Newspaper Page Text
THE FEDERAL UNION.
VOLUME S—NO. 4*
N1ILLEDGEVILLE, GA. THURSDAY, AUGUST 4, 1831,
WHOLE NUMBER »6.
EDITED BY „
j Q t pOLfHLL & J» A. CUTHHeKT.
^n-KioVfs published every Satartaj -at THREE DOLLARS
TJ r.iium in adv.uice, or FUL’H, if wot,paid before the end of the
,r The, Office is on Wayne Street, opposite McCombs’ Tavern,
i ' ll ADVERTISEMENTS published at the usual rates.
N j] citation by the Clerks of tii6 Courts of Ordinary that
Anniiratimi has been made for Letters of 'AdtiiU)istration, must be
published THIRTY DAYS at least. . . .
Notice hv Executors and Administrators for Debtors and Credi
tor' to rentier in their accounts, must be published .SIX WEEKS.
Sales of Nceroes by Executors anti Administrators must be ad
vert i fed SIXTY DAYS before the ilay of sale.
Sales of personal property (except negroes) of testate and" intes
tate estates in Executors and Administrators, must be advertised
FORTY DAYS.
Applications by Executors, Administrators and Guardians to the
Court of Ordinary for leave to sell Land, must be published FOLK
MONT'IS.
Applications by Executors and Administrators for Letters Dismis-
pory, must be published SIX MONTHS.
Applications for Foreclosure of Mortgages on real estate must be
advertised once a month for SIX MONTHS.
Sales of real estate by Executors, Administrators and Guardians,
must be published SIXTY DAYS before the day of sale. These
Sales must be made at the court-house door between the hours of to
In the morning and 4 in the afternoon. No sale from day to day is
Valid, unless so expressed in the advertisement.
Order* of Court of Ordinary, (accompanied with a copy of the
Vmd, or agreement) to make titles to land, must be advertised
THREE MONTHS at least. , ,
Sheriff's Sales under executions regularly granted by the courts,
must be advertised THIRTY DAYS—under mortgage executions,
SIXTY D\Y.S—Sales of perishable property under order of Court,
«ltist he advertised, generally, TEN DAYS before the day of sale.
All orders for Advertisements will be punctually attended to.
'.•All letters directed to this Office, or the Editors, must be post
paid, to entitle them to attention.
a married man, isa.good husband, and has a lari
FOREIGN.
From the Baltimore Aiarytander.
THREE DAYS LATER—REPORTED PO
LISH VICTORY.
The Nerus, arrived at Boston, has brought the
JLondon Sun of the evening of June 3d.—The on
ly article front this paper furnished by our Boston
Correspondent, i^Mlie following, which affords us
some ground to hope that the gallant Poles have
beau winning another harvest of laurels in their
unequal struggle with the Russians:—
From the London Sun o f June 3.
We have yet nothing absolutely to authenticate
the rumor mentioned yesterday, of another signal
victory of the Poles over the Russians. No doubt,
however, exists of great and important advanta
ges having been obtained by the former; and we
have just been informed from a most respectable
source, that the Polish Legation is in possession of
the particulars of this fresh victory. Our inform
ant, however, states that the obstinate and sanguin
ary conflict, which lasted two days, (19th and 20th
May) took place with the Russian imperial guard
commanded by Gen. Pahien, which were almost
annihilated.
Since the foregoing was in type, the Boston Eve
ning Transcript of Saturday, has come to hand.
Its I >regoing intelligence is of the highest impor
tance, as will be seen by the tallowing extracts. If
these details are true, to the extent reported, the
Russian commander must have been in a very dis
k agreeable predicament, at the date of these advi-
f ces:-
" CONTINUED SUCCESS OF THE POLES
The London Star of the evening of the 3d June,
«a ys, “The brave Polish Commander has complete-
i ly outmanoeuvred the Russians. While a Polish
] corps was amusing them at Minsk, Skryzneeki uni-
? ted all the corps on his left, crossed the Bug, and ta
king Oslrolenka by assault, has proceeded to Lom-
za, defeated the Russian Guards at Tychosin, and
in fact occupied the whole country between the
Rug and Narow.
Accounts from Warsaw, of the 26th, left Die-
bitseii at Zocolow, apparently in route for Ostrolen-
ka or for Bielsk or Bialistock, with no resource but
to throw himself on the protection of Prussia, as
Dwernicki threw himself on the protection of the
Austrians He iias, however, to cross the Bug and
Narevv, with Polish corps on every side of him.
By tiiis masterly movement, the Polish General
General has placed himself in contact with the Sa-
mogitiaus, Lithuanians, and other revolted districts,
by whose population his army will be indefinitely
augmented, so as to leave to Diebitsch no prospect
of escape, but within the Prussian frontiers. The
foreign journals assert, he will endeavor to reach
Thorne, in Prussia; but we expect he will seek to
cross the Rossoka, and avail himself of the shelter
of its vast forests.
The march of Skryzneeki is without parallel in
modern warfare. From Warsaw to Ostrolenka,
was a flank inarch of full eighty miles; thence to
Lomza another 30; and to Tychosin 20 more—the
last 50 being in the rear of tiie Russian grand ar
my. The Poles seem also to have gained advanta
ges in a repulse of the Russians at Minsk; and this,
with the new position of Skryzneeki, no doubt for
ced Diebitsch to retreat to Zocolow, near the low
er Bug.
The ranks of the Warsovians have also been re
cruited by volunteers from Prussia and Austrian
Poland; and tne whole compaign resembles a war
of chivalry, in which the enlightened enterprize of
Europe is directed individually, against the further
encroachments of the barbarous Muscovites, Tar
tars and Siberians.
We have just learnt (says the London Globe, un
der date June 2, three o’clock, P. M.) that a report
is general in the city, of the Russian defeat by the
Poles, and that the Imperial Guards had been cut
to pieces. It is said to rest on letters from Berlin.
It is certainly very prevalent.
The Morning Star of the 3d says, that the above
report probably alludes to the overthrow of the
"Guards at Tychosin, who were taken by surprise.
A private letter from,Warsaw, dated 18th, says:
Since last Thursday the two armies are in full move
ment. General Diebitsch has made a manoeuvre
with the principal part of his army, in the direc
tion of the Bug and Narew, with a manifest inten
tion to get into the wawodie of Plock, to gain the
Prussian frontiers. The motive of this change of
position is not difficult to be understood, as the Rus
sia n General finds it difficult to receive his convoys
fr<vn Russian Poland, and he now wants to gain
the Prussian frontiers, to be in communication with
Thorne, where he has a considerable magazine of
provisions qnd amunition waiting for his approach:
Gen. Skryzneeki has also made a flank move
ment; on Friday morning his head quarters were
at Milosna, and in the afternoon Jablonna, and on
Saturday at Sierock,* his main army was in the di
rection of Pultusk; three hundred Polish officers
have received orders to proceed to Lithuana, to or
ganize the insurrection there. We have thismo-
uent a report, that in the environs of Ostrolenko,
he Imperial Russiaji Guards have experienced a
new check. Gen. Uminski commands in that quar
ter.
The Messager de Pologne, a Warsaw paper, of
£the 21st May, announces that Gen. Skrvbecki had
ken Ostrolenka on the 18th, where he obtained a
rge sum of money, the baggage of the enemy,
nd 1700 prisoners. The object of Skryzneeki in
advancing to Ostrolenka, is supposed to have been
to get between the Russians and their supplies.
this, because you will then be able to form an idea
of the value of his opinion. He neither looks for
place, patronage, rank, or power; but his chief re
commendation is that he is, a thorough Frenchman.
He loves first his family, next his country, and then
the whole world. This is just as it should be. I
wish we had more like him in France. Now, then,
hear what he says:—
I began by asking him about the state of public
opinion in his Department, and whether the Depu
ties to be returned at the approaching elections,
would be the same as those who are already
named? He told me, that he thought that (
Marshal Gerard would again be returned, and
very probable Larochefoucauld, but that as to the
rest, he expected many changes. He told me, that
whilst the inhabitants of his Department were op
posed to anarchy, to riots, to mobs, and to war, at
any rate, they were equally opposed to the present
system of “hqmiliating France.” Now mark that,
I pray you.—Remember the word,* “humiliating
France!” The people are against war at any rate,
and are against peace at any rate. They are anx
ious to see France strong, respected, and formida
ble, though just, moderate & enlightened. He told
me, that M. Casimir Perier had not so many parti
sans among the landed proprietors a3 he imagined,
and that his system of submitting to any insult for
well organized artillery-and cavalry of the Grand
Vizier, wiiiiejthey have neither. They have accoi-
dingly retreated to Perlipe. It is evident that the
Pacha of Scutari intends to cut off all the Grand Vi
zier’s communications, by advancing on the moun
tain along the river Vandar, and so to compel the
Grand Vizier to act on the offensive in a country
where he can derive no advantage from the disci
pline of his troops, or from his cavalry or artillery. _
The town of Perlipe, which is the mart of Mace
donia, has been plundered by the insurgents, many
houses have been set fire to and destroyed, and
large magazines of goods entirely destroyed.
It is said that the inhabitants (chiefly Greeksand
Franks, and therefore natural adherents of the new
order of things,) assisted the troops of the Grand
Vizier, and thereby drewthis vengeance upon them
selves.—JYuremburg Correspondent, May 23.
FROM THE NEW-YORK JOURNAL OF COMMERCE.
North Eastern Boundary.—Since making the
extract on our first page from the North American
Review, in regard to the decision of the Kingof the
Netherlands c we have met with the following par
agraph in the London Morning Herald of May
28th, which goes to sustain another of oiir position*
on the subject, viz: that if the United States are
disposed to throw the question back upon its origin
al footing, Great Britain will be the last to object.
But no; the United States are not so folish. The
decision is on the whole in their favor, and they
know it. It will stand. It will lie ratified by the
United States from choice, and by Great Britain
from necessity, the honor of neither party permit
ting them to flinch from the result of a reference, to
which they mutually assented.
London May 28.—The decision of the King of
Holland, on the question of the boundary between
the United States and British North America, ap
pears to have excited a great deal more displeasure
in America, than it has in England. Thus
His Majesty is in the enviable situation of displeas
ing both parties on whose behalf he consented to
become mediator. The Minister of the United
States at the Hague, in the first instance, protested
against the decision, on the ground that the King
had exceeded his powers, which did not allow him
to pursue a middle course, but simplv to decide,
what was the boundary line indicated by the Trea
ty of 1733. “If,” says the Minister, “his Majesty
found the language of the treaty inapplicable to, and
wholly inconsistent with, the topography of the
country, no authority whatever was conferred ujxm
him to determine or consider, what practicable boun
dary line should, in that case, be substituted and es
tablished. Such a question of boundary as is here
supposed, the United States would, it is believed,
submit to the definitive decision of no Sovereign.”
This seems to be a very proper view of the question
and at the same time it indicates very clearly that
the Americans will not abide by the decision, so
that the affair is as far from being settled as ever.—
The feeling, however, of the Legislature of the
State of Maine, the State most interested in the
question, is most decidedly against the award.—
The report which the two Houses have published,
•calls upon the Government of the United States to
disalow the decision upon various grounds, some of
which are not a little curious. In the first place,
t hey say the arbiter has not decided the differences,
but only advised the manner of settling them,
which he had no authority to do. In the next
place they assert that the differences, were not t >be
submitted to an individual, but to the Sovereign
Power of an independent State. “At the time of
the selection of the King of the Netherlands,” ob
serves the report, “as the Sovereign to arbitrate
and settle the differences, he and his Government
were exercising, and were in the full and uncon
trolled possession of the Sovereign power of Hol
land and Belgium, formerly the United Provinces
and the Netherlands. Subsequent events, and e-
vents which occurred many months before the
subject had been considered, and any sort of decis
ion was made and delivered to the parties, separa
ted Belgium from his dominions and from the sov.
ereign power of his government* Losing Belgium
deprived the King of nearly three-fifths of his sub
jects, and of course three-fifths of his power and
consequence, and he ceased to be king of the
Netherlands. The loss of Belgium arose from the
prevalence of liberal opinions, and the desire of the
people to secure their rights. The revolution,
from the course the British pursued, naturally pro
duced feelings of attachment to, and dependence up
on them for aid anil protection, and as naturally
excited feelings against liie institutions of the Uni
ted States. But we go still further; the course of
events did not simply increase his dependence up
on the British, but compelled him to call upon
them for assistance, to enable him to sustain his
power as King even in Holland. The British were,
long before the decision, his Privy Counsellors, if
not the managers and regulators of his public
concerns and negotiations, upon which the exist
ence and continuance of his power depended. He
was within their power and control. Having
then lost the character possessed at the time of the
selection, the King or sovereign power of the
Netherlands ceased to be the arbiter to whom the
differences had been submitted, A decision after
such a change of character and interest, cannot for
any purpose, be considered as having any obliga
tory force or effect; it can be considered only a
mere nuility.” ^ ^
Tne above is certainly a very amusing piece ofj S y S t em of foreign policy. Think of this and then
soplnstry, but nothing mure. St,II, however, we , ^|, whether it will be possible lor a Casimir Pe-
th.nk the Object,on to the deesjon urged by the U- rier Admi „ lstralion mucl * longer to trifle with the
n.ted State s Munster at the Hague good and val- | bllc inion and the n! , d onaf will
1 n" 1 a ,“ y ' u "n T ? r . ‘ e alVa 1) I had scarcely turned from my moderate and pat-
", . !t C y , ^ all °' r ' d ; a b I* ' V 83 ,sb f d! riotic fr,end, btibre I met a Royalist Merchant horn
that the boundary pointed out, is contrary to the - - ' J
spirit o the treaty, and much against the interest
of Great Britain and her North American provin
ces. The disputed territory i3 now in our posses
sion, and as we believe that we have right on our
side, we would recommend the Government not to
part with it. Besides, possession is nine points of
the law.
giH cause I knew that »i I attacked ‘Divine xiig.A, I
family of amiable cnildrei^ and perhaps his tota%siiould be obliged to talk with him half an nour,
fortune 6,000/. sterling per annum.^ I tell you qll fand that would not suit me. So I wished him a
the sake of preserving peace, was anti-national,
and would not much longer be endured. I asked
him, to what party lie belonged? He replied, “I be
long to no party—I never did—and I never will. I
wish for peace, but for peace with honour—I wish
for liberty, but for liberty with the laws—I wish
for order; but I know that laws must be good, be
fore they can be respected.” I asked him, whether
he thought that France should leave Poland to be
sacrificed? And he answered, “Undoubtedly not!”
Mark ye, this is a Rentier—a proprietor—a maiiof
wealth and family and respectability, and educa
tion, and talents, and honor. I asked him, whether
iie would have France to go to war for the indepen
dence of Poland? and I will tell you his answer—
“Our government ought to endeavour, in conjunc
tion with the Cabinet of Great Britain, to obtain
for Poland, peace and independence, without going
to war at all; but if the Emperor Nicholas shall re
fuse all counsels, and obstinately persist in his cruel
project of crushing Poland, then, after having en
deavoured to excite Prussia to an useful mediation,
and again failed, I see no other course than for
Franee to make war on Russia.” He followed this
up by an observation, which is full of justice and
truth.—“If, Sir, France shall allow Poland to be
crushed, Austria, Prussia, and Russia wili march a-
gainst France, and who will say that England will
not, remain neutral?
I asked him whether he thought that in France
there were many landed .proprietors and men of
property who hold the same opinions, and who were
equally distinguished for moderation and patriotism?
He replied as follows: “I think there are a vast ma
ny more than persons generally believe; and if I
were asked to give a round estimate of thinking,
respectable individuals, who desire to see a more
national system of policy adopted, both at home
and abroad, I should say, we count in France from
1,200,009 to 1,500,000.” He said, that the war par
ty ai all hazards, was not more disliked or dreaded
tnan the peace party at all hazards: and if the
Journal des Debats was more read than formerly,
it was because it was generally considered to be the
organ of Sebastiana, and was therefore consulted
for early foreign intelligence. I asked him, whether
m ins Department, republicanism was gaining
ground? He replied, “If it has gained ground, it
nas been during the last two months. Before then
tnero were hopes entertained that a national policy
would be followed, and that the Government would
act on national principles. But since it has been
leit that the cnief aniety of the Government., is to
preserve the Crown to Louis Piiiiip and his heirs,
the desire has arisen, and, I believe, greatly extend
ed, of convincing the administration, that France
expected something better than this from the late
events in July.” 1 asked him, whether in his de
partment, the majority of’ thinking people were
content with the march of the Government as to
the questions of Belgium and Italy. He said, “Cer
tainly not! That as to Belgium, the universal opin
ion was, that Louis Philip had evinced much cow
ardice and apprehension of ollendmg; and that as
to Italy, lie never spoke to a person who. did not leei
with him, that the Italians had been most cruelly
treated by the French Government.” Tins was
the substance of our conversation, and gives rise to
a thousand reflections. Here is a rich man, who by
war must lose part of his wealth—must endanger
even his estate by the possibility of foreign inva
sion, and must give up two of his sons to the con
scription, and make other enormous sacrifices in
case of war. Yes, iiere is this man prepared to
make all these sacrifices with cheerfulness and satis
faction, rather than see France “humiliated” (yes,
that’s the word,) by the present system of political
concessions to absolutism and tyranny, and be as
sures us thai fie fully believes (and he is no random
guesser,) that in France there are nearly a million
and a half of respectable citizens—husbands, fath
ers, masters and rentiers—who are prepared to
make similar concessions, and to contribute by their
purses and their blood in the defence of a national
Belgrade May 12.—After the battle of the 23d
1 of April, the troops of the Grand Vizier retreated
[towards Monaster, without being pursued by the
I enemy, who seemed to be sensible that though
Rhev gained ground it brought no advantage to
(compensate for their losing doble the number in
■ killed and wounded «a the 21st and 23d, from the
F'-om the London Vv. n ng Chronicle of June 1.
Visit to the Bourse—state of public opinion—
moderate party—Royaiisfs—Baron de Rothchild,
&c. &c.—Declarations of the Moniteur—Letter of
General Lamarque—Speech of M. Pirson—Letter
from Poland.
To the Editor of the Morning Chronicle.
Paris, May 28,1831.
Sir—Yesterday I passed two hours at the Bourse.
I conversed with men of all parties, and of all na
tions. We talked wholly on politics, and without'
attempting to give you a narration of all that pass
ed, I will oontent myself by supplying you with the
substance.
The first individual I met on entering, was a
French landed proprietor from the Department of
Seine et Oise. Though rich, he is intelligent, pa
triotic and humane. He is very much beloved by
his acquaintances—adored in his family—and res
pected by liis neighbours. He has a respecta
ble chateau, and attached to it about 700 or
800 arpens of land. He is fond of reading—is a
man of considerable information—is verging on fit
Bordeaux. Poor man, he was full of trouble and
complaint. Nothing went well without “the white
flag:” and he put to me the following question,
wlnchl know he thought to be a “poser:”—“Can
you believe, Sir,” said the Royalist, “that the Duke
of Bordeaux, our legitimate Monarch, will remain
all his life an exile in a foreign land, though inno
cent of any crime, and as pure as the mountain
snow; and can you believe that the Governments
of Russia, Austria, Prussia, and Spain, not to say
England, will allow forever this innocent youth to
be deprived of the Crown to which he is entitled
as a matter of right, merely because his grandfath
er signed some unpopular Ordinances in July, 1830?
Are you not, on the contrary, quite sure, that in
the very first war which shall arise in Europe be
tween the Great powers on anv subject, the cause
of the Duke of Bordeaux will form part of the vi
tal question; and will not Louis Philip be dethron
ed, and Henry the Fifth be established in liis place?
Why, Sir, not to believe this, would be to be
tray an ignorance of history and human na
ture.” And so this was the way my Royalist mer
chant went on talking for about a quarter of an
hour. To convert him was impossible, and so I
simply said, “But, Sir, should no war arise in the
life time of the Duke of Bordeaux, and should he
die without male issue, what then? “Why then of
course,” said the Royalist, “this man, Louis Philip,
would be King in his own right, and his children
after him.” I did not discuss with him the ques
tion of “What is the right of a Prince to reign over
good day, but not without leaving him miserable,
for I whispered in his ear a second time, “Suppose
the Duke of Bordeaux should die without male is
sue and before a war shall be declared in his favor.”
I am sure he will never forgive me for this, for it
destroyed the whole of his hopes, and showed him
the weakness of liis system
I turned round, and there stood Baron Roths
child! He had just entered the Bourse, with one of
his nephews on his arm, and he lvas smiling and
whispering first to one, and then to the other. He
Jold us there was good news Irom Belgium!—that
nearly ninety Deputies had signed a proposition in
viting Price Leopold to become King!—that the
question was sure to be carried!—and that then the
funds would go up. This was quite enough for the
jobbers, so they set to work for five minutes, and
then the Funds rose from 65f. 75c. to 661*. 5c. and
then Baron Rothschild left the Bourse. He had
just received his courier from Brussels. He had just
read the intelligence he communicated, and the
thoughtless considered it all “very fine news,” and
the Rentiers danced and sung, “peace, peace!” I
laughed heartily at their folly, and merely observed,
“so you think this is the termination of the Belgian
Revolution!” They all said “Oh yes, oh yes!” and
and so I laughed on, and went my way. And next
day I spoke to an editor of a liberal journal in Pa
ris. He had visited the Bourse for the purpose of’
picking up information; and he asked me, “Shall
we have peace or war?” I replied, “What does M.
Perier say to this question?”—“As lor M. Perier, he
says all in the Moniteur, which scarcely any one
reads, and no one believes. He tells us that we are
to have peace, and that all the other papers are
misinformed—utter falsehoods—and are not enti
tled to belief; but he had better answer me three
questions, of which the first is, what is the state of
our negociations with Russia for the cause of Po
land—its independence—and its Constitution? 2d.
What is state of our negociations with Austria for
the cause of Modena, Rome, and Piedmont? and
3d, what is the state of our negociations with Prus
sia, England, and the Genuanic Confederations for
Belgium? I told him to publish these questions in
his Journal, and he promised to do so. But it is
of little use—for Casimir Perier will not reply to
them.
And last of all I conversed with a partizan of M.
Casimir Perier. He was 60 years of age—was de
lighted that the funds were rising—said that the
Ministry was firm and would not last—that he iov-
ed liberty as well as any man—but that Franee had
too much already—and then he began a long tirade
against the lilierty of the press. He sai *• “that
Franee wanted an aristocracy, and that Casimir
Perier would assure to her this advantage, that
Franee wanted peace, and that it was absurd to
suppose that, because a few hundred Italians made
riots in the Papal States, therefore, we were to
march an army thither, and dethrone the Pope.
That as to the Belgians, they were never contented,
and never would be, and that for his part, if all Bel
gium should be drowned, he should not look upon it
as a great calamity. He said that the Revolution
of July was just, beccuse it was made against ille
gal ordinances; and though the punishment inflict-
edby the people was,perhaps, excessive,yet it wool
be a lesson to kings not to violate the laws. Hi
said that Louis Philip was the only man who could
have saved France from anarchy and invasion, that
if the French were not happy now, they never de
served to be, and he hoped never would be.” I
asked him what he thought of an hereditary Peer
age/ He said, “Let the existing Peerages be he
reditary, and those to be created, let them be for
life.” I asked him, if he thought the King should
have power of creating an unlimited number of
Peers; and he said, “Oh, certainly.—Would vo
take away an iota of the Roval force?” This man
is a great friend of Casimir jPerier, or I should not
quote him, and it is thus that these people under
stand the Revolution of July. But one day or oth
er these men will find out their error; for France
will not be tricked out of the principles and the re
sults of that revolution.
As 1 decended the steps of the Bourse, I met three
young men arm in arm, all adorned with the rib
band ofthe Decoration of “the Cross of July, 1830.”
I knew two of them, and so I inquired whether they
had taken the Oath of Allegiance which M. Casimir
Perier had required of them? “No, no,” was the
answer, “not such fools. We owe allegiance to
France, hut not to a dvnastry.” I shook my head,
and passed on. Well, well, I thought, I did not
expect this last August, but I derived some conso
lation from reflecting, that, it is never too late to re
trace our steps; and if Casimir Perier will not act
with the nation, w T hy the nation will act without
Casimir Perier.***
Thus the system of M. Casimir Perrier is oppos
ed by the war nartv—bv the moderate and reflect
ing patriots of France, who will not that France
'should be “humiliated” by the young and ardent
part of our population—by Republicans—Liberals
—Constitutionalists—Napoleonists—Carlists, and
Ibe Ultra Royalists; and no one approves of the sys
tem but the lovers of peace at all hazards. * * *
The King of the French is actively engaged in
-ecognising the Aristocracy of the Restoration,
whilst the King of England is occupied in deliver
ing both himself and his people from the trammels
of a cruel and oppressive Oligarchy. The latter
has a ma jority of 150 in the New House of com
mons! We shall see what will be the majority of
the former in the Chamber of Deputies!
And now* I have before me a letter from Warsaw
of the 16 May. It is very short, and I will give
you a translation. It runs thus:—
Warsaw, May 16.-—My Dear friend.—In vain
we have looked for help from France, that France
which led us into revolution, and promised us her
best aid. In vain do we call to the remembrance
of your cruel Government, the wrongs we have
suffered, and the ills we have endured. We have
appealed to the delicacy, to the honour, and to
the gratitude of Franee, but in vain. To England
we must now look ; but we have no right to ask
her aid on the score of favors we have conferred,
or past sendees we have rendered. We saved
your country from a Russian invasion last Autumn,
by our revolution, and, in return, we cannot even
obtain muskets, under the sea! of France, nor re
mittances of money. Lord Grey is the distin
guished friend of liberty, and he is,surrounded by
those who have long fought against the policy of
the Holy Alliance, but will they break with Russia
for the sake of Poland? If not we must prepare
for pillaged cities, murdered families, for crimes un
heard of in civilized countries, and for a third inva
sion. We shall again drive back these robbers,
who would wrest from us new liberty, but our
sirength may at last be weakness, and Poland may
fall. Exert yourself, then, to the utmost in this
holy cause. All goes on well at present. The Ru-
sian army does not advance on us. The cholera
morbus is not so virulent or destructive as among
our enemies. The enthusiasm is increased. The
confidence of our troops in their General and their
cause is unbounded. The defeat of Dwernicki is
compromised. We have received a very i ..por*
lant communication from Lithuania, which vott
wili read In our Journals. The decree has gone
forth, that the rebel provinces of our dear ancieht
Poland shall be united to us. All this is encourage
ing, and the fundholder with the landholder is jae*
paring to make his sacrifices. It is a national con*
test, but how small is tiiat nation when opposed to
Russia? Yet to submit, would be Vvorse than td
be exterminated; and though Warsaw mav by de*
stroyed, it will never be occupied by a Russian
Army.
; To the French Government then, Poland rxf
«>nger looks for assistanc, and her dreams of hop«
a e all blighted by the sad realities of cold negii cts
and repeated refusals. To Eng 1 ? nd will she look
i.ivain? Let Lord Grey’s G "9 rnment arsiver
this question in the negative, and England will be
mistress of the world. The people are all ready
to march with her, and public opinion is all on one
side. The millions are for peace, but with honor,
liberty, and justice. The units for peace at all
hazzards.—Yet again I say, England may save
Poland, and yet preserve peace.
Your obedient servant, O. P. Q.
ARL GREY AND 1m. LORD HIGH CliAN-
CELI OR OF ENGLAND.
It is a circumstance not perhaps unworthy of re*
mark, as one of those strange coincidences wh ich
frequently occur in the courseofhuman attains, iliat
the only tiro chancellors of England, since Sir Tho
mas Moore, in the reign of Henry VIII., who have
been raised to that high office from the station of
simple barristers at law, without passing through
any ol the intermediate or superior grades oi ihe
'profession, have been raised to the woolsack b\ Earl
Grey, the present Premier of the British adminis
tration. We mean the late Lord Erskiue and the
presem Lord Brougham and De Vaux. The for
mer, who was alter all a lawyer of very mediocre
talents, although, perhaps, the most eloquent advo
cate that ever adorned the English bar, was ap
pointed in 1806j-during tire short lived Grev and
Grenville administration, and resigned with 'them*
after a ten months occupancy of office. Lord
Brougham has been elevated by the same noble
man, and it remains to be seen what will be the du
ration of his term. Both of these distinguished
men were without equals in the immediate branch
of their profession, to which their attention war
principally directed, the practice in trie Court of
King’s Bench; but. as an Equity Judge in Lincoln’s
Inn Hall, Lord Erskine failed in so marked a degree,
that his decisions as chancellor, are seldom or n , ver
cited as authorities. Lord Brougham, it may be,
from the versatility of his talents, the profundity of
his genius, and the extent of his researches in iegal
science, and its practice generally, will form a bril
liant exception in the class of those who have disap
pointed public expectation, when transferred fionj
the study and practice of the common and statute
! IW , to the exercise of chancery jurisdiction.
SUMMARY*
Attachment to the Union—extra.—“I believe our
oppression to he so sectional in its character, so ir
remediable in its nature, so desolating in its eflucttv
;is to justify, under any Government, the last ap
peal—an appeal to the God of battles.”
The foregoing gem is selected from the oration
of Mr. Isaac \V. Hayne, delivered at Columbia
•mi the recent anniversary. Comment were super
fluous. This oration was deemed so refreshing a
.specimen of the feelings of the party; trial a Com
mittee of Nullifiers, of which Judge Harper was
Chairman, requested and obtaiued a copy tor pub
lication. And yet this party is shockingly indig
nant at thfe President of tne United States,' tin- pie-
' ruing to laik aboul such a tiling as its w*ant of
attachment to tiie Union! Ail is peace, quietness,
and reverence for the Uniou among these people,
and Mr. M Duffie ridicules the idea of civil war
and bloodshed. It. is ali bugbon and scaiecrowl
Go on gentlemen.—Camden Journal.
We have known for some weeks past, that the
anti-masons had addressed a letter to Judge
M’Lean of Ohio ; and w*e have good reason to be
lieve, for the purpose of ascertaining whether e
could consent, if nominated, to ,-t nr as their can
didate for President.—Whether this letter was ad
dressed to him, “6y authority” or as the mere sug
gestion of particular individuals, we pretend not to
know, nor do we care. It lias drawn forth from
him, however, an answer, winch tiie anti-mr sonic
journals will experience no great pluasi re n j.ub-
lishing: for their edification and amusement,
ever, we take leave to state, that Judge M Lean
has explicitly declared that, he would not denounce
masonry, if he was certain that such demme • n
would elevate him to the Presidency.—Albany Dai*
ly Advertiser.
Baltimore, July 15.—Spots in the Sun.—Our
intelligent correspondent ‘H’ informs us that here
are now on the Sun’s disc txcenty distinct spots, dis
tributed into three groups, of three, nine, and eiijiit
spots each. If the observations of our correspond
ent be correct, that these solar phenomena have a
connection with the weather, we may expect si me
very hot days before the end of the present month.
It will be recollected that he predicted in May, the
great alternations of heat and cold which have
since taken place.— Cour.
ty years of age, and has something to lose by an- tion of “What is the right ot a rrince to reign over cause is unbounded. The defeat of Dwernicki is
arehy, and something to preserve mid love- He is' a people who will not love, honor, or obey him/’ be- 1 discouraging, but the revolution of Volhynia is not
An ox’s gall will set any color—silk, cotton, or
woollen; I have seen the colors of calico, which fa
ded at one washing, fixed by it. Where one lives
near a slaughter house, it is worth while to buv
cheap fading goods and set them in this way. The
gall can be bought for a few cents. Get out all
the liquid and cork it up in a large phial. One
large spoonful of this in a gallon of water, is suffi
cient. This is likewise excellent for taking out
spots from bombasin. bombazet,, &c.; after Seing
washed in this, they look about as well as when
new. It must be thoroughly stirred into the wa
ter, and not put upon the cloth. It is used without
soap. After being washed in this, cloth wUch you
wish to clean should be washed in warm suds.—
Economical Housewife.
Bipe Tomato Pickle.—Take ripe tomatos, and
pick them with a fork or pointed stick, put them in
to any kind of vessel, salt each laverthicklv; let them
remain in the salt about 8 days, at the’expiration
of the eight days, put them for one night in a ves
sel of vinegar and water; then to a peck of tomates
and a bottle of good mustard, put half an ounce rf
cloves, half an ounce of pepper and a dozen larg
onions sliced, pack them in a jar, placing a la ver i f
onions and spices between the layers of tomato; ,
in ten days the pickles will be in good eating or
der. * -
At this season of the year it may be worth whiV
to inform all, who do not already know of the same,
that Indigo weed struck plentifully about a harnes t
serves to keep horse flies at a distance. Insects ha mi
a strong aversion to Ibe smell of that plant.