timber, are always
■ good for agricultural pur
poses. Their productive
ness is not to bo ascribed to
potash alone, for all the oth
er elements of available
i crops, are equally present;
but the existence of an a
; bundance of magnificent
i potash-yielding forest tree
will never deceive the far-
I mer as to the natural capa
cities of the soil. Hence,
' when a farmer can learn
. what amount of potash 100
pounds of his soil contains
mount of potash 100 pounds In an available condition, he
of his soil or subsoil contuins may judge with, considera
te an available condition ble safety of the natural re
(for this alkali exists in com- sources of bis land. This
bination with flint or silicic alkali exists in some soils as
acid in an insoluble form), high as two per cent—a
he may judge with consider- quantity, however, rarely
able safety of the natural found—and in others, ten
resources of his land. This thousand parts of earth yield
alkali exists in some soils not one of potash, Such
in a proportion as high as soils are always unproduc
two per cent—a quantity tive, nearly barren,
however, rarely found—and
in others, ten thousand parts
of earth yield not one of pot
ash. Such soils are always
nearly barren.
If Prescott is not as good a plagiarist as
Browne, he soon will be; and we commend him
to Mr. Thompson, Secretary of the Interior, as
worthy ofemployment, if for any reason the pres
ent agricultural clerk has to be removed, Pres
cott has this merit over Browne: he is not so
careless and stupid as to contradict himself. —
Browne attempted to ride several horses at the
same time, some of which go in opposite direc
ions.
MANURE FOR FRUIT TREES.
Dr. Daniel Lee : I am engaged in rearing
an Apple and Pear Orchard of considerable ex
tent, and desire to avail myself of all proper
means for the judicious cultivation and rapid
growth of trees. I have at my command a va
riety of animal and vegetable fertilizers, but am
at a loss in making such a selection from them as
would be dictated by an intimate acquaintance
with the constituent elements of growth in trees,
and the composition of fertilizers. I have
within my reach, without price, and in pretty
large quantities, the following substances:
1. The droppings from extensive hog pens.
2. Hair, blood, bones, and other refuse mat
ter from a large slaughtering establishment.
3. Charcoal dust, somewhat mixed with wood
ashes, thrown out from the ash pans of locomo
tives.
4. Hair and spent lime, from an extensive
tannery.
5. Quick lime and ashes.
6. Black mold from spring branches, com
posed wholly of decayed leaves.
Now, which of these substances, and in what
proportions can I employ to advantage in pro
moting the growth, longevity and productive
ness of Apple and Pear trees, both dwarf and
standard.
If any of the artificial manures can be advan
tageously employed, which of them would you
suggest? ' Pyres.
Tennessee, September, 1859.
Our correspondent possesses rare advantages
for obtaining several of the best fertilizers
known to the most advanced agriculture; and
ho may use them as well to secure superior or
chards and large crops of apples and pears, as
to command the most abundant harvests of
grain and cotton. It is rare that fruit trees are
pushed forward too rapidly by the application of
an excess of rich manure, like that from hog
pens and slaughter-pens, yet the bearing of a
young orchard might be delayed by such means
several years, if not indefinitely. The efforts of
nature would be wholly directed to the produc
tion of wood and leaf-buds, so that large and
barren trees would characterize this preternatu
ral development. Seek the mean between a sur
feit of plant food, and a feeble growth from the
want of it. Remember that, were you to bum
a pear tree or an applo tree, and give the ashes
obtained therefrom to a chemist for analysis, he
would find that lime salts constituted not far from
one-half of the same. This fact explains why a
calcareous soil is generally favorable to the pro
duction of fruit and fruit trees. Give all the
ground in your orchards a liberal dose of lime
from the tan-yard,or elsewhere, at the rate of 100
bushels per acre. Apply the locomotive coal and
ashes about your trees, and somewhat further
than the roots extend, as a lasting rather than a
rich fertilizer. For the latter, use the hog-pen
manure, blood, hair, Ac., mixed with decayed
forest leaves, charcoal dust, or with the natural
soil of the orchard. Manure as you would to
produce twelve barrels of corn to the acre, and
cultivate the ground over all the roots of the
trees, but be careful not to injure them with the
plow, or other implement of tillage. Our plow
men damage young trees outrageously, and
yours will do the same, unless you watch them.
"Work with the hoe near the trees. Whitewash
them with lime, to keep the rabbits from eating
the bark in cold weather, or cover them with
straw tied about the trees. Mulch in summer
to keep the roots from suffering in dry weather,
and protect the stems or bodies of the trees
from the direct rays of the sun on the south and
south-west sides. Prune so as to make low and
spreading tops, that will shade the trunks of the
trees, and produce fruit within reach. Look out
for the cotton-aphis, which is the worst enemy
to Southern fruit trees.
■ m .
AGRICULTURAL ADDRESSES.
Hon. Edward Everett has accepted an in
vitation to deliver an address at the Georgia
State Fair, to be held in Atlanta, from the 24th
to the 28th of October.
Hon. H. W. Hilliard will deliver the Annual
Address before the Alabama State Fair, on the
l?th November.
Lieutenant M. F. Maury has accepted an
invitation to deliver the annual address before
the North Alabama Agricultural and Mechani
cal Association, to be held at Decatur, on the
10th inst
Crab Grass and Pea Hay. —Dr. Ware, of
Athens, informs us that he has made fifteen two
borse loads of good pea vine hay on two acres,
which produced a good crop of wheat this year.
This is equal to some three or four tons to the
acre, and a nrop really worth having.
Mr. Martin’s meadow at the foot of the Sand-
Hills, near this (which we have just visited)
shows a large yield of Crab-grass hay that is
put up in three or four four times more stacks
than it ought to be. The exposure of so much
outside surface to rains andsunshine to ruin the
hay is extremely bad economy.
[gg”The first fair of the AbbeviUc District So
ciety will be held on Wednesday and Thursday,
19th and 20th of October. The Hon. A. Burt
will deliver the annual address on Thursday. •
sweep HUSBANDRY.
The day is not remote when sheep husbandry
will form a prominent feature in the agricultural
industry of t|ie cotton-growing States. Among
the breeds ofi sheep worthy of care and culture,
alike for theif wool and flesh, the South-Down
and Cotswold stand pre-eminent. One of the
handsomest South-Down sheep ever raised in
this country, was bred by Mr. J. C. Taylor, of
Holmdel, M< nmouthcounty, N. J., called “Mas
ter Fordhan ” which was sold to Messrs. Mowe
& Haines, i f Sacramento, Cal., last year, for
S3OO. We jive, in this number, a true like
ness of this fine animal Considered as a dis
tinct breed, the South-Downs are hardy, com
pact, and e ccellent feeders, of medium size,
good nurses and quite prolific. Their mutton
is famous fa a due mixture of fat and lean meat,
and is free fi yin that excess of tallow which dis
tinguishes improved Cotswold. Os the latter,
we also give' a likeness of the imported ram
“Cedric.”
The fleece of this breed is much used for
combing and making all worsted goods. Col-
Ware, of Virginia, gives the preference to the
Cotswold sheep. He thus describes them in a
letter to the EditO’of the Country Gentleman:
Luther Tuckej, Esq.—ln compliance with
your request I fend you this notice of my
sheep: I had a fyck of good sheep, but found,
besides the fleeefl. each sheep at 4 years old on
grass, would not command more than $2 50—
the best, fed on grain in the winter, would bring
over $4 00. To Ripply a butcher each year a
lot of fat sheep of a farmer’s own raising, would
require him to katp 4 lots on hand to sell one—
the fleece but line more than paying for the
keep. To rely up>n a fleece alone for profit, was
too insignificant a matter. At the highest prieo
per pound given h the United States, it would
require too many sheep to make a small sum of
money. Not beifc' satisfied with this state of
things, I determhed to purchase some of the
large mutton sheep of England, the improved
Cotswold, and tr what could be done with
them; and as independent of the pride, I believe
it the true policy to have the best, as it soonest
returns the outlay I imported, I do import each
year, winners of tiie high prizes of the Royal
Agricultural Society of England. If they beat
England, I must surely have the purest bred
and best.
I soon found, alter putting 3 crosses of my
imported bucks on my ordinary flock, that the
fleece greatly increased in weight, and sold for
as much per pound as the fleece of the ordinary
sheep, and I sold the mutton from these crosses
(not thorough brel) without difficulty, the fall
after one year old, for $lO each on the farm, so
that I sell out clean every year, keeping none
over the winter, but the breeding ewes and the
lambs of the same spring.
You will see from my circular sent you, by
remarks of others about my sheep, that I have
sold some mutton for $35 and $25 each, and
you will see from the number of pounds of washed
wool to the fleece, that we make more money
to the fleece than any other breed. I send yon
samples of wool—the longest is from a fleece
of 18J lb.—the next 17^ —the next 16—the
next 14—the growth being from the shearing of
1853 to that of 1854. Ail is not so long. 1
have had it longer. I always wash my sheep
before shearing, but admit that the flock from
raising lambs and losing .some wool, average
only 6 lbs. washed. We never Bell under 30
cents per lb., and sometimes get 40, and you
will seo we still make as much money or more
to the fleece than any other breed. Selling out
clean every year enables ns to keep all our
sheep of the most profitable size—ewes that
bring us lambs every year ,(aDd being prolific)
mostly bring twins and wool too. We are never
overstocked. The butcher is always ready for
the overplus.
I consider the improved Cotswold the most
profitable sheep for general farming purposes
(wool and mutton), for while I formerly sold one
mutton 4 years old for $2 50 on grass, and $4
00 on grain in the winter, in the same time, be
sides getting more money for fleece, I sell 4 of
this breed for S4O; and that profit is in that
proportion, allowing that each bring the same
number of lambs,* for I never sell one of them
the fall after one year old for less than $lO each,
part bred at that—butchers have offered $6 and
$8 each for some lambs , and been refused. The
thorough bred are too much in demand, and too
costly to alter.
Seeing these results, naturally the farmers in
this section have occasionally procured of me
rams and improved their flock, until this little
county of Clarke that I live in, has now a repu
tation for mutton probably unequalled by any
State in the Union. Is it not the true policy of
the farmer to keep that breed which will produce
the greatest amount of money from the smallest
number? It is not unusual in this county, for a
flock of from 40 to 50 ewes, part bred, to yield
in mutton and wool, each year, from S6OO to
$650.
I know it is a theory with some that these
large sheep require more food to sustain them
than the small breed. Some say double. My
experience is the reverse. I cannot, nor can
any person else, form any correct idea of the
fact on grass, but nearly correct conclusions can
be arrived at when you feed them on grain for
the butcher. In this way I have tested it. I
have, beginning at the same time, fed a lot of
ordinary sheep, 7 years old, the pick of 700
good ones, and a lot of yearling Cotswolds, the
samo number in adjoining fields, the most indif
ferent field to the Cotswold—the same amount
fed at the same time to each lot. The former
always eat up clean, and wanted more; the lat
ter always left some, and were sold rolling fat,
for $lO each; the former not until some time in
March; then with difficulty and grumbling by
the butcher for $4 00 each, having the advantage
of the others also in age. I have come to the
conclusion that at least 2 (I believe 3) Cotswold,
even yearlings, can be fattened well for the
butcher on the grain it takes to fatten one of the
others of any age. The Cotswolds have great
propensity to take on fat, are always mutton.
Indeed, you cannot lay the fat on any other, as
you can on them. It is their nature. All others
travel a great deal, and ramble off their food.
The Cotswold are heavy, sluggish sheep—fill
themselves and lay down and ruminate like cat
tle, and thus convert their food into fat, instead
of rambling it off, and it is to this sluggish qual
ity, I ascribe the fact that I have never lost a
thorough-bred by dogs: they do not jump up
and run when anything comes into the field, thus
tempting dogs in the chase, They are large
sheep: have been brought in England, by full
treatment at 3 years old, thorough bred, to nett
for the butcher over 300 lbs. Can any other
breed of sheep give from $2 to $5 in fleece in
the spring he is OBe year old, and in the fall of
*“11 ewes brought 23 living lambs—6 of the 11
brought 16 lambs—one of the 5 brought 4—the other 4
brought 8 la.n.s each.”
the same year, without fail, $lO as a mutton,
and draw butchers hundreds of miles to get
them at that, as they do here every year? can
cattle do so? and they have no fleece? Can
they give $lO even the fall after one year old ?
and they consume infinitely more per head.
Then what animal can be so profitable to the
farmer as the Cotswold sheep for general farm
ing purposes, returning its outlay with such cer
tainty, so speedy, and so unceasingly?
Josiah Wm. Ware,
Near Berry ville, Clarke Co., Virginia.
-m
Burnt Corn, Ala., Oct. 4th, 1859.
Messrs. Editors: —After noticing in the Field
and Fireside ” an article from the N. Y. Obser
ver, upon kyanizing wood, I am resolved upon
making an inquiry concerning the use of Rosin
Oil for the same purpose.
Please inform me, as will as the numerous
other readers of your paper, through the next
issue of the same, or as soon as convenient,
whether or not this oil is beneficial in preserv
ing wood, especially the shingles of the roof of
a house ; also, the manner of applying it for the
same. Very respectfully yours,
Itiiiel Lee.
Any oil is useful to preserve shingles or wood
but the use of some mineral paint, like white
lead, is generally thought to improve the preser
vative quality of the oil. In ordinary hands,
kyanizing has proved a failure We can show
our correspondent a place on the Genesee Val
ley Canal, where ten thousand dollars was soon
lost in a patent kyanizing establishment, of a
recent date.
Plows and Stock. —Calling on Messrs. Car
michael & Bean to purchase a couple of their
superior wrought steel, two-horse plows, which
are just the thing for fall plowing, we visited Mr.
Carmichael s place to see a fine cow which has
a pair of twin Devon calves of great beauty, and
so nearly alike in form, size and color that no
one can distinguish the one from the other, al
though five months old. This cow and her off
spring ought be exhibited at the State Fair, to
be held at Atlanta on the 24th instant.
South Carolina Institute Fair.— As will
be seen by our advertising columns, the Insti
tute Fair will be opened in Charleston, on the
15th of next month. Col. Alfred P. Aldrich,
of Barnwell District, has accepted an invitation
to deliver the annual address.
Key West, Florida, )
Sept. 25,1859. f
Dr. D. Lee — Dear Sir:
In your department of the Southern Field
and Fireside, I noticed some time since an ar
ticle on the cultivation of the Date—in which
the writer directs attention to the Florida Keys,
as being probably well adapted for its growth.
About the time that the paper containing that
article reached me, I was shown by a gentleman
residing here, a large Date tree, loaded with
fruit—which had borne very full for several
years, but had never brought any fruit to perfec
tion. The dates grow to be of full size, of a
bright yellow color, and then drop. Whether
this is the color of the date when ripe, I do not
know, having never seen any except when pre
served, and they, as you know, are nearly black.
He and several other gentlemen of this place,
asked me to request you to write an article on
the subject of the cultivation of the date; and
to beg of you, if you please, to give some direc
tions as to the proximity of the male and female
trees, and the manner of fructifying the bearing
tree, so as to make it bring its fruit to full matu
rity.
The date tree grows to be a very large size
tree, and bear large quantities of fruit; and I
have no doubt that their cultivation would be a
profitable business, if the people only under
stood the art.
Please tell us in your article, what is the
color of the date, before it is preserved.
Yours respectfully,
J. 0. Branch.
Seasonable Hints. —Hogs should be fattened
before the very cold weather sets in. The fall
is the best time for fattening animals of every
kind, as the weather is then neither too hot nor
too cold. There will not bo much corn to spare
this year; we advise farmers to make up their
hogs and get rid of them as soon as possible.
From buildings of every kind generally require
some alteration or repairs before winter. This
w ork should not be deferred to a more convenient
season; it is always pleasant to have these things
done in proper time. Cattle and sheep require
warmth and shelter, and much food may be
economised by attending to their wauts in this
way and protecting them from the rigors of win
ter.
A Late F'ai.l Predicted. —A gentleman of
Clarksburg, who is something of an amateur
naturalist, and has for years taken great delight
m'studying the habits of insects, birds, beasts,
«c., informs the editor of the Register, of that
place, that he lias noticed for several years past
that the martins invariably leave us on the Bth,
9th or 10th of August. This year they still re
main, although it is now the 19th of August.—
He predicts from this that we will have a late
fall, and that the farmers need not be afraid that
the frost will hurt their corn.
Swine are often troubled with a disease, (so
denominated by veterinarians,) the ‘kidney
worm.’ Corn soaked in very strong lye, made
of wood ashes, is said to be an infalible reme
dy. Salt and brimstone, in small quantities, are
a preventive, and indeed, the only one known.
Comfortable quarters and good food are of really
more importance in the successful management
of these animals than many are inclined to sup
pose, and should never, on any account be ne
glected.
—t- ~ttt mmt
Good Cropping.—We have it on undoubted
authority, that a young man in Natchitoches,
Martin Barnes, by liis own labor, aided only
three months by one hired hand, has raised a
crop of cotton, for Which one of his neighbors
offered him, a few days ago, fifty bags of cotton,
just as it stood in the latter part of August. He
had in cultivation thirty-five acres, and the en
tire yield, it is thought by good judges, will be
seventy bags, worth, nett, at fair calculation,
three thousand five hundred dollars !
His outlay, beyond his own labor, was not
more, perhaps, than fifty dollars. What stock
he worked, we have not been informed; but not
probably more than one horse, for we know one
plow steadily plied is capable of cultivating 35
acres of cotton on light soil in a favorable sea
son, as tin- last has boon. — Natchitoches (La.)
C ■■ run >cle, hit inst.
TVe publish the following communication,
mainly for comment hereafter, with a view to
point out popular errors :
[For the Sonthem Field and Fireside.]
GREAT STERILIZING POWER OF CULTIVA
TION—SOU—MANURES .
SECTION I.
Twenty years ago, I cleared a new ground of
fifty acres. It lay tolerably well The trees
were lofty and beautiful, the soil light, loamy
and rich. While fresh, it brought about 30 bush
els of corn to the acre, and 1,500 pounds of
cotton.
This field I planted, in succession and alter
nately in com and cotton, for ten years. I se
lected a spot in it of less than an acre, not sub
ject to waste by rain-water. On this spot, I
planted nothing for ten years, but cultivated it
just as the balance of the field. On the eleventh
and twelth years, I planted this spot with the
whole field, in corn and cotton. These two crops
showed that this fresh, unplanted spot, bad
grown poor, in the same ratio precisely, as where
heavy crops had been grown every year.
The soil, too, had undergone all the apparent
changes, the same as where the field had been
planted. It had become more firm in its con
texture ; lost much of its dark, carbonaceous
appearance, nearly all its vegetable mould, or
humus, as it is called. The progressive sterili
ty was the same in the whole field. Many other
observations have confirmed this same truth; and
I will venture that any man can be convinced,
that ground well cultivated, leaving the same
amount of vegetable matter upon it, will grow
poor just as fast, as the same ground well cul
tivated with heavy crops.
Now the truth is only in “ the facts,” and the
facts are the reason or “ nature of things.”—
False facts and false experience have ever op
erated the most obstinately and energetically in
retarding progressive knowledge.
Let us seize the true facts here, if we may,
and draw from them several important probabil
ities.
1. That plants, in organizing their structures,
do not consume or take any of the solid sub
stance from the soil in which they grow.
2. Consequently that the analysing of soils to
ascertain what elements they need proper for
the growing of the desired crop or crops, is a
vain and useless labor—the presumptive pom
posity of science.
3. That since plants do not derive any of their
solid substance from the soil like the animals
they .nourish, they return nothing substantial to
it in their final decomposition.
4. That the action of the soil and of all ma
nures on plants, is by the nutritive stimulations
they offer to their vital properties. Stimuli are
nature's provisions for movements and changes.
5. That the gases and liquids which the soil
and manures evolve, are the true nutriflers of
plants. They offer themselves, at once, to the
plastic force of formation, or to their assimila
tion ; enter into their structures, and form their
solid substance.
6. That cultivation is the greatest and most
potent sterilizer. By tearing up the soil, and
exposing it directly to the tremendous, preda
tory action of the sun and atmosphere, the nu
tritive gases are uselessly and wastefully ex
ploded from their bases, where nature had lock
ed them up in chains of adamant for future use;
are wafted off by the winds, and, in a few years,
all are wasted by the plow, which would have
produced luxuriant crops for many long ages.
7. That the only means we have left to plow
and plant successfully, are by constantly restor
ing back to the soil those substances, which
hold the nutritive gasses firmly in their bases,
ready to be exploded for the growth and de
velopment of the plants wo cultivate. These
substances are all the bodies, that have had life.
8. That all manures should be kept in dark,
dry, and cool places, isolated from all exposure,
to prevent, much as possible, the premature ex
plosion, or decomposition, before the time of
planting.
9. And lastly. That the resting of land is a
powerful means of retarding sterility.
Let us now return rapidly back on these pro
babilities, and crowd in a nut shell, if we can,
what, decently told, would swell many ponderous
tomes.
SECTION H.
1. That plants do not take any ponderable,
or solid substance from the soil in which they
grow, can, and has been proved by direct exper
iment. I cannot do better here, than by quoting
from the most celebrated experiments ever made
or recorded in history—l mean those of the
Florentine academics. (Gregory Econ. of Nat.,
vol. 4.) These learned men were selected alone
for their ability, and called together by their
sovereigns, who nobly flung down their purses
at their feet, and said: “ Institute experiments
and discover the means of making more bread
for the people.”
An iron box japaned over with a cover was
prepared. This box was filled with soil made
perfectly dry; a willow-tree planted in it, and
all ingress excluded. At the end of fifteen years,
this tree was taken up, the dirt washed careful
ly from the roots, and replaced. The tree weigh
ed 666 lbs. On drying again, and reweighing
the soil, it was found to have neither gained nor
lost any appreciable weight, although it had
grown a tree of 666 lbs.
I believe such experiments have been often
made; I will recite no more.
2. The analysis of plants to ascertain the ma
terials or ingredients contained in their struc
ture ; and then, the analysis of the soil to discover
whether these iugredients are present or absent,
and if absent, to supply them by art, constitute
the great scientific basis of modern agriculture
more property terra-culture.
How beautiful, how specious and captivating
this theory! but how unsatisfying to the mind,
that hungers only for the truth! How easily it
is comprehended, and a man in profound ignor
ance can become a philosopher in a moment,
his mind satisfied with reason 1
The first idea I ever had of this theory, was
in reading the Ag. Chem. of Sir 11. Davy. This
great man in analyzing wheat straw, found silex
or sand. The idea of supplying soils with sand,
where there was none, to help nature to make
wheat straw, was of easy occurrence. The idea
spread over Europe and America, and the theo
ry was every where bom full grown, at the same
time. It is the theory of the materialists, who
behold in all minds, in all lives, nothing but the
displays of chemical attraction. In their mad
transcendentalism, they forgot that all lives are
the breath of the Divinity, impressed on all the
forms at first, which they have preserved, to run
the long race of all time; that these forms pos
sess an attractive force, a higher plastic affinity,
which can elaborate from the soil, even in the
absence of the chemical bases, all the needed
materials, and sliape their organs.
Accordingly, Spallanzani fed chickens on food,
which contained no lime. It might have been
expected, there would be no shells on their eggs.
But when the eggs came, their vital chemistry
had elaborated the lime in the absence of the
basis, and clothed them with good, strong shells.
From analogy and from the facts, the plastic