Newspaper Page Text
PQ2TST.
I.INES on the Death of John Howard, Lt. Col.
during the Revolution, of the 55th Regiment, Ma
ryland tiihe.
He died not when the martial smoke
Of battle hung around him—
lie fell not by the uabre’s stroke,
Nor has the torn flag bound him.—
War’s sulphury cloud away was driven,
While his spirit held its course to heaven.
When the drum gave forth its stirring roll,
The trumpet its brazen clang,
He flew, like a steed for the distant goal,—
Where the din of the warfare rang.
7 te perill’d his life, and his blood was shed,
s '.Vherc the Maryland line its banners spread,
lie died in peace at his own fire-side,
In the fulness of years and honor,
In the land which enjoy’d in the height of pride,
The rights which his arm had won her.
The graven stone to the great may rise,
But his prouder trophies are weeping eyes.
A
BROKEN VOWS.
And. this is alt I have left now—
Siinnce and solitude and tears:
The memory of a broken vow,
My Righted hopes, my wasted years.
Ihere li$jtgs yo'ur lute: the wandering wind
yVili hence its only master be;
B tf; never may its numbers find
More wandering master than in thee.
' Mv falcon it has slipped its band—
Afar your faithless gift has flown;
The bird which fed from my own hand,
Alas, its stay is like your own!
Vou swore to me, yon starry ranks
Should sooner leave their homes above;
Yon river change its native banks,
Than you forget your early love.
Each starry world its station keeps
In night’s blue empire as before;
The same our native river sweeps—
In vai’n—for I am loved no more.
1 will go weep till rose and blue
Alike from cheek and eye depart,
A faded,flower—and then adieu
My o^vn false hopes and thy false heart.
[The ensuing extract from a Sermon by the Rev.
Mr. Spring, cjf New-York, we insert as much with
our own approbation as, if possible, desire to gratify
the wishes/of several ladies who have requested it.]
Neatness and taste.
a Christian woman ought to be distin-
fishable by her simplicity, her neatness.
Ver economy, her faithful and becoming at
tire, but never by her stiffness and precision
Now does the gospel proscribe all ornaS
ment in the article of clothing? lt does, in
deed, prohibit that profusion of ornament
which consists in a studied display of per
sonal decorations and costly array. But no
where does it interdict that decent regard to
external appearance, which gives respecta
bility to the female character. A woman
without respectability is without influence ;
and without influence she is without the
power of doing good. Nor do 1 hesitate to
say, that it is no part of the religion of the
gospel for a female to be very scrupulous in
avoiding the common modes of apparel. 1
believe there is much more anxiety, and
more attention to dress, and much more sin
in studiously avoiding them, than in natural
ly falling in with them. Fashions, which
characterize a gay and worldly circle, a
Christian woman will avoid. But how ridi
culous would she appear to disregard the
spirit of the age, and cleave to the habila-
ments of her ancestors, while the prevalent
inodes if dress among persons of her own
class, are not inconsistent with modesty and
decorum. And let it not be forgotten, that
there is no intrinsic evil in mere dress of
any kind. So long as the heart is not cor
rupted, nor the best interests of men injured
by the garments they wear, they are of lit
tle account in the sight of God.—And is
there no reason to believe that vaniiy may
insinuate itself into the mind from the love
of plainne-is and singularity ? Do we not
all know enough of human nature to he sa
tisfied, that a woman who is habitually well
dressed, thinks less of her apparel than the
woman who is well dressed only occasional
ly, and whose thoughts are incessantly oc
cupied about the dress of her neighbours !
An Indian may be as vain of her blanket,
and a Quaker of her bonnet and cap. as a
coxcomb is of the newest fashion, or a cour
tier of his splendid retinue. And what
would become of the interests of society, if
you proscribe all the ornaments and con
veniences of dress ? To what untold mul
titudes do these give useful employment?
How many benevolent institutions are main
tained in existence by the industry of fe
males, in forming articles of mere ornament
and fancy ? And how many streams of
charity do they fill, which without them
would be dry ?
“ I should be lothe to have these sugges
tions misunderstood or perverted. I plead
not for profusion of apparel. Extravagance
and finery in dress, I would censure and
condemn. A fop or a belle I would hold
in steady contempt. All attention to per
sonal appearance which excludes higher and
more important objeots from the mind, is in
consistent with a pure religion.—Against
the splendour, gaiety, and fickleness of
fashions, the pure and unassuming influence
of Christian piety is natively arrayed. And
vanity, splendor and"extravagance in clo
thing, are the result of a vitiated taste,
never "DecMM the person half bo Wgty as
beautiful simplicity and neatnessBut
while l say this, I cannot believe the relig
of the gospel requires that fre djifad k
no regard to the feelings and opinion-
society, or that wo should divest oursel
of that self-respect, which renders.us re
spected and useful in the world, L, '*■
It is possible these tiioughts may offend.
But sure am I, they present no cause of
offence to the most self-denying mind.
There is a spirit in some of our most excel
lent females in relation to the article of
dress, thnt requires a more prayerful self-
examination than it has received. For
myself I do not believe there is any thing
praise-worthy in that spirit of female curiosi
ty, which interferes with the dress of her
fellow-chr stians, and would reduce the
taste of the community to one standard.
And I have always found that those females
who are the most officious in these matters,
are, with few exceptions, the very persons
who would lead the fashions, if it were in
their power. To such I would'say, the Spi
rit of God affirms of a virtuous woman, that
“all her household are clothed in scarlet; that
she maketh herself coverings of tapestry, and
that her clothing is silk and purple.” 'j
Maiden Speeches.—“ There are ma
instances of individuals who have had t
greatest difficulty in overcoming the tern
which men naturally feel in addressing a
large and enlightened audience. Addison,
we believe, never ventured upon more than
one speech in Parliament, and bungled sad
ly even in that. It is even said that he was
the unfortunate member who conceived
three times, and after all brought forth no
thing. The throes which Smglespeech
Hamilton experienced in the delivery of the
celebrated oration which gave him his agno
men, were so great as to deter him from all
subsequent pursuit after oratorical distinc
tion. Lord Erskine broke down in the first
speech of importance which he attempted
in the House of Commons—At the com
mencement of his harangue, Mr. Pitt took
a few notes, bur threw them aside shortly
afterwards, on finding that there was nothing
either new or striking in the arguments he
was advancing. Erskine was so discon
certed by this slight circumstance, that he
first hesitated, then stammered out a few
incoherent sentences, and finally sat down
without making any conclusion to his speech,
under the plea of sudden and violent indis
position. The regular frequenters of the
House of Commons see many failures of
this kiud ; and sometimes, even when a fail
ure does not take place, can see, from the
agony of the speaker, that he will not run
the risk of exposing himself a second time
to the criticism of the House. The most
extraordinary single speech in the whole
range ct Parliamentary debates, whether we
look to the effects which it produced, or the
speech itself, is that spoken in the reign of
Charles 11. by the Earl of Carnarvon, on
e proposed commitment of Lord Danby.
he Duke of Buckingham, who was the in
stigator of the impeachment against the no
bleman, first made the Earl half tipsy, and
then persuaded him into a high opinion of
his great talents for public speaking. The
Duke was well aware that the Earl of Car
narvon was a sworn friend to Lord Danby,
and expected that if he could once get the
Earl to speak in his behalf, he would be
guilty of some folly, which would equally
commit both his friend and himself. He
therefore urged the Earl to undertake Lord
D’s defence, “not from any favor to the
Lord Treasurer,” as the Parliamentry his
torian says, “ but only from ridicule.” The
Earl consented, and stood up in his place,
and delivered himself to this effect; “ My
Lords, 1 understand but little of Latin, but
a good deal of English, and not a little of
the English history, from which I have
learnt the mischief of such kind of prosecu
tions as these, and the ill fate of the prosecu
tors. 1 could bring many instances, and
those very ancient, but, my Lords, I shall
go no farther back than the latter end of
Queen Elizabeth’s reign: at which time the
Earl of Essex was run down by Sir Walter
Raleigh. My Lord Bacon he run down Sir
W. Raleigh, and your Lordships know
what became of my Lord Bacon. The
Duke of Buckingham he run down my Lord
Bacon, and your Lordships know what hap
pened to the Duke of Buckingham. Sir T.
Wentworth,, afterwards Earl of Stafford,
run down the Duke of Buckingham, and
you all know what became of him. Sir
Harry Yane, he run downtheEarl of Stafford
and your Lordships all know what became
of Sir H. Yane. Chancellor Hyde, he run
down Sir H. Yane, and your Lordships
know what became of the Chancellor. Sir
Thomas Osborn, now Earl of Danby, run
down Chancellor Hyde: but what will be
come of the Earl of Danby, your Lordships
can best tell. But let me see that man that
dare run the Earl of Danby down, and we
shall soon see what will become of’ him.”
The Parliamentary historian adds, that this
speech being pronounced with a remarkable
humour and tone, both surprised and disap
pointed the Duke of Buckingham, who after
his way cried out, “ The man is inspired—
claret has done the business.” The House
divided—and their Lordships, frightened by
the fate which had regularly befallen the
prominent movers in all former impeach
ments, decided against the commitment of
the Earl of Danby. The Commons com
plained that in so doing, the Lords denied
them justice. 7
Power Looms.—The power loom,
vented by the Rev. Mr. Cartwright, a
gyman of Refit, is one of the most ’
ous, efficient, and we win add, super-eminent
ly useful machines that has ever been
tructed. Mr. Cartwright states, in a
ifovAoHrirv latfav L! i.
in-
cler-
ingeni-
con-
nterestimg letter at
matyne, of Glass
him to
idea of con-
Mr. Cartwright replied, that
tuist. in that wise, set bis *'
work to invent a weaving mill. The Man
chester gentleman all declared that was im
practicable ;butMr. Cartwright denied that
there could be ahy greater difficulty in in
venting a machine to weave cotton than to
spin it; and meditating afterwards on the
subject of this conversation, he Succeeded
in constructing a loom, all the movements
of which were performed by the means of
machinery! Mr. Cartwright took out a pa
tent for his invention in 1787. The pro
gress of power loom weaving was not at
first so rapid as might have been expected.
This arose partly from imperfections that
originally attached to the machine, but
chiefly loMhe circumstance of its being ne
cessary to dress the web from time to time
aftei* they were put into the looms, which
made itnmpossible for one person to do more
than attend to one loom. But a beautiful
machine invented by Mr, Thomas Johnson,
of Bradbury, for warping and dressing the
yarn used as warps, has completely obvi
ated this difficulty; and, at this moment, a
boy or girl, of from 12 to 14 years of age,
can with ease attend to two power looms—
and can, by their means, produce three times
as much well woven cloth as could be pro
duced by the best hand weaver! During
the last ten years, the number of power looms
increased with astonishing rapidity. Accor
ding to Mr, Baines, there were, in 1818, in
Manchester, Stockport, and immediate vi
cinity about 2000 power looms; in 1821,
they had increased to 13732; and in 1825, in
the parish of Manchester, alone, they
amounted to upwards of 20,000 ! There are
now, probably, about 45,00G power looms
in Great Britain, employed in the weaving
of wool; of these there are supposed to be
about 8000 in Scotland.—Edin. Review.
ifA Luminous Bottle.—The following , is a
method of preparing a lurainons bottle
which will give sufficient light during the
nijght to admit of the hour being easily told
on the dial of a watch. A phial of clear
white glass, of a long form must be chosen,
and sWie fine olive oil, heated to ebullition
in another vessel. A piece of phosphurus of
the size of a pea must be put into the phial,
and the boiling oil carefully poured over it,
till the phial is one third filled. The phial
must be then unstopped to admit the exter
nal air, and when it is to be used, it must be
carefully corked again. The empty space
of the phial will then appear luminous, and
will give as much light as a dull ordinary
lamp. Each time the light disappears, on
removing the stopper it will instantly re-ap-
pear. In cold weather the bottle must be
warmed in the hands before the stopper is
removed. A phial prepared in this way
may be used every night for six months
with success.—Mechanics’ Magazine.
The Enchanted Gun.—It happened some
sixty or seventy years since, in the land of
pumpkins, that an honest old simpleton who
had been “to training” had made money
enough by throwing stones at a “ training
cake” to get very comfortably fuddled, even
without any draft upon his purse or the
“ four-pence-ha’-penay piece” laid by for
that purpose several months before. Some
wags who had kept more sober upon the
occasion than oufhero, not having had so
good luck at gingerbread gambling, loaded
his gun to the ver) muzzle, with alternate
charges of excellent “double battle” and
touchwood; starting him home ward,, took
care to put a red hot nail rod upon the top
most piece of touchwood. Uncle lchabod,
honest old soul; shouldered fire-lock and
took up his * line of march’ for home. He
had not gone far, however, before pop goes
the first charge from his gun—rather singu
lar, thought uncle lchabod, but a mere acci
dent doubtless; a charge being, left there
carelessly. A few rods further, bang! goes
the second charge, “ Lord a mercy,
says lchabod, “this is tamal strange, I
swaggers, but 1 guess it did’nt all go off the
first time, or else ’twould’nt go off again,
would it though ?” He had hardly finished
this dialogue with himself before off goes his
repeater again—“ My gracious!” exclaimed
our terrified militia man, f * the old boy is in
the gun. I never haird of sich a thing in mv
bom days”—an exclamation which he had
hardly concluded before his everlasting mus
ket struck four; and lchabod, having no
longer any fellowship for a weapon possess
ing such fearful continuity ofexplosion, very
prudently threw it over the fence, and made
rapid strides for the house of tbq clergyman,
having now no doubt thatjie or his gun was
bewitched. The clergyman"himself was not
without his doubts on the subject, after Ich-
abod had testified t*o the whole story, the
truth of which was Corroborated by several
distinct discharges from ttte gun in the place
where he had thrown it, which was within
plain hearing of the parties. -However,
while the matter remained subjudice, the
mischievous caitiffs, w)io had caused all the
alarm, arrived with the offending musket,
which made its last discharge in. the clergy
man’s presence, and refused further service
till re-loaded. If was never fairly settled,
however, between him and lchabod, wheth
er or not it was a case of real witchcraft-—a
matter which we are the first to put fairly at
rest, by detailing these particulars.
At the Court of Cassation of Paris, a
point of jurisprudence has just been decided,
which, it is hdped, may tend to check , the
practice of duelling, at least as fu]r as marri
ed meq and fathers of families are^oueprn-
cd. A Mr* Lellorrian tried for the mur
der of a Mr. Garel id a duel. Lellorrian
was acquitted of the rnWder, but was sen-
a.t *he suit of the widpw, to,the pay-
t of damages to the amount of 20,000
francs to her, and 4000 francs to her r.hjjL
dren, to be paid when they come of age, with
interest until that period.
The Toll of an Ass.—When the late Lord
Kaimes went to Aberdeen, as a judge upon
the circuit, he took up his quarters at a good
tavern; and being fatigued and pensive after
dinner he inquired of the landlord if there
were any learned man in the neighbourhood
who could favour him with his company over
a glass of wine. The landlord answered,
that the professor of mathematics lived close
by, and the Lord of Session sent his com
pliments. The professor was not only emi
nent in science, but of various and lively
conversation, though he had the defect of
La Fontaine and Thompson, both great
poets—that of a*stupid and dull appearance,
before it became enlivened by wine or com
pany. After a respectful bow, he took his
seat, and looked at the fire, quite immersed
in some problem he had left. Two glasses
of wine were filled and drank in complete
silence. Lord Kaimes, to begin the con
versation, said, “ I have just passed your
new bridge, wholly constructed of white
granite. What may have been the cost ?”
“ Can’t say,” was the dry answer of the
mathematician, who still looked at the fire.
My Lord, surprised and piqued, said, “ I
saw a board put up of all the tolls to be paid
by carriages and animals ; will .you be so
good as to inform me what is the toll of an
ass ?” The professor, as if awakening from
a dream, quickly retorted—“ I do not pre
tend to know, but when your Lordship re
passes, the toll gatherer cannot fail to inform
yon.” Our learned judge started Up, and,
taking him by the hand, exclaimed, “You
are my man!” and they began a long and
animated conversation.—JYew Lit. Gaz.
Remarkable Coincidence.—Died lately, in
Twinsbnrg, Portage county, Ohio, Moses
and Aaron Wilcox, aged about 50 years.
They, as we are informed, were twin broth
ers, born in Connecticut; they married on
the same day, their wives being sisters:
they hoped to have experienced religion on
the same day, and attached themselves to
the same church; and on the same day they
engaged in mercantile business together at
Middletown, and failed together: from
thence they removed and settled themselves
together, in this State, at a place which
from them derived the name of Twinsburg;
they were taken sick on the same day, and
were buried in the same grave, and have left
to their bereaved children the same rich in
heritance of an unsullied moral and Chris
tian character. The singular identity which
pervaded the character of these men, and the
events of their lives, manifested itself no less
in their persons. During their youth and
middle age, so nearly did they resemble each
other as to challenge the most discriminat
ing eye to distinguish them. Employed, in
the early part of their lives, in the neigh
bourhood of each other, as school teachers,
they were wont occasionally to change
schools, and always without detection on
the part of the scholars, of the change.
W hat reader of this, as he passes through
Twinsburg will not think of the twins?—
Cleaveland Herald.
Curious Punishment.—The following col
lection of a few of the many curious punish
ments, inflicted for various offences, is
copied from the old records of Massachu
setts, between the years 1630 and 1650.
“ Sir Richard Saltonstall, fined four bush
els of malt, for his absence from court.
“Josias Plastow shall, for stealing 4
baskets of corn from the Indians, return
them 8 baskets again, be fined 51. and here
after be called Josias, and not Mr. as he
used to be.
“Joyce Bradwick shall give unto Alex
ander Beek 2s. for promising him marriage
without her friends’ consent, and now re
fusing to perform the same.
“ Thomas Peter for suspicion of slander,
idleness and stubborness, is to b.e severely
whipt and kept in hold.
“ Richard Turner, for being notoriously
drunk was fined 21.
“ Edward Palmer, for his extortion, ta
king 33s. 7d. for the plank of Boston Stocks,
is fined 51. and censured to be set one hour
in the stocks.'
“ John White is bound in 101. to be of
good behaviour, and not to come into the
company of his neighbour Thomas Bull’s
wife alone.”
PROM THE NATIONAL INTELLIGENCER.
SURRENDER OF TWO OF THE PRAIRIE DU
CHIEN MURDERERS.
Extract of a letter from Col. M’Kenney, to
his friend in Washington City.
‘ “ You are already informed of our arrival
at this place, on the 31st ultimo, and that no
movement was made to capture the two
murderers, who were reported to us to be at
the village nine miles above, on account of
an order received by Major Whistler from
General Atkinson, directing him to wait his
arrival, and meantime to make no move
ment of any kind. We were, therefore,
after the necessary arrangements for de
fence and security, &c. idly, but anxiously
waiting his arrival, when, at about one o’
clock to-day we descried, coming in the di
rection of the encampment, and across the
Portage, a body of Indians, some mounted
and some on foot. They were, when first
discerned, on a mound, and descending it;
and, by the aid of a glass, we could discern
three flags; two appeared to be American,
and one white. We had received informa
tion the day before, of the intention of the
band at the village to come in with the mur-
•derers to-day, and therefore expected theqf,
and concluded this party to be on its way to
folfilthat intention. * In half an hour they
were near the 4tvcr, and MNMtfinuL
place,*when we heard singing; it was an*
nounced by those who knew the notes, to
be a iptfhsong; when presently, the river
being* only about a hundred yards across,
and %e Indians approaching it, those who
knew him said*" it,is the Red Bird singing
Iris. Heath Song*” On the moment of their
arrival at the landing, two scalp yells were
given, and th'ese were also by the Red Bird.
The Menominies'who had accompanied us,
were lying after the Indian fashion, in dif
ferent directions all over the hill, eyeing,
with a careless indifferehce, this scene ; but
the moment the yells were given, they
bounded from the ground as if they had been
shot out of it, and rounding in every direc
tion each to his gon, seized it, and throwing
back the pan, blacked the touch-hole, and
rallied. They knew well that the yells
were scalp yells ,* but they did not know
whether they were given to indicate two
scalps to be taken or two to be given; but in
ferred the first. Barges were sent across
when they came over; the Red Bird carry
ing the white flag, and We-kaw by his side-
************By this time the murderers
were landed accompanied by one hundred
and fourteen of their principal men. They
were preceded and represented by Cara-
minis, a chief, who earnestly begged that
the prisoners migh| Teceive good treatment,
and, und£r no circumstances, be put in irons.
************Th e murderers were march
ed up in front of the centre of the line—
some ten or fifteen paces from which, seats
were arranged, which were occupied by the
principal officers attached to the command,
myself, &c.; in front of which, at about ten
paces, the Red Bird was halted,' with his
miserable looking companion, We-kaw, by
his side, whilst his band formed a kind of
semi-circle to their right and left. All eyes
were fixed on the Red Bird; and well they
might be ; for of all the Indians I ever saw,
he is decidedly the most perfect in form,
and face, and motion. In height he is about
six feet, straight, but without restraint; m
proportion, exact and perfect from his feet
to his head, and thence to the very ends of '
his fingers, whilst his face is full of expres
sion and of every sort to interest the feel
ings, and without a single, even accidental
glacp, that would justify the suspicion that
a purpose of murder could by any possible
means conceal itself there. There is in it a
happy blending of dignity and grace; great
firmness and decision, mixed with mildness
and mercy. I could but ask myself, can
this be the murderer, the chief who could V
shoot, scalp, and cut the throat of Gagnier ? jj
His head too; nothing was ever so well **
formed. There was no ornamenting of the
hair after the Indian fashion; no clubbing
up in blocks and rollers of lead or silver; no
loose or straggling parts ; but it was ctttaf-
ter the best fashion of the most refined,
civilized taste.********In one hand he
held the white flag, and in the other the pipe
of peace. There he stood : he moved not
a nerve, nor once changed the expression of
his face. They were told to sit down: He
sat down with q. grace not less captivating
than he walked and stood. At this moment
the band on our right struck up and played
Pleyel’s Hymn. Every thing was still.
The Red Bird, looking toward the band, and
eyeing it with an expression of interest ;
and as if those pensive notes were falling
softly and agreeably on his heart. When
the Hymn was played, he t^ok up his pouch,
and taking from it some kinnakanic and to
bacco, cut the latter after the Indian fashion,
then rubbed the two together, fiHed the bowl
of his beautiful peace pipe, struck fire with
his steel and flint, into a bit of spunk, and
lighted it, and smoked. All this was done
with a grace no les?s captivating than that
which had characterized his other move
ments. He sat with his legs crossed.
If you think there was any thing of affec
tation in all this, you are mistaken.—There
was just the manner and appearance you
would expect to see in a nobly built man of
the finest intelligence, who had been es
corted by his armies to a throne, where the
diadem was to be placed upo:i his head.
There is but one opinion of the man, and
that is just such as I have formed myself,^''
and attempted to impart to you. I could
but speculate a little on his dress. His
white jacket, with but one piece of red upon
it, appeared to indicate the purity of his past
life, stained with, but a single crime ; for all
agree that the Red Bird had never before
soiled his fingers with the blood of the
white man, or committed a bad action. His
war pipe, bound close to his heart, appeared
to indicate his love of war, which was no
longer now to be gratified. Perhaps the
red, or scarlet cloth, may have been indica
tive of his name-the Red Bird.
All sat except their speakers, whose ad
dresses I took down, but indeed I have not
time to insert them here.
I will now pass on, and describe, as wenf
as I can, We-kaw, the miserable, butcher
looking being, who sat by his side. He is,
in all respects, the opposite of the Red Bird;
and you will make out the points of com
parison by this rule; Never was there be
fore two human beings brought together for
the same crime; who looked so totally un
like each other. Red Bird looked like a
prince, and fit to command and worthy to be
obeyed; We-kaw looked as if he was bora
to be hanged. Meagre, cold, dirty in his ,
dress and person, and crooked in hjs form :
like the starved wolf, gaunt and hungry, and
blood thirsty—his whole appearance indi
cates the existence of a spirit, waiy, cruel
and treacherous; and there is no room left
after looking at him, for pity. This is fee
man who could scalp a child no more than
eleven months old, and cut it across the back
of its neck to the bone, and leave it, bearing
off its fine locks, to suffer and die upon the
floor, near its murdered father! But his
hands, and crooked and miserable looking
fingers, had been wet often with blood before.
The Red Bird docs not appear to be over
thirty—yet he is said to be over forty. We-
kaw looked to be lorty-five, and is perhaps
that old " . jBfflfE* V ; 7.