Newspaper Page Text
HIE HEIiALL
St JMCfIPTfOX .-
$2 00.
(!. HEARD.— Proprietor.
11. T- LEWIS. - - Klitor.
THURSDAY
Tbnrtdn), June 15, ISS2.
Deniortuatfr Eseculivo Com
milter .fleet in;;.
Pursuant to a call of the Chair
man, the Executive Committee of
the Democratic Party of Greene
county, met at the Court-House
in Grernesboro’ on this (sth) jday
of June.
Mr. II P. Williams was reques
ted to act as Secretary.
On motion of Cpt. L. B. Willie,
it was
Resolved. That a Convention of
the Democratic Patty of the coun
ty is hereby called to assemble at
the Court-House in Greenesboro’
on the first Tuesday in July next,
at I I o'clock, a. tn., to elect dele
gates to the Gubernatorial Conven
tion, and to take such further ac
tion as the Convention miv deter
mine. Wm. 11. BRANCH,
11. P. W 11. LI A MS, Ch’u.
,Se’y.
I> tIM ISI.YMIUF I V OFFICE
The probable candidacy of Mr.
Stephens for the Chief Executive
Office of the State has given rise to
discussion among some Democratic
papers, a9 to whether or not Geor
gia should have a partisan Govern
or. Mr. Stephens has announced
that, if elected, he will not be a
partisan officer. The Constitution
lias found in this one reason for ad
vocaiing bis nomination; snd the
Teletrruph k Messenger for the
same reason opposes him. If each
of these journals had given specifi
cally its definition of the word
Partisan, there would probably be
no substantial difference of opinion
between them; and it would likely
be discovered that their contest on
this point in the controversy has
been merely a logomachy.
Webster defines the word to mean
“an adherent to n party;” he also
says that it is ‘‘appropriate to one
who is unreasonably devoted to his
party interest ” Now, it is not
Ukely the Constitution will contend
that our Governor should be st
itched to no party; nor is it likely
its opponent weuld advocate that
this officer should bo unreasonably
devoted to his party or interest.
It is expected of a Chief Execu
tive Officer of any Government
who has decided political convic
tions. who belongs to ono of two
political parties that divide the
people, and who is elected on the
strength of his political faith, that
he will adopt such a course in offico
as will most effectually impress his
views upon the administration of
the Government, and as will best
carry out his policy and that of his
party. This object could not be
accomplished unless he had an eye
to the politics of all those who fill
important positions of honor and
trust under him. It would boa
suicidal policy for him to appoint,
for instance, to fill certain politi
cal offices the foes of his par
ty, who by filling such positions
would have instruments in hand
that would tend to disrupt the par
ty in certain sections, or would en
danger its strength and harmony
Such a course would not only bo
bad policy, but it would be a
breach of the trust reposed in him
by the people who elected him.—
The success of one of two contend
ing political parties moans, that
the policy of the triumphant ot.e
shall prevail as long as it is in
power. Otherwise there would be
no reason in any citizen's adher
ing to any party organization. To
this extent above indicated we be
lieve in partisanship.
But all just men will contend,
that every officer in the discharge
♦>f his official duties should meet
>ut equal and exact justice under
the laws of the land to all citizens,
regardless of class, color, or party.
That government becomes oppress
ive whose agents administer its
laws with partiality and prejudice
in favor of or against a particular
els 6.
There is another species of par
tisanship which perhaps has been
a greatr evil in our State than any
other. We refer to that barter and
sale name among politicians which
has for years cursed this country.
The emoluments of office have been
too often lavished upon those
whose highest claims for promotion
have been thei* devotion to the in -
terest of the official giver. Too of
ten is the bargain made by the po
litical aspirant with hts parasite af
ter this style : “Aid uie in secur
ing this position, and I will reward
you with such an office in my gift;’’
or “aid my friend to seedre this
place, and I will assist yours to se
cure that.” There are more ways
to bribe than one. There are oth
er means by which to buy arid sell
besides gold and silver. This po
litical trading has led to the ap
pointment ef many incompetent and
dishonest persons to fill positions
of trust, to the exclusion of men
of real merit and integrity. Wo
long to see our offices filled by men
who can enter upon the discharge
of their duties without being ham
pered by promises, or weighed
down by obligations to return po
liticr.l favors,-—men whe will have
an eye single to the good of the
country, and n it wrapped up in the
interest of their frieuds, relatives
or supporters.
This is our platform on the sub
ject of partisanship, and we be
lieve it is cne upon which Mr. Ste
phens squarely stands.
• jiLMur-Xu. a.
As will he seen in another column
of this issue, “Juuius” again writes,—
He evidently dies hard; but Call he
must in this controversy. We do not
mean to arrogate to ourself superior
powers of reasoning; hut simply to
maintain and to demonstrate that the
position of this paragon of legal lore
and political economy can not stand in
the light of truth and reas n.
Ho still contends that the Act of
1819 as amended in 1824 (that is the
particular section of that Act which he
quotes) is now io force.
In the first place, he does not at
tempt a reply to the construction we
put upon the words of this Act; which
shows that it ia no authority lor him
whatever even if it was in force. It is
useless to repent our views on this
point.
Ua the Act boen tepealed or super
seded ? Why there is not a section of
it in force. We thought it was suffi
cient in our last issue to call attention
to tho fact that the law on tho subject
would be found in the Code; and that
the words quoted by ‘Junius’ from this
old Act are not embodied therein.
We will say for ‘Junius'' benefit
that whenever our liiwr are codified, it
is the purpose and duly of the oodi
tiers to compile all the general laws in
one volume that are in force at the
time of publication. We have before
us the Codes of Georgia, published in
1861, 1867, and 1873. In every one
the codifiers have left out ‘Junius’’
law. Now, “Junius/ these men who
compiled our laws, among them com
mittees learned in the law appointel
hv the Legislature to revise their work,
backed by Acts of the Legislature
specifically ratify in c their work, all
thought your law was long since a dead
letter. So the issue on this point is
not between us alone, but between you
and the men reforred to. W# wiil
leave it to our readers who is the bet
ter authority on a question of law, you
or they.
Now we will call attention to some
of the Statutes—when they were pass
ed— at present in force upon the sub
ject. If ‘Junius’ had only turned over
one leaf in Oohbs Digest ho would have
found an Aot passed about 22 years
after the one he read from, entitled
“.4/1 Art to alter and amend the scr
een/ Acts i/i relation to Itinerant
Traders” etc; and in its provisions, in
stead of finding the words he quoted,
the only thing, pertaining to the power
of any city over itinerant traders, he
would have discovered in See. 4:
“Nothing in this Act shall ba con
strued to take from the corporate au
thorities of the City of Savannah, the
power to regulate peddlers within the
limits of the city.” Again, if ho would
have come down still further in his
research among our Statutes, he would
have found the law on the subject still
further modified in 1859, 1860, 1866,
etc. etc.. Now the compilers of our
laws, as embodied in the Code, culled
out of all these statutes what they con
ceived to be in force, dnd left out what
was not in foree
But is it not strange that the Su
preme Court has never thought of
Junius’ ’ law, in any of its modern de
cisions (some of which he has quoted)
relating to the power of different cities
total business? 'Junius' ought to
give that Court the benefit of his re
search. It has been wonderfully care
less in ov*ilooking law. Hut perhaps
he is simply trying to teach us what
Inula the codifiers, committees of the
Legislatures, the Legislatures them
selves, and the Supreme Court have
been on this subject.
‘Junius'again quotes the 62 Ga ;
quote* the points nude in Com
plainants Hill in that ca*e, and says
the Supreme Court overruled all these
points without the mention of any
special grant. Why the very issue in
that case was whether or not the
Charter of Macon gave power to tax
business. This was stated by Judge
Jackson in the beginning of the judg
ment of the Court, rendered by him on
p 649. And on the very next page
the Court cites as its own authority 60
Ga. p. 133, in which it definitely de
cided that Macon had this authority to
tax business from the special provision
we referred to. Rend it,‘Junius,' an<l
learn. We have not time again to call
your attention it.
'Junius' quotes another authority
Ga.) and contends that tho City of
Albany has no more specific grant of
power on the subject of taxation than
is in our Charter; and yet tlie Supreme
Court say that under its provisions
business may be taxcu. Our Charter
by its terms coufines taxation to real
and personal properly within the city
limits Tho Charter of Albany au
thorizes a “levy of such taxes as may
be necessary for the support of the
city government, and in such a way as
shall be deemed by them to operate
most equally on all the citizens aad
property within the corporate limits of
l ho city-” Why, here is a specific
grant in tho Charter of Albany to its
Council to levy such tax upon its citi
zens or properly as tho Council deem
equal and proper. And yet ‘Junius’
sees no difference butwern this Charter
and ours! Suppose the Charter of
Albaoy had read “to levy such tax
upon the real and personal property in
the city limits as the Council saw fit;
would ‘Junius' then contend there was
no difference? If so, he is too blind
to distinguish light from darkness; and
we are not responsible for bis want of
discrimination. —lf the Charter of Al
bany had read as we just suggested,
then ‘Junius would never have found
this case in the Supreme Coutt reports;
for that town would hardly have fur
nished a lawyer who would have con
tended that the power to tax property
only, carried with it the power to tax
business also.
But it will bo seen by reading the
case cited in 60 Ga. that the tax re
sisted in that case was upon a resident
carrying on a certain busiusss in the
city limits—retailing liquor. We do
not think even Albany has the power
to tax a non-resident, itinerant (ruder,
simply because the provisions quoted
by 'Junius’ confines its power of taxa
tion upon its citizens; that is, it* resi
dents.
1 1 is reply to the law we quoted on
him in 55 Ga„ p. 678-682, is that he
never ask jd the C mneil to tax non
resident peddlers. Why, this was the
very burden of his whole argument last
week. Here, ‘Junius,’ is where you
utterly dodge the issue. In the very
beginning of your first article you set
out to prove that (I quote from you)
• our city authorities had a right to
levy a tax upon a party coming here
from a distance to sell goods by sample."
All the way through you argued that, non
resident retailers should be taxed. You even
contended that they should be taxed to the
exclusion of the wholesale drummers.—
Now in reply to all this we quoted on you
the decision in 55 Ga, which establishes
beyond doubt the principle that even if a
city has the chartered right to tax itiner
ant traders, it oau not discriminate against
certain ones of the class. Now you take it
all back, and say “Let the tax on peddlers
be uniform so as to apply to all itinerant
traders, whether they live in Gruenesbore’
or Atlanta.” Our medicine may have been
the “weakest of all homeopathic prssorip
lions,’’ but it was sufficiently strong to
act as a powerful emetic and make you
disgorge the food you had been feeding
on, and which it had rendered so distaste
ful to you.
Your declaration, above quoted, takes in
all itinerant traders. Out before you get
through you tetrad a part of tilts, and
wish to exclude the wholesale fellow. If
you have not a right to exclude the resi
dent peddler, what right have you to ex
clude the class that xells to merchants ?
The very decision you read In 60 Ga. de
clares that “all taxation shall be uniform
upon the same class of subjects to bo taxed
within ths territorial limits of the author
ity levying the tax, that is to say, that if a
tax of twe.ity-five dollars is levied upon the
class of liquor dealers in -aid city, the
same tax must he levied upon all of that
sums class f subjects in order to make it
uniform.” Hence we say that if you tax
itinerant traders, you must tax. all of this
class, whether wholesale, retail,resident in
the city, county, or elsewhere. If‘Junius’
had rea l the decision in 56 Ga., he would
have seen that even Atlanta, with its
special grant of power to tax peddlers,
could not discriminate in favor of those
coming in wagons from the country or
i lsewhere.
He says he has a list of fees charging
I peddlers from Atlanta: and asks if Atlanta
I could be successfully prosecuted for col
lecting tliis tax would these authorities
continue to impose it? II is reasonable to
infer that the Council of Atlanta has
changed its Ordinance on the subject since
the decisiou in 65 <>a., so us to conform to
its Charter. If it has not, the Supreme
Court has decided the question about its lia
bility to a suit for damages.
“Junius" thinks it is absurd to say that
Atlanta may lax Greenesboro’ peddlers;
but Greenesboro’ can not tax Atlanta ped
dlers. It is absurd, is it to say me
city lias more power delegaled to it than
auot her ? Whether absurd or not, any
man who will lead the Charter of Atlanta
and compare It with the Charter of our
tow n, who has sense enough to keep him
out of the insane asylum, is obliged to con
clude Mint the former city has tenfold more
power delegaled to it than our country
town. The great mistake “Junius" makes
in discussing the law of this question, is
assuming that what one ci*y can do, all can
do. You might as well look into the pre
rogatives of a king to find out what Jug
Tavern can do, as to look into the Charter
of Atlanta to learn what Jpover the Town
Council of Greenesboro’ has.
So much for “Junius’ ” reply to our
views oftlie law on (his question.
“Junius” fttrthev says, that our state
ment that the merchants here are paying
no city tar, is unsupported by facts. What
we stated was, that lie (Junius) was not
nmv paying a cent of city tax. He seeks to
controvert this statement hy saying, that in
1880 the merchants did pay a city tax. In
other words, he proves what now exists by
what did exist two years since. We have
been a resident here over five years—this
being the sixth year. Hut one year with
in this time has any tax been assessed by
our Council; and that was in 1880, when
the bar rooms were closed. “Junius” ad
mits that no tax for this year has been as
sessed—but that one of the City Council in
formed him it u-ould have to be paid. Three
have informed us that in their judgment it
would not have to be paid; giving as a rea
son that the license fees of the bar-rooms
here would be sufficient to carry them
through, as they have been in previous
years, except when they were closed One
of the Council further informed us, that
they had had a vote on the question, and
voted against assessing a tax. Now, “Ju
nius”, which one of us has misstated facts?
He says that we “wish to excuse the
peddler from a house in Atlanta flora pay
ing license here, on the plea that his house
pays tax in Atlanta.” IVc made no such
statement aj a reason why such a tax should
not be imposed. “Junius” is old enough
to have seen at a casual glance at what we
said, that we presented no such plea. He
intimated in his article last week, that the
ritail drummer should be taxed so as to
put the same lax on him with the resident
merchant; and what we said on the subject
of his paying tax in Atlanta was in reply
to this position of “Junius”; and the reply
wav conclusive.
lie charges us with saying last week,
that our merchants here have fixed their
prices so high, that itinerant tradera from
a distanoe must be invited to coma to
Greenesboro’ to protect our citizens from
extortion. In the name of all that is truth
ful, where did he get this idea from?—
Here is all we said on the subject of soiling
at too high a figure: “If (ho merchant here
can not compete with the Atlanta merchant
in prices, after freight is paid, then it is
evidence that the former is selling at too
high a figure: and if there are not home
merchants to compete witli him, foreign
ones should be invited instead of repulsed.’’
Now where is the charge in these words of
extortion? We made a simple statement tha*
a child could understand. We stand by it,
and reiterate it. “Junius”, instead of trjing
to controvert what we said, or admit its
tru li, is guilty of the grossest misrepre
sentation. He either knew his assertion as
to what we said was false; or he did not
know wliut he was writing about If he
knew it was false, then he can probably
find in the Becalogue the siu he has been
guilty of. If he dtd not know what be was
writing about, then he was inexcusably ne
gligent in not posting himself before he
went off half cocked.
“Junius” intimates that we were writing
in the interest of an Atlanta client. Not a
word on thisjsubject have we penned in the
interest of any client. We would scorn to
use the press for any such purpose. The
case referred to was fully and finally decid
ed in favor of that client, before tie wrote
a line on the subject. So what we have
said can not possibly affect said client’s in
dividual interest or our own. “Junius”
must not j udge others by himself, lie
probably neve.' did auy thing in his life
exoept in his own interest. How is it with
hitn in this case? Has he had no
individual interest in this matter? Who
his been active among our people to have
this tax imposed? Who engaged counse
to sec that tho tax was levied? Who are
the people whose interests ive have over
looked ? “Junius”, “ Junius ” is the peo
ple ! He is the communiiy craving protec
tion! He says we have permitted the
lawyer to bury the [editor. lie has buried
law, reason, justice iuil every thing else in
the interest of the merchant, not the mer
chants. So blinded was he by that interest
that when he wrote hie first article, he ac
tually thought no one but.the merchant
paid Slate, county and city tax. This was
the only reason he urged why the mer
chant should be protected, iu preference to
any other elass. On this subject, ‘Junius,*
yeu enjoy one of the attributes that belong
ed to the character of Bonaparte: you are
“wrapped in the solitude of your own orig
inality " You will not be apt to find any
one who will ever wish to keep you compa
ny in your solitude, or envy you of your
original idea-
Parties
WISHING to buy Seven Hundred acres
of good LAND on Oconee Kiver,
about six miles from Greenesboro’, on the
Willis Ferry Hoad, can obtain a good bar
gain. Will sell on two and five years pay
ments. JAMES B. PARK, Jr.
_June P, 1882.
07F“Real again this week the extensive
announcement of C, A. Davis & Cos.
REVOLVING
Feed Cutlers
Are the very things to make Oats (in the straw) and all other rough food go from
fIJU io 50 per cent further than when fed-ti stock in the usual way. We otter the un
excelled SANFORD Revolving CUTTER at $lO. Come and examine it. You will
find it paying for itself many times over during the year.
C. A. DAVIS k CO.
FRUIT JARS.
This week we have just opened a large shipment, of Fruit "Jars. We have the
Gera and I’orcelain lined Jars, both quarts and half gallons, at prices that will en
courage the putting up of fruit. Plenty of rubbers and extra tops tor fitting up
Jars. This year we bought our rubbers directly Worn the Rubber Company insieau
of the dar men, and can offer them at about half the usual price. Jelly Glasses, pints
and half pints, cheap. 0. A. UAYIo & Cos.
GRASS BLADES and SNATHS.
Grain Cradles and Scythes; Whet Rocks, extra Cradle Fingers; Thresh Belong
assorted widths; Machine Oil, Hemp and Rubber Packing, Zink Oilers, Osnaburgs
and Duck for grain sheets. One thousand grain sacks at $1 per dozen just received.
Seamless sacks 20cts each; Collars, Bridles', Halters, Harness, Gear assorted.
C. A. DAVIS k Cos.
FROM A. T. STEWART & CO,
These beautiful Ginghams from the closing sale of A. T. Stewart & Co-, are offer
ed at 10 and 12Jcts per yard. Also just received, 100 pieces beautiful Prints, fall
standards at low prices. Lawn. Tennis Suiting and Combination Prints, One case of
those popular Cottonades in cassimcre style* 15,20 and 25cts per yard. Hail and
Frost Casbmnret in Sheep Gray and Navy Blue. Times are hard, money is scarce;
we make our prices all low so as to meet the people half way and overcome the exi
gencies of the case. C. A, DA\ IS & Cos.
May and June*
The temperature thus Tar lias been very low for the season oftlie year, but “OKI
Sol” is apt very soon to assert his authority, so that gentlemen will need Alpaca and
Mohair coats and vests; white Vests, summer worsted and fancy Cassimere Pants;
gauze Underwear, low quaiter Shoes and Slippers, fancy half Hose, white lies, sum
mer neck wear. All of which they will find at C\ A. DAVIS & Cos s.
At the same time the Ladies
Will need, printed Dress Lawns in all the new patterns, with and without side
bands; summer Dress Goods latest fabrics; Dress trimmings, Dress shields, White
Goods, Vjgtoria Lawns, Linen and ‘lode’ figures and London Cords, assorted: Ham
burgs white and colored, Laces, Knfflings, Openwork Collars, Mother Hubbard Col
lars, novelties in Gloves, Hosiery, Slippers, Newports- and they will buy them of
C. A. DAVIS & Cos.
S’HIENIX-LIKE
Greenesboro’ is rising from her ashes. The workman’s hammer is heard in her
midst. Builders will find plenty of hardware, nails, locks, bolts, knobs, screws, hin
ges, lime, cement, Atlantic and St. Louis strictly pure White Lead: Linseed Oil boil
ed and raw, mixed Paints all desirable shades, in 1 lb boxes, liquid Paints in quarts,
half gallons and gallons, readyjfor the brush, Burnt Umbre, raw Umbre, raw and
burnt Sienna, yeli /w Ocbre, crome Yellow and Green. Venetian Red, paint, varnish
and whitewash Brushes at C. A. Davis & Go’s. Prices very low throughout. Special
prices for round lots.
Mosquito Netting.
In white, red, buff, green, pink and blue. Get your nets in time before Hie mos
quitos begin to sing their sanguinary lays, liny Fly Traps, Fly I’apir, ifly Brushes
Dusting Brushes of G. A liavis .j- Go.
MIXER IILUMY.
New arrivals every week in our Millinery Department. The latest tilings are
sent, ns by Express as desirable styles appear. Ask Miss Loulie Bourne to show you
the new Hats in ‘Patience” shape, the new Lace, Straws and French Chips, the Rus
tic Flayals and Leghorn Flats. The new things just received in Flowers shaded Rib
bons, Mull Ties, Lace Ties, I.ace Collars, Mother Hubbard Collars. The new Skirts
and Bustles. Every thing desirable in Millinery can be found at C. A. Davis & Co’s
Mbs Bonrno’s good taste and skill arc admired by many hundreds of customers.
Dr. Warner’s Corsets.
We have recently received another Invoice of the popular Corsets- We have
Warner’s “Health” Warner’s “Flexible Hip”, Warner’s “Caroline corset”: also Hip
Gore, Clipper, Cinderella, Bon Ton improved and None Such. Also Nursing corets
assorted. We have sizes from 17 to 30. Prices 25, 50, 75, sl, 125 Compare our
Corsets wuh those that cost 50 per cent, more any where else—we do not fear results
C. A. DANIS & Cos
PATENT MEDICINES.
Jaynes Expectorant. Moodys Malarial Cure. Van Derans Remedy for Cholera
Infantum. St Jacob s On. Besides these we have many other Standard Patent Med
lcines and a full stock of staple Drags at very low prices.
0. A. DAVIS & CO.
BOOKS AND STATIONER!.
Book i adopted by Board of Education; Harvey's Spellers, Appleton's Readers
Reea £ Kel ivg s Grammars, Sanford’s Arithmetics, Derry’s Histories, Appleton's
Qeogru, hies; a l ' these to be had at lowest rates of C. A. Davis k Cos. We have also
nearly evtr jr oth ir kind of school book anu best book used in this section; anything
not in stock t rofured on short notice at bottom price. Slates 5, 10 and 15 cts. Copy
Books 5 and 1U cts. 100 gross Crayons just received, Letter paper, note paper “>1 cts
per quire to 20 cts. Envelops 2Jcts. to 15 cts. a pack. Legal cap, Fools cap, and Bill
paper. Blank Books, Blotting paper, pens, pencils, etc. etc
C. A. DAVIS & CO.
In the paragraph above we have only called attention to a few of our specialties.-
Besides these we have hundreds of lines of Staple and Fancy Goods carefully select,
ed and prices at figures so attractive as to draw crowds of purchasers for 30 anil 40
miles around. We are vet too constantly busy to prepare. our Bargain Tables ; but
during the summer months we hope to be able to open this popular department, and
to render it more attractive than ever before. Of this opening our friends and cus
tomers will be duly informed. Very truly,
C. A. DAVIS & CO.
Greenesboro', Ga., May 25, 1882
WOOL YV OOT 1 ! HEORGIA— Greene County-
V * ” UV7lj '.D Mrs. Lucretia Mapp, Guardian and
1 PERSONS having Wool for Sale wi ex-Oflicie Administratrix of the Estate of
find it to their interest to call on IpSallie Lou Mapp, deceased, has applied for
B. 5. Warner or E. A. Copelan. They Refers of Dismission from said Estate, and
have perfected arrangements by which they suc “ Letters will be cmnted on the first
can dispose of wool in large quantities and Monday in July next, unless good objeq
are prepared to pay the highest market tions are fi led.
price in CASH. " JOEL P. THORNTON, Ord’v.
April 2D. I*B2—tf. April 3rd, 1882—3 ms
order
t-7\ST I
lifeti me s*i
M OTHER9 )
)d 30 UNION SQ. NEW YGRI{ ®
M G'hicago ill. ty
Bl 0 RANGE MA9S. 3
New Home Sewing Machine Go.,
25 Whitehall Street,
Feb. !>, 18S2-6ms ATLANTA, Ga.
A. A- JEKNIGAN. - W. f. ADA MB.
Drs. Jernigan & Adams,
:0:
Physicians and Surgeons,
their professional services l<
all who may need them.
Greene County, Ga., March, 2, ’B2.—tf.
GEORGIA —Greene County.
All persons concerned are 4 bereby no
tiefid, that the Estate of Mollie Zimmer
man, deceased, Is unrepresented, and tha’.
Letters of Administration on saidEfctatj
will be vested in Jesse P. Wilson, Clerk si
Superior Court of said county, or some oth
er fit and propor person on his own bond,
on the first Monday in May next.
JOEL F. THORNTON, Ord’y.
March 27, 1882. '
RICHMOND and BIN YULE R. R.
| PASSENGER DEPARTMENT
ON and after SUNDAY', February 26,
1882, Passenger Train Service on the
Atlanta and Charlotte Air-Line Division
rill be as follows;
Mail and Eypress. Mail
Eastward—No. 51. No. 53.
Leave Atlanta. 2.15" p m 5.00 a m
Arrive Gainesville, 4,54|p in 7.56 a m
do Lula, 5.20 p m 8.30 a m
do Rabun Gap J’n 6 2g p m 0.13 a m
do Toccoa. 7.0 b pin 10.06 a m
do Seneca, 8.24 p m T 1.20 a m
do dGreenvillc, 10.07 p m 1.26 p m
do Spartanburg. 11.40 p m 2.58 p m
do Gastonia, 2,00 a in 6 10 p n
do Charlotte, 3.15 am C.OO p m
Maii. and Expukss. Mail.
Westward—No. 50. No. 62.
Lcnve Charlotte, 12.40 ara 11.05 a m
Arrive Gastonia, I.ls'ain 11.05 am
(1 > Spautantnrg, 4.04 a m 2.35 y m
do Greenville. 5.32 a m 4.00 p m
do Seneca, 7.15 a m 5.65 p m
do Toccoa, 8.28 a m 7.05 p m
do Rabun Gap J’n 0.32 a in 8 00 p m
do Lula, 10.18 am 8.43 pm
do Gainesville, 10.51ara 0.15 pm
do Atlanta, l.lOpin 12.06 am
T. M. R. TALCOTT,
General Manager.
J. Y. SAGE, Superintendent.
A. POPE,
General Passenger and Ticket Agent.
IIIIORCIf
RESIDENT
Greenesboro Ga.
Ihave all the Modern improvements n
cessary to render operations as bear
able as possible, and expeditous. The
utmost care and consideration will be exer
cised in all operations.
SATISFACTION GUARANTEED,
dec,9,’Bo.
Texas Siftings.
i*
SIFTINGS is one of the best humorous
papers in the United Strtes, and is robbing
the Free Press, Hawkeye, and others ei
the glory they have so long enjoyed.-*
Cameron Sentinel.
It is literally a household necessity, an I
is taking the lead in the list of liumorou#
papers.—Rochester (N. Y.) Express.
$2 a ye;ir Subscription I*pic l
SWEET k KNOX.
Austin, Texts.
p eoh;ia-g reene County.
VJT Alexander B. Tappnn. Guardian A
Holcomb G. Moore, now of full age. i pplic
for Letters of Dismissipn frem said Guar
dianship, and ouch Letters will be grantet
on the first Monday in June next, unles 1
good objections are filed.
JOEL F. THORNTON. Ord’y.
April 3rd, 1882--o\vks
G 1 fiiiUii SA—t.leone County.
V Mrs. Lucretia Mapp, Guardian of
Charles 11. Mapp, now of full age, applies
for Letters of Dismission from said Guar
dianship, and such Letters will be granted
on the first Monday in JiiDts next, uni Mi
good objections arc filed.
JOEL F. THORNTON, Ord’y.
April 3rd, 1882—5wks '
—Washed, unwashed and lurry Wo*
bought by C. A, Davis & Cos,
DENTIST