Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page.

Friday, October 22, 2010 JH ;&?ij,iuijte* M A '% f ... ' , ■'. ...■/.', || t'r 't-;;, 1 ' Pl' *'*’ * *• ’ fwy ' ■... ■■jgi '■"""' ' ji BH ■ fl \ \ Jjj §* jIBBIBrB| V g S& ■F 9H n vV aBBRy TwyajS; SBEIIII t j3gfj| S|| ?slßpj|Bß B BBHBp aßp aasg 'Ji||B 988 K&m&s&f §g&a* jSßlipp; fig Georgia's Seniors knew they had to revert to a past mentality. By NICK PARKER | The Red & Black It was no secret anymore. The seniors realized it. The coaches saw it. Fans knew. Opposing coaches were taking advantage of it. Georgia had become perceived as soft, and it was hard to argue. If the 1-4 record at the time didn’t show it, the film did. The physical brand of football associated with Georgia for so long was no longer present. “We haven’t been blocking and tackling good enough,” head coach Mark Richt said three weeks ago. “I’m going back to my original philosophy when I came to Georgia and that’s when I would say it’s hard to get better blocking without blocking and tackling, so I went back to that philosophy. What got me off that philosophy? A lot of it had to do with the one season when we had 32 guys hurt going into the year.” Scared of his already thin team being ravaged before they got “to the gate healthy,” like it had been the previous season, Richt “did the least amount” of blocking and tackling to the ground this preseason and through the first five games than he had ever done before in his time at Georgia, which he admits hurt early in the season. Richt, and the seniors, knew Georgia had to get back to the “Georgia way,” the hard-nosed, aggres sive brand of football Georgia had become synonymous with under Richt. See SENIORS, Page 9 Inside 'We Do What We Do' • Page 2 I Kentucky Coverage • Page 10