Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page.

for u met eat, for as the boat abated «4F In stoodHMfejaM * upright and quickly railed Me hat with that grace •nd dignity which aeemed peculiarly to belong to him, ha aurveyed once more hia officer*, hi* army and hi* friend*, and after pauiing a moment, he murmured with an emphasis l never can forget, an full of mingled sorrow and affection, so deep and earnest, so soul like in it* accent*, tho single word •* farewell ! ’ and waving his hni, the trosli gush ing tears prevented Ms further uclion or utterance. At that momonl n shout, such asi havettover heard before not since; one simultaneous shout hurst I rout the shore, and so loud and deep and Cull was it, that it drowned tho ecltoof tho heavy guns—the large 89 puandcrs—which at the sumo moment were fired from a short distance above ; a dull, heavy noiso was all I could distinguish ; and as tho shout of the multitude was wafted over the parting waves and tho cannon's smoke rose upwards, thu General once more wuvod his hand, and his bout shot rapidly from the sight. This was the last lime Washington ever saw New.York.” Mr. Custis informed us that he had lately sent Queen Victoria an autograph of Washington, in compliance with the earnest request of Her Majesty to procure one from a member of the family of the General, and which was not appended louu ofliei. al document, together with a few accompanying words. Mr. Custis had this in his power, mid u abort time since forwarded the desired treasuie which was most gratefully received and acknow ledged ! FROM THE AI.EXANDIi IA OAZfTTE. Lights and shadows of Logo Focoisa. The subjoined Mights and shadows' of modern Democracy may tend to reflect the true positions •of the present political parties, and demonstrate that thn Democracy, par excellence, of our day is entirely different from that which is bygone. National Bark.—'Resolved That it is expedi. ent to establish a National Bank, with branches in She several Slates.’ Voted form 1814 by Calhoun Cuthbert, Ingersoll, anti King of Alabama. ‘A na tional Bank having power to erect branches , re commended by A. J. Dallas, and referred to a com mittee, Mi. Calhoun, chairman, who reported a ■bank bill which passed the House by u vote of 80 •yes to 71 nnys(67 of the 80 Republicans) and tho Senate by 22 ayes, to 12 nnys, (17 of the 22d Re publicans.) Yet we are told that the Bank was a Federal measure, when twoihirds of the Federalist voted ngaioslit, nod two-thirds of the Republicans of both Houses voted for it. •A National Bank founded upon the credit of tho Government’—suggested by Jackson. “Of the constitutional powerof the National Gov- eminent to create a bank. I did not then nor do I now entertain a doubt.”—G. M. Dallas. ‘July 22d, 1832, G. M. Dallas voted for the re- chartor ef the Bank, and against the veto.’ Tariff.—Gen. Jackson, Van Buren, Raton and Benton, voted for tho Protective Tariff of 1824— Van Buren, Katun, Benton, Wright and Col. John son fotr'he higher one of 1828. * Protect the manufactures adapted to our circum stances.’—Jefferson. ' W ith u protection not more than is due, &c.— Madison. * vV ought not to depend in the degree we iinve done, on supplies from other countries.’—Monroe. •Protect that portion of our manufactures, &c.’— Jackson- * It is true we had become a little more Ameri canized; and instead of feeding British paupers and laborers, feed our own.—Jackson. •L am in favor of discriminating between articles made at home and nut made at home.’—Benton. ‘Oppose any change in the present Tariff.-Penn. sylvania Legislature. * We are opposed to disturbing tho present Ta riff.'—Hickory Club. ‘ Congress may adopt the policy of encouraging our own manufactures.’—Ritchie. ‘ It [protection] is to put them [manufactures] beyond the reach of contingency.— Calhoun. ‘The present Tariff is not a Whig tariff, the Dem ocratic aid being essential to its success.’—Penn sylvanian. ‘Col. Polk is opposed to the disturbance of the .present Tariff.’—Democratic Union. ‘ Tho TurifFof 1842 was passed by Democratic votes.’—Bidlack. ‘If party is to claim it, (Tariff"of ’42) it is more properly ours, for without us it would have failed ut terly.—Loco Speech. ‘The committee turn with confidence from the land office, to the custom houses, and say, here are the true sources of Federal revenue-’-IF. li. King. DISTRIBUTION. * It seems to me to be our true puliey. that the public lands shall cense us soon as possible to be a source of revenue.’—Jackson. ‘ Each State has an interest in their proceeds, of which they cannot be justly deprived.’—Louis Me Lean, Sec. of Stale, 1831. We nre prompt to acquiesce in the proposition of the Secretary.’—Ritchie. * The Lands were ceded to be disposed of for tho payment of-be public debt.’—Benton. ’Lands proposed tube ceded to the Stules,by Mr. Calhoun, in 1842. ‘Laud distribution Bill pussed the Senate, July 30, 1842.’—Mr. Dallas voting font. ‘The Committee turn with confidence from the Lnnd offices to the custom Houses, and snv here are the true sources of Federal revenue.’—IF. R. King. INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT. * It seems to havo been lately settled by the three great departments of the Government, in favor of the exercise of the power.’—Polk. ‘ The expediency of making Internal Improve ments is unquestionable.’—Polk. * A judiciuus system of Internal Improvements, within the powers of the General Government, I approve.”—Polk. ‘Internal Improvement Bill voted for by G. M. Dallas, 1832.’ SUB-TREASURY. ‘The effect of the scheme would be to expose the Public Treasury to be plundered by a hundred hands.’—Globe. ‘It is disorganizing, revolutionary nnd subversive of the fundamental principles of our Government.’ Globe. ‘It increases the Executive power, endangering the security of the public Funds.’—Enquirer. •It is calculated to promote two currencies, a bn ser one lor the people, a bettor ono for thu Govern ment.’—Richmond Enquirer. Bunks upon the ground of safutylo the public are to be preferred.’—rolk. ’Millions of tire public money muy be iu the hands of a Receiver atone lime, and if he be corrupt, and •hall engage in speculation or trado, and meet with a reverse of fortune the Joss sustained by the Gov ernment would bo inevitable.’—Polk. •The President is opposed to this project.’— Globe. ‘Far less safe, economical end efficient than the present Deposite System.’—Calhoun. ‘It is certainly subject to very strong objections.’ Richmond Enquirer. A Ntw Cork,—A lady in this villuge, says the Concord. Mass, Freeman, reduced to the verge of death by brain fever, whose case was considered hopeless by her regular physician, nos been sudden ly and unexpectedly restored to health by the appli cation of cold water. The cure, if we are rightly informed, is a ramnrkable one, und will he likely to bring this new system of medicine into favorable notice. Governor Troup haa written suhjeut of the Tariff and the Presidential election, which the democracy are publishing in band hills and eoiiding over the Slate to affect the elections. If the Governor’* opinion* are so valuable, why were they not given to us before, so dial we mighi examine them, and sue if they were right, und not fling at us a day or so beforo the election, in older to control our votes 1 Thn Governor might to know dial wo ure not children to be scared by the sayings of any man, however big lie may think him-elf. Iu his own county, where ho lives, he citnuul influence a single neighbor, and the reason is, lltul they know lie is mad with thn Whigs be- cause they would mil run him fur President in 1840. und has quit them, and now abuses them. In iliat your, lie said the democrats had been stealing and plundering the public ircnsurv—he has now joined them. Wlio would join u party, when lie believ ed they hud In oil plundering the public treaso. ry 1 Who would believe n mail that Imd joined • party, which he know Imd boon stealing the puli lie money t Tho Governor speaks very dogmati cally, und tells us, such and such tilings are so. just as lie spoke in 1840, about tlie Domm-rais stealing; lull he has given us no proof of wltul he says. Now 1 believe wltul is said, just in proporliun to the proof which is furnished. He tells us a good deal about thu rich of England being driven to tho continent, to support themselves after they have been broken down in their fortunes, and he speaks of her high taxes, and the poverty brought upon the country hy Ilium. Wltul has this to do with our country I II the tariff of 1842. hurls our country so badly, why du the British manufacturers muko large contribu tions to circulate politicul tracts in this country to break it down ? More than two millions of dollars have been subscribed in England to circulate trade tracts in this country to control our elections. British gold, is the menus to be used to client Amcr. icau freemen out of their rights.' Dons England treat us so kindly, and tax our productions so low. lltul wo ougiu to let hor bring iter productions here freo of duly ? What does Mr. Jefferson say on this subject ? ho was tbe nttlhor of the declaration of our Independence, and while Secretary of Stale in 1793, he laid down this rule, by which we should ho governed iu our trade, with England. ‘•When a nation imposes high duties on our productions, or prohibits them altogether, it may be proper for us to do tite same by theirs.” This he spoke in refer ence to England. Now let us seo how she taxes our productions. It is true taut every dollar which she evi a as duties on our productions, comes out of the pockets of our farmers. In 1840, we sent her 841,000,000 worth of cotton, and before she would lut us sell it,she took from the pockets of our farmers 83,300,000-.we sent her $3,380,000 worth of lobuc co, and before we lauded n, she made us pay her for duties 822,537,000 ! We sent England thu year $54,000,000 ol produce, and before she would let us land it, she took out of it lor duties 828,360, 000! und left us only $25,040,000 to trude on.— She sent us that year $15,500,000. nnd we ehtirg ed her no duties on that umount ut ail—she sent us $30,200,000 und wo charged hor only $6,000,000 duties on that amount. Just look at the difference Iu the way she treats us, und that in which we treut her. We cuine very near losing all tho specie from our country, by this sort of trailing, and we have stopt it, and us long us England taxus our pro duce.lgo for taxing Iter pruducc. Sue brought about tho rovulutiun by taxing our labor—und she nas gone at it again—und tho true doctrine is to play the game ol ‘lit for tat,’“you kill my dog, I’!l kill your cut”—and if Euglund taxes our produc tions, we will tax hers in return. Gov. Troup tells us, that we are to be ruined by the high tariff of 1842. He says this, but does not prove it—now l will show from the prices current published in the "Constitutionalist" at Au. gusta, Georgia ; thut prices huve not risen since the passage of the luw—and if they huve not, then he duties have not increased the prices, auu wears not hurt by them- - 1841. 1842. 1843. SwecJns and Rtis.iu Iron, C cts pr. lb. 5 to 5J eta. Cut nail*, 7 to 8 5) tu 7 4j to 6j Salt Liverpool 5(1 to 6‘2J 55 lo 60 45 to 50 Sugar, IU to 124 Stoll 8 to 11 Cotton bagging 20 to 28 16 to 22 16 to 20 4 brown shirting 7 5| 5 Calicoes 8 to 26 6 lo 23 5 to 20 Cotton drills 12J It 9 Satinets 50 to 100 55 to 90 30to90 f end *wsrs*is3fn^a!^i . 1t*y it power, wouid do soiaetbfni rorou " “ ■ ‘ Dr. Lathrop, of London, wnsa man of genuine piety, but much opposed to the noisy zeal that seekelh the praise of men. A young divine, much given to enthusiastic cant, one day said lo him, “Do you suppose vou have any real religion T”— ••Nono lo sjieak ot,“ was ihaexcellsnl reply. The prices, in me tnmtih <>l September, year have been taken Now, I respect Gnver Troup us much n.s any ollu-r man; ami what ays, I would believe as .soon—hut Here are facts, which every body knows, and they ure directly opposed to what lie says; now which shall 1 believe? his statements, or these fuels. Now, I believe nothing about (he tux on cotton- bagging increasing the price the amount of the du- for if tins was so, why does not the lax on raw cotton increase the price uf cotton at home ? 1 bought in Savannah, last year, cotton bagging 42 inches wide, for 14 cents per yard. 1 Iinve been looking at the Commercin'. Register’s report to Con gress-and I find tb it tho cost uf cotton-hugging laid down iu New York, without the duty, is 9 1-2 cents the running yard; the duty is 5 cents the yard—this would ttiuke tiie cost 14 1 2 cents the yard, without any profits to the importer, and yet 1 bought it for 1-2 cent less than what it cost. The truth is this s the foreign manufacturer has his prices; when lie sends it here lie has to lake off tho duty, and sell i fur whnt it will bring; if there is no duty, ho would get the full 14 cents—but if there is a duty, he has to deduct the amount of it, und lake the balance. It makes no odds vvlmt he prices it at at home, he cun gel no more for it here than the demand and supply will authorise. Alter the tariffof 1842 was pussed, tho British manufacturers held a meeting, nnd in the debates they stated that the increased duties would he so much taken of}', from their profits, and that they would liavu to ro- iluce their prices accordingly. Tills they did, and sent their circulars lo their customers in this coun try, suying that they would reduce prices in propor tion to the increase of duties, And it is because they are made to lose these duties, that they have raised two millions of dollars to circulute free trado documents iu our country. Gov. Troup sins there is hut one wav to get clear of the Tariff', und that is to elect Mr. Polk President. When did the Democrats ever reduce a TurilT? They were elected, pledged to repeal the Tariff of 1842, and would not doit, though they hud a majority ul'69 in the House. And if they believed it was as bad, us they say it .s, what ex cuse can they give for not doing it ? They pro mised to reduce our State tuxes, and instead of do ing so put 25 per cent more on. They passed the high Turiflsuf 1816. 1824. 1828.1832. uud can any ono believe they will reduce this? Look oul, they will put on 25 pur cent more ! The South Carolina millifiers say that nothing is to bo oxpectud from Mr. Polk’s election. Mr. Rhetl, a member of Congress says— -The Democratic party can no longer be looked to for sup port. Nothing ii to bo liopod from the Presidential nlnctiou. MR. Polk has alkeaot been tkimmino his mails so am to CATCH TIIE BREATH or BOTH NORTH AND SOUTH." Tho leading puper of the Party in that State says :— The Prehiuential Candidates.— The Tariff.—The renders of the Men ary CHiuiotruil lo have seen iliut oar in terest in tbe PrnMidentiel election rrnln on oilier e round. than Mtiy hope of a voluntary end fair .elllrmenl ol llin lariA'quea lion hy the Democratic purly, should they triumph it ii proper lliet wo nliould give plnin miaous for no opinion thut intty aback good imturrd people, apt to believe what lliey wish. Observe, then, that die program of TanflT taxation ban been uniformly upward, from the i-ommniieemeot of die Uovern- ment to thin d.y.wiUi a tingle exception. All die iriumplit of all die free trade men in tbe country—all the .iff on I overt tiro we of Federalism end nioiioply—have ended nomeliow in increna- ng ill.duties on imports. M e have made die tnrift* an inane between parties,ami having carried the free trade drkel with a rush, huve in aue time opened our eyes to find dint we bad only worked to confirm the ascendency of monopoly. These lliines might and should have taught us before that it war hopeless lo aspect any relief from the legislation uf Cungiees —but the Democratic parly presented for the conteai oflH48 to Fondly and apparently so staunch an aapect on llda ipiea on, end after their terrible defeat they itemed so deeply con- sad If raiseJT WbM did we eoo then t Ain our foolish credulity I Democrats gave the easting vote, n tho Hums and tbe Senate, for the Inlstaoua Tariff of 1842 Yet thay gave eiioh plausible excuses for h—they epoke s well against tariff oppression, aed in favor of unfeltcrsd con inerce, end promised so ospliciUy to wage war to the deal with a syatem which for certain exigent present considers ions they felt compelled lu assent to, dial even then, thong 1 all our doubts wore roused, we still fell bound to check iTi expression ofthain. anl wait for that teat to which they in-i ed us. What did we neat sue 1 A House of Representative composed of two-thirds Democrats,commencing its labors b rejecting in quick succession three resolutions proposing i revise the luriffof’42on itevenue principles—and closing b luying on the table a hill that wont only part of tite way ! therei.ofof the country from I to! restrictive system t W, have learned sioce the adjournment, from authentic eoiirre- (hi,t it a direct vote lied been taken on die passage ol Mr. McKoy’e Bill, ten more Democrats a ere prepared to sustain the present atrocious lurifl*! So much for hoping, Forour purl we shall hope on more from tile Jeginlutiou ol Congress.'’ We aue, ft out lliia stale muni, that hud the vote cine up directly on the repeal of tho TurilT, it would huve been lost, by u majority ol 23 vote-.— Now, when cult the Democrats expect to get more than two thirds majority in Congress, und yet, with that largo number they would not repent it ? Res' itNsurod llioy will never do it. And even some ot the Georgiu Democrats, Hon. E. J Black would not vole lor its repeal, nnd Dixon (I. Lewis, from Alubuniu, left the House the day before the vote whs taken, and would not stay to vote lor its repeal. And the substitute offered by the Democrats for tho Tariff of 1842, was so had, thut Mr. Rhett, from South Carolina, would not go into the iHuuse, though he was at the door, nnd vote to save the Bill. And the Globe says thnt Mr. Calhoun’s friends did not want the tariff of 1842 repealed.— Can we hope then for any thing from Mr. Folk’s election ? The Democrats Bay not! Bill here again—The Chus. Mercury says : — n The federal ex- cutivi* r:in revise n-iilier tii ir opinion nor their policy. Blit even if they could, Messrs. Clay and Fhklinghuyskn, if successful in the pending content, would not redress our wronsjH, being both avowed Tariff men, nor have we a right to count upon a jot more ot redress from the successolour own cuuditlutes,—both of whom voted for thu Force Bill,one ofwhotn Air. Pallas, is an avowed Protec tive Tariff mun—and the other, Mr. Polk, though committed nnd believed true to iim and our nuti protection principle* up to the time of his nomination, bus since gone over to the one- inv, uud occupies the suiue position with the Whigs.” That same puper says iiguin :— “Shull we wait until it suits the Northern and other Tar\l' Democrats, to cease playing the hypocrite at Baltimore, and the traitor at Washington? £ hall we look for relief through Congress, at 'lie bunds of the Democratic party ? A bure enu meration of their acts will settle this questions “ They assisted to pass the Tariffof 1824. “ They passed the act ut 18*28. “ They voted for the force Bill. They helped the wings both in ITonse mid .Senate, in the base violation and overthrow of the Compromise act of 1883. “ They voted for the present Black Tariffof 1812. “And at the late session of Congress, with u Democratic majority of two-thirds in the House, They overthrew n bill, which retaining tho principle of protection, proposed merely the modifying und pnitiul equalizing of the odious exactions of the Tariff. Lei us turn from inis nnd see what the Northern Democrats say about Mr. Polk and the Tariff of 1842. The Harrisburg Democratic Union, a paper per- Imps of the greatest influence with the Democrats of Pennsylvania, says : “We happen to know, nnd tote upon the authority of a Tenne-sean, with whom we conversed ut Baltimore, a near neighbor of Col. Folk— that he holds the doctrine or free trade IN unqualified auhokrence. He nev* r advocated it and never will. He is iu favor ofu judicious revenue tnriff affording the amplest incidental protection to American industry. He is the especial friend nnd advocate of the coal and iron interests, those t vo great objects of solicitude w ith Pennsylvanians, und believing permanence in our laws to b«> of incalculable value, is opposed to the disturbance of the existing TARIFF. These facts we state on the verv best au thority, and caution the democracy oj this rreat State against listening to the misrepresentations oj the coons.” Does this look like repealing the Tariff? A Whig editor at the North said that Mr. Polk was a Free Trade man—the Democratic paper replied at once—(the Danville Republican :) “True to Instinct.—Not ono Whig paper have we sceu which does Gov. Polk the justice to correct their misrepre sentation of his views in relation too Tariff. “Will they have the honesty to proclaim that he in in favor of just such* a tariff us Mr. Clay! Such is the fuel.” Mr. Polk, in 1841, on the subject of prolection, flays.”! am in favor of n tariff for revenue, such an one as will yield a sufficient amount to the tres- ury lo defray the expenses of the Government economically administered. In adjusting the de tails of the revenue tariff, I have heretofore sanc tioned such moderate discriminating duties us would produce the amount of revenue needed, and at the same time afford REASONABLE INCIDENTAL PROTECTION TO OUR HOME INDUSTRY.” Plio Albany Argil* Hie oelebiated organ of De mocracy in N-w York, says— “The Whigs dare not present their lender (Mr. Clay) in the position which he has placed himself, in his recent avow als of opinion on lb“ tariff. They know thnt he and CJov. Po k occupy the same ground on this subject—and all their efforts to conceal thn fact, by garbling and lulsifying language will only serve to fuoten it more Irmly in thn minds of those on whom it was designed to operate—and to increase distrust of the cause and the partisan, whose chief reliance is THUS SHEWN TO BE FRAUD AND IMPOSITION.” The Age, tt leading democratic pupor in Maine, says— “Col. Polk is opposed ton “protective tariff” properly so called; thut is to say, lo u turiff for protection merely and without reference to revenue, He is in favor of a revenue tnriff with incidental’protection. 0 This is all right,* and it is preciselythe GitoUNDTAKrN by Mr. Clay. One of the most important ohjec-ions taken by the democracy to the tar iff of 1812, is (hut many of its duties upon the raw products of agriculture ark too low and ought to be raised ” The Troy Budget insists upon it, thnt tho letter of Mr. Polk affords inco-tesliblo evidence thut he is iu favor of Protection. In Pittsburg, Pennsylvania a cnil furs L-ico Fo co mass meeting is addressed In "all the friends of the Tariff, whu arc exhorted to support Jumes K. Polk, unless they want tho Tariff' uet of '44 re pealed. A Mr. Melville, an itinerant Locofoco orator, is engaged in an electioneering expedition in tiie Stale of New York, expressly to muke the people believe that Mr. Pollt is “» warmer protection man than Mr. Clay.” At a Democratic Convention ii New Jersey, tiie President, the Hon. Mulilon Dickerson, avowed himself a turifT man, in favor of the tariff of 1842. Al tlie same meeting, tite Hon. Benjamin Wil liamson told his Democratic friends thut the views of Mr. Clay nnd Mr. Polk as ton protective turiff were identical.” A few days since tite [Ion. Silas Wright of New York, made u speech, in which he declared that the ly ground of objection lie had lo tiie tariff of 1842 was its duties on Wool were too low. Tiie Philadelphia Mercury, u few duys since, lien pleading for the Democracy, thus spoku of the Tariff: The Democratic Parly nnd the Tariff.—It wns a Demo cratic Congress Unit eased the Turiff net nf 1818. It was a Democratic Congress dint pussed tiie TurilT set of 1824. It was a Democratic Congress tlint passed the TurilT act of 1828—against which Henry t.'luy voted. It wns a Democratic Cuiigreas dint pussed tiie TaiifT act of 1832. It was by Democratic votes that tbe Tariff net of 1842 was passed It WL in 1844, to disturb the present Tari Can any honest man expect any thing from such a double faced purly ?—anli-Tnriff al the South and Tariff at tho North 1 What madness has drtv. en Gov. Troup to seek to mislead us on this sub ject ? We know his parly heiter titan he knows it himself. Rend wlml another South Carolina Democratic set «ba —m jrwnsX-y ly saying that at lo the taflK nose* the *Utl»of and wilt coaelede tins head by stylng leal da to law unit, then is at thr North little if sny ditfcrancs batwaaa Whlge.nd DrOMMr.it*; th It they both combined al Ilia lair arssioo.not on I, to euatain the black tariff, but lo re eatablieh its Sianseai Twin, lit* system nUnternel Improvements—and that hemoat be s blind dupe indeed who Imp** for justice from eilber. II«- ■Idee, there is avery probability that tbe Democrats will be no stronger in tbe next, than in tiie present Congress*'' If the Whig tariff is so bad a* the Democrat* sny it is, why did they not repeal it ? If the deinucruts believe it to be so had, and seek to defeat the South era Whigs on account of it—why do they associ ate with, and aeuk to secure tite election of a party, composed of a majority of Northern democrats who have thn same sentiments ? uud why does Gov. Troup join a puny, that had the power to repeal it und would not—nnd then condemn a parly, thn' did not Iinve the power und could not repeal it? Answer these questions if you can! Gov. Troup speaks of tiie extravagance of the government. In litis, he casts a severe censure up on tiie democrats. They urged '.he people to turn tliuW figs out of power, uud n> pm then) iu, because Yet tiie tl the Whigs expended too much money ! Let us see how they have acted : Tho last year of Whig adminislrn- noses me *ntw , »t . < For the present jrittr. > oco * D P* proprtated for like purpose*, in- eluding the »eioed till. Making nil increase of *1.848.000 Can .he people support eoch a deceitful end rutnous ‘’“Go® Troup sny., that iho tariffof 1943 will raise several millions of dollar., more than .a na_ cessnrv. I" this lie l,a " rnnd,; 8 G real , 1 will take every dollar, hat will he received l. >«»' ,o pay the increase of appropriations made by the democrat, a. the In,. Congress, and to nay hit firs, instalment of the democratic debt which lulls due next Jnniiitry ; last year, it did not raise enough to upport the government d«"™‘rala said f 10,500,0001 bat uufominRifllr «*»• nyne. It j* ee,„|, v '"J** ) •• politiciansth*jrW*r«iiiv»ri.blv srra,,d,sal! !* , *Ml5 —in« opposition nf Mr. Rsrnlnlph at tin,,. ,5* *««b at& virnlmt clnwa. trr.a*i. 1812, iksjZ w ; ,r—amt whilst Ms. Lhiy wen Secretary orn!*. J '" rl H £ in tlm Inst public oildress ever mails by Mr **3»« People—in a speech in the city or U tick mi I,. nemlimcy of tliot lesifnl struggle betwren it,. «T'“ u,i *r Z tsridin.'.nd_.b« .Federal Go"rmnem, «'•;= nflf^ *17 943.000 But tite democrats said ,n tho h^ Congress, that their abject in altering the tariff was to raise more revenue. If there is too much raised now, why increase tho amount? »rrnts wnnled lo do It ? [ \w I’m ilFot 1H12 is lilt; loweti* passed since 1824. nd the fiilloRing comparative statement of duties upon lentliiyj articles will sliuw i’ All liouieRpunA, Hhirting*, NlioetingR, dimities, cctton, fl’imirln, anil every oilier undvctlcotton,not exceed, ing *20 cent* coni per yard, Bar iron, nmnnfuctiired in purl hy rolling, Bur iron, not manufactured hy rolling in whole or part Sugur, brown, r, clu> ed, M olltKHGB, Suit, Course hlonkct*, 6-4 Do do 8-4 All fine kindfl, Cut nails. Boots and bootees for men * of leather, Boots and bootee* for wo men of leather, Rootn, bootees and shoe* for children, Unmanufactured hemp, Hemp, Manilla, numin, and other Indian hemp fur bale rope, Ate., Unturred cordage, Cotton bagging, I'lniinels, A xcs, Adze*, Chisela, Vices, Drawing-knive*, Cutting-knives and scythes epadoB and shovels, Gj c *q. yard f 30 per ton $0 per ton 3 cents per lb 12 “ “ 5 « 44 12 to 50 ct. Ih. 5 e. per gnll, 20 c. per hush. 15 per cent, 3 cents per lb. $1 5ft per pair 15 cts. per pair $30 per ton 4 c.peril), 20 per cent 7J c. sq. yard $30 per ton $18 per ton J c. per lb. 12 “ 44 5 44 44 same as 1816 5 c. per gall. 20 c. per bush. 25 pur cent. 25 “ 44 25 44 44 5 cents per lb. $1 50 per pair 15 c. per pair $35 per ton 5 c.per lb. 3Jc.sq.yard 33j per cent, 1828 83-4 c.sq. yard $3o per ton $22 40 pr ton 3 c. per lb. 4 44 44 12 44 44 same a* 1816 10 c*. per call. 20 c. per bush. 15 per cent. j cents per lb. $1 50 per pair 15 c. per pail $60 per ton 5 c. per lb. 5 e. sq. yard 45 per cent 1832 7J c sq, yard $30 per ton $18 per ton 2j c. per lb. Free Free 5 c. per gall. 10 c. per bush. 5 percent 15“ 44 5 cent* per lb. $1 50per pair $40 per ton bu.uerlb. 3 12c. sq. yard 16 “ 4 * 30 per cent 30 - - 30 44 44 30 •• “ 1842 6c. Sq.yard. $25 per ton $17 nertou 2 1-2 c. per lb. ' white 4c. lb brown 2 1-2 lb. 6 c.per lb Free Free 1 1-2 c per g all. j c. per bush. | 15 percent 25 per cent 1 cents per lb V 25 per puir 50 c. per pair 15 centsper pair $40 per ton $25 per ton 4 1-2 c.per lb 4 c sq. yard 14 c. sq. yard 30 per cent. 30 “ •* 30 44 44 30 44 44 di-cru.l net of vinl.nc-might Imve intnlv.-J . til. horror, ofcivil war, and li-d lo lb. di.ii,.,, ' '"“Wy L I Confederacy.—nod when every pntrimic ete iv...i Ul, 1 t, *f|U I greet of event, will, tbe deep.., solicitude—,| ®I occurred which that g.nil.nian avuiled liimJu "PP®ri^j, I lice to tliechuracterof hi. great nnd diatiucm-i" i 1,1 '“he I In the course of ha, epeech.no i. reported nf l,..' VfPviaa ••licrillcm.n : I am .tied with the tno.i . ' “"h ' «ion. for tbe fate of the Union, t nuiant e, D J„’. , W ir 'li^. | deeply I oiu penetrated wiibibn sens.nrd„;. Pr ''i’.'»uko. I Mioliietif threatens it. cxi.leiicf. If MadUanfili , !'*»t|ji I thru chair, lie might be bullied iota c „“ jj*l^’rr | Monroe was in pownr, Im might be cosxsd inti If I men. of this difficulty, lint J.ck.on i, ob.ii„„ e 'j”*'j«* I and fond of fight. I fear matters munt coin,. i„ ii d,,ro «f I lure: lfso,tbis Union is gone*” Then p.iurit r 0 P* 0 ni? I minute, raising bis finger in thnt emphatic n in Li for I to Ins action ns a speaker, and seeming as it "* r *°P tc «l£| more freely, ho continued,* 4 Thereisonemna n.?* *• I*renu I icho can save this Union. That man is ""'.irirr;. he has the poteer. i believe he n/lhe found to hawa I ism and firmness equal to the occasion.” w ** e P*tri*. I {Shortly after this r ‘ > K« , Hh)lp|^ proceeded on ,|, I Washington to I’hiladelphie .in the , promise bill had passed. Deeply imnre*Md^»l!i^?** e nod valuable service which Mr. Clay bad hut T e 'a ‘ he ^| country. he hud himself conveyed to "the rienate I Ion plainly exhibiting in his foe* and apanaranc«!hlr r ’ l,k * I ol that fatal dieeuer to which he wn» (toon t 0 | where two brilliant rivulo alars, and prodigallv J ft t\ ic, *.l itrs of nature met Lr the last lime. As Mr Cla*?* I to salute him, Mr. Randolph said: * B PP r oachiJ| I 44 Mr. Clay you perceive I urn dying; but \hsuk (Lu .1 have strength enough yet left to r, Inra to yo« int 1 1 knowledgemeiit* (or having snvedilie Union. 'Poor*.! 'This incident, we understand Mr. Faulkner to **■ i, I ed during a recent visit to the city ol Kielimonit I as Miller, of Powhatan, a gentleman of highJC?.^ I who for many year* enjoyed the rniimacr and " Mr. Randolph, ami upon whose aceuracv'the uitn,..? 1 T** could be placed The relation of this intere-tb?°S"Si the life of Mr. Randolph by Mr. Faulkner, produced",^ Mdec,i ' effect upon ihe audience, nnd seemed »o inspire tl# " ,r ^ himself with on increased love for the Union, and iu ,W| ^ I fender, Henry Clay.—Marliutburg (Va.) I Tho Inst incidout, was stated by Mr. Ciat r in his,speech at Milledgoville, last March,toUr^’ Why dues Gov. Troup censure the Wings lu» passing a lower tariff than ever was passed by the Democaats ? Bui lie bales the VVliigs so badly, that lie will say anything lie thinks will injure them. Here are the facts und lei them he contradicted if they cun. Here are the duties which the Democrats pur posed to put upon the following urlicles by theii bi l last Session. Iron. 59 to 104 per. ct. Sill, 05 lo 139 perci Cotton bagging, 29 lo 60 perct. Sugar 57 to 17G per ct. MoIumcs, 35 to 173 per ct., und they i posed to increase the doty, on coarse flannels worn by the poor. 9 per cent higher than the Whi*, s ha made it—the duty on wool hats was increased, nnd that on coarse wool made four times greater than that imposed by the Whigs. And when they re duced any duties, they made a greater reduction on the articles used by the rich, than the poor. They reduced common earthenware only 10 pc Men’s leu the r shoes only 5 per ct Silk boots, 15 « “ Wool hats increased, silk hats reduc’d 29 - « Flannel shirts increased, 9 “ “ Silk shirts reduced, 10 •• “ Treble in.grain carpeting reduced 57 “ “ Conise cassimere reduced, 10 « “ Whiskey and gin, reduced, 27 « •• 4r.ii proof liognac Brandy, reduced, 93 “ « If the whig tariff was unjust, the democratic one, was much more so. Let every honest man read th» ae vaets for himself and say if Gov. Troup wished lo abuse the Whigs for what they had done, why did he not abuse the Democrats for doing worse ] The Democrats have always been in favor of a high ariff. They p-issed as tiieir own papers admit, the tariffs of 1828 and 1832; the first raised 610,000,000 ■annually more than was wanted, and the latter $5,000. 000. To get clear of the money, they resorted to an extravagant system of internal improvement—General Jackson promised us to stop it, he vetoed one little b his friends begged him uot^to do so again, and in a short time he spent more money than any President before Inm had ever done. Like the State tax, they promised to reduce the expenditures, hu; they added on, instead of taking off. The following statement shows how much each party has spent. It commences with Mr. Jefferson's administration and comes on down to the present day. Jefferson. 180‘i to 1809. Mndlson. 1610 to 1817* John Qilincy Adams, 1820 to 1829. Amtrc-v Jackson, 1810 to 1837. Van Buren 1833 ami 1839, Whip, 2 ami 1-2 year*. Jcmocratic Appropriation* fn ii year, including vetoed hill ? S | J? Iff*-' ||!| "Is? '• nd-S "III > > 3 Cumberland Road. 14,201 216,777 27,097 659,048 557,670 69,709 1,054.961 2,093,098 523,274 715,246 7,979,831 997,479 3,839,001' 2,192,293 1,096, M6 460,000 430,00* 1/2,000 000,000 1,094,Hd0 000,000 1 000,000 lv not. We do not speak without sufficient cause. With a Democratic House of Representatives, Mr. John Q has obtained a a VICTORY and the ADMISSION OF Ada i ith i 1,775 82,381 131,870 178,811 479.R70 830,000 000,000 000,000 Here power. paper says; «• Is the South—Is Carolina content to he cajoled lime and again Ly professions, when a President is to he nominated, and the brunt of a narty battle to he borne—and in the end to he uniformly Van liurenised and 8ilaa Wrighted hy a Tariff vote, as the guerdon of her toil* 1 Does she expect anything else now, in caae of ihe success of the same mou and tneele* vatiou of Mr. Polk 1 This gentleman, (even before be is strengthened to betray by the aecnre possession of power, but has me prospect merely,) within two little months from bis nomination, which we accepted as that of a free trade man, boldly electioneers upon the very ground of the Syracuse Res olution, for which we denounced Mr. Van Buren,and is vaunt ing ly proclaimed by the Albany Argus, a Democratic press, as occupying upon the tariff identical ground with Henry ('lay! T This blow iatlie more fatal, because dealt by a Sooth- .mb , „ ery, by telling them that a Southern Democratic politcian inay ern baud; it encourages our treacherous allies in their (reach 111 wear his free "trade principles aa loosely as the willow-pliant Berrien. Ittells them that lie holds the sincerity and spirit of hia Southern adherents in such light esteem, rhat he make* no scruple* to conciliate tfnffsu|iport,by making sac* riflue of hi* own and their principles hi the shrine of the Punns> I- tvauia msrnrno' , on the, to us (hiiiering calculation that North*, ern ia< iff Democrats aieso mochmore firm iu theconviction than we in ours, that while they can be gained to support a south, ern Democrat only hy liisaposiact from southern principle#, there i* no fear ol such apostacy aliaenating us. But we tre i the same extravagant Van Buren parly restored to His average was, per year, $1,096,146. His party the last Congress averaged $2,000 less! Cannot the country see where we nre going to, and where this purty will curry us? Can the “Democrats” believe anything their par tv tells (Item? This system began with the Democrats.— Mr. Calhoun, in 1819, as .Secretary at War, recommended to CongMBR n system of roads and Cauuls, connecting l.ouisi- with Maine, Suvnnunh with Boston—including a line of ship canals on the Atlantic coast 100 miles long—Albuny with thn lakes, Philudelphin, Baltimore, Washington uud Richmond* with the Ohio river—Charleston and Auuustn with the Tennessee—a Cunal from Pittsburg to Lake Eri- road from Detroit to Ohio—a Canal from Illinois river to Lake liigan—a roud from Milledgeville, Gu., to New Orleans— jad from Tennessee river to New Orleans—and a canal connecting New Orleans with Mobile! He recommended o survey as herein cwntemplnted, and iu 1824 a hill passed in pursuance of hia recommendations. Gov. Troup has retired from public lifo so long, that ho has forgoiton tiie history of the times. It is to he hoped that before he attempts to U’acli others the course they should pursue, he will ascertain 'hit he is right in the one he is pursuing himself. He may rest assured that the friends who stood by him, when i h* bayonets of the federal army were threatening him, w i never follow him into the ranks of that party, whirl then toasted and fed the General, who was lo dn him into submission, ed to the party, who sustained the doctrine that the General Government cou d sell a sovereign state, to a foreign king. No; never will they do it. A TROUP MAN OF 1825. House CONSISTING OF A LARGE MAJ W HIG M EM BE RS. Why ? It teas to have been hoped that a Democratic House would have been ns ENERGETIC AND CONSISTENT as their Whig predecessors. The De mocracy of Ihe South did not expect such a jc mrse on the. question of Abolition. On the question of the Tariff, the same tergiversation is exhibited by a large portion ofthe Democrats of the House. Con the Southern portion of the party be satis fied with the proceedings of Congress 1 It it not evident that these proceedings ure so shaped aa to have some influence on the next Presidential election And the Southern Democracy ore appealed to; they are called upon to keep united; and vet the essential rights of the South are trifled with, or disre garded, because votes must he ohtuinedfor a Presidential can didate? The proceedings of Congress, so far, have produced dissatisfaction among us, because of the large Democratic ma jority in the House.” The Democrats with a majority of I wo-thirds did not repeal the tariff, and upon a direct vote to adopt the rule rejecting abolition petitions, it was rejected by a majority of TWENTY VOTES!!! Can the people of Georgia support a party which sports with the great question of slavery, to make votes in the Presidential Election? And yet the Democrats have done it f The‘Globe,* the leading democratic paper at Wash- ingion, is endeavoring to excite the abolitionists against Mr. Clay, because he permitted his daughter to marry a mtn that sold negroes. An individual named Cae. siiis M. Clay had written a letter on the subject of sla very and some of Henry Clay’s frieods had called on him to say whether he approved his sentiments 1 Hen. ry Clay replied, 41 so far as he (C. M. Clay,) ventures to interpret my feelings, he has entirely misconceived them. lie is equally mistaken as to those in the circle of my personal friends and neighbors*” The Globe seizes upon these remarks, and says, 44 Mr. C. M. Clay ough t to havo known that, Mr. Eruf ig—Mr. Clay's next neighbor and son*in-lavv—has been a slave-trader by profession and sold thousands in the New Orleans market, erect standing in rows like rolls of cotton-bag* ging in the ware-houses. It was the fact of his being engaged in this horrible traffic, that induced many of Mr Clay’s friends and relations to oppose the match between Mr. Erwing and his daughter. But it formed n objection with Mr. Clay. And now Mr. Clay agrees with his friends and neighbors, on the subject of slavery, Mr. Erwing among the rest, wo suppose.” Can any Georgian read this infamous attack upon Mr. Clay hy the leading organ of the Democratic party, because of his being a slavo-holder—see the attempt to break him down at the North, because he 44 agrees” with us, on the subject of slavery, and not resolve to stand by the man, who stands by us?” No man should hesitate. Look for one moment at the dishonest game now play ing by the Democratic party. They have been circu lating the lion. Mr. Walker’s letter on the annexation of Texas, and in that, he advocates the measure, because it will extinguish slavery. This sentiment proving ob- jectiouable, they have issued a new edition for the South, leaving this out, and another edition for the North putting it in. Here is the sentiment published that the public may see the fraud. Can the people confide in the honesty of a party which thus acts? “Admitting 1'exas secures the extinction or slavery. Is slavery, then, never to disappear from the Union ? If conniii’d within its present limits, I do not perceive when or hovv it is lo lorniinale. It is true, Mr. George ’Tucker, ihe distinguished Virginian and professor in their great university, .liasdi’inoustraled that, in a period not exc-eding eighty years, land probably less, from the penalty of population iu ull the slaveholdiug States,hired labor wold be ns abundant and cheap as slave labor; and (hat nil pecuniary motives for the continu. auceof slavery won Id I hen have ceased. But would it, there fore, then disappear? No, it cerluinly wouid not for. ut the jowest ratio, the t-luves would then number at leust ten mill ions. Could such u innssbe emancipated ? And if so, wlml would be the result ? We have seen, by the census and other pi oof, that one sixth of the free blacks must he supported at the public expense ; und thnt, at the low rule of $50 euchjt would cost $30,000,000 per annum to be raised by taxation to support the free blncks, then in tbe south, requiring sup. port, namely, 1,666,666, it manumission were permuted, but as such a tax could not lie collected, emancipation would he, as it now is. prohibited by late, and slavery could not disappear in this manner even when it became unprofitable. No, tpn mil lions ol free blacks permitted to roam at large in (lie limit* of tbe Souihcould never be tolerated. Annin, then,the question is asked, Is slavery never to disappear from tbe Union ? Tlii* is n still tling and inoinei.tuus question; but the answer i>* easy, and the proof is clear. It trill certainly disappear if Texas is annexed to the Union ; not by Abolition, but against and in spite of all its pbrenzy, slowly and gradually, by diffusion, ns it has already thus nearly receded from several of the more northern of the slaveholdiug States, and as it will coutiuua thus more rapidly to recede by the reannexulion of Texas, lid finally, in the distant future, without a shock, without ubolition, without a convulsion, disappear into and through Texas, into Mexico and Central and South America. Thus, Iliut same overruling 1'rovideiice tliot watched over the land ing ofthe emigrants nad pilgrims at Jamestown and IMymoth, that gave ns the victory in our struggle for independence iliut guided by bis inspiration the framers of our wonderful constitution; (hut lias thus far preserved this great Union from dancers ho many and imminent, nnd i* now shielding it from Abolition,its most dangerous and iuternul foe—will open Texas as a safety valve, into and through Wuicli slavery will lowly nnd gradually recede, and finally dissiipear into the ndlc!*s regions of Mexico nnd Central and noutlie boundless regions rica. Bey outlieru Anie del Norte slavery will not pass; not only Thov stand now then nm,,,* | ‘“’cause it in forbidden b.* law. but because tlm colored races i m y stand now, as men, oppos- , hf . re p r « : p om | orulft hl ,| ir rutlo of ton tl) olw over ,i,„ w |iito«; nd holding as they do, the Government and moat of the nlli es in their own possession, they will never permit the en* aluvcuieul of any portion of the colored race, which makes and executes tho laws ofthe country. We ask every honest man who loves his country, beyond the mere pnrhzau devotion of iho day, if he docs not see in all this, the wicked and designing pur poses of the Democratic party ? Does ho not see that they are struggling for power alone and not for their country ? Will he lend Ins help to them ? or ratliei will he not calmly survey the evil tendency of tlieii conduct and before lie gives such men power to abuse nnd ruin the country, cast his vote for one who has never yet deceived nor betrayed that country? IIn enemies oven do h.ni tho justice to admit his patriot ism. Let every one read the following thrilling inci dents in the lifo of John Randolph, a personal enemy even, and eay if ho can withho d from Henry Clay hia support 1 ArPENDIX. “The London Times,” says “A subscription was recontlv opened to raise fumla to cir culate FREE TRADE TRACTS in Foreign countries. Aboutfour hundred and forty thousand pounds were subscrib ed. Some (j these tracts are lo be printed in Mew York, for circulation is the United State*.” Hear what the “Georgia Constitutionalist,” says about Ins own party, in the last Congress— Mr. Guieu, Editor of the Constitutionalist, tlm lending Democratic paper in Georgia, on the I lib of January, 1844, used tbe following language in regad to the present Democrat ic Houae of Representative* : 44 On the questions highly important to the South, the pro ceeding* ofthe House of Representatives cannot fail to create •nine alarm as to ilia filial result. The House ofRepresentn currcd. Democratic Sentiment on Slavery, People of Georgia, read and judge fur v ,I what kind of allies, ihe Democrat.-, 0 f y ou ,o," Irnvo in Ollier sec.ion. uf the Union. Here i. - * .he mao, vvliom JOHN H. LUMPKIN. R, Democratic cnndida.e for Congress, mviie'd 10I I .lie Stnle—\ve naean Dr. DUNCAN, a ri-arMem? live in Congress fromOliio. Here i»»lmi| lei , j j in an address to ihe people of his own Stale, DR. DUNCAN, ON 8LAVERV. “ There is no man living, perhaps, who i, ^ deadly hostile to slavery, than I am. My feeling. education, the circumstances llial have anrrouwWi through life, together with my principles of what I be lievo to constitute the natural political riglitaufmu! all conspire lo make me abhor it as one of ihem.i' est evils that exiBts on the face ofthe earth. °y« greater in its moral effects and corrupting terxlencial than all other human evils put together. It {, OMo#| a moral and political evil within itself, or iatrintiuli, bo of the darkest and most damnino character, but ,• all its bearings and effects calculated to produc- the most fatal effects on both the moral amt the |»i„ l(1 | inetitutiona of our country. It is an evil that ha,, don now, and will, in ail time to come, while n exi.ii,,a volve in it, as well in its present positive a. in in’f*. ture operations, crime, fraud, tiieit, nomar,Ken- der. and death. For the truth of what 1 aay u to it, present effects upon the iustilutiuns of the country, I have only to refer you to a view of the slave State, ia our Union, and a comparison between the relative me. dition of the improvements nf them anil the free State,. You see tho free Slates happy and fhiurishing to the admiration and astonishment of all who aee tbem.- Public improvements and private prosperity are swift and head ill the race, while on the other hand pourt, lean and hungry sterility, and squalled wretchedness eeem lo cover the face of the land in many parts where ,1m institutions have a residence. Cross the line thatsep- erates lire free from the slave Slates, or aland upon il and look across tho former, you will see comparatively all life, and happiness, and prosperity, both public and private ; but turn your eyes upon the latter and survey it—every thing material [except a tew ofthe wealth; proprietors] bearing tho impress of poverty aniitillsji dalton; all look as if pestilence and famine had ben making their said innovation. The anger of hud, and the vengeance of Heaven seem to rest upon every thing upon which you can cast your eyes. Every prospect eeotns to be withered and willed by the/rownanddisaii. probation of avenging justice and violated humanity, [a i short, almost every institution, every prosperity,public and private, seems to be sickening anil dying, from the corrupting and corroding effects of slavery. But the curse be on the heads ot' those who sustain such in institution.” And here whal the Hon. Mr. TAPPAN. ol Ohio, another Loco Foco, says “If tho action doe6 not lie for imputing a want ol moral virtue, can it lie for imputing a consanguinity With any particular race ol men, for Baying of another Ifcat he has a drop of African blood in his viene?—tint ha is of kin, in some degree, remote or near, loti* negroes—to that race of men, who have been, forage, the victim of a bloody and relenting avarice, and who are bowed down to tho ground, and trodden under foot by oppression, sn wide and enormous that no nun can for a moment contemplate their situation wither the deepest commiseration and horror—commiaeriti* foe their Bufferings, nnd horror at the iinuienae main wickedness and crime which holds them in subjection 1 know of no principle of ethics, nr law, which wold fortiid a descendant of the fair haired and ruddyTeulo- ua from marrying the swarthy native of Africa."—[St* Barret vs. Jarvis. Tappan’s Reports, p. 212.] Wxrrehton, Sept.21,1844. To the Editors ofthe. Constitutionalist. If you wislt lo know the truth, and let your read ers know it, concerning my opinions upon the mb' jwcl ol'discriininntion* between free and aiave It- dor. reud nnd publish my letter lo tho Columhw Times, written some two weeks since. If !°* wislt to know tiie truth, and let your readers knot it, touching the statements madn in the corttftcal* of Messrs. E. J. Cox, and others, in 1640, readaud publish my reply therein, published in the ‘Waile ingion News” early in October, 1840. I hopeth« aaaapicion of many of your readers, that you W not much solicitude either to knew the truth or * others know it, upon either subject, may not strengthened by your neglect or refusul to pi*** those papers before them. _ As to my opinions upon the subject of I*** Annexation, in ull its forms, I am content lo I** them with the people of the 8th C° n 8 rc,s ' ol ' , f t riel. I have discussed the question fully •t™ ly in every county in the District, before ,nu " ll “ of people. I am well satisfied that my vtgv upon that scheme of treason and plunder, (“j* J ler Treaty) have not been palatable lo tho * laud-monger*, stock-jobbers, and ilieir. •Ih^i democratic leaders. I am g!nd ot i'- I l |r 0 1 . fear and pretended suspicions of u portion Democratic press of Georgia in relation . views of domestic slavery, are very we i u ^ Stood by the people of Georgia. I ['««' h( gunge to express my scorn and contempt whole profligate crew, who, I honestly would sacrifice that or any other interest o • pic to obtain power. I Ituvo no other ' I* make to attacks upon this subject by tlm** sewers of filth anil falsehood. Your obedient « ,rv R n ". , j. ooMB S. - .. J The most spirited Ladv yET, " _ ** l *| a 0 j M ». our country, more than any other,are tru slant patriots—Molly l’itchar.al the halt . 1 .. .. <3—1, P.rnlllia ; * llu When I** INCIDENT, rpn IIV.-S i. ll.iuocr.tic by . Uric majority, and yet tho Tariff' Cli.rle. Jams. Kaulkn.iC E*q“Vn' hi. .peecli at Gfrerds- miil Abolition question h.vo beau .ppro.clird -ippar-ntly with town on th.3<1 inat. while commenting iu eloquent and indig- fr.r ami reluct.lire, but we may <ny with CONI-R8810N lo n.nl term, upon the movement, nf the Diniuionicts .t |K. llin*. who ere ZEA1-OU9 ANl> AIIDKNT ADVOCATES South, misled an inchletH in iho life of John Kaadolnh, .. OF A TKOTECTIVE TARIFF AND OR ABOLI NON——'■•-‘■t-■--w .—.—... . . . p .‘ Could the Democracy of thu South have couduct on the part of the Democratic moth; Mrs. Mmte in Sou It Carolina “Wife nf n Whig.” of West Jersey. men flinch the women draw on tne Read the following letter lo the Salontw* August 20, To the Editor of Ihe Standard : *sjgt Sir—lit looking over the colunt* ot ^ Beam” ofn late date, I perceive an »rt'cm forth that there is no man to be f' ,ul ‘ ^ district able lo meet Mr. Elmor[iho gg» Q ] i„ public debate. Now, it 'hercUM^ willing to volunteer his service* lor g*^ the partv, there i* n woman—a rest •' g| ul| ,ji county, 'able and willing to combat ™ ', ive w )lt* any position hu ha* mind to taka ilitical iOF ABOLITION- cradirehl, to .h...,nim»l.y .f ,!m c.lebratid ^11'. u rand coulait between the.wo political P*^ b*»* *nikip«tcd «uch ju.t nnd honorable to tlm f.nw of H.nry Cl.y, that w. h. ' grand coutesl uetwuon in tVipgOf* i majority ta CoB|i*ut deemed a worthy of being prooorvod tad plocod bofr e ) J UK wir.v