Newspaper Page Text
PAGE 4—THE BULLETIN, May 30, 1959
JOSEPH BREIG
THE WIFE AT WORK
The man who loves his wife
in the way that a wife ought
to be loved does not want her
working in an office or a
factory.
If it is inescapably necessary
that she do so,
then it is in
escapably nec
essary. But
the right kind
of husband .
will not be
content until
the necessity
has been ended.
Neither will he lightly con
clude that in his case the word
“necessity” applies. To the con
trary, he will be difficult to
convince that it does apply.
The right kind of husband is
not a materialist who puts fur
niture, or drapes, or carpeting,
or an auto, or money in the
bank, ahead of his wife’s true
happiness.
He is not a timorous soul,
either, cowed by advertising or
by public' opinion into feeling
that he is obligated to keep up
with the Joneses in worldly
things.
Far from if. The right kind of
husband is a manly man with a
mind of his own. He is far more
concerned about his wife’s good
than about what some neighbor
might think.
He knows that the good of his
wife is not best served by send
ing her out to work. He knows
something about the temptations
and the stresses of the workaday
world.
He does not choose to subject
his wife to such strains. Nor
does he forget that he has the
primary responsibility for pro
tecting his marrigae from harm.
The manly and religious hus
band knows that it is his duty to
be the guardian of his marriage,
and to safeguard his wife from
dangers to her pure wifeliness.
The right kind of wife, furth
ermore, wants that kind of hus
band. She wants a man who will
be strong and industrious and
courageous, and will reverence
her womanhood.
Unless she is very foolish,
What she wants out of marriage
is full wifehood—not mere con
venient association and pooling
of earning power. ;
The right kind of husband
secs his wife as some one in
comparably more important
than an additional bread-winner
arid an occasional companion.
■He* * pays her the tribute of
looking upon ner as wife and
mother, and as the highest kind
of maxer this earth knows—the
maker of a home and family.
Full wifehood means mother
hood-even if it must be that
very noble form of motherhood
called “adopted.” It means the
making of children not merely
in bringing them forth; but m
rearing them for mature perfec
tion under God.
It means surrounding God’s
children with the right condi
tions for their physical psycho
logical and spiritual develop
ment. Full wifehood means
making the home into what a
home ought to be.
This and nothing less, is what
the true and manly husband
wants for his wife. And this is
what the truly womanly wife
wants her husband to want for
her.
For this cause, countless hus
bands, measuring up to their
husbandhood have worked long
and hard and unremittingly;
and in the process have achieved
shining success.
The wife who works when
it is not an inescapable necessity
is not doing her husband good,
but harm. She ' is encouraging
him to be less than he is capable
of being.
She is robbing him of the in
centive for the kind of appiica-.
tion and effort he needs if he is
to achieve everything he ought
to achieve, and grow to full
stature of manhood.
She is depriving him, too, of ,
the rich joy that coiftes in later
years when a man . can look
upon his children as they begin
their own lives, and know that
he made this possible.
Nowhere is there a house im
posing enough, or an auto
gleaming enough, -to compensate
a husband for the children he
did not rear to maturity.
Nowhere is' there any social,
position, or any jewel or luxury,
or financial preferment, that can
make it up to a wife for the lit- ;
tie ones she did not make a
home for.
Pope John appealed to us to
“make every home into a shrine
of religious feelings and a school
of virtues” like the house of the
Holy Family in Nazareth.
This is what a 1 real husband
and a real wife want. This is,
what is permanent and happi
ness-giving amid all the baubles
of life. '
Theology
For The
Layman
F. J. Sbeed
SANCTIFYING GRACE (3)
Faith is directed to God as su
premely truthful, Hope to God
as supremely desirable, Charity
to God as supremely good. Faith
w*e have already glanced at, it is
the simple acceptance of God as
our teacher.
Hope is
more complex.
There are
three elements
in it; it de
sires final un
ion with God,
sees this as
difficult, sees
it as attainable. The nature of
Hope comes out more clearly
as we see the two ways of sin
ning against it, by presumption
and by despair. Presumption
ignores the difficulty, either
by assuming that no effort
on our part is necessary.
God will save us what
ever we do, or by assuming
that no aid from God is neces
sary, pur own effort can save us
unaided! Despair will not be
lieve in the attainability, the
sinner seeing himself as beyond
tire reach o f God’s power to
save. The answer to both is St.
Paul’s “I can do all things in
Him that strengthens me.”
Charity is simple again. It is
love of God. As a necessary com
sequence it is love of all that
God loves, it is love of every
image or trace or reflection of
God it finds in any creature.
Whatever the soul in charity
loves, it loves for what of God
is in it, the amount of God’s
goodness it expresses or mirrors.
This is true love, since it
means loving things of persons
not for what we can get out of
them but for what God has put
into them, not for what they can
do for us but for what is real in
them: it means loving things or
persons for what they are, and
it is rooted in loving God for
what He is. (This we have al
ready noted in the strongest rea
son for learning what He is—
that is for studying Theology.)
Faith, Hope and Charity
are called habits by the theo
logians, and his is not simply
a technicality. If we think over
(Continued on Page 4)
Jottings.
(By BARBARA C. JENCKS)
By David Q. Liptak
Q. Lately there seems to be a
renewed effort on the part of
some individuals, probably act
ing in concert, to build up a case
for cremation. At a business
luncheon the other day, for in
stance, a few tried to convince
me how "scientific" and "re
spectable" the practice is. My
own rebuttal, I fear, was a little
bit weak, because I haven't
looked up the matter in a long
time, Would you please list for
me the reasons why the Church
is opposed to cremation?
A. Cremation is not wrong in
itself. If it were, the Church
could never permit it, no matter
what the circumstances. As it is,
though, the Church can allow
the practice in times of grave
public necessity; as, for exam
ple, during an infectious plague,
when there is no time for bu
rial, or when immediate dispos
al is absolutely requisite.
. As an- ordinary rule, however,
the Church is strictly opposed to
cremation, and forbids it under
Severe penalties. There are two
main reasons for this position.
; The. .firstJakes ' nto account
the fact.that during life the hu
man body is really (not meta
phorically, the Temple of the
Holy Ghp(st. The mortal frame
of the-deceased Christian, after
all, has , been sanctified many
times over by the sacraments:
it has been washed with the
saving waters of Baptism, an
ointed with the sacred oils of
Confirmation and Extreme
Unction, consecrated in a spe
cial way by matrimonial con
sent or the . imposition of hands
in Holy Orders, glorified count
less times through absolution in
the confessional and the recep
tion of the Holy Edcharist. It
has been often blessed, too, by
the sacramentals: by the Sign of
the Cross traced on it, by holy
water sprinkled over it, by a
'scapular or medal worn. It has
been used finally, to assist the
soul in functions of worship and
TCont"ihue<f on Page 4)
• CAN A POLITICIAN BE
COME A SAINT? Certainly! It (
is a difficult road, however. Yet
the public servant has more op
portunity than most to set good,'
example and to help others in
temporal needs. In one of my
first interviews with Clare
Booth Luce, we discussed ' this,
problem of politics and sanctity.
She agreed that the road was
indeed a rocky one. Yet there
are the examples of Thomas
More, Thomas A. Beckett and
today’s saint, Catherine of Si
ena. Some have made it you
see! All during the recent con
troversy of religion in politics
I have thought of two quota
tions. One was from Command
er John Shea who before his
death in World War II wrote to
his young son, Jackie, and said;
“Be a good Catholic, son, and
you cannot help but be a good
American.” The other c y a m e
from the colorful Hilaire Belloc
and is oft-quoted. When run
ning for parliament in a non-
Catholic district, he was warned
carefully not to mention his re
ligious affiliations for fear it
would be fatal for his election.
The unpredictable Belloc arose
faced his audience and said:
“Gentlemen, I am a Catholic,
As far as possible,-1 gc* t6 : Mass
every day,”
• THE PUBLIC SERVANT
(and I prefer this title to poli
tician) has both obvious oppor
tunities and handicaps in the
battle of sanctity. Pride is a bar
rier with us all but it would
' seem it, would be. the especial
thorne of the public servant. It
is hard to stand off from the
plaudits of the crowds who
shout your name and the news
papers which carry your every
word and to have law-making
powers and not identicy your
self with it all. The politician
has a temptation to see himself
as a little god. The presidency
of the United States has also
been called the ' highest teih-
by Brian Cronin
1. A Cardinal is correctly addressed as: (a) Your Excellen
cy? .(b) Your Eminence? (c) Your Worship? (d) Your
Lordship? -
2. The first martyr of the Church was stoned to death in
Jerusalem. His name was: (a) Stephen? (b) Simon? (c)
John? (d) Paul?
3. After what event was a voice from heaven heard to say:
“This is my beloved son in whom I am well pleeased.”:
(a) The Crucifixion? (b) The Resurrection? (c) The Nativi
ty? (d) The baptism of Jesus?
4. Zachary and Elizabeth were the parents of: (a) St. Joseph?
(b) Our Lady? (c) St. Paul? (d) St. John the Baptist?
5. The Angelus commemorates the: (a) Annunciation? (b) In
carnation? (c) Resurrection? (d) Immaculate Conception?
6. “Servant of the servants of God” is a signature that ap
pears on documents issued by: (a) The Pope? (b) Card
inals? (c) Religious brothers? (d) Bishops?
7. The letters A.M.D.G. meaning “To the greater glory of
God” in Greek represent the motto of the: (a) Cictercians?
(b) Capuchins? (e) Dominicans? (d) Jesuits?
8. Who was the first apostle appointed by Our Lord?: (a)
Andrew? (b) Peter? (c) Judas? (d) Thaddeus?
Give yourself 10 marks for each correct answer below.
Rating: 80, Excellent; 70, Very Good; 60, Good; 50, Fair.
Answers: 1 (b); 2 (a); 3 (d); 4 (d); 5 (b); 6(a); 7(d); 8 (a)
Bad Effects Of TV Exaggerated?
THE BACKDROP
Br JOHN C. O’BRIEN
SHARING OUR TREASURE
Visit To Church Leads To Conversion
By REV. JOHN A. O'BRIEN. Ph. D.
(University of Notre Dame) —
By Rev. John A. O'Brien, Ph. D,
(University of Notre Dame)
Do you w a n t to share the
Faith with a friend? If so, bring
him to Mass or some other serv
ice, briefing him beforehand.
Even if you are simply passing
by a Catholic church, bring him
in while you
poral office in the world. In the
words of Kipling, it would be
hard to keep your head while
all around you men are losing
theirs. - Of course, Thomas More
literally lost his head but in so
doing he saved his soul. Cath
erine of Siena in turn bore both
the cheers and sneers of the
crowd in the service to her God
and her country.
• THE SUPREMACY of God
in our lives is not something pe
culiar to the . Catholic, as one
would think these days. Every
created thing is bound to praise
God above all things for He is
our Creator and Redeemer.
Senator Eugene McCarthy in his
“America” article, quoted an
Episcopalian dean as saying:
“No Christian can grant to the
state an absolute right over his
conscience , I would- say that
the allegiance given by Roman
Catholics is not to a foreign
power hut to the Lord, and this
is virtually no different from
the rest of us Protestants.” Pope
Pius XII with one stroke of his
pen did away with the question
of. a double standard for public
and private life. He left no
doubts. God is God whether you
are sitting in the president’s
chair of office or the rocking
chair in the family home. We
would wish then for the ap
pearance pf men of vision and
courage, who see the role of
public servant as a terrible re
sponsibility and a glorious priv
ilege and their dependence on
the Supreme Legislator and Su
preme Ruler. Where are' the
men of stature who like Thomas
More, cried: “The King’s good
servant, yes, but God’s first!”
... or Hilaire Belloc who dared
sgy to .the voters of his area:
“If you reject me on account of
my , religion, I shall thank God
that he has spared me the in
dignity of being your repre
sentative.” Belloc won the elec
tion. More became a saint.
visit briefly
with our Eu
charistic Lord.
Then explain
to him some
of the pictures
and statues.
Thus you May
kindle his in
terest in the Faith and help lead
him into the fold. God seems to
give some grace or blessing to
all who come into His holy
presence.
This is illustrated by the ex
perience of John M. Young, a
young Englishman now with the
Royal Canadian Air Force, Ot
tawa, Canada. I first met John
in September 1956 When he
came as an International photo
grapher to take some pictures
of a motley crowd I was ad
dressing for the Catholic Evi
dence Guild in Hyde Park, Lon
don.
“I was reared,” began John,
“in the Church of England, in
which my mother was quite ac
tive. After graduating from the
Perse School in Cambridge,
England, I joined the editorial
staff of the Cambridge Daily
News. Later I served with the
British forces in Palestine and
then went to South Africa where
I worked for the Rhodesia Her
ald and Sunday Mail.
“Thinking that I had a reli
gious vocation, I attended St.
Paul’s Seminary, Grahamestown,
to study for the priesthood.
While there, an Anglican friend
gave me a copy of The Road to
Damascus, in which a dozen
brilliant scholars, British and
American, tell of their conver
sion to the Catholic Faith. It
made a profound impression on
me, and I could not easily dis
miss the reasons which these
scholars gave for embracing the
Catholic religion.
“After reading more books on
the Catholic Faith I discontin
ued my studies at St. Paul’s and
went back to England. I got a
job in London as a photographer
with the International News
Service. One day with a couple
of girls from the office I was
walking along Leicester Square.
On? of the girls invited us to
visit the Catholic church, Notre
Dame., recently erected there.
“Entering t h a t“ Church was
the turning point in my life. The
beauty of the church, the atmos
phere of reverence and holiness
and the sense of God’s presence
stirred me deeply. The taber
nacle lamp burning before the
alter proclaimed His presence in
the tabernacle. Whether it was
in Palestine, South Africa or
Great Britian, whenever I en
tered a Catholic church there
was the tabernacle light pro
claiming God’s presence and
saying softly, ‘This is the house
of God and He is at home.’
“This, I realized, but mirror
ed her marvelous unity: in wor
ship and belief the Catholic
Church is everywhere the same.
She speaks with the authority of
her founder Jesus Christ, who
promised to be with her all
days. What a contrast to the
divergencies of belief among
Church of England ministers,
many of whom were uncertain
what to believe.
“I took instructions from the
pastor of that church, Father
Paul Jacquim, and in June 1956
was baptized conditionally and
received our Eucharistic Lord
in Holy Communion. I had come
home at last. My widowed
mother had long been perplexed
by the contradictory beliefs of
our Episcopalian ministers.
“Realizing that unity of be
lief must characterize Christ’s
true Church, she too took in
structions and was received into
the Church four months later.
She is a devout Catholic, active
in her parish in South London
and a Tertiary of the Carmelite
Order. God Grant that we may
share our happiness with many
others.”
The debate about the effect
of movies on children, so spi
rited a few years ago, has shift
ed to the effect of television.
Just as critics of the movies
used to contend that the rise in
juvenile de-
linquency
could be at
tributed to too
much movie
going by chil
dren, today
critics of tele-
vision are
blaming tele
vision for crimes of violence by
children, the decline of reading
among children and the neglect
of home work.
Many parents refuse to have
a television set in their homes
because they think it is bad
for the children. Television, we
are told, is more harmful than
the movies because it is avail
able at almost any hour of the
day.
'WESTERNS' IN BRITAIN
A child’s movie going is rela
tively easy to control, since he
cannot attend a movie unless
the parents give him the price
of admission. But the child does
n’t need a red cent in his pocket
to see a television program; a
turn of the dial brings it in.
Now, we are told, the fears of
parents about the baneful ef
fects of television are largely
groundless. This is the conclus
ion of the Nuffield Foundation
of Great Britain which recently
made an exhaustive study of
the effect of television viewing
upon English children.
The findings of the British ex
perts, of course, represent only
one point of view and sociolo
gists can be found who would
challenge their conclusions.
American parents, in particular,
may doubt that the conclusions
of the British study would be
valid for the United States,
since British television pro
grams are in many respects dif
ferent from American programs.
Yet the British networks show
a great many American pro
grams, particularly “westerns,”
and the complaints considered
by the British experts appear to
be pretty much the same as
those heard in this country.
Take, for example, the charge
that the watching of westerns,
with all the gun slinging and
violence, stimulates aggressive
behavior in children. The Eng
lish study found, comparing the
reactions of children who view
ed television with those who did
not, that westerns and crime
shows did not make the “view
ers “any more aggressive or
maladjusted than non-viewers,”
except in the case of those few
children who were emotionally
disturbed.
In fact, the experts reported,
the stylized action in westerns
was far less likely to disturb
children than more realistic
plays where the child identified
himself with characters on the
screen. Television presentations
of the classics, they noted, were
sometimes more disturbing.
CURIOSITY AROUSED
Another finding of the British
investigators was that instead
of diminishing a child’s interest
in reading, television viewng
stimulated interest in reading by
arousing the child’s curiosity in
a wider range of books than or
dinarily he would be attracted
to, including non-fiction.
Television does not, so the
British experts found, make
children passive. Children’s love
of activity and exploration, they
reported, is very strong. When
there was a choice between
sports or hobbies and viewing,
television often was the loser.
Children tended to make room
for viewing by cutting down on
other ready - made entertain
ment, notably the movies and
radio, rather than on hobbies
and play.
Teachers interviewed by the
British investigators reported
that television appeared to have
no influence one way or the
other on the imaginativeness of
children. They rejected the
view, often expressed by par
ents in this country, that tele
vision dulled the imagination of
the child.
Another complaint oft e n
made in this country is that
children who watch television a
great deal become jaded and
lose interest in real life hap
penings. The conclusion of the
British survey was that, if any
thing, the opposite was true.
Children who watched tele
vision had become interested in
a wider range of subjects than
the non-viewers.
The dangers that a child may
spend too much time before the
living room screen was found
by the investigators to be a real
one. But where it occurred the
investigators found the fault lay
largely with the parents.
In two-thirds of the homes
which had television, it was
noted that the parents left the
sets on throughout the evening.
By putting their own viewing
on a more selective basis, the
parents, it was suggested, could
teach their children to make
their television viewing more
profitable.
THE STORY LADY
Maureen Wenk Hanigao
THE UNHAPPY ROSE
Once, oh not so very long ago,
in a sunny garden, there grew a
beautiful red rose bush. There
were many other flowers in the
garden too. There were some
tulips and pansies and some
Johnny-jump-ups and even a
few tall straight snap-dragons
that stood guard at the edge of
the little white fence. Almost
everyone stopped to look at the
garden and admire the neat
rows of blossoms and the beau
tiful colors. They all looked so
gay and bright that everyone
thought it must be the happiest
little garden in the town. But
that was not quite true.
ONE SAD FLOWER
Over in the corner on
the
Impressive Religious Revival Is
Venice’s Tribute To St. Pius X
By Father Anionio Niero
(N. C. W. C. NEWS SERVICE)
VENICE, Italy, — The
month-long visit of the remains
of St. Pius X in Venice was the
occasion of an immense and im
pressive religious revival in the
city of canals.
What His Holiness Pope John
XXIII has called the Saint’s
“last pastoral visit” to Venice
demonstrated the devotion
which the Venetians have for
their beloved “Papa Sarto,” St.
Pius X, who was Patriarch of
Venice before he was elected
pope.
An estimated 800,000 people
filed past the gold and glass
casket during the month the
body was kept in the Basilica
of St. Mark. Communions total
ed more than 100,000.
Venice has never lived
through such solemn days in its
history, although its history is
studded with great religious
moments.
The number of visitors to the
basilica increased gradually
from day to day. Finally it
reached unprecedented totals
and disorganized all the care
fully laid plans for order. The
church had to be closed several
times because too many people
tried to enter it at once.
Mass was celebrated without
interruption from 6 a. m. until
10 p. m., with Communion avail
able at all hours by special con
cession of Pope John. In the
morning there were people in
front of the church before it
opened, so eager were they to
view the Saint.
Two of the largest crowds
assembled at the basilica on the
Feast of St. Mark, always a
‘major occasion in Venice, and
on May 1, Italy’s Labor Day.
One of the largest pilgrimages
was composed of 15,000 people
who came from the diocese of
Padua. Pilgrims came from
every town in the north of Italy.
As they floated in gondolas and
boats down the canals, they
chanted the Litany of the Saints
like the pilgrims of old.
On May 5, special pilgrims
paid tribute to the late Pope.
They were the Italians whom he
had confirmed when he was
Patriarch of Venice. All were
more than 70 years of age.
Toward the end of the month,
crowds grew so large that police
had to be called. Among others
to come in pilgrimage was His
Eminence Giovanni Cardinal
Montini, Archbishop of Milan.
Every Sunday morning Pope
John telephoned the present
Patriarch, His Eminence Gio
vanni Cardinal Urbani, to learn
how the observance was pro
gressing. On May 10, the last
day of the commemoration, Car
dinal Urbani telephoned the
Vatican to say that it was rain
ing and that it looked like the
final ceremonies of departure
would be ruined.
The Pope, through his private
secretary, Msgr. Loris Capovilla,
who is a Venetian, said he
would pray for his Venetians
and their celebration. In the af
ternoon the Cardinal-Patriarch
telephoned the Vatican again to
report that there was sunshine
over Venice.
As the body of St. Pius was
carried by train back to Rome,
the faithful at all the main stops
gathered in crowds to pay
homage to him. The chapel-
train halted 20 minutes in
Bologna, Florence, Siena and
other cities. Even at road cross
ings there were clusters of peo
ple who knelt as the train
passed.
beautiful red rose bush, there
was one little rose that was
more lovely than any of the
others and it would surely have
been the nicest flower in the
whole garden except that it was
always sad. Every day the little
rose cried and cried because it
had to stay in the garden and
could not go out and see the
world. The little rose knew that
there must be a great huge
world beyond the white fence
because every day the little
animals would come and tell all
the flowers about +he places
they had been and the wonder
ful sights they had seen. Early,
early in the morning a fat
brown bunny would hurry by.
“Wait,” the little rose would
call, “Come and tell us where
you have been all night.”
“I have been at the edge of
the woods,” the bunny would
answer, “And a few minutes ago
I made a visit to the lettuce
patch on the other side of the
hill. Oh my that is a fine place
indeed, and such a fine break
fast I can have there! Now, now,
I must not talk any longer. I
wish I had a nice safe place to
stay like you have little rose,
but I must scamper, scamper,
scamper all the time!”
When the bunny had gone the
little rose cried more than ever.
“Oh, I do so want to see the
world—whatever am I going to
do?”
“Don’t cry,” said the other
flowers, “We love living here in
our beautiful safe garden with
all the people coming to admire
us. Why can’t you be happy here
too? The animals will tell us
enough about the world.”
But the little rose couldn’t be
happy just hearing about the
things it never could see. And
when the puppy dog came and
told the flowers how it followed
a little boy to school, and the
kitten whispered to them about
the kind old man that gave her
a saucer of milk over in the big
barn, the little rose wanted to
see the world more than ever.
Then, one day, a wonderful:
thing happened!
BILLY CAME
A little boy named Billy came
to look at the beautiful flowers,
and with him was the lady who
owned the garden. She was tell
ing Billy that because he was
such a nice polite little boy,
and never took any of her flow
ers without asking, that today
he could pick whichever one he
liked the best, and he could
take it to his mother for her
birthday. For a long time Billy
looked carefully at every flower
and the little rose could hardly
believe it when it heard Billy
tell the lady that he wanted the
little rose with the dew drop on
its cheek. How happy the little
rose was!
Billy carried the rose home
very carefully, and when he
gave it to his mother he gave
her a big birthday hug and kiss
too. She was so pleased, and she
said she liked Billy’s flower bet
ter than any present she had
ever had. She gave the little rose
a drink of cool water and then
everywhere she went she put
the rose on her coat and took it
along to see the world with her.
And each time she returned she
gave the rose another cool drink.
The little rose went to a quiet
lovely church, and to the busy
grocery store, and far across the
town to visit Billy’s grand
mother. And the little rose was
happy all the time, for every
day it saw something new in the
great wide world!
/
i
'4
Wc\t HuUrtut
416 8TH ST., AUGUSTA, GA.
Published fortnightly by the Catholic Laymen’s Association of
Georgia, Inc., with the Approbation of the Most Reverend Arch
bishop-Bishop of Savannah, The Most Reverend Bishop of Atlanta
and the Right Reverend Abbot Ordinary of Belmont. Subscription
price $3.00 per year.
Second class mail privileges authorized at Monroe, Georgia. Send
notice of change of address to P. O. Box 320, Monroe, Georgia.
REV. FRANCIS J. DONOHUE REV. R. DONALD KIERNAN
Editor Savannah Edition Editor Atlanta Edition
JOHN MARKWALTER
Managing Editor
Vol. 39 Saturday, May 30, 1959 No. 26
ASSOCIATION OFFICERS FOR 1958-1959
GEORGE GINGELL, Columbus President
MRS. DAN HARRIS, Macon Vice-President
TOM GRIFFIN, Atlanta. Vice-President
NICK CAMERIO, Macon Secretary
JOHN T. BUCKLEY, Augusta Treasurer
ALVIN M. McAULIFFE, Augusta Auditor
JOHN MARKWALTER, Augusta Executive Secretary
MISS CECILE FERRY, Augusta Financial Sncretspy