Newspaper Page Text
Th is delicious
vitalizing
drink...
Charles H.
Krrp th• 6 bottle carton
on hand at homo
r
i
i
MAVIS — a delicious
chocolate- flavored
drink in a bottle, all
ready to serve. Pure and
wholesome, full of
energy-giving elements.
Enjoy it today. Ice-cold,
or hot (heat it just as
you would heat milk).
Mavis
real chocolate flavor
c'At grocery stores, bottled drink stands, industrial cafeterias
and lunchrooms
Drink
EASY TO PAY
1 .nmi
fur SO Vtrrk*
$ too
1 2.00
$ 200
t 4.00
$ .-too
J 6.00
$ 400
$ 8.00
$ r>oo
$ 10.00
11.000
t 20.00
(5,000
$100.00
Earn
THE TERMS OF THE MORRIS PLAN LOANS ARE SIMPLE \NI>
PRACTICAL AND FAIR—IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO HAVE HAD
AN ACCOUNT WITH THIS COMPANY TO BORROW
For each $50 or fraction
borrowed you agree to de
posit $1.00 per week in an
account, the proceeds of
which may be used to can
cel the note when due. De
posits may he made on a
weekly, semi-monthly or
monthly basis as vou pre
fer.
MORRIS PLAN
Saving Certificates
vou 5%
HIE
Huy them on the weekly, j
semi-monthly or monthly
plan. We have always
cashed them on demand.
MORRIS FLAN COMPANY OF ATLANTA
66 Pryor Street, N. E.
RESOURCES OVER $1,000,000.00
The New Quiet Cabinet Kelvinator
Surprisingly quiet and free from vibration, these
qualities, combined with its proven durability, make
KELVINATOR the outstanding ELECTRICAL RE
FRIGERATOR of today.
A size and type for every family,
A price for every purse.
KELVINATOR
492 Peachtree, Atlanta. Ga.
W. H. DODSON
Sneee»>«r, «• IUnlell A DocUon
WATCHES, DIAMONDS AND JEWELRY
Phone WAlnut 9256
ATLANTA, GA.
N*W Number 48 Broad St., S W
Old Number 24 So. Broad'$t.
< Oppo.it* Rich's)
Well, the Daughters of the Ameri
can Revolution is probably the most
re-actionary organization in American
life. Last year it wrote itself down as
stupid and as re-actionary as the Ku
Klux Klan when it broadcasted a black
list that was a disgrace to itself. This
year it could not again face the wave
of ridicule so the Daughters contented
themselves by asserting that some
school teachers are planting the seeds
of communism in the country, that
every teacher should be forced to take
the oath of allegiance, that more crim
inals should be deported—of course,
aliens. But I haven’t yet seen any
thing condemnatory of the oil scandals
and other such incidental trifles. The
I). A. R. may take itself seriously hut
thank God the rest of the country does
not. These estimable ladies who un
doubtedly mean well should really re
sume their household duties. I am
afraid that the weight of dignity they
carry with them because they are the
daughters of some plain, old-fashioned
Americans, is turning their heads.
I see where the worthy Cardinal
O’Donnell has attacked Einstein. It
seems that the Cardinal doesn’t think
much of Einstein or his theory and he
says so in a very nasty way. Which,
to say the very, very least, is unbe
coming in a Cardinal. I never knew
that Cardinal O’Donnell was such an
eminent scientist as he gives one to
believe, and thus far I have not dis
covered any new evidence to make me
change my opinion. Rut what puzzles
me is, why the attack? Surely, a
Prince of the Catholic Church would
not attack the discovery that has
created a sensation in the world of
science, just because the new theory
was presented by a Jew? Yet it seems
so strange that he talks in a rambling
sort of way about this new theory as
being atheistic, and that in some
queer way it threatens Christianity?
I scarcely believe that the Prince of
the Church need worry about the Ein
stein Theory threatening anyone or
anything because thus far no one
seems to understand it, least of all,
the Cardinal himself. Strange, isn’t
it, how some churchmen will insist
on discussing things they know so
little of? Rut I am sure the dear old
( ardinal can sleep comfortably. He
need have no fear that the amiable
and kindly disposed Einstein is hatch
ing another international menace
against the Catholic Church.
Rabbi Morris Litchenstein, leader
and founder of Jewish Science, has
asked me to publish the following let
ter written by him to Rabbi Stephen
S. Wise. Rabbi Lichtenstein thinks it
will be of much interest to my readers.
In view of the fact that from time to
time readers have asked for informa
tion on the subject of Jewish Science
I am willing to give up a part of the
column to this communication:
“Dear Mr. Wise:
“Last Sunday morning from
your pulpit, you criticized Jewish
Science, in rather violent fashion.
You not only assailed its philos
ophy of life, but also endeavored
to impress upon your hearers the
idea that Jewish Science is
neither a Jewish nor a religious
movement. I, as you know, am
the founder of this movement and
the spiritual head of the Society
of Jewish Science I therefore
consider it my duty not to let your
unwarranted attack pass unchal
lenged.
“This is the third time, to my
knowledge, that you have thought
it your duty to speak disparag
ingly of Jewish Science from your
pulpit. It is indeed your privilege
to denounce things which you
consider to be wrong. But it is
not within your right to make
things appear wrong in order to
he able to denounce them. This is
exactly what you have done in
your criticism of Jewish Science.
You have not, it is clear, studied
its principles, nor even casually
acquainted yourself with its
teachings, for you have con
founded its philosophy with that
of another religious movement,
and have unjustly accused it of
denying the reality of sickness,
sin, worry and fear.
“I feel that you have done our
movement a great injustice; you
have first misrepresented it, and
on the ground of that misrepre
sentation you have tried and con
demned it before our people. I
therefore challenge you to a pub
lic discussion on Jewish Science,
and it is my aim to prove to you
that Jewish Science is not only
compatible with the Jewish faith,
hut that it is the very essence,
the very soul, of our religion.
“Jewish Science is indeed not
satisfied with merely rhetorical
preaching, or with vague gener
alities about religion, but insist?
on applying the tenets of Judaism
to daily experience. It shows how
the ills of life can be conquered
through an attitude of faith in
Divine Help. And it is my deep
conviction that if we were to
eliminate this aspect of our re
ligion, our religion would become
but a shadow’ of the past, without
efficacy in the present. In fact, I
contend that religion has no other
function than that of helping man
in his daily life.
“The organization which I rep
resent, as well as I, resent your
attacks, particularly because you
pretend to speak in the name of
Judaism. Y r ou claim that what
you said was the answ’er of Juda
ism. I w’ish to remind you that
tere is nothing in Jewish Law to
support your antagonism to Jcw-
ish Science; w’hile, on the other
hand, there is ample ground. 8
whole tradition, in fact, to sustain
its teachings and practices. I, too.
am a rabbi in Israel. I, too. am
qualified to represent and inter
pret our faith. As our views dif
fer so widely on a subject so v ’* tai
(Continued on page 12>