Newspaper Page Text
D r" pc m
AMD HE GIVES HIS VIEWS UPON LEAD
ING TOPICS OF THE DAY
Prevented from (loins AmotiK Hist’oimlUn.
etift* lie Ala ken a fStrmiK Talk to the Voters
ell!:'. S£ii t'anscressional lVlstrlet. The Tur¬
in Hl»mv»ed at I.rnstli.
Congressman Carlton has been al
home for a week or so, and has fur¬
nished the Danner-’Watchman with the
following interview upon the tariff and
oilier leading questions in Congress.
It is lengthy and n il! crowd mtr space
for two weeks, but it is the clearest and
fullest exposition of the all-absorbing
ouestion that, we have vet seen, and wc
know it will prove 1 as interesting ° to our
readers , as any thing else , we could pi . in..
Your presence at home, Captain, I
suppose indicates an early adjounsent
of Congress? Congress has practically
‘-Oh yes,
been adjourned doubt for formally two weeks ad journ or mere,
and will no now
in a very few days. There has uot
been a quorum present in eitherjhe
' House or Senate for desired some days past,
Every member who to g» home
or was called hence by absence, business, lias
been granted a leave of only
enough members iu session remaining and to prevent to keep
Congress legislation, l’.y the any the
improper harshly and unjustly way, critieis
press has
< d Congress for remaining so long in
session. Especially lias this criticism
ill-become the Southern Democratic
press. It must be remembered that the
work before tbe present Congress was
necessarily no less tedious than it was
important . To have originated a tariff
bill in the House, upon which the whole
Democracy might stand united, and oil
which the Democratic party was to go
before the country, with the hope and
prospect of success in the Presidential
contest, was by no means When an easy or
speedy undertaking. and diversified you eon
template how varied are
the interests of the different states and
seetions of this vast country ot ours;
when you remember that there was do
volved upon the Democracy the duty of
rcducing taxation and reforming the
high protective of the republican party, the
ami under which the business of
country has beeu conducted for the past
twenty-live years, then you the begin tedium to
form some appreciation of
and magnitude of the work which was
before the Democratic House of Ilepre
sentatives. Furthermore, much of the
delay was caused by the obstructions
whieh the republican? in the House
were enabled to throw in the way,
not only of the Mills tariff bill,
bid, in tire way of any attempt, what
ever, at tariff reform, as is refusal fully
proven by their utter failure or
to offer a substitute for the Mills bill,
While on this point 1 would like to say
further, that I regard the refusal of the
majority in the House to bring forward
a resolution for an adjournment, there
by keeping the republican Senate in
session and forcing the republicans to
present a tariff bill, the finest piece the of
political strategy that lias marked
coil I SO of the Democracy for years,
You perceive that, by this course on the
pavtwf the Democrats, the Republicans,
as a just reward for their long standing
and continued hypocrisy, have been
forced into an inconsistency, which
Ihey cannot explain away, an insinccri
tv which they cannot, and dare n#t, at
t’empt to the justify discussion before of the the country, tariff in
During the republican members,
the House, untied republican
backed by the press,
took a most positive and uncompromis
ing position against any reform of, or,
as they express it. “tinkering with’’the
tariff Whatsoever. Upon this position and
(lie republican party was fully and
squnivly planted, as was plainly itsChiea
unmistakably platform.* promulgated Subsequently in the
go far popu
sentiment throughout the country
began to grow so strong in favor of such
revolution and change, as would cease
burdensome taxation upon the many
for the benefit of tbe protected the few,
and which was gathering into na
tional treasury an unjustifiable and un
heeded surplus of over $1.°>0,000,000, alarmed
that the republican Senators at
the outrages that their own party had
so long tTtc and so successfully practiced giv
upon country, would promised, that if the
en time they too present to
country a tariff bill. This was, as us
ual a promise, which to avoid the incoH
sistency of the position that party is
now in, they never intended to fulfill,
thinking and believing that the Demo
crats in"the House, eager to get home
iu order to enter the fall campaign,
would force an early adjournment, and
thereby relieve them of their mifortu
uate dilemma. lint, alas, they The inisjudg- much
ed the temper of the House.
Imped for adjournment did not come.
Time was given and the republican
Senate forced to fullil! its promise, and
unless we greatly mistake the signs of
the times, that party with its Chicago
platform on the one side, and its tariff
bill on the other, will, in its attempt te
steer the old ship of wrecked State through both tbe
republican strait, he upon
Scylla jtoes and Charybis."’ bill meet
the Mills your cor
dial endorsement, and do you think the
business of the country will be benefit
ted thereby if it should become a law?
•■Most unquestionably it does. 1
voted for it and worked hard to secure
its passage in the House. Of course,
for reasons already given, it may not
«ive all that the representatives of the
different States may have desired, and
perhaps might have been made more
favorable to our section, but it was the
best we could do. and is a long stride
in the right direction."
Do you think the mass of the people
sufficientlv understand the tariff ques
lion, to make it Ihe great and control
iie' i-sue of the Presidential campaign?
"Ob.vcs. Never in the history of
otr .rovernmeut w ere tbe fhi“ people question so
thoroughly educated upon
as«o»\ Not only has President Pleve
land's first message to the 50th Pen
wress (and of which the Mills hill mav
be said to be a counter part) started the
people to thinking upon this question,
but with the accumulation of a large
unprecedented, un justifiable and need
less surplus in the government treasury,
with the business depression, hard
times and great financial stringency in
certain sections of the country anil in
certain channels of trade and industry,
while in other sections and in other
more favored and protected industries
and enterprises there is such prosperity
and accumulation of wealth, as was
never before known in the history of
this or any other country, and which
ran close only relation be accounted the for by the too
between government
and these favored sections and individ
ual enterprises, 1 say, with these facts
and experiences, so constantly and op
pressively before the people, they have
gone into the full study of the cause of
this most un just and unnatural eondi
tiou of things, and you may rest assur
ed, with the full determination of affect
ing a remedy, through their sovereign
Power as expressed through the ballot
box. \ es, the people are last disabus
then" minds of that heretofore too
popular idea that the tariff was a deep,
intricate and incomprehensible the study question of which
of political economy, mystify, and regarding
only tended to
it in its true light,'have at last realized
that tariff means nothing more nor less
than taxation, and that*a high prefect
ive tariff simply means the levying, on
the part of the government, of a heavy
and burdensome indirect taxation upon
the many, for the benefit and support
of the few. Did ever a more unnatural
and unjust condition of affairs exist in
the history of any government, Till and it
must be apparent to that if left alone
and not reminded, peoplejthey through the sever
e ign power of the must in
exatably break down the government
and bankrupt the country. Is it not a
startling fact that this great govern
meut of ours, with its great power and
wealth is in llie lield of private enter
prise, crushing out the weak and build
ing up the powerful into a class of mo
nopolists and and capitalists wealthiest that aristocracy belittle
the strongest
of Europe? 1 wish you could be iu
Washington with me awhile to see the
powerful and unscrupulous crowd the lobby, corridors which of
daily Capitol. and hourly sole and
the Their purpose
aim in being there is to originate and
push through measures which will ben
elit certain particular and favored in
terests at the expense of the great
masses of the people, especially the the high ag
riculturalists as under present
protective tariff system, of they are paying such
ti, ( . greatest amount tribute to
unconstitutional plunder realize that and this robbery,
It is sad indeed to great
government of ours, ejected by our
fathers as the grandest political fabric
the world ever saw, has been so drag
»,>,] down as to become a mere com
mercial machine for the creation and
upholding of monopolies—trusts enriching tbe and al
combines, continually coffers of these fa
ready vored and overflowing protected few, to the
utter
bankruptcy and ruin of the many. Yes,
sir; the President’s message and the
Mills bill have made the issue square
between the two parties, and when con
sideling that for nearly a quarter of a
century the contests in our national
elections have been controlled almost
entirely by the issues which grew out
of the late civil war together with the
personal praise and abuse of candidates,
a-ul that during this long of period no
questions or principles administia
live government have, been suggested
or discussed, it may be said that they
have thrown American polities into a
condition as novel as it is important
The great masses of the people are be
ing fully aroused and it fast enlightened be
upon this issue, and must square
ly and fairly met in November. The
toiling and poorly-paid anxiously wage-earners inquiring into of
the country are
the cause of their unrequited labor,
The numerous labor strikes throughout
the land are but unnatural, expressions unjust of dissat- and
isfaction at the
unrenmnerative condition of affairs,
Tim farmers, confronted to-day with
the outrageous and unrighteous grinding bagging
trust, as well as other monop
olios, stand disheartened, dismayed and
disappointed in the midst of their op
pression and demand them a change in their that
system, which forces all of to the buy
farm implements aiul neees
saries of life iu a highly products protected mar
ket, and to sell the of their
labor in the free trade markets ef the
world. The great masses of the people
of whatever business interest or pursuit
are crying out against the creation of
millionaires and protected through government monopolies while sane
turned
they are struggling for comfortable ex
istenee beneath burdensome taxation,
They are startled at the plethoric con
dilion of the government tret,Bury,
which threatens bankruptcy to the bus
iness interests of the country, which
depresses labor, which continues their
poverty, and which condition of affairs
will doubtless be met by their over
whelming condemnation at tbe Novem
her election.’’
In what way dees the high protective
tariff benefit the few te the injury of
(he many, and what is the difference
between the Mills bill and the Senate
tariff bill?
claimed “Well, that the the protectionists tariff levied have ever for
was
the protection of American ntanufac
torics and American wage-earners,
That import duties laid upon all foreign
manufactured articles, built tip the
home market, enabled cheapened American the price of
goods and the better and higher man
ufacturers to pay
wages. The very argument itself is
fallacious, to say nothing of what the
experience under this high protective
system has proven. I have yet fo be
apprised of tliefact that American man
ufacturers are more magnanimous, gen
erous and benevolent than other busi
ness men of the world. Then, in the
name of common sense and reasoning
what do they want to be protected from
foreign the competition price of their for. if manufactured it is to cheap
en
goods and higher at the same their time force them
to I don't pay wages the to American employees? people
suppose
will continue any longer to be deceived
by any such fallacious argument. Now
for the sake of the argument let us ad
niit that what the protectionists claim
is true; then haw does the matter stand?
From the census of 1880 we find that
the actual number of people in this
country employed iu manufacturing
was 2-738,805. Now these 2,7518.805
people are the whole number said to he
beuelitted bv protection, and to whom
the who’e remaining 57,2151,105 of our
population has to pay tribute in the
shape of tariff tax. .Vow. manufacturing, if protection
helps those engaged in would ask,
and which I deny, where. 1
is the right or justice in forcing so large
a majority of the people to pay tribute
to so small a minority? Does protec
tiou cheapen the price of goods? Don't
everybody know that if foreign goods
are kept out of our markets by an inl¬
port duty, our manufacturers are o im¬
bled to raise the price of their goods, and
the full amount of the import duty
often even with a profit on that amount?
Who. then, but the purchasers or Does con
sumers pay this increase of price?
it need an argument to show or prove
that if it was not for this high protoc
live duty, levied upon foreign them goods,
the consumer could purchase at a
lower price? A\ hen you go to Atlanta
or Now York and price a suit of clothes
at 935 or $40 and then go over to To
routo in Canada and find that you can
buy the identical, if not better, suit of
clothes from $8 to $10; also a late style
derbv hat for$1.00that you would have
to pay $3 for in Xcw York or Atlanta
then you will begin to realize how a
protective tariff don't cheapen goods
to the consumer. Does it increase
wages to the employe? So it does not.
The recent investigation ordered by
Congress, and which was made in the
city of Vow York as to the immigration
of foreigners to this country developed
the fact that at least 70 if not SO per
cent, of the operatives employed which in
New protected England industries manufactories, of the Country, are
the
were cheap, pauper laborers from Eu
rope, and which state of affairs had
driven the American laborers proper
to seek a living in the far West. The
same protective duty which increases
the price of goods to the the employees ordinary cen
sinner increases it to en
gaged in the very manufactory, where
they are made. Then again admit for
the sake of the argument that protection
does increase the wages of the em
pierces, and to remove it would reduce
them, say 25 per cent, or from #2 to
$1.50 per day. Would not the em
plovees he the gainers? Would net the
purchasing power of his wages he in¬
creased more than the amount of de
duction they had sustained? Could he
not buy much more with his $1.50 with
the tariff tax off thaw he could with his
$2.00 when the tariff lax was added to
the price of the goods he purchased?
Protectionists oppose the introduction
into our markets of cheap introduction foreign pro
ducts, I would ask if the
into our country of cheap foreign and
pauper labor by American manufaetur
ers, for the purpose of making high
priced goods for American far consumers for
and laborers, is not worse out¬
people and our country,
As I have before said, the vast major
itv of our population, are made, to suf
fe'r, (to useastren “blackmail’’ term) hv the goveru- them,
mein levying aggrandize and enrich upon the fa
in order to
vot ed and population, protected few, the but farmers ofallclass
es of our are
made te sutler the most, under this pro¬
tective tariff system. There are. 7JI70,
000 of our population actually employ
ed and at work in the pursuit of farm
ing. In 1880, there were 4,008,907 sep- he
urate farms of all kinds and sizes in t
United States. The value of these
farms, without any movables on them,
was $10,107,007,770, and while the
whole capital invested in manufaclur
ing in 1KK0. was $2,700,272,000, compared or val- not
quite 28 per cent, as with
ue of the farms, without estimating the
stock and they cattle thereupon. affected by Now tariff let's
see how are the
which is levied for the protection of
the manufacturing interest. There is a
duty on wheat, but wliat good does it
do the farmers? Our annual export of
wheat is mere than one. hundred and
tit'ty fold greater than the annual im
port of wheat into this country, while
our annual export of flour is from 8
000,000 to 10,000,000 barrels. The price
at which he can sell his wheat in New
York, is the T.oudon or Liverpool price,
less the freight and charges. Now say
wheat is selling in London for $1.0.'! per
bushel of <50 pounds. Then it vvoul be
worth 93 cents per bushel in New York
dcductiuglflcentsporbushelforfreight, and prolits London. The
charges price for granulated to in Loudon
sugar
3 1-2 cents per pound, and the price for
the same sugar is 5 ff-4 cents per New pound, York
Then 10 bushels of wheat in
at 93 cents per bushel, which is $9..'i0.
would buy about 102 pounds ofgranu- pound,
lated sugar at 5 3-4 cents per
while the same amount of wheat, in
London, at the same price, would buy
about 202 1-2 pounds pound, of 103 llie 1-2 same pounds at
3 1-2 cents per or
more than he could get in the home
market at New York. What is true of
the farmer's wheat is likewise true of
his corn, which is almost exclusively,
if net entirely, a product of export in
this country. The same trade regula
tious govern the one as the other, and
the difference in the purchasing power
of the corn in the New York and Lon
dou markets is in the same ratio with
that of the farmer's wheat.
Now let us inquire about the tariff
tax on salt, necessities which is perhaps, (he great
estof the of the farmer. The
duty on salt ia 82 per cent, or about 83
per cent, on hulk salt, and 30 per cent,
on salt in bags. The fishermen of this
country engaged in curing fish for the
markets, and who are the especial pets
of the Eastern tariff makers, get their
salt free of duty, or if it is paid, it is rc
mitted to them, besides the profit they
make upon the weight of the salt in the
sale of their fish, while the poor indtis
trious and hard working farmer has to
pay the high rate of duty for every
pound of salt he uses. .Inst to think
that the national treasury groaning un
der a surplus of over $130,000,bOO, col
lefts annually in the neighborhood of
on foreign salt. The home
production of salt is valued at about
OtiO.tiO i or $0,000/100 annually, and this
being increased from $2,000,000 te $3,
0O3/KI0, by reasan of the tariff duty, it
will therefore be seen that the country
at large pays a tax of about $3,000,<#I0
fer the u«e of its salt, more than one
half of which is paid by the fanners,
Many mere outrages and hardships
which cotue of our American piratical
tariff system I might be cited. call
Just here want to your atten¬
tion to a few other facts, cxecrcisrd showing under how
the taxing power was
republican administrations. During the
war. and after the duties on imports
been so largely increased, thus giving
great advantage and most generous
bounties to our home manufacturers in
creasing their profits front 18 to 40 per
cent. Congress in order to moot the
heavy demands upon the government,
by reason ot the war, le\ iecl a.slight tax
upon those home pioduets. I t was a
duties paid ami hv Si upon'foreign
:unountC<l products, the if 1 remember correctly, about
ill which' year 1SS?» to
$127,000,000, was about 5 per
cent upon the value of their products,
for the same year. This was a tax upon
thS wealthy manufacturers of the conn
try, but as soon as the. war was over,
they cumplaitiefl that it was a war tax.
and it was repealed. Congress likewise
imposed a companies, tax upon railroad companies,
insurance express cstnpn
nics, banks, their capital, checks, di
poslts, etc., also upon all incomes ex¬
ceeding wealthy the amount exempted and by law.
These corporation* indi¬
viduals complained about this burden
ef taxation upon them, did not think it
just to require them to pay anything
for the support of the government, so
the law imposing these taxes was re
pealed, while the burden of taxation,
upon the laboring increased and toiling by raising masses the of
the people, was
tariff duties upon all the necessities of
life, far beyond 'This what they in relieving were during the
the war. outrage
wealth of the country, from aiding in
the support of the government, and
thereby increasing the burden of taxa¬
tion upon the poverty stricken masses
of the couutry, is made all the more ap¬
parent when vve reflect that it was done
at a time when our public debt was
more than $2,000,000,000, than $140,000,000
something more the interest thereon. an- II
nttally to pay and favored
this wealthy government
class of -our citizens had been required
to bear their just and legitimate share
of the burden of taxation for only a
few years longer, we would to-day have
no national debt, and the millions of
,mmm '"’ so 10 “ ,t ”""
sinking fund, and to pay interest on .the
public debt, could be given hack to the
toiling masses, who, by reason of gulf, gov¬
ernment oppression, behold-tin'
between a hare support and absolute
ruin widening and deepening year after
year. Well, have asked “what is
you me,
the difference between the Mills bill
and the Senate tariff hill?”
From what I have already said about
the republican party and its connect ion
with tariff legislation for the past twen¬
ty-live years, 1 suppose it would he
enough to say, that the one is a Repub¬
lican bill, and the other a Democratic
bill. The .Mills bill reduces the present
average rate of tariff duty of 47-10 per
cent, to 42-49 per cent., which is $4.01
reduction on the present average rates
on every $100 worth of goods imported.
This makes the total reduction on the
revenues derived from Imports $50,-
591,030 89, of which amount $30,832,-
791 38 are reductions on the dutiable
list, and $19,785,845 51 are reductions
from articles placed on the free list.
These reductions are almost entirely
upon the necessaries of life, while the
luxuries are left to bear the burden of
tariff taxation. Does the simple re¬
duction of the present average rate of
tariff from 47-10 per cent, to 42-49 per
cent, in order that the cost of the actu
al necessaries burdened of life may he cheapened
(o 00,000,000 and oppressed
consumers, and that too, when there
are $130,000,000 the more in the need treasury for,
than government has any
look much like “free trade?" And vet
the Republicans say the Mills bill is a
free trade bill.
The Senate tariff hill proposes a re¬
duction in the revenues of the govern¬
ment of $73,750,000, and places 'more
articles on the, free, list thau the Mills
bill does, hut they are articles of luxu¬
ry, and netartielesof necessity. Don't
this look more like “free trade” than
the Mills bill?
Of the $73,750,000 reduction propos¬
ed by the Senate hill, $52,250,000 arc
taken from the products of while agriculture, the
$7,000,000 from w hiskey, tar¬
iff tax is reduced only $ 14 , 500,000 and
scarcely any of that reduction is madc
ttpon the necessaries of life. (Hie very
noticeable lick that the Senate biil
makes at the farming interest of the
country, and that too in the interest of
one of the government pets, is this:
The Mills bill puts bagging ties on the
free list. The Senate bill increases the
tax from 35 per cent ad valorem, to a
specific ad tax, equivalent to about 118 per
cent valorem.
The effect ef the Mills bill, should it
become law, will be to lighten the bur¬
den of taxation and increase the happi¬
ness and prosperity of the masses of the
people, who earn their living by daily
toil.
The effect of the Senate bill, should
it become law, will he to continuf* the
goveriimentbountiestotlie wealthy and
favored monopolists, capitalists and cor
potations, who have already been made
millionaires at the expense of the labor
ing masses, who create the wealth of
the country.
For a better statement of the Uiffer
enee between these two bills. 1 berrj
with hand you an extract which I have
clipped “The essentia] from the difference minority report, made tin¬
between
House bill and the Senate substitute is
apparent and radical at the outset in
the matter of revenue. One is framed
in the interest of the public treasury;
the other in the interest of
pockets. One is framed in the interest
of the whole people; the other in the
interest of three hundred maim fact ur
ers. One is designed to reduce both
government revenue aad taxation—tax
ation, especially, which hears heaviest
on the necessaries of life; tbe other is
intended to raise a public revenue,
d* e l, but to maintain private revenues
l>v increasing and retaining taxation on
all the necessaries of life. The advo
cates of the substitute freely propose to
reduce Ihe duties or abolish them on
things which yield only governmen rev
enue, but refuse to reduce or abolish
the duties on those things which pro¬
duee private revenue,
{< o-xeci'otp in N^x-p tssi x.]
j My Poor Back! • ;
. , , , _ ,
i 1 nat s me common exclamation of those suffering . with rheumatism or kidney troubles. In
either disease Paine’s Celery Compound will surely effect a cure, and there will no longer he
an y Cause to complain of “poor backs.” Hundreds of testimonials like the follow
ing confirm our claims for that grand old remedy, Paines’s Celery Compound:
“Two weeks ago I could not sleep /> /r^-\ more than an hour at a time any night,
was constipated and kidneys did not act, and had a good deal of pain in the
back. Since I took Paine’s Celery \jK / Compound the pain has left my back,
and I can sleep like a child.” Zenas ft' 'j WvY. Sanders, West Windsor, Vermont.
“ 1, ’ c °" ,ro " blea wilh rh ™ matism for C:ve 1 wa * a,mo<t ” na!,1 «
° ^ ''cry_often con fined to my . bed tor weeks at a time. I
have used nearly all medicines imaginable, besides outside advices, hut to no advan
ta U5C( C«. 1 only Having one seen bottle Paine’s and am Celery perfectly Com JT cured. pound advertised, 1 can I gave jump it around a trial. and I have feel
now
lively as a boy.” Prank ("aroli, l-'.ureka, Nevada. /V/.v, $r.oo. Six for fj.oo.
Solo iiy Drihkusts. Sknd for S-i-acf. Tistimonial Paper.
WELLS, RICHARDSON & CO., Proprietors.
BURLINGTON, VERMONT.
_
November Bth fo Oeeember !§tii, 1088 .
h
A MINIATURE WORLD ON 93 ACRES I
Augusta ^National ^Exposition!
The Largest Exposition Ever Held in the South !
Every Description of Mechanical Ai l Exhibited—Every Description of the
I’rmluets of the Soil, Vegetable and Mineral Every Description
of Hu 1 work of Matt's Brain and Hand Every Description
of the handiwork of Woman. The linest horses
in the country will lake part in (lie
nice. Day and night carnivals.
Music by Cuppa's Band.
■ . JH 111 - -1 K 1 j N^rT* i»i ^ ■ i . . ^ l^- .ai, ^ nim.i im»».| _i /v
I ' I7~ m ■ T .C -rr -
And Gainesville, Jefferson & Southern Railroads
WILL SELL ROUND TRIP TICKETS
From 1‘oints named at following Low Bales, which include transportation
to and from t lit* (Irounds and Admission.
Sale of Tickets Commences November 7th, Closes Decomber 15 th.
TO AH JUNTA AND RETURN FROM—
Lexington,....... .... 12. jO
Wintei'villo....... . ... 2.90
Athens,......... .... 3.05
Antioch,..... . .. . 2.00
LIMIT OF TICKETS FIN E DAYS„& ;
JOE W. WHITE, E. R. DORSEY,
Traveling Passenger Agent. Deneral Passenger Agent.
AUGUSTA, GA.
FURNITURE FOR ALL!
MARTIN BROS.
Crawford, (la., have just received direct from the factory
TWO CAR-LOADS FURNITURE
Embracing every Style and Quality
AT PRICKS TO SUIT THE TIMES.
Having bought ala bargain, it direct from know the makers, for spot, cash, this
large shipment of Kuril tire, we we can make to the inter¬
est of the buyer to see it before they buy. We have
handsome full suits ranging from the cheapest
to the highest, spring and cotton mat¬
tresses, chairs of all grades.
IjrgrAT PRICES THAT WILL ASTONISH YOU.
MABTI 1 T BEOS.,
CTS.A.-WTF’OIRID, GLA..
IE UE OVERSTOCKED!
AND MUST UNLOAD !
We Have More Furniture than Room!
And to get it off our hands we will for the next few weeks offer
LJ l-s I » I • . ( I K T I) | I i f |—« t\ JWI r. pi » t " P I O
VJ 1 ^''***“ a*^ L/ W J r-*
To buyers. Our stock embraces every! li ing in Hie line needed bv the pco
i»)e of this section, and we will sell it lower than vim ever saw
Furniture sold in Ibis F-imilv-mil market We have also a eom
‘ oiete a 1 line of ‘ Fauev Hroeeries -if
■■■ , ,
eoi ie--|» imnugiv low pm t>.
LARUE LINE DIFFERENT MAKES OF STOVES!
McMAHAN & WILKINS,
(Jrn\vl*or<l, ( jeorgin.
Maxoys...........
Bnirdstown.......
Wood\ille,.......
Fnion Point......