Newspaper Page Text
€5*W0lf* S0tmru#l»
COMMUNICATIONS. that this rii'llt is grunted h. t!»*• Coiiitiliilinn. but
ini — - I is n reserved, or mare properly nn nbnt.net and tin;
_ , 1 ienuhle fight. Tin* Slates certainly liavt* given*
[roR thk jo jml.j I to the General G* vernment a number <»t
Dnrinp th* mgn of Anewlii, in R»m*-.«h» ten- ri . lh „ B( . wlli ,,,
ate became so dead to independence «d fueling nr rra | <;„ Vt . n , m ,.
action, that they received every one of lurt qropi.in- . n ,. v ,. r r ,, ul( j j,
p- tty
lion# or laws, with onthusiuNin and applause, bv cry
ing omnes. omnes Tin* remind* in« of the Cl irk
r rty, they cry omnes, omnes, to every word that Mr
impkin may have uttered, every action lie may
have performed They, by their action* towards
their leader*, ratify the Vingly adage, “ the King can
do no wrong.” They cry aloud agninat Mr. Gilmer,
because hit administration dors not amt them —
True, very true. For it is their rule never to he
pleased with the administration of a Troop man —
And they never have so far proved that to he their
rule, at in their opposition to Mr. (iilmer. The
history or the Clark party is a history of repeated
inconsistencies. Did they not. in 1895oppose Troup
manfully defending the rights and interests and
honor of the Htate ? Oppose the old treaty ; < >ppo*e
the obtaining the land, so long due to us, when it
was obtained by a treaty ratified and afierward* siic-
•••sfully carried intoeftect.*’ And all because Troup
was Governor, and he and his nnrty desired it. In
1830, were they not warmly in favor of taking violent
possession of the Cherqkee lands, even withoutn trea
ty ? And because the Troup party opposed it. 'I hey
advance against Mr. Gilmer, hi* policy towards the
CheTtkeri, or liis being in favor of reserves, 4*c.—
Again here is the grossest inconsistency, lor their
gre*t man, Mr. I.uinpkin, has publicly declared and
gave as one nf his reasons for not wishing to offer,
that he and Mr (iilmer agreed exactly m their poli
ty with regard to the Cherokee lands. Hut they
ttilI cry omnes, omnes, to Mr. Lumpkin, hut rail
against Mr. (iilmer, because he thinks exactly as
Mr. Lumpkin says he. does. And as a Inst resort
they are circulating handbills perverting Mr. Gil
mer's true sentiments, and misrepresenting his able,
honest and independent administration. Hut tin*
true reason for their not supporting Mr. Gilmer is,
he is a Troup man, and a republican, and more par
tie.ularly because they have been in- st egregiously
disappointed. When they gave him their support
in l*2R, they had high expectations Ilia', they would
be well paid for it. llut Mr. Gilmer has proved too
honest for them, lie has followed principle more
than men. And I cannot see why an honest Clark
man ahould blame Mr. Gilmer in disappointing their
expectations of office. For I am certain the (Mark
party would not allow Lumpkin if Governor,Ingive
a majority of offices to Troup men. Hilt citizens of
the Troup party, we must not forsake our pirty.—
We profess to follow principles more than men. It
is true, Mr. Gilmer differs with ua on tome essential
points But where is the man can suit all of us 5 —
We know his political principles are as ours, lie
has proved lint lie adheres to principle and not men
lie hat shown a noble generosity and devotion to the
people's will, hy rejecting his own opinions, ami
adopting theirs, and carrying them into effect.—
The people by their representatives declared there
•hould he no reserve*, and passed a law to that effect,
he assented to it, and Ins signed the hill, and it is a
Uw,aud lie will enforce it, and if it should lie re
pealed, I affirm it will he tin* legislature and not him
that will do it for he In* imthing.to do with it, but
toe.arry ii into execution. Let us not ca*<t off a man
who lias ever so ably supported the dignity of the
Plate, «V shown such a devotion to her interest, who
has taken is lua governing principle tin* trill of the
people. N u hk>* Mr Lumpkin who resigned hi-
seat in the Legislature, hi I -21 , because as he says
He c oil I not obey the will of Ins constituents I
support principle and not men. I shall never blame
a Governor for n »lappointing any Clark man whit
aver to office. Because they are diametrically oppo
sed In u* in every point of view. They have a ven
different mode of miniging things that does not
■uit us. They always use their offices on-re for their
*ivti pro.ii in oi and the promotion of the party *—-
And tu'ver ivm* I d» us any good if they could help
it. Then let os not oppose Mr. Gilmer, for though
d.Ter.ng in s one things ve th us yet lie hna and trill
obey our wish * It is useless to say nnv tiling of
Mr Lumokiu, for li s own notion* speak that lie
cannot b** depended upon. You all must he aware
that the ho*i .r of the .State is at slake. Whether
alls shall again resu ue the color* of Federalism, or
coit-ou- her pr -ml stiml in the Republican ranks
Tutu choose a Republican, one who was horn ami
raised on**, hut n *t a Federalist, whose principles
have ever been pliant lu Ins inter**!.
PRINCIPLE.
P"Ssf:-s and exercise. Hut they hi
abstract or unalienable rights. «•;
ilportanl ones Us tin st*.
lent »1 governing principle in - ur gov-
will of file majority — a good pnnei- | *
i that
■'jorily
the
rupt
case mi our Govern-
ritv have tin* right to
d upon them uneonsli*
And no convention
iglit. Ilud tile Ct.'lo-
ined bv a majority of
they lived, ive never
frOR TilC JOf.’RffAL.l
TO THE PEOPLE OP GEORGIA.
It is the right of t.!»*j peopln, and it is ono thoy
should me to search into the motives of men who
seek their support: It is a principle tint will hold
good, to give onr support to the man, who seeks it
with the purest motives. And if two men seek it
who agree in policy, hut disagree in motives,
•hould find out who has the purest motives, and
give him our support. Now, here is Gov. (iilmer
and Mr. Lumpkin, who agree exactly in policy.--
Then we are to determine between them accor
ding to their motive*. It cannot be denied, and
there is no circumstances to prove otherwise, that
Mr. Gilmer has consented to be a candidate for
Governor, not to subserve the interests of a party
or the ten ters of a party, but for the interests of
the State of Georgia. But is it so with Mr. Lump
kin? Was it patriotism induced Mr. Lumpkin to
seek your support? In his letter declining to
become a candidate, you will find patriotic views,
by which ho professes to be governed. But cir
cumstances are strong in proof, that there was not
fHUch patriotism in the motives for changing his
former praiseworthy professions, in declining be
coming a candidate. And why did he become a can
didate contrary (as his letter says) to his own wish
es, to ‘mown sense of propriety, and to Ilia patri
otic views? It was to subserve the views and in
terests of a party. Ha was caucused to be a can
didate by a few ambitious leader* of a party.—
Now I ask the honest people of Georgia, how can
they support a nnn for the first office in their gift.
wh» has been forced in opposition to lu* own will
to be the candidate of a party, bv the threats of
some of the leader* of that Party f Where is the
P*tnoti*m or honesty in such motives ?
PRINCIPLE.
[rot mit Jornsxi. ]
Th* Cnrmittition of the United State* is * ...in
fract of partnership entered into by the Stales, a*
parties, for their mutual interest and defence; and
laying down rule* by which they, an a company,
should be governed. When a number of individu
als enter into a contract of partnership, and lay
down rules hy which they, nn a company, should )>«>
governed, if a majority «f this company should en
ter into measures which are both destructive and
oppressive to the interests of a respectable minor
ity, and also contrary to their rulca, to this minor
ity i* granted a right by the law of the land, bv
aommon law, or by the law of nature, to object
to those measures, to refuse n< t only their assent
to them, but to lis governed by them, and to dis
solve the partnership if the measures are persis
ted in.
Such is the relation that the State* hold to each
sillier, and the constitution ; and such have been the
•»ensures of the corrupt majority ot Uongres*. The
States, a* parlies to the contract of partnership, the
constitution, certainly have the right to judge of
its infractions. For where is the principle in free
f rovernment. or in the law of nature, that doe* n it at
ow every party to a measure, the right to judge of
that inensur- ; The idea is both unreasonable and
unnatural, .if taking away the right of any partv t-
e contract, t * refuse to he g werned bv oppressive
measures But there is not in the constitution, any
thing either expressed or impl *d, giving the right
of umpirage between the Slates and General Gov-
•rnnient. And the only way we can decide where
in the right of umpirage lies, is to judge according | existence of tin* T.iriiV w
to tht- natiir.oln.ir Gnvrrnm.nl The Cnn.t.tu- ] thorn Bonin nml so lint m >n
tmn neither declare** in tavor of the Slates or the
Supreme Court And I hope I have proved before
tile impossibility of the Supreme Court being a pro
p»-r tribunal : it not being independent, hut merelv
an adjunct ve branch of government. True, sonic
contend that it i* the right tribunal. Hut they strain
the construction of the Constitution as much in doing
* ». as they do w lien they claim the right by the con
stitution t«i pass unconstitutional laws . showing
how pliant men’s consciences are to their interest
N .w we can draw no other conclusion, hut that the
States are rightfully the judge* nf the infractions ol
1 which they are evidently parties
»a contract entered into, where
* umpirage expressly pointed < ut, the par
ties themselves have Uie unalienable right of judg
ing for themselves Tl.- .7
ipeciall
Tin* fund
eminent ih 1
pie. Hut not wli
and selfish, which is now
merit. And flic virtuous
throw off the burdens pre
lutionally hy such a majority
can restrain them of rin.li a
nii-sheen governed and reslr
tliii government under which
would have been fre«. Hut tliev were not hound l»\
the arbitrary ncN of a British Ministry and Parlia
ment. And had we ever been hound hy the will of
a majority or the will of the world, we never would
have been in so enviable n situation us our present
one; for we nil knew flie world, til lately, w.»s a
despotism. None lias ever denied onr right to sep
arate from the British (loverrimetil: — A government
to which th« colonies had sworn allegiance—one
which they had grown up under—had no agency in
forming, mid therefore had not so many r.gills ns
Britons. Hut they claimed it ns a natural right, to
he free from a despotic government, which oppres
sed them, not ho much as the Hellish majority in
Congress does now the Southern States Ve-. tlm
northern States ore cormorants that fatten upon the
destruction of our Southern wealth, and when wr
object to their rapacity they r.ii-»e the siren Hong
disunion, and lull us by its dangerous melody. In
deed hi many points of view, our condition is not
equal to our condition when colonies. For when
colonies we were allowed rights which are not al
lowed now as sovereign and independent Slates
The high handed attempt of Judge Marshall to lo-d
it over tis last year, reminds us of the law requiting
ierabl . Let lis 1 1 ilyze the mibutituie. It hjys. the ■
circumslatiei s ‘ under which the citation rf.no up, gb
l * are unfavorable I * calm deliberation.” Child an\ ; sm
one doubt this 1 No one who knows the Jimmie'r •
which prevails m-ar the rl •»*• of n seHeidn, c . old of
doubt it: No one wlm remembers that tie report j h"
cmiie up about n «>r !) o’r.h-ck the last nlrjkit ol th C_
quoruni prw*ent, can | rtt
-Pie
Mr.
ere, h
Limtpkn
lit it. L the
lid.iliun,
trimly none.
Hiil liuj initio
any “ tederal
l tht: pOHilioli qu
•at pn It iurch and a post t
on I.it "rutin .'.', it bus
l»-.o .1 C! ;
«.f .VuHiJl- -
undone ilis t
i »t dan
hat li..
I F>«
’ youconde
n-ttirp.itHo,, an. i 0- hi.
..led ' lione, cer- 1 'I :
apply
they have confidence ill . »V. to a III III. oilji
xeculive ami Ji-iirial I)e- i honest reimhlic.i
the (’
Mii- 1 lii. sp. m-Iics iltirinff tli' let hpbs'i'W «>f t llP t^lfta-
.H —, 1 .tnre, vp.e-110, wlm-li tiiniijli thoy contain some
•uld] Unt 1 (I. not uss 'id to, nre f.-anjrltt with
ar"iune:it, nod inni'y elnquenee,—kinilrrd
... of n clear lend nod sound iienrt. The
ip.op! ■ .f It lid.vine, unity Slav ■ r-nson t > be proud
0 f i , tot \ .. ond I a rain repeat that I
tint thoy intdhtl to do jiuticeao Uiemselve*
h •„ bv .’". 'l!i t vnn.l. ..iitiiin of tlieirconfi-
i n the first .Monday in October.”
rxp-cin
partinetits «•! the (invernment of this St
whose rogniznice the case t»f TiihshIk will more ii
mediately come ‘Is there, ill this position, m
tlnngof •• i tleral unurpalioii” or of ^{consolidation
• | imi,
t t’kitt
id ulteiior j \ >t lio
and true fr:cnd
>*re allowed to imicy themselves Clerk f
know nothing of the political character a
designs nf the r. I lenders.
The successful rel'utalion of these n
( defn d. The federalism nf the pers ms
the ac- from Jolm O'OVhII down In the gentleme
' at the ;ii the shite charge, was matter of not *r
present time f*J*Jd Dec. I rf.tl,] in tire case of George neiglihorhoods they r» >ide<l in, two years preceding ! have i
Is atoreg.iid and hi tins is “the head and the late glorious and neei-ssary war,—it in aseertaiti- | that m
front of their ofi'ending " But will not this condu- j ed by their hostility t" theO!<l Treaty.nml the death j Powell
sinii naturally follow from their premises already j struggle they made to establish tm* New Treaty — i Troup
Purely
The
mrii v
hide, h .wever, «
m*ml Assembly is utirte
pJ*Jd Dec. lo'.’.l,] in tire (
oticed, and from the fids, that Judge Ciavt
overtmr (i.Inter, in tin. the minority had •
mice,” had L tii d.- |..n I their d.-termma'
isregard improper interference y^ith the de
>d <;
-r had de
iterf.rein-.e
• the “ tederal usurpation,” wI
ion ‘ contained in the Huhst.tu *
»e found
he said (iov. (iilmer wished i
r, tin- reiort of the con,mitt' e >
old,I
our people
land to In: tried.
Georgia to appen
and carry her m;
Government pra
■ ot to he tmrii*
Court n
i City.
ol-mies, to be trim •‘ported t
le had tlie impudence l<
before him at W a- hingl »
Tassels there to he retried. 'rin
ses a deceit Upon IH that ought
I is said tin- judges o| the .^up em«
elected only during good behaviour. Hgt
in for life, is a feature very much tinged with mon
archy. Man is never too honest, hut Ins interest
will overcome liis honesty. The judges only have
to sanction every net of the Government to rein iin
firm in their station for life La -it year we had woeful
experience in tin* case of Judge Peek, th <t Judge
hail hut to coincide with (j.ngre - ami tin v wi re o-
mo/eahh*. I’or (’ mgress pays tile a.and imp-
them, and to (.'ongress alone are they responsible
Those patriots who friuied the Consiiiuti' n wers
very milch deceived. 'They judged the United States
as they were at that linn*, for our people were ex
Irani-ly honest then Tln-V made no allowances lor
the degeneracy 11 int
11 which the world In -
subject, at times. Til
led tint Congress roul
pass ail iiiicoiHtiliitmn
'•rrupt i
ok It fo
Ii — ltd this
st ml iiii)i
Indian.
l.y T
"1 I..W.T,
idi-r tin- inn,re-
lat tin* per;
destructive t-* the honor, intf
I vereignty of Georgia : ft measure con
j (i \dams, a federal President, r.ititi*
j majority, sustained hy federal agents,
victory hv tile federalists .|| through tin* Union — I
Tiie Mack Iits of the |»r »|. ^to-s against the Old {
Treaty wdl die
tally unworthy * <e r confidence. In tin*
troversv between tlie President and Call
h is not untie, d. tint these t.n-n and tile
Inye sided with r Ill-IHI. B auch, ling!,
and go;.e against Old 11 irk ry tootli nml
re some of the assertion* and
ill dsv. •
ig any of the publications bef
I will mention hut one assertion. 'File Edit-,
w-rlimis is j of tin* Cl irk papers speaking of a popular
alluded to, I introduced in tin* Senate in I 1. says it was intro-
I who sneer! duced hy Allen B. Pow -II, (a Clark man.) Now the
ety in tin* Editors aforesaid km-w just hs well as ! know they
..t always been (’lark men, t.iat nt the time
asure or resolution was introduced that A. H.
was considered line of the most violent
lieu hi the Legislature, and continued so un*
mil difficulty with one of Col.
. ith Troup himself, for I do not
DEMOCRATIC—STATK RfUUT TICKET.
[Unit TMF. Jot’KN\r..J
REIM’HLK’A.N ELEC FOBS OF (JEO
Your \\ ill .-!ior 11y he called to the perform
1 l M 1
lie.
free An
and Governor,
tiie blood and t<<
secrated hy tin,
triot sages II-
tin* blond of the
no other oreasn
-,the p,
that --
A pr. v
and liis i
•I v , tram
If hi you, fel-
Ihu ollice linn-
i-l muler-'tr in-
til lie had
trived by John j Troup’s k
d hy a i’ederal • now re
ind hailed ns a ! Hefoi
th -rising
a-rairnt \
this hill,a
,11-. t which.
g tln-s
rda up.
who
torv remarks allow
much talked of bill,
witnesses in our courts
the noise in ide about
jmlici try. would sup;,
el V da
•Ulati
id I
the fact
tlv
‘ tlm
• th-
rsci
xl Pr
i the C.
identcl elect
1 th-
take
ul-.isk I 1
m-igli-
ml distrust
.at hie eleva
of winch of them, Duff Green,
n, is not the oriole. Will tin
'lark parly, open their eyes ill
•unlrv ?
I we have done. Does not .Mr
he is, • "
.1 n-ks
to the
' II
i h-r lull r. '
id in i n i.-st rat h
o’-J* ct M| suspi-
I and h s friends,
f’ Magistracy of
;o»* question, and
lent nf it, advau*
kilo
r no such dill'i-
H \LDWIN.
1 si /.*» ,/,• nf ( "ii'oiii, i s—Chapt: r 19/.
I A ol It c line I • p iss. II, it in til
of tin- y. ar. which hv th- tMir.s;ian
edre*
uriftlieiialile natural and t
[commi ■
es, Imt left it in
d ri 'It’s id'lll- S‘a
iTATF. RIGHT.
O-.I
Messrs. Camnlt V Uaglaad.—I bog leave to oc
cupy your columns with a h-w comments, upon th«
article in the* last Ecu]oral Union, i^nod “A t'l.i-
zen of 13 ildwin.”
I rofieat tho question adh-d hy the Recorder,
“ why wore tin* Il-’snhilioiisof .M. J. Kimuui, Esq
not agreed to?” They merely called for the con
currence of the individuals pro .' nt, in the immin-
ntioiiH of I).-legates u ho It id I,eon appointed at
Athens and Savannah, t<> represent Georgia at
the contemplated Anti 'FanIlT’-invention in Phila
delphia—similar concurr* nt es Icid been already
given by meetings held in Bib!), Monroe, and, if I
mistake not, Jones counties. It w:n presumed that
no diversity of feeling or opinion w:n cherished in
regard to the Tariff-—it was admitted that the Del
egates were capable and worthy t» act as such:
audit tens expert t that all party liitjj; would
have been smothered as we were endeavoring t,»
abate the rigour of the Tariff.
Will the correspondent ol the Federal Union,
who appears to h ive lw- n a 4 1 mker on in Ven
ice,” deny that the •motion for udjourmn ’iit made
l»v Dr. Fort, wrfs not intended to defeat fin- Reso
lutions ? Why attempt, the prevention of a vote
directly up nt an agreement in them, it’ friendly t<>
their adoption? Let me not ho answered, that
those who voted f,r an adjournment did not desire
to evade the questions presented hy them. Oppo
sition or unfriendliness to n measure may he ns
fully shewn hy nn indirect, course of conduct, n.s
hy r downright nay. If I mistake not, every
Clark min, with two exceptions, who took part in
the meting alluded to, voted with Dr. Fuit for
an adjournment.
Why, if tho (’lark gentlemen approve of Anti
Tariff meumres, did they not agree to Mr. Ken-
an’s Resolutio-h? 4 A citizen of Baldwin,’ will
not surely pretend that the party to which ho ev
idently belongs did not Imv* the majority. Three-
fourths of the persons present 1 believe were (Marl;
men, they could on that meeting have carried their
point, no matter what, hy numbers. I think now
as I then did, that the greater pan of them desi
red to evade an iign mnmit in the Resolutions—
and they did evade it, hv a motion proceeding from
one of them to adjourn.
If it he said that the individuals present did not
represent the County, why did Mr. Bolliill make a
proposition to proct*. d then to tin* election of |).-i-
ngatos to the Anti-’FanlV Convention ? Surely 4 A
Citizen of Baldwin* will shun, assigning n reason
like this, which casts upon his friend the co-edit*-
or of the Federal Union, a shade of inconsistency
with his avowed principles, in his remarks mad.*
that day, which cannot he defended even with in
genuity hy Mr. Folhill himself. Mr. l’olhill very
gravely condemned the n Mninati-mat Aliens, he
cause the gentlemen who nn t there for that pur
pose did not represent the people of Georgia--lhat
they had no notice, fyr. Can 4 A Citizen of’ Bthl-
win’ reconcile Mr. Ibdhiir.s condemnation of the
proceedings at AMions, with Ins own pr iposition t >
proceed at otter to the election of Delegates ;;;
Baldwin, when according t > that gentleman the
people of Baldwin had no knowled-.o* of such a
proceeding? Can 44 A Citr/en of Hilda in” con
vince any intelligent, unprejudiced, man that Mr.
Folhill was right in Ins objection t,> the manner of
the Athens and t^ivannah nominations, and no/,
wromf in making a in >ti-m h ’for • the ni.-ctin r t •
nd'ipt that which he hut just ohj. - tod to? ('an he
consistently condemn what was do;rt in Athens, I
and in his very next broith, seek to have it doiiel
in Mil ledge v ill t : Forshninc, Mr. ** (fiti ton” -for.
shame, Mr. Folhill, to suffer such a publication t >1
appear in your paper as a candid and able defence
to the obliquity and speciousness of your political;
conduct! | n»*gi
But enough—The Resolutions of Mr. Kenan du -i
are before the public the communication of 44 A f • th
Citi/.Vn of Baida in.” defending the nppeser* of
them is also helore the public, and with one more J
reflection I have done. If when we consider the
object of the Fii;l.id lphia Convention—the object
of the Rosoluti ms—and the probable benefit which j ^
Georgia may receive hy tne device of some con- ^
Mtiiiitional nvans t-' abate the oppressiveness of
t!ie Tariff hy the Delegates in said convention, tin*
* opposition of Messrs. Folhill, Fort, Rockwell, and
I others at such a time and und w such circumst ances
he not evidence of a lukewarmness at least to the
hould like to hear from
v-l fr-1
i lid '
t'-itro
•i favo
'ful. ,
* ;i 11-
■nh-a
i tin- h-
for 1
,Vf- t have two thousand d iil .rs p.-r innuui. A
similnt c-»ur-«- is pu.sncd hy tin s»- sinks of ih-pr.ivit\
two of tin: N.-wsjnrs .nivoraimg thn dt-sngiis ••
tin- ofii* e hunting I*•-«I*• r llists.disgiusrd .is d«nu-aT;its
win* '•-•natituti- tin* Cl irk cioii-u-^.
'I’in-s.* men Ii ive pur in d, mid hut to., successfully
ihe p.-liev,hy whu h the -ives in shm-|i's c|otliin- r
withdrew the lick from tin* gu irdnuship .-f llien
'hepln rds—mid IT-*ni un-lives ri/iiiiH;/ d suthrested
Tiny have excited your suson-inus, r-ms.-d yom
resentment, and exasperated it into haired a-iains
everv eminent dcmoi r itic statesm m in the country
Open \ our eyes, f. Ilow-c itizens of the dark party,
who love the principles of J. H’ r.son and cherish an
ardent honest wish for the happim-si? and prosperitv
of (ieorgii Scrutinize, fearlessy, impartially am!
ind politicks .•!’ the
»e in willing to deli v
ct.
otivi
i life :at in
into whose hands you
country.
Men of Gi o.'g ft. enquire of tin- members of the
Clark Caucus, whetlu-r lln-v h * ve n -t been at all tun-s
Ee-leralisls and sec.retlv preferred \dauis Jo Jacksmi?
W hether they are not now Duff (ire. n nu n, and
in their hearts, adln-ri-nts of the apostle of iiiilli-
ficnt on. John (' (’allnuiii, and inimiral t«* tlie re-elec
tion of Old Hickory? And whether lln-y d* m-t
take themselves, and ree.omiin nd I-* other*. Duffs
U illr-un and Clay 'F'-Iegraph, I ha I i- 1 ibniing to de
le it Jackson selection ; ami do they not ibn-ry the
11 lithe, which advocates that measure ;<» t <senti.il to
tin* preservation of Ihe I’niim ? And if when they
think it safe, they do not make light of tin* evils, or
P'-silively advocate the ’Faritl ?
It is not m-cessarc to enquire about a fact that i<
notorious. The Clark lenders A their honest or decei
ved agents all over Ihe State, strained their in line nee
in opposing the old treaty, tlm sn ared tin- rights, ln»n
or. n nl and s iveivignU ol Gr.-rgii, and cmili'ind
ihe wealih and eouiforts. on hiiudretls of our citi
zens, they nr*- now enjoying und. r that Treatv ~
And #//./the Clark Caucus, or not. hv a tissue of in-
♦rigues nml mnlimivrrs of the f ulest character, eli
de ivnr to establish Hu* nr.in treaty of tln-ir Federal
['resident and favorite. John Adams, which, by con
veying portion of tin* so.I of Georgia, to her In
dian enemies, went, not only, t * rob her citizens of
their pr pi-riv. hut aimed a deadly blow at ln-r sove
reignty and independence • Nml did not tln-ir pro-
ceedmgs mi Hi - I fest'n j occasi.m, io'eulifv the < lurk
leaders with tin* North, rn Fe.leral:s* .-, d. inon iffate
tlieir re-uliness to sacrifice the dearest interests of
tln-ir country to party opposition, and prove their
p die.y anti Georgian ? Their eondu t in tli.it crisis
broke them down, with the principled and tiiinl. ng
m n of tln-ir " \ n partv. W at have they since
4 \n I thex taught the
Atlantic ; ui;n
7. And tin-
i In- had arrived to in
1 ving beyond the (in
■ war upon tins people.
• went forth a decree
dry. should buckle on
>od people,
■ all th
that all who
their armour
1 until recently, ever
ire the formation of tin* government and W'*ii'd
ohfthlv hav** remained so for ages t*» come, but for
e clamor of a lew ib-siguing deungogues. and lam
toiiisln-d t*i lied Editors who are respectable law-
•rs and enligliteiie.l men, attempting to alarm the
tin- fromiers on account of such
especially «
I confident i
tin* mass of the people thorough
ly understood th s matter, tln-re would scireelv-be a
dissenting voice to tin- principle long since laid d *wn
bv tlie courts and acquiesced in by all classes, until
for private and party purposes, a noise
about it. Lord Mansfield tin- ablest Jmlg
-at upon a bench hi Eng! ind, hud down the ru!
that a n dive or citizen of any country, (slaves ex
cepted.) might he introduced and sworn according
to their faith, and In* left it to tin-jury In judge ot
the cr*- libiiity of the witness.” Now where is the
d mger of admitting Indians under this rule, the jury
ire not bound to believe what they swear, any more
than they would be hound to believe the testimony
loriously bad. Tin-opponents of Gov (iilmer, might
just as well find fault with him fur not having a law
p issed to exclude the testim
b .d char icier, I t we are in i
FOR OOVER.VOR.
GEORGE K. GII.MER.
BALDWIN COUNTY.
FOR SENATE.
SAMI ML lIOYIiFN.
FOR TIIE HOUSE OK REPRESENTATIVES/
JOHN II. HOWARD,
J VAILS S. CALHOUN.
B ‘fore the publicati *n of another paper
tlie qii'*sti«tn which Ikh a^it-atoil tin* State for some
months past will be settled—It will be decided tin
der whose ad ministration of the laws wc are to
live f»r tiie coming two years. About tlie re
sult wc can have no doubt if the Troup party will
but do its duty. Let eV rt ry man, then, be awake.
Let every man remember what is tit s ake in the
way of principle. Let every man remember the
conflict of 1825, and the result ol it. Georgia ex
perts every man fa do his ditty on this occasion as
h’l on f.W. To the polls then, in full confidence, of
tint c^er tiie justice ot your cause, of tho purity of your
prttiples, and of your strength, if you will be but
an tod.
.-pr i
!). A ml wiu-n tin- army
••ii many thousand of the
of their bugg ige au l dro
irv. hi yond tin- < in-at 8c
1M. An I when Georg,
mer. had relumed from t
i* em-niv, they h
ors, and t*».*k mi
« back to
the
I b. l
Mrs.
i band
public. Iml
I prevent** 11
,UM i I -.vill ju
the public,
Gil-
TIIE MISSION A RI ES.-—The f .flowing arti
cles, from the “Reconb-r Extra,” will show fully
the result of the late trials in Gwinnett county.—*
The result is much to be regretted on every nc-
count ; yet tlm law must take its course. It is
most strange that those who refused to profit by
n li»r not Ii iving a law! Exc utive clemency, should labor under such de-
r,n .V “1 nl1 persons "t lusions as to duty ; particularly ns every effort was
n »r« dang.-r r * i th*-; nru | 0< b.>th by the Inspectors, and by religious per-
ar- mi i 'J* : lM - 1 - sous< remove that delusion,
r i"! Tint tlii-y Br<-BPtinij nml.-r o.lyioo from other
ili v ,,r.-ju.lire<! a i q»-*rtw cviflont from tip hrt th>it tli-y had in
I tlieir poss -s.sion tin’ following documents.
Mil nt toother inconsistsnci. s in thrnppn-j An opinion on the claims f»r improvements by
i - G *vi-m -r, hut wh it better cm Ur i-x-'the State of Georgia, on tlieCiierokecNntion. un-
1 men win* in lo9J. could find ten nr twelve | dor the treaties of 1817 and 18*98, by William
r supporting hi ji au.t now find, without j Wirt, Esq. dated June ‘24, 1^)0.
l " “ u hL part as many t.*r opposing■ liini. j Opinion on the right of the State of Georgia to
HARMS. extend her laws over tim Cherokee Nation, by
! William Wirt, Esq.dated June, 1830.
[rou the Georgia JOURNAL.] J Both priut-ul at New Krlmta, for the Cherokee
Edita.s I linve had aev.-ral g.-neral Hint- N.ati in, at the office ol the Cherokee Phcnix and
1 thought would In- of us** to tin ! Indian’s Advocate, in 1830.
From the lienor ler Extra, of S pi. 24.
TRI AL Or Fill’. MLS.SlON’ARi ES, See.
ar c * r sp ui-lcnt writ**.s to us from Luwience-
’ • I !»■ *o
topu--
s Ins Iro n tun** to
r tiling jr * tin-ir us,
m I It-avA* them h*
un nent. illustrili
rtliward, ca'
< of ill
nl Sanhedrim, which sits i
Wnshii
12 table
And In* obsi
(1 nil I lie laws wliicl
were written t*>r the gnvernmi-n: of the (irnml San
liedrim. And he was a faith ol servant.
11. And lu* pleased the people.
12. And the penult* - id Is not this man blame
less in i.iir eyes Has he not fulfilled llie iaw ? Ver
ily, verily, he lias.
' El And they siid wo will call him from tin
Grand S mliedri n, a id ho shall rule over ns.
11 And on tlm I th m with of th • y »(tr hy Hi.
Christians called I *2 >. but h r the Jews ftrJJ, he wi:
made ruler over all tile pe -pie.
I > And it came to p iss, that when George, whos,
surname \v is(idun r. h id rub-d over the people I’**
nl 1U ,
VMS L*
•lit ii -
Tha
.said I
on - Wils *
■ •(lid be the
of his followers
id^thev !*• -r«- faLe
people had elms
And 111*• v flattered the peonl.* ;
*t lb .s *.Y .rg.* sav. Hi .t Urn Red
• G .1,],,: Ojdiir shf
portion of the pe-.
And hr sides this they said i
rs of Wils
to th • pe
him,—and whe
al of
it t It-1
it
hr*.
1 i •
put <h
The
more .
• blenders.
W... Fed. !
* shall keep
shall not hi
m.siinnmed Lu
pie, turn, why g
ir leader and he 1
great abinulanc-
White man tan
se or his cmv. Ins
it,-for if Wils *i
ir testimony uga
n said lint.
• faith—are
unn\ good
much gold,
ruler, he wi
Vt r.lv w
I n-.t folio
ts both to
rou — If Wilson be
X, „pl, ;
xml I** bis eli-inies.
r and his g.*ld and
which he ii itS) in
is own f *il iw. rs.--
orge, will lie not
lb-
end of f
Is he a friend .
I.umpki
ml, " I,.
i and said
V tiling, iin
d rule
-Wait
44 lie
1 noth-
belii ve. that i
i couslitiiliun
g Im iitlity lint has 1**
le pe
• justly admired in y
' | laws; Ins I, •
d and then
>*| of this pe
s n »t G- ,rg
■ n »t preset
Whv tm
reader is tired of reading.
1. 'Flu-re ought to be but
ment in the Slate, al! tin- sto.
and ill tin- profits distributed-
ml imiirove-in-nls. because ll
ilu-n ret hack the interest if
idle
bankii
befo
tlo
idle shaving st*.-
2. There on*.
Fort Hawkins.)
ing tli ir chil.li
mud them / '
bee line a e * u >
owned by tin* State,
i edn.-atioo and inter-
people at large would
iv purloined by a few
lege at Macon ; (old
■d near I. *
f iff. ami
B. The
t4itII settle
I part, of tin- State, n
rented, would mike Athens
die public, m *re .generally,
h-» located in aonn*
ol bites all'neaV iV, and ye 1 '
nar ■ et an 1 hi itari •!< must
•-•nfirieiiieiit is best,next. t.
I the
• of him.
resolve
! roods.
I-B h.Tore'lh.'i
tin* r r it tr ick
lor th v find ii
•ill In mis can 1;
best, but it urn
r» ti tv i
- *•*•». md.qoi).)
•I'.w be bought
if H.OUd. l'cb •
- work. ln*c
•et. and it
deal longer Ii;
ville
tin- Ifilh
oil..
44 \:i inte
the Soperi i
the St ite, a
ter..I i. lies 4
Cli.-rol-
The 1
Sh t’ll'l wake
id Imild then
•sting tri il took place yesterday before
(? nirt of' this c.-iuiilv, in the cases of
inst Klizur Butler, Saomel A. Worces-
*s Tr -tt. .Missionaries, und sight other white
idents of tin- (.’lie.fdiee country , the latter
t one exception, have intermarried with
e women.
were nil arraigned and tried for living in
tin* territory occupied hy the Cherokee* within the
0 iart-wed limits'of (ieorgi i, in vhditinn of a law
;nss;-d at Ihe last session of the Legislature, which
requiii-d them to take an oath l<> support the Ooosti-
f*ltion and laws of the Slate. |l was c.'intended l <T
(Jmmsel in tlieir In-half, that t!ie law was iinc.onstitu-
f’mnal ; tint, the State had no right to exercise juris
diction over that territory, and to make such an ex
action of them, inasmuch as it was not. required of
01 ln-r rit!/.**ns. 'Flic Counsel for the State insisted
that it hid been the uniform practice for ve.irs* past,
to enforce the criminal jurisdiction of the State
ov.-r tint section of country ; that individuals niini*
lirlv sitmted hid been punched I**r a violaiion of
tin-luvs; they cited authorities to prove the right
o 1 ’ tin- Stale in tills r*-sn**ct, and tint other States
hid, under pre.-:sel,- similar circumstances, exercis
ed liot !i e vil and crioi.n il jurisdiction. A jury had
been selected from a full pimiel about !) o’clock in
t i • mor .in _ r , supposed to he as impartial and as lit
tle biased by prejudici' as any that could be obtained.
F'ie argu'in-nt did not close until afler 12 o'clock at
•i g!it._ Judge Clay t'*n the ll Oil Verted to the evidence
in the c *se. pro i -un.vd tin- law under which the
prisoners were irr lig'n-d. t * he, in liis opinion, clear
ly con.t luti m i!, cited instances of decisions in si-
nilar c is* s Inn* t-d’oru det* rmined. and directed the
• ill in they dirt 1
nellts at lust
to decide for t’l
c is-*. is to tlieir
■mselv
guilt
i the
Vide
• in
ect
reported
,»»rt "f
forty m b
marly ac
8. 1 wi
ii -iiTt. to :
Freshvter
tlnn the.
ine.-li »n of tin* Flint and Oc-
• • legisl.ilnre. Tlie c » n-nittee
v because they followed tin* re-
who irvoyed ill.* rout too liigh
lie. they are within less than
other and the r*»ut between is
1 bin*
Eve
tile Ra pi I?
Melh -d. -t b
-Iv*
-s right ; but lliey are dif-
■i*mg tin* (/liristinns the
r«* work and want more
influential with tin* rich
** too higotted and abusive
vn, end the Methodists
i»» ing t» hi.tui", in the se
as to d .good.
And n i\v I think <•>.!. tbit 1 I ve in a count!
dn-re I am at lib. rtv t** recommend to mv cmintr
len a*iy thing which I r *uUv think will he for the
nod, of which they also are the free and ind.qn i
eat judges, und which ever way they decide, I m:i
ill go on w.th my own little concerns at home.
.7 Satire Cl urgian
nine
'•ply
[com M UNtCATKP.]
Extract nf ah Iter foam »***’'f 0 ****
* * * # # Sept. 20th. 1840.
4 * I am exceedingly gratified to learn, that not-
j witlist lulling tbo disallection and hostility of a
tli.-se chief followers nf \Vi|-' ^' w individuals who were once his supporters, it is
Hie ; it *»f tii • land, and ot tlie ! ^Ito/HfOtli'T pr"b.i!ilo that John 11. Howard, Esq.
therein. They d.-sire imt the } "'ill :i*_riun bo r*‘turnc-tl t*» tlio f/Ogisl iture. It can
icither d> they seek their wcl- hardly prove oth-Twise, if tiie people ofyoureoun-
' ty have a proper respect for themselves
hnfhigh oflicps. and cry aloud | regard for their own interests. Mr. II
why it
m.rv. T.»m prisoners
d* rgo four V. .rs i.npri
. When they were
e. and tin- question w.
should not 1m pro nn
*1 replied to the follow
locence. The jury
*<nrii- if. finding the
o r*- trwlay sentenc-
•i u-nt in the Feiii-
raigned t<* receive
put. hv the C -ml
ned. Al-. If rrester
ig effect, —it' lint in
the precise words
44 May >t p east the Court—If I a n guilty of tlie
charges which h ive been made against urn in the ar
gil. n - ii t of this c is-, h'U. not alleg-d in tlie indict*
ment. then I hive .milling to sJfV why the sentence
of the law should not b*- pronounced against me —
But I aver before my God and mv country, that I am
not guilty of those charges. I therefore say what I
Inve heretofore said, tint the State of Georgia has
n*» right of jurisdiction over the territory in which
1 reside. an l therefore this Court has no right to
pass sentence upon me.”
It has linen intimated-here that these prisoners act
under fin* advice of high ronnsrl—-tint tlieir case is
expected t<» be removed by writ of error and they
released —some of them not desiring the Executive
Counsel for tin* prisoners. Messrs. Harden, Chef-
ter. II irrss and 1 nderw »od. F**r th*- State, Messrs.
S .lu-tinr Trippe, llutchin *s and Holt. Mr. Mr.un-
ger also addressed the jury, but merely with tho
view of cautioning them against being influenced
hy any degree of prejudice in tlieir decisi m ”
SK
Ti
TENGE OF TIIE COURT.
State, ) INDICTMENT,
■■ i
RIFS, y
,:s pe**pn
[for THE JOUR.CAL.]
ONLCMi’KIN AND THE HARK CAL’.
CCS rs TIIE FEOFI.E (M’ GEOlUHA
Hr Lumpkin hasj»ru *-ntlv .l- i-lim- l contraven-
* t!’*• public exp Kiif- . r. *;)• *• 11a ; the Ciark (Nm•
.at Athens Fr.'.n his remarks there, it it obvious
saw cl*- n Iv. wdial heo.ved 1o his country and his
n character—saw* deiirlv, the course that honor
1 duly imp tse.l in*ni him— sa>v clearly, (wh*»
ild avow! seeing) wli it hi uefinimlalion ,*j' endur-
; mischief, w hat a deluge of ui'uriated d.soor.1,
them.
I 32. And it came to piss that nn the Hltli month
I id’ the y»- .r c >ib-d by iw IStl, but l.y the Jews f>-B|,'
j and mi tin- third day of tlie mouth; tin* people as- ,
‘moulded in the sexeral cities throughout the land,,
[ and ch 'se (ieorge surnameil (iilmer, their ruler.
TV Ami In- was a faithful ruler, preserving the ;
, liw unbroken in all tilings. And the people loved
j him.
i RI \n l tlie time which Gscrge ruled over the
T» 'Fu.- subsequent history of George, is it not
w; t’eu hi the 2 1 C.i ipter of the l-t B .k of Chroni
cles ?
In (I icio in tt Superior
The Missionaries, } Court.
VinmcT—GITLTY.
i I sincerely believe this prns*-cutinn has been
hi and endtirgd, I will not sav i'i an unchristian
or ii duo Muper. but certainly in n great spirit of opposition
ward is a to ,1, ‘* J ‘ ,r political effect, I deem it my duty to
irsii-tor : !l *' ew f‘*"'arks on this occasion, not hy way of
.. i-iii r i i . i I vindication of tlie public authorities, for they need
ot nminponriinbio honor—or sound nohticnl prin-J nMllH , M|t 1 . . M
ciplos,—:md above nil, of uncompromising lionfis-
of tahuits—of groat firmness of «
higher do
th*- u*institute
Whenever there i
there i
ing for thftuiMlves. The JJuie. are a.bstraclh
sovereign, free, and indedei.dent, and the ri-b.
■launed for judging and d exuding tor themselves is
unalienable, that iias always reatert with the Slates,
wh.cb they never have given up, (for in wheie is it
declared they have) and being unalienable, it they
Were to pretend to alienate it, they never could make
conclusively.”— drunkenness
Whether or not those gentlemen ‘load’ the (’lark l, ;,lr ,m, l ,tl ”
party, or wliether the good an«l intelligent mom- ^ l lT ir,, * i i -- ll
hors *>f that party will subscribe to their conduct,
is a question for practical demonstration.
AN ADVOCATE.
s, falsehood, subornation
spr.*
• hit
k,>.M
tor tie
•] ted th
Iwrt article in the t ie ('
to deni mil a pas- which n -
gnatur.* of Oh- .anti pr *tlV
I have known that bv «»t‘i«*
Ifeeted Yet with tiles.- v
. this Patriot, this Ciiristi.i
In- is n professor iii a elm:
m tv and patriotism "f it*
pitiful distinction of liein,
moral and p -lit-
r the I md. by his *•
* veu probable —
- means it could /’<
ews distinctly be- tires-
i, Wilson Immp- nppr
•U truly estimable the t
members) nec
Ihe t;» tul id nt-
sdirection of public opin-
and with a hope that it may undeceive many an
ono^onj )VO(l tho rojspcct ign-.r nit and innocent individual, who has been sri-
•e.l into a similar transgression, by the high ex-
plo of this ii n<l nt: Fu I dis >bedience. I mean no
Toadies, the penalty of the law is punishment
r the offence, and my r»»s;ipct for misfor-
ys inclines me 1 lie rather to reduce than in-
suffering. 1 shall speak a free and deci
ded language, uumixed however, with the' least
temper of unkinduess. Foreseeing, as I think I do,
on** of tlie main objects of this singular perverse
ness, I will endeavor, ns far as is in my power to
t it by a full and plain history of the case.
ty. In tlie L°gis!at
anil ostiu.-m of liis f.*Ilow-m<Mnb«
gr-’pthan Mr. Howard; and I ludi'-ve no one pos
sess.*.1 a greater share of personal inllnence than
ho di-l. His election therefore will he particularly cu.m pi
propitious to any local measure in which the fiti- ,unft n l
zens of your county may fi?el an interest; for it
H known t > till who are observant of the usual
course of legislative proceedings, that measures
merely of a local nature, are generally carried by
the p'-rsmi il influence of the member who takes
[FOR THE Jilt'll v v i..]
TO THE FEOFI.E OF GEORGIA.
hnr-ctizi ns.—lYrmit one «»f your Imdy to ad-
a few remarks to ymt upon tin- subject of the
idling Tons. N -t considering myself ns
llo'v.-r of eitlu r of the rival camliJales for Gov
ernor. I had made up mv mind t*> take a neutral stand
ifi the atiproa-liiug contest, and I should not hu
tb":n 4 L »rg'‘. -At thi^ ju;ietur*‘ of our public nf- | w \\\„ ()f pretend t*> discuss the right of jurisdiction ;
furs it is highly important that the representatives that mailer is settled; hut that every body may see
of the p tuple, shim! 1 ho thoroughly conversant, not the true nature of this whole transaction, I proceed
onlv with the domestic concerns—th*’territorial to give the following particulars : In the year IH25,
.vessrs. t um o. v t\ i
Journal of the dli inst
sing notic**. A writer
server,” alleges, lint c*wlain mei lbers of the
Rlure •* voted fur the federal doctrines <-f m.urpnti*
and consolidation ” The gr.-uml of this allegation
that they w.-re not prepared, upon very short n
line, t
the citation in the c
House of Kepr.-s.-i
remembered, that i
port ; and ii may l
Voted ng.iin9t the
could not he prepu
vole f
port nf tin*
of Tassels.
oinuiittee
So far
d, it i
ii»stit uti- was .-ffereil for the re
presum'd, th >t the miimrit
p«-rt, not only because the
hut because th
x, . , 1 - ii, uic> n*->fr couiu man*- vole |.»r «•* strong a paper ; hut because ilu-v tnougli
iu im^j; «pon thsir fssWnty. It rs n*t tenNndvd ssdsr ths tir«anistanes», that lUf iub*t tuts was prt
meted with prospects, fr<»in
ild have recoiled with horror,
ly and ungr.ci**i.sly. that a
high minded man w.uihl h ive rejected it with scorn,
us ii pvi'S'-nul indignitv. If his cuid.i l thus i.o, ad
mitted of n darker shade, it is afforded, by his ili
tim t knowledge nf tlit* fact, that th- Clark leaders,
who luve any political principles at a;’, ..r-* ingrain
ed federalists—th it those thoroughly iu the secret,
though, (they dare not yet draw the screen that cmi-
cwals them from the people) are, in v.ews, objects
and exertions, [identified with Cmnkett, Chiit-oi.
Calhoun nml the undying F**deral partv through the
Union, t • )uill down and drive ml-- retir* nu-nt An-
drew Jackson, and replace him if possible, by Cal-
hown, if not by Clay, or any other eminent adrocats
riirlits, n.1'1 tllP sovornio-n nttribiitps nf llie Sin!.'; H-" I 'te venerable l-re.idfnt, Monriw, omiinunioa-
but « itli tlm bisti>rv—[lolit’V. nml true prinrinb's „t '-■•! Cnn.rr.-Hi. O.e.drsj^n winch li-.-n th« sub.
I'm n-.-mrnl <r..v.-rmn -ufc 'Up-.n nil thk,- s, bj-cts J-'',"•«-<*-"!->• t'mt benevu!." 1 »ag.. of
u n ,1 , , ... . ' . aim'Imrating the condition of the Indians for"' 1 —
if. the approaching contest, and I should ..ot have Mr * ! " W 511,1 !l IS bestowed much thought, and lh g. K**«t of th- Mississippi, hy way ns he en
de -11 rt ed IV • in line course if Editors and politic if "'| u • , ’ r | I r y " l V‘* *um liltotlio logislativc linll that (. ;l |ly expressed. 4 * of atonement alike due fri
*-ss.i\ ists en_*a ;. d in tin-controv. rsv, had carried it in*'Tniatiutl which research nlono supplies, and justice ami humanity, for the long train of i
ith that fa
is.- those .
Hut wli <
ruble
id ll *
lioraling the condition of tho Indians found on
East of the Mississippi, hy way as he emphati-
“ urn our
justice and humanity, tor the long train ot injuries
II I-: imlisponsihlo t-» a st.itosman. AH who inflicted on tint race, hy tlie discovery and settle-
know him cannot hut ml^iiro his frankness—liis ment of America." I wish mv limits would justify
Tg-an, alive to the interests gotninr? candor—his ituli’pcndoiicn of mind. Ho mv presenting tin* whole of that valuable document,
..old Stand by in sih-nc** and thinks like u frco.nun, and what Ite honestly thinks, blit I can only give a few of its outlines. He com-
that pure patri.-t and d*s- 1 |, ^ f*irl -sslv -!)«-ak‘‘ “ I’rrltc °nm pc'ir” is his menc.es th^s “being deeply impressed with tha
nmtlo. lie' mikes no comprnmiie f/r tlm sake of ""t rrmora! nf ilm Indian tribe, from
. • r,,- 1 . , ii i the lands which they now occupy whitlun the Inn-
l’;T"-f'ty-. '*;* rare virtue, and shmil 1 be the coon-
elierislm.l in these days sn.irkinjr d'lplint.v lr , xv ,. st .. v „ rd n „j „„ril,wi r d tber.of, U of very
covers wutli .•iCquiesci-iit snub's tho ta-ms of > » ma- / ( ;,,f t i„ip,rrlahccto aur union, and maybe accom-
ny political .asjiirnnts. Ol •his ability, h.s u'poits ;,|in a i»iann-*r t-» promote the interest and hap-
ntul spooclu's in the 1 gi'lature, furnish abundant piijessof these tribes, the attention of the govern*
*. v -<• t unis, iti in '<• .t hi i v appear t*- you who! *d Mice : witness hi • r- port up in the FI -ruin lit o, •*,* q M been 1 ng drawn with gr.-.it bulioiluds to
arc not apprised of the fact, a large majority of tlie j witness Ins address to the Tariff’ States; witness tli» object. For the removal of tlie tribe# with»nth«
i folded arms, a
uted stnt.smu
the
branded with
pithets of Traitor and Duunmnist ; a man who
had done umre f f (Georgia and the cause nf Statu
Rights, than any man in the Sint**, and those chnrgt-x
made by the leaders of n party who had largely c *n-
Iributed t-* liis present elev ilion. by :r vin t him the