The Washington news. (Washington, Ga.) 1821-183?, January 24, 1824, Image 1

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page.

Volume X] #fßTltn WtKKIT, BY PHILIP C. GUIEU, |TjT VBW A R RAVG EM E NT. A* exp."rerice has discovered to us the little attention paid o printing debts, and the great tlifTiriiity and expense in collecting such cleb*s; h as a few only can be called liberal in paving punctually wha they owe justly, to the printer, we have, after due consideration, come to this conclusion, iha? wr. oight sot to give credit We are compelled, therefore, to adopt anew plan In consqtince of this an d our terms shall in future be,for the paper three do'lars per annum, if pa and in advance—tour dollars, if paid within s;x months—and live - v dollars if paid only a; the end of the year ■For advertisements, they are to be paid in ad. vance sheriff sales excepted, which are tube paid quarterly The above rules shall be ■tric’ly observed, and no one need apply who is not ready to comply with them Terms of Advertising, 75 cents per square for the firs* insertion, arid 62 4-2 cents for •ach continuation. Sheriffs’ Sale, ILL be sold on the tat Tuesday # in February ne .t-at the court house of Wilkes county, within the ti ua! sale hours, the following proper ty, to wit: / 12 negroes, viz*: a fellow Robin, a fellow Frank, one nsgro wo man Ruth and her children Titus Nel ly, and Jackson, ally and her children Moses and Martha Maryland her child Patience, and Charlotte, also one trunk of goods 4 boxes fancy articles, ‘ one desk and show box, one side board, cecreta r y and book caae, one 1 set dining table-, one candle stand, j one chzen wind or chairs, three beds, steads and furniture, one set crockery and glass ware,2 pots. 1 oven, Sc l spi der ; h vied on as the property of Roy land Beasley to saii-ify sundry execu tion’ vs. said beaslev, property point ed out by the defendant. ALSO, One negro girl named Eliz abeth, one cutting box. one 40 saw gin, one white horse, I cream colo'ed horse one stack fodder, supposed to be 4000 weight, one horse cart and gear, one set black rnith** tool*-, one set waggon wheels, one crib of corn in the shucks, 26 tead of cattle, 3 mule . and a young bay horse ; levied on as the property f Patrick Kelly to satisfy an executim in favor of Wil lirm Swan for the <se of William Dea ring vs. srid Kell, property pointed out by plaintiff fid left on the pre mises, with the xception of the ne gro girl, by orde of plaintiff. /LSO, One traq of land contain ing three hunted and twenty seven acre , more ofless. in the occupan cy o’ John 0<on; levied on as the the property if ‘Simon Pettee to sat isfy sundry eicutions vs. said Pettee. ALSO, v Three hundred acres of Ju-d more ♦ J ess. on the waters of cre|; evied on % the prop 1 erty of Sauel Brooks, to ;at*sfy sundry e onions vs. said Brooks, property p|ited out by the defend ant. * I AL O, Twoveds and furniture, •ne hone me cart, one pine table, one de ls two chest-, half doxen chairs oi lot crockery ware, one ima I ctd one Poking g’ass, one pot oai~n, ene spider, one trunk, one j'.i.t'jd and tongs, one pair fire idogsjt Wian*s saddle, one \vo macft one Jer ey wagon*, It property of Wan. .-wan, to di tre s. warrant in fayor Wilkinson vs sad fcwan til :hr j pointed out by the defend adoptcw est in hvi possession by the r> | H n(Vt plaintiff, lonai/ ALSO, fifteen acres of land, mors so, j.•/.,, lying ia the county of s vo*/ *s, whereon John K. Little ‘Preside-; levied on as the pro \rv!j|v of said John IS, Little to sat h i sundry executions against him. wi ALSO, , Two horses; levied on as l\e property of Henry Rose to satisfy IJundry executions in the name of A. JfrJ Gibbon and John D. Thompson vs sad !lo<e; property pointed out by John D. Thompson. O. Wingfield, and. s. Jan iarv S, <824. Blank Deeds, For sale at this Office, The Washington News. WASHINGTON, (georgia) SATURDAY, JANUARY 24, 1824. D. Meigs £sf J. M. Hand, Haring formed a connection for the purpose of transacting a Warehouse And Commission Business , KE'TECTFULLY solicit the patronage of their friends and the pub ic 1 heir Ware House L ► ituated opposite that of Messrs. R. Malone Ic Co’s, upper end of Btoad street, and is new, cpaciou -and con venient, and from its situation, af fordf great security from lire The subscribers will also attend to receiv ing and forwarding any produce or meichandise confided to their care. Daniel Meigs. Jonathan M. ti and. * Augusta, December Si. Admiui tratorsbahs Will he sold at Elbert Court H use , on the first Tuesday in February next , agreeably to an order of the ( ouvt of Ordinary of said county , One tract of Land, containing three hundred and nine ty-four acres, lying on the waters af Warhatche creek, in said coun ty; it being tho real estate of John Rich, deceased, -old for she benefit of the heirs and creditors.—Terms ts sale made known on the day. W illiam Rich, adm’r. ftov. 15, 1828. 46 —ts V x ILL he mid on Friday, the v 30th.iost. at the late rei denre of Peter L. Bailey,de ®ased, in Oglethorpe county, all the per sonal estate of said deceased, con sisting of household and kitchen furniture, corn, fodder, apd stock of all kinds ; sold by an order of Court. Terms of sale made kuown on the day. Henry J. Baily, adm’r. January 8, 1824. AGREEABLE to an Oldero the Inferior court, wi s be *old at Elber Court House on >he firt Tue.dav in March next, ah thee.aim and title of the estate of Thomas Gardner, deceased, to a tract of land in aid county, lying on the water* of the Beaverdam creek and Ray creek. Ann Gardner, adm’x, January ‘O, 1824 3—tds. sold oa the fir-t Tues- W day in February next, at El bert Court house, between the usual hours of sale, agreeably to an order of the honorable the Court of Ordina ry of the county of Frank*in. 200 acres of Land, more or less, situated in the county of Elbert, on Broad river, for the benefit of the heirs and creditors of Robert Turman, decea ed. Terms of sale made known on the day Parks Chandler, adm’r. Nov. 3. 1823. 45—ts Will ve sold at Elbert Court House • on the first Tuesday in February next , agreeably to an order of the Court of Ordinary of said county t One tract of Land, lying in said county, the property of Richard Burton, dec.— t erms of sale made known on the day. Mary Burton, adm*x. William Davis, adm’r. Nov. 15. 1823. 46—ts JJ’if/ be sold on the 27 th Huy of Jan miry next , at the late residence of Ludwell Fullihive, deceased # all the perishable property belonging to said deceased , €i (INSISTING of stock of hors- J es, hogs, cows and sheep, corn and fodder, plantation tools, houn hold and kitchen furniture. Berms made known on the dav of sale. W illis Fuliilove, Temporary Mm’r, Dea. 16, 1523- 60—ts ON the iith of February next, will be sold at the residence of Frederick Wittiok, in Wilkes county, all the personal property of Charles Wittich, deceased. Terms made known on the dav of sale. ERNEST C. WITTICH, admr. January 1,182 L 1 tds FOREIGN. From the National Advocate. FROM BRAZIL, By the latest accounts received at Boston from Janeiro, by the brigs Dove and Wethcred, if apnears that jealousies and animosities existed between the Furnpean Portuguese, and the native Brazilians. The F.mperor has studiously avoided de claring for either party, aad was evidently employed in attaching the military to his views. The Cortes have been dissolved in the name of the Fmnernr, at the head of his Iroenpa ohn 9%r nt>!nnipali W pcuns. We should not ho surpri sed if after fie ’apse of a few years, the new nude Fropeeor should he deposed. a free Government as faldished hj the Brsxilians.although it i said, <hey are wanting in the Melligenoi of the Colombians. The following narrative, says the Boston Dmlv Advertiser, was fur nihcd to the keeper of the Com mercial leading Rooms, by a pas senger is the AVet hr red • S*>mje events had transpired in the government of the new empire, which seemed to show that the Bra zilian# ba'l rather over-rated the privileges and freedom supnos p d to have hern soured to them—Great ( animftuif’fs and jealousies existed, nod though other lines of party were drawn, the principal contest was be tween the old (or European") Bortu gucse and the native Brazilians, who appeared to entertain the most hit ter feclto**# towards each other. Both parlies imposed themselves possessed of the Emperor’s entire confidence and h fictions. and while each were um.tceuveriog to bring out his-dftclarafi n, he studiously a vnided it, hut at thesamo time, was evidently employed in attaching the military to his views, who in the Capital 3c neighbourhood are prin cipally of she former party. The Cortex or Legislative Assem bly, wore digesting and debating the new Constitution, consisting of 270 artiedes. some, of which had passed. Tn the debates several of the Depu ties belonging to the liberal party had expressed their sentiments ia a most hold fed independent language. The liberty of (he Press began to •bow i self by the freedom of half a dozen papers issued daily, Soms Htf*oks bad been made upon the Ministers, and hints-and inuendocs thrown that irritated the govern ment. When the Emperor,it seems, to have the appearance of a desire to submit every thing to the opinion of the Cortes, sent a message (10th Nov.) requesting their opinion res pecting the right and propriety of Utese tilings, which was returned without answer, with a demand in the first place to be (old for what reasons the troops bad been assem bled in the streets, (as had been done the evening preeediog) and placed at the very entrance of the house of their deliberations. No reply to this demand was made till the morn ing of the 12th, when, after the de puties had assembled as usual, a corps of artillery was marched into the city and planted about the hou ses ; and while the cannons were aimed and matches blazing to en force compliance, if necessary, the Cortes was dissolved iu the name of the Emperor, to meet or act no more from that moment. They dispersed immediately, but every one did not go his way without fear and trembling. Os thosa who bad been the most bold in asserting for the liberty, of speech, and the toleration of religion and the rights of Brazilians as a free and independent people, seven- teen were proscribed, among them were Don Jose Bonifacio, formerly private minister, and his two broth ers, who, with two others* were ar rested before they left the houso, and sent to prison. Soon after this the Emperor appeared on horse back, escorted by a few officers, and followed through the streets by some of his loving subjects, whose ap pearance was certainly none of the most respectable. The Empire of Brazil may last awhile longer yet, hot Don Pedro the First, has no longer the hrarts of any of his native subjects. There are many of them. nnd< übiedly. who could co operate with the other par ty with a view, the more speedily to bring about a re-union with the mother country, as being a condi tion preferable to any independence they can establish and maintain. In deed this was an event already talk ed of as probable to take place soon, i It was believed that the Emperor’s entire desire was te see this effected, and it w as said a ship was to be des patched immediately for Portugal* with the news, and probably to make overtures. It was also reported that Lord Cochrane, in disgust, bad ■ft Mn%gf, to the numerous Portuguese ships, made prizes by him, would probably be restored; but this was after wards contradicted. The windows were crowded bv Brazilian beauties, of all degrees and complexions, and whose loyalty was displayed by the waving of a i thousand white handkerchief!*, and their reiterated screams of Viva’ Viva! H s Majesty published a de cree, in which he promised kh sub jects that he would himself give them a constitution, and hinted that it should be a belter one time that which the Cortes had half manu factured for them. In the evening *tbe city was partially illuminated and *here was some other manifes tations of rejoicings, bui it was far from being general. In short this event is locked upon as a complete triumph of the Portuguese over the Brazilian party. Legislature of Geo gia. INDT \N CLAIMS. Iji Senate, Dec. 12. 182S, The conitni'tee on the state of the republic, to whom was referred <he resolution of the House of Repre sentatives relative to the claims of the citizens of Georgia, under the treaty made at the Indian Springs on the Bth of January, 1821, and the petition of David Glenn, one of claimants, Report : That they have examined the ob ject presented to their consideration in these references, with all the care and attention demanded by its importance, and have concurred in the belief that the only efficient mode of obtaining the object in view will be by an address from the le gislature of Georgia to the Presi dent of the United States, They have accordingly prepared, and herewith submit tho following memorial. To the President of the United States of America, The memorial and remonstrance 1 of the Senate and House of Repre sentatives of the state of Georgia, in General Assembly met. Respectfully Sheweth : That the attention of your me morialists has been drawn to the construction given to the treaty, en tered into between the Uuited States and the Creek Indians, in the year 1821, so far as the same re lates to the claims of the citizens of Georgia, and believing that suc h construction is calculated to pre vent the allowance and pay meet of many of the said claims, which it was the intention of the parties im mediately in interest to provide for, they ask the attention of the Presi dent of the United States to the rea sons which have influenced to this belief. These memoralists would res pectfully submit, that it was not the intention of the contracting parties, to confer on the President of the United States the right to exclude a ny of the claims of the citizens of i Georgia as a class, except those oo- i eurring after the act of Congress of the year 1802. To them it seems, that the obvious iotention of these parties was, to invest him with au thority to examine and decide each individual claim with reference to the proof adduced in support of it. The controversy between the com missioners of Georgia, and the chiefs, warriors, aod head men of the Creek nation, regarded the proof or the claims, a list of whinli was exhibited, and not the question whether those claim#, if proved, should be allowed. This inference, as the memomlUfg believe, may ha deduced from the terms <>S‘ the ar ti*les of agreement, as well as from a consideration of the relative cha racter of tho referee. Bur it will prevent repetition, and present a condensed view of the object, to con sider it with reference to the rule of decision complained of. That rule excludes all claims or iginating in the depredations com mitted (by the Indians on the citi zens of Georgia,) in a period of hos tilities, op previous thereto, if not followed such hostilities. It pur ports to be founded on the princi ple adopted among civilized nati >us that a treaty merges all pre-existing claims,A that those not provided for, ace consequently annulled. In its application to the case under con sideration, it has the effect of ex cluding all claims previous to tho treaty of New-York (1700,) except for slaves -and all claims origina ting subsequently thereto and prior to the treaty ofUolerain (1726.) ex cept for the property provided to given up by that treaty. It is res pectfully contended that this rule is in apple able to the claims of the cit izens of Georgia on anj ju<t princi ple of analogy—-that st is forbidden, by the terms of the agreement en tered into at the Indian Springs, and the relinquishment consequent’ thereto, and is repelled by the cir* e urns lances attending that oegocia tion* Nojust principle of analogy, it it conceived, will authorise the appli caJo jof the rules which govern treaties between independent and civilized oafious, to the negotia tions terminating in compact, be tween the United States, or the state of Georgia, and the Indians, residing within the territorial lim its of the latter. If, on the one haod, it be admitted that these In diaus are, to a certain degree inde pendent, and that their indepen dence is recognised by the a*d of treating with them, it seems clear, on the other, that this independence has its hounds Tbev are locally resident within the territorial limits of Georgia; and it is difficult to conceive the idea of a nation ab?o-- lutely independent, and yet resident-, within the limits of another inde pendent stale. The question may he tested thus. Absolute indepen dence bespeaks uncontrolled sove reignitv, and includes the idea of the right of alienatiug the national j domain, at the will of the nation, j and to a purchaser of its choice. Could the state of Georgia—would the United States submit to the un controlled exercise of this right—to J its exercise in favor of any foreign f nation, by any nation of Indiana dwelling within their territorial li mits? If this question be, and it is believed it miut be, answered in tho negative, it seems vain to contend, that the Creek Indians constitute au independent nation, since the concession strips them of one of the attributes of independence. But if independent, they are unciv ilized, and would, from this consid eration, have ajust claim to be re lieved from rules adopted by civil ized nations in the foosiruciion of treaties, if those rules were injuri ous to them m their operation. They e&naot, therefore, demand the benefit of thew,!to set up an im plied exemption, contravening the otherwise plain infart of their ex press stipulations. An Indian trea ty it, it is conceit, an instrument which is to be to its literal irnpoj, or at mas , cording to its meting and in * as these may be Reeled from the instrument itself the oircom oes attending on execution, at 1 the character of * framers, cannot it is bo ‘ J subjected totbeadifimal. technical rules, which between civil ized the existence of wbisht was nnfcoowo to the *'“ negotiator, bj which *e would not have consented that bis ihoald be boaed, and of which he [No. .4