Newspaper Page Text
FEDERAL
it, in a civil—the second
itid, 12 Wh. 419, 3(i, in a
-Utw expected that counsc.
: of the la w io the precedents
Iftj beyond the very imper-
jt least fallible reports of its.
‘unanimous judgements; but it
j cfaty to "trace the rivulets of the law to
i»tai*p,$*i there might-be some bing there
o which Fcould yield my opinion—sonte-
to control the reason and to bind the linth,
case like tMfc Among the rolls there is found
tie record of $ <«u’se between the lessee of Martin
evtc ° otj
ffs. Hunter,reported in 7 Ci.603,
[J&^rfaxi .
i61 3s*«inif du&fmtiaring tliis record v/ith one
the'Vise imported in 1 Wh. in 1816, it appears
ihe same case, twice brought under the con-
atiun of this Court. In the first it came up
issued under the seal, and by the
^ oPi.Y*cWt, without the allowance of one
it^iudgbsAnd a citation, signed by the Prese
nt oYfhe Court of Appeals o! Virginia, with an
igument of errors accompanying it. This was
icily according to the 25th and 22d sections of
he Judioary Act. On the back of the writ of error
is dus endorsement: “I herewith send the record
<niJ process, in the suit,in the within writ mentioned,
us by tii£Gnnc writ I am commanded. Win. Flem
ming, President of the court -of Appeals, in and Ibr
“lie Commonwealth ol Virginia.” Annexed there
in was a schedule, beginning- 41 Pleas at the Capitol,
in the City of Richmond, on Monday, the 23d of
April, 1810, before the honorable Judges of the
xCouri of appeals of the Commonwealth of V irginia.
JCe it remembered, that heretofore, to wit:” This
according to the laws and custom of England,
fcs tvci.' H * s > hi »v single judgment, tlie laws and
vustems *. ^ ie tJuited States. This was the rc-
paid tv' ^ ie regular process of this Court, by
the highest tribunal of an ancient, proud,
and powerful Co^.**1011 wealth-nay, more, So they
#oe» cd“the writ, as t Serein they were command
ed.” This to a precept worthy of all example.
JVly fervent prayer is, “jS**® perpetuaand the
to maintain a political controversy with Georgia,
state had determined to extend the dominion of her laws
over all the territory embraced within her chartered lim-
.—. r --j , — # its: and it was known, that some white men residing
Jiope is most confidently inJn.^ed, that no state : the Cherokees, urged them to oppose this policy,
Court will, ever hereafter, lefeJ >“*•, dignity or the I a policy which in its results, would be as beneficial to the
xi<dits of the State impaired or din’mulshed, bv thus Cherokees as to Georgia. In order to arrest this hostile
otnrnintr. for the Judicial inspection l *» tribu- influence, and to
there is no ’a
from a Dis< 1
* ... - fL*njr wm
re the removal ot
j< : : C.;mt b
lull.'fair
m-
record
- writ.
cuoge held in thorn ^although abounding in terms of LOTTERY & EXCHANGE
equal i
FEDBiiALi IMOIS.
M;7 LEDGE . iLi JB> AFIitL 19, ; 8.52..
i 'j C. ti ItEiSPON t >LN 'i Si several ■eoir.tmnnca-
. ions have been omitted this week lor the wuni. of room.
Yney wiii appear in our next..
t dzp’ The proceedings of public meetings in the coun
ts of Early and Madison were received Loo lute for in
sertion this w eek.
THE PERSECUTED MISSIONARIES.—The re
flection is painful, that men who are strangers among us,
who claim to be citizens of a distant sister state, wh
1 icar the priesily office, and die sacred name of missiona
ry, should, for an offence not involving moral turpitude,
oe confined in an ignominious prison, and be compelled
to perform a daily task of manual labour, in company
with the vilest malefactor. This is a fruitful theme lor
•..lie enemies of Georgia. In some states, a great, deal of
virtuous and humane feeling has been called into action
against us, and we are accused of ijerseeuting the mis
sionaries. But on this subject our fellow citizens in
New-York, Massachusetts, and elsewhere, have been
misled: when they are better informed of the facts, and
have rellected more dispassionately, we think they will
condemn Worcester and Butler, for renouncing the'cleri
cal and missionary, and assuming a political character.
All the world knows, that the Cherokees are attempting
This
iUllIiliUt: _
y wag^ever so considered by eit^r party. That
o’ ted ’States neve ■ did intend to raise in the bosoms
f die 'tales independent governments of Indian people,
and -hat the Indians never so understood! these treaties
at the ti/tic! hey were entered into. That the terms us
ed were adapted partly through necessity and the diffi
culty of finding terms exactly suitable and equally un
der s 00a by the parties.
10U». That no treaty‘existing between the Untied
State* and the Cherokees requires that t^ey should be
penna icndy maintained as an independent people in the
state of Georgia and that if it did so, it would bevoid,.as
di-smejuliering a State contrary to the ennMiturion.
11th. That whatever coutract the Unified States shall
have made with the Cherokees and which shall prove j
impracticable on the part yf the Union, ought to be n»ade
good to the Indians by liberal con mutation in money or
otherwise as the partfesmay mutuayy agree.
12th. That the Cherokee government, so far as it ex
ists at all is to be found only on t:
for them by the government, on
powerful, calm and conclusive, ap.
powers of the people of the United
a conclusion by the follovins s’ren
“ In the previous discussion *ve have confined
ourselves to the question of ri<*ht, avoiding all those
1 considerations, which render it expedient that these
Indians should remove to the country, West of the
Mississippi, assigned for their permanent residence.
OFFICE,
MILLEDGEVILLE, GEORGIA.
fllHE subscriber has opened a Lottery and Exchange
Office in the Room next South of the State Bank.
He will keep constantly on hand ,Tickets in the most
popular Lotteries.
United States* Bank Notes will be bought and sold,
and all business connected with his office, shall be
transacted with correctness and dispatch. He has now
on hand tickets in the following Splendid Schemes in a
great variety of numbers.
Me Crehee's Office
MILLEDGEVILLE, GA.
OEFICIAL PRIZE LIST.
Drawn Numbers of theNew- York Consolidated Lot
tery, Class No. 9. for 1$32.
30,-38, 25, 27, 14, 54, 37, 35.
Holders of prize ticket* will cail and itet the cash at
N. McGEHEE’S
April 19 Lottery St Exchange Office.
RICH PRIliES.
$20,000, & 100 Prizes of a $1000.
No false philanthropy should induce us to wish! DELAWARE & N. CAROLINA CONSOLI-
1 their continuance in the situation jhey nmv occupy.
BEERS’ OFFICE,
IW. Ml.- BROAD-fcTREEX, AtbT.-iT.\
territory set apart
Arkansas. Tliis
to the reasoning
hates is brought to
snguage.
returning, for tiie Judicial inspection
deter white men from opposing the ex-
jiah their records and proceedings, annex'd to the ecution of the laws of the stare, and from instigating ig-
* • - 1 - p - ----- norant Indians to rebellion against them, a law was pa^-
man to reside in the Cher-
from the president, or
such residents to take an
.mutually
jieats in
ji.seii’ degraded bv so returning their records, as the
}iig!iest Court of Virginia has returned hers, in the
iirst case of Hunter and Martin.
Bat the scene was changed in the second; The
•writ of error diJ not issue from or by the authority
isf this Court, or the Circuit Court, under the 9th
section of the laic of 1792.-1 Story, 260. The writ
went ro tiie Court of Appeals without a teal, under
•Xhe signature of one of the Associate Judges of this
•XJotirt; it was presented by one of the most liistiu-
jmished members of the bar, as the attorney of
^\I lrtin, and he moved the Court to certily the re*
<:•). d according io the precept ot the writ. 1 he
C j jrt denied me molion and directed that no entry
ieinnid t>e made thereof in us orders. This fact
siopears among the records of this Court by the al
ii Viva ofB. W. Leigu, sworn to betbre a Judge of
t liti General Court of Virginia, whose official char
acter was certified by tue Governor under the
jgreal seal appended. The Clerk of the Court
made no return to the writ of error, and certified no
ijrbceedmgs of tiie Court had under it. This is
then, no precedent ibr tliis case. The Court
-w inch directed no entry to he made of a motion to
•i. riifv the record according to the precept ol the
-writ, couid not do it "os therein commanded,” and
ji-.j tort her proceedings were liuil on this subject in
-tins Court on this sell’cailed writ ol error, lhat
j) irt ofiiie case requires no further notice ; the pro-
<<v. ediugs on tiie mandaie will be retorted to here-
iii’er. Thus the precedent of Hunter and Martin
as iu the first case directly against theplaintifij and
Xo tiie writ of error in the second, there was no
xeturu bv Judge or Clerk, tins Court could inspect
jtiot ling but tue refusal to notice the writ of error as
tiinvfd by the affidavit of Mr. Leigh; they could
inovv it in no other way. W hat would have been
the legal edi ct of the judgment of this Court on
« iCii a writ of error and such a return? l'he an-
&. vc r is obvious: see Brown against Maryland;
t r writ of err >r was issued by one of the Judges of
Jhi< Court without the seal or that of the Circuit
Court. L'tie record was returned and the case
argued oil both sales without objection, or, so far
as upptiars by the report, the point not being no-
tic ; 1 at the bar or 1’ioiu tiie bench. McCullocii vs.
M inland, re ter red to by the Court, was on a case
a.aied a»r the opinion oftliis Court,’“all errors being
released.”—! VVii. 519, 20, and as ap-
the record. In the United Slates vs.
23>.■ unis 1 Cr. 252, tins Court emci tamed jurisdic-
ijoii uf a case brouglit 1 ‘fore it by a writ of error
to remove tiie record of an indictment in the Cir-
c ut Court of ih*H District and affirmed the judg-
an- ui iifter argument on both sides. In tiie United
{States vs. Moor, 6 Cr. 159, 172, they decided
tnat thev Jiad no jurisdiction.^ On being reminded
.«*fth* case ot’Siiiims, tlieCtiicf Juyice remarked,the
question wiui mu u m that case as to the jurisdic-
1. mj. 11 pfi ed sub siientio and the Court does not
couaider use f bound bv tiiat cast, 172, anu it was
.not ineniioiud m i lie opinion ol me oourt.—Iri Du-
lopeau vs. U. S., tiiey otieervc under these laws,
Inis Court has taken jurisdiction oi a caae brought
by a writ of error from Tennessee. It is true the
question was not moved, and consequently still re
mains ipen.—6 Cr. 317. Thus the second case of
Hunter vs. Martin, and the cases of Brown and
McCulloch vs. Mary la ml, are disposed ot as prece
dents of a return to a writ of error issued by this
Court under its sea! and tiie 22d and 25th sections.
They are no evidence of any legitimated, sanction
ed or even nqnced practice, still less ot law. Ii is
utterly useless to examine the question whether a
Stale'Court is bound to obey an order to return
tiieir record to inis Court Ibr its judicial inspection,
on a paper purporting to be a writ ot error, signed
by i Judge of this Court without a public seal, or
whether this Court has jurisdiction iu such a case.
r Tn mgh such may have been a loose and nub si-
. 4ealio practice, in cases where the defendant in er
ror appeared and his counsel or gued the merits, it is
utterly without any authority in law, and contrary
to iis nest settled principles. It is time that such
practice was stopped, or it may tend much to wea
ken the resjiect due to the legitimate acts of this
.Court, and no proceeding ought to be permitted m
its name,or on its authority, unless pursuant to &.
in strict conformity to the laws which authorize
itheru to act. This is not submitting the silent
practice of this Court to the test of an individual
opinion. In the case referred to by the Court as
cm approved one of jurisdiction under thelbth sec-
. lioul ii was contended “-That the amount of judg
ment was not sufficient to ground an appeal or
writ of error to this Court. This is a new question.
T.urtv five years has Court been adjudica
ting under the 25lh section of the judiciary act of
17S9, and familiarly known to have passed in judg
ment on cases of.very small amount without having
before had its attentiou called to the construction
of the 25th section now contended lor. JVeverthe-
Jess, if the renewed construction has been erroneous-
adopted without examination^ it is not too late to
c. rrect it nou , . ,, —Buell vs. Van Ness, 3 Wh. 321,
2. I pass li»r the present from the practice U> the
decision. of this Court. So important do this
Co.irt deem the mode of removing a cause from a
District to a Circiiit Court, that though it may lie
# done by writ of error or appeal, they kayeadjudg-
uadi tp maintain the constitution and laws of the state.
The i-es'dent, whatever might be Ills religious belief, and
his office or Occupation, was not required to renounce
any article ofi/is creed, or forbidden to penbmi any du
ty enjoined by his religion. The minister or nJssionary
was not restrained in bis attempts to enlighten the heath
en, und to convert their souls to the Christian taith. He
who was friendly to the Ch«rokees, was not required to
fierform a single act in opposition to their interests or
their wishes, except taking this oath of submission to the
constitution and laws of Georgia. This law imposes n< •(.
die slighest restraint on Worcester and Butler, in their
discharge of a l the duties of a religious mission. But,
for them, this liberty was not enough. It now appears,
that their mission was of a tempo; a!, and not of a spiritual
nature. Forgetful of the sacred < ffice which they are
reported to bear, and abandoning the duty of converting
and enlightening ihe heathen, they have made them
selves champions in a worldly controversy, and have at
tempted to resist the supremacy of the laws of a state,
within her ascertained acknowledged boundary. They
have long since in fact, laid down the sacred character
of missionaries of the cress, to become the emissaries of
a party, in the political strifes of tiie world.
Their present confinement has teen courted by them
selves: it is on their part, a voluntary endurance, for
which they are not entitled to the sympathies of the re
ligious world. The law has been most reluctantly en
forced against them, by the authorities of the state—
When they arrived al the gale of tire penitentiary, they
were detained for hours, without the portals, under an
invitation from the executive, to accept a pardon offered
them on the easy conditions, that they would promise to
obey the laws of the state, or leave ns territory. Disre
garding die anxious wish, the painful solicitude of our
whole community, they rejected this invitation of mercy.
Ai any sulwcquent period, until the decision of the su
preme court was announced, by tliis reasonable promise
hey might have procured their instant liberation.
What do our fellow citizens, who have espoused die
cause of ttese missionaries (much abused word ) eXjtect
that Georgia will do ? Shall these two individual* t>e
allowed to trample on laws, which are enforced against
every citizen of the state ! Shall she abandon the claims
which she had advanced, shall she recede from the pos.-
rion which she has deliberately taken, and hide her dis
honored head, because these two men have entered her
erritory, under authority from a missionary board in
Massachusetts?
Towards these prisoners our feeling are altogether
kind; they are probably honest and benevolent men:
but they have strangely erred from tiieir priestly and
missionary duties, and were wofully misled, when they
were induced to enter into a controversy w ith Georgia,
in the tone of friendship, we admonish them to beware,
iiow they permit ambitious men to use them us fire
brands tor kindling the flames of civil war.
Weehail hereafter invite file attention of the board of
foreign missions to tliis subject.
uation il
Tiie decree has gone forth; it is Irreversible, that
the white and the red mao cannot live together.
He who runs may read. He may ijead it in tiie past
and in the present, and he may f iscern it in the
signs of the future. W ilhout attempting to investi
gate the causes, moral and physical, which ha ve en
acted this la w of stern necessity, it is enough Ibr our
present purpose to know that it exists, and to leel
that its penalty is destruction to one of these parties;
a penalty only to be avoided by their migration be
yond the sphere of its influence. The longer this
salutary measure is delayed, the greater will he the
injury to them. Their State of excitement and
uneasiness will continue, the collisions and dif
ficulties with their white neighbors will multiply,
and surrounded, as they must be, with disheart
ening troubles, their habits and prospects may be
wrecked in this hopeless conflict. Had they not
better go, and speedily? Go to a climate, which is
known to be salubrious; to a country-fertile and ex
tensive; beyond their wants now, and for genera
tions to come; and to a home, which promises com
fort and permanence.
Can they expect to maintain their present nosi-
: i 'p 0 es tablish an independent government,
tion?
DATED LOTTERY.
Class No. 7, for 1852.
To he drawn at Wilmington, Delaware.
Drawing received at my Office on the 26 Aprfl.
66 No. Lottery—10 drawn Ballots.
SCHEME:
of 8?0,000 is 520,000,
“ 10,000 “ 10,000,
“ 5,000 “ 5,000,
“ 3.000 “ 3,000,
1,000 100,000,
1
]
1
100
10
56
56
112
112
224
1960
15400
Prize
do.
do.
<fn.
6*
do.
do.
do.
do.
do.
do.
do.
do.
500
100
80
50
40
30
20
10
8,000,
. 5,600,
4,480,
5,600,
4,480,
0,720,
39,200,
154,000,
$366,080.
18040 Prizes, amounting to
Price of Tickets—-Wholes 810—Halves $
82 50.
-Q.uarters
having underfined and (indefinable relations with
the State of Georgia? To add another imperium in
imperio to our complicated system? Such an ex
pectation appears to us vain and illusory.
Practically unattainable; and fraught with their
<VS*ruction, if it could he attained. They would
Ik* exposed to the operation of all those evils, which
have sweept over their race, as the fatal Simoon,
the blast of death, sweeps over the desert.
THE CHEROKEE QUESTION.—In the Globe
of the 31st ult. ttrere is a powerful article on tliis absorb
ing k pic. We regret that us great length must exclude
it fn ni our columns. Feeling authorised from tiie time
tnd maimer of ushering this elaborate production into
lie notice of the American people, to consider it as ex-
><■:- ng file views of the administration, ve will mention
a few of its leading features, which have struck us on a
nasty perusal. The production is said to be from tiie
: en of lie Secretary of war.
1st. It is shewn that all the nations of Europe who
planted colonies on this continent, considered themselves
tiie lords paramount of the countries clamed by them,
t d so lar as the matter of right was concerned, regard
'd only the claims of each other.
2d. That they granted titles to the soil regardless of
any claims of the natives.
3d. That in the set dements made on the territory* now
comjxisiiig the United .States some were made without
the pretence of an agreement or purchase from the na
tives, while others entered into treaties of cession, which
: is" mode became general because it was found by lar
cueaper than the expensive wars growing out of atbrciuie
entry. D«*ctor Franklin is quoted as authority lor tins
reasoning on this question.
4tln The right of the governments thus established,
o take possession of the lands within their limits when
iiiey might deem it proper to do so, seems never to have
been questioned till at the close of the late war the British
ministers at Ghent proposed an article of prohibition
against the United States and in favor of (he Indians.
This proposition was indignantly repelled by our an
noys—11. Clay, i. Q. Adams&c.
5th. That according to the law of nations, universally
acquiesced in by the ablest w riters of Europe, civilized
nations have a right to occupy and cultivate countries
claimed by savages. That this right may be exercised,
according to rtasen >tnd justice if the savages are left a
sufficiency of land for tiieir subsistence.
6th. That those rights on the termination of the war
of the revolution vested in the States respectively.
7th. That under the Constitution of the United States,
these rights have not been given up by the Status and
are therefore reserved.
8th. That under the government of the United States
it has been the practice of the. general government, to
leave to the States the sole management of theirow*n In
dian relations when they chose io undertake it, and t
allow item to abolish the independence of the Indian
governments within their limits al their own pleasure.
This hns-aecordinglv happened from time to time in se
veral Stares. The Siale of New-York is shew n to have
abolished the Indian governments within her limits,
when their population was: over six thousand. Thi>
happened with tribes with whom the United States ha.
pentd tin intercour.*e, but no opposition was made .
Be jurisdiction claimed by the State <r rather toll:
iecision of her courts sustaining her laws over the ludi-
ins.
9th. That the treaties made by tiie United State*:
fill Indian tribes are not. to be, considered as bargait
be tween; equal • Tin Indians through. are eons’de -
be. 4eae by a writ of ccrlioian, as <4 aiid treated as a ibutanys and dependains. The luJf-
A YOUNG MOTHER.—At. eleven years and two
months of age, a colored girl, in Eaily coumy, gave birth
to a healthy female oh lid.
From the Globe.
We have at length received the diftsenting opin
ion of Judge Baldwin, in the case of \Vorcester
against the State of Georgia. On a previous ap
plication, the Judge declined furnishing a copy,
being unwilling that his opinion should go to the
public simultaneously with that of the Court, lest
it might be open to the imputation of having a
tendency to impair the weight of the decision and
mandate in Georgia. He preferred to remain in
the attitude in which he had been placed bv the
representation in the public papers, that his dissent
from the opinion of the Court was 00 a question
of mere formality in the writ or record, and that
the decision of the Court was virtually unanimous,
until the time should arrive when the publication
could have no effect on the course to be taken by
the authorities of Georgia. As . that course must
have been already taken, there can be no objection
to the publication, and the public have a right to
know the Opinions ofall the Judges on tiie interest
ing questions which arose in that case. Judge
Baldwin stated ih open Court, that, although his
dissent on the first question which arose in the ar
gument, rendered it unnecessary for him to give
an opinion in relation to the other questions in the
cause, yet he thought proper to|declare that he
adhered to his opinion delivered last term in the
ease of the Cherokee nation against the State of
Georgia, and, of course, dissented from the judg
ment now given*
CHEROKEE SUPERIOR COURT,
March Term; 1832*
W E the Grand Jury chosen and sworn for the
county of Cherokee, cannot refrain from the ex
pression of our gratification at tlic organization of the
country into a county.
We know that new as our county is—the extern of
its territory uni the few persons yet citizen,*, of it, that
much cannot be done towards the improvement and re
pair of our roads. We would however recommend the
Inferior Court, to use all the means within their controul
to have this object attended to. The roads in the coun
ty have been so tong neglected that they are in some pla
ces almost impassible—and knowing as we do that dur
ing the ensuing summer an unusual number of persons
will visit the county, we would respectfully u ge the In
ferior Court to the accomplishment of a purpose so inter
esting to the whole community.
The opinion of his Honor Judge Doccherti upon the
right of the State to organize the country into a county
—and to legislate for it and over it—-meets our approba
tion as well as his administration generally Uurihg the
present Term—to whom vve tender ourrespects. To the
Solicitor General, Mt. Trippe, we also tender our ac
knowledgments for the manner in which lie lias discharg
ed his duty.
We request that our presentments may be published
in the Federal Union, and Georgia Journal.
George Saber,
J\oble Timmons,
John S. Holcombe,
Leroy Hammond t
Samuel Means,
IFm. Hi. Ray,
Hubbard Barker,
William Smith.
William Lay*
James Hemphill,
John Dawson,
James Cantrell\
R. T. Fowler,
R. F. Daniel,
Green B. Durham }
John Jack,
Reubin Sams,
John P. Brooks,
Charles Haynes,
On motion 01 Burner H. Trippe, Solicitor General,
ordered, That the presentments of the Grand Jury be
published according to their request.
A true extract from the minutes of the Court, March
28th, 1832. OLIVER STRICKLAND, Cfk.
&
U" HAVE removed to the county of Cherokee, and at
JL present reside at the house of Oliver Strickland,
Esq. Business in that section of tiie State in the line
of my profession confided to my care will meet with
prompt attention. Letters will be directed to “High
tower Post-Office.” Z. B. HARGROVE.
April 19 41—4t.
OUR months after date application will be-made
to the honorable the Inferior Cutirt of Henry couh-
y, when sitting for ordinary purposes, for leave to sell
-he land and negroes belonging to the estate of Alexan
der Moore, deceased—To te sold for the benefit of the
.eirs and creditors of said deceased.
THOMAS D. JOHNSON, Adm’r,
April 19 4m
TOSE indebted to the estate of John F. Adam*,
late of DeKalb county, deceased, are requested tc
ke immediate payment; and those haying demand)
•ain-st said estate, will present them in terms of the lav/.
jAM£s CAMPBELL, Adm’r.
April i9 41—6;
Splendid Prizes !
$40*000 $10,000 fir f 10
N. YORK CONSOLIDATED LOTTERY,
Class I\ . 13, for 1832.
Drawing to be received at my Office May 10th, 1832.
66 Number Lottery—10 drawn Ballots.
SCHEME:
40.000 DOLLS.
10.000 DOLLS.
0,000 DOLLS.
1 do. 4,104 “ 4,104,
I do. 3,000 “ 3,000,
1 do. 2,000 “ .,000,
10 do. 1,000 “ 10,000,
10 doL 800 “ 8,000,
10 do. 600 “ 6,000,
10 do. 500 “ 5,000,
10 do. 400 “ 4,000,
20 do. *200 “ 4,000,
44 do. 150 “ 6,600,
56 do. 100 “ 5,600,
Great many 70s, 60s, 50s, 40a, &c. &c.
Lowest Prize $12.
PRICE OF TICKETS.
Wholes only $10—Halves $5— 1 Quarters $2 50.
P. S-—I have selected the above Schemes tor the ac
commodation of my friends at a distance. They are
Schemes worthy the attention of adventurers, giving
them four weeks to order tickets before the day of draw
ing. It would be well however to order immediately,
your orders would then have precedence, consequently
would be attended to first.—As soon as the official draw
ings are received, at my office, information will be ex
tended to niy distant customers, through the medium
of the papers of this place,*or by letter (if requested.)
ORDERS for Tickets from any part of the Un
ion, (post-paid) will meet with prompt attention, if ad
dressed to
NATHAN McGEIIEE.
March 29. 1832. Milledgeville, Geo.
FRANKLIN HOTEL,
MILLEDGEVILLE, .GEORGIA.
T IIE subscriber begs leave to inform his friends and
the public generally, that his House is now open
for the reception of travellers or regular boarders, on
tetter terms than any other public house in Milledgc-
ville. His table will be supplied witil the best the coun
try affords, and his Bar furnished with the best of Li
quors, and no attention will be spared to render general
satisfaction to all who may faVor him with their patron
age.
He will also attend promptly to any business connect
ed with the Banks of Milledgeville, in renewing or dis
counting notes, &c. Persons at a distance wishing busi
ness of this kind transacted, can have it done at the low
price of 56 cents per note.
AARON SEARCY.
Milledgeville, April 19,1832. 41—tf
On Saturday, the 28th April r
Witt be re c v ni at B, * J Office. A j uiawiqg
UNION CANAL LOTTEHY, *
or PEMsnrivu.
Gibk'.o >• u>
60 Number Lottery—9 r t .*•. o Ballots.
SCHEME r
1 PRIZE of $25,000
1 PRIZE «/ $15,000
I PRIZE of $10,000
■i
so
*
Tickets $8—Halves
Packages of Wholes S160,.
do. u Shares in proj
Prizes cashed and prompt aue
arters g2L
prompt auemmn paid to orders ML
Beers’ Fortunate Lottery Office, No-Sdfl Broad Street^
Augusta. Address (post-paid) ..I
April 19
W. P. BEERS,
TO T11EI-IBLK.
R eports; having
Francis A. Huso
w ui those unacquainted
W e the undersighed ci."
iiors of Mr. Huson,
it uicuia cu against Mr.
thick if uneontrodirted. m
ith Mr, Huson, injure hinHw
ns of McDonough and neigh*
pleasure certify that circum
stances have occured which entirely dear Mr. Ur.*-a’a
character of even a suspicion of guilt or participation in
ihe affair; and that our confidence in him as a man^
honesty, honor and integrity is unshaken.
Wiley Mangum,
Edmund Low,
Thos- C. Uivssell,
T. J. Russell,'
James EL Calaway,
James Shaw,
Wm. A.Calaway
Wm. L. Crayton,
David Clements,
Wm. H. White,
Henry W. TJndal^
Peter Johnson,
Peter Raudhan,
M. L. Moore,
Samuel Peck,
Abner Upchurch^
John Hunt,
VV. Beck,
F. E. Mansou,
Oliver \V. Cox,
Henly Varner,
Tandy W. Key,
A. C.Sl 'an,
McDorci
Harwell Ragland,
Jas. C. Steele,
"Wiley W. Gaither,
Thomas J. Joh/isonfc
J. G. Fears,
James Love,
AS m. L. Tuggle,
J. H. Brynii.
J. F. Tomlinson,
Joseph P Manley
A T. Karelin,
J. Stokes,
A'dc Stafford,
Au;a-a Spencer,
Tor anceCi midi,
C r . ': rCni'toro
Git nCla
Henry Ba k>',
A. xv«der LumXL
J. M. Peck.
Al d;rw R. Moore,
Jan;- - S. Jones.
y ee. Ap ' 14 1 '2.
41—
> u* tne ( 't on! r-
.irh he offers for saifc
A TEACHER WANTED,
W HO cuu come well recommend as a man of _
moral character, capable of teaching the English
Language and Geography correctly, will be employed
at liberal wages by an early application to the undersign-
Store, Vvashington county^Ga*
TO FAll’iEUS.
T HE • , o ib.-. eg ie •
mere, m i . e na . n ha:.
■ :i reasons! » m
COTTON SCREWS,
for packing >J re n ,n sq ire .i f . * ,it-se .-screws aue
on an improved plan, niakiug a bag of carton bj t. rning
twelve times. Three hands wifi pack ten baits a day,
and four and a half yards bagging wiil make a ban cr-fi-
taining between 375' and 400 pounds cotton. The sub*,
scriber will keep constantly on hand a supply ol ihese
Screws. He is certain that on trial in this part of Geor*
gia, this machine will be found by the farmers to answer
all die purposes intended and here stated. Application
to be made to the subscribe! on his plantation, about T'
miles west of Milledgeville, on the Monticello read.
ALEXANDER JARRATT.
April 19 41
1 * HOHOIAf Jasper c >unry.
D Rfi A RY COUCH, jr. of Capt. S. Adamrfi dis»
tic-, toils before George Dawkins^ Esq. nt cs:ray
r o n HORSE, with some white in his forehead sop-
posed to be fifteen years old this spring, four !’«•• e vta
or eight inches high, branded on each thigh, \u i.. i*-
teligible enough to be understood—A ppraisei 1 mV
iam Couch and Paschal Traylor to Twenty d hare rhia
19th March, 1832. ROBERT KELL AM c. i.^
April 19 41—3:
GEORGIA, Jones coumy.
I OVEL SMITH of the three hundred and fifty
A eighth district G. M. tolled before me, cne ei>
ay bright sorrel HORSE, with a blaze in his face, i is
-ift eye out, branded with a letter Y. on the jef' siv t K.
!c”, left hind .foot white, sixteen hands high iupp< cd
< te eighteen years old—Appraised bv John f ms and
ioel Hum to twenty-five dollars, this 17th April 1832,
JAMES GODDARD, J. r.
A true copy taken from the estray Bonk tiffs 16th
April 1832. M. X MARSHALL, c. i. *.
April 19_ • . 41—3t
XEOUTOR’S SALE.—Will be sold onThtirs*
day, the last day of A Jay next; at the hour* Jt
Martha Freeman, deceased, late of Monroe county cw
Horse and a yoke of Oxen.
Also, will be sold on the first Tuesday in July r x*
between the usual hours of sale, at the court house d»xn
in Forsyth, Monroe county, three ukely negroes, a wo
man and two girls from ten to fourteen years old.
Also, will be sold on the first Tuesday in August next
at the court-house door in Jackson, Suits coumy, a L' »
>f Land, number nine, in the first district of original!-/
Henry now Butts county, containing two hundred'wo
and a half acres, (some cleared laud and improvemen >•
on it,) and thought to be a valuable Jot of land. Al s. iff
as the property of Martha Freeman deceased, la e eff
HO cuu come well recommend as a man of good j Monroe county, in pursuance of tiie last will and testa
ment of said deceased. Terms made hnow rt on the day J
of sale. COLLIER. FOSTER, Ex’or.
April 19 41-—tds
W ill be soid
la e di,
Monroe county, deceased, oh Thursday 31st it Max
next, one new Cart, plantation Tot Is, and sundry rJiti
articles too tedious to mention. Bold lor he benefit tff
the creditor*—Terms made hnown on the c'bv.
FHELMAN DURHAM,
Adm’r. with the n ;i annexed
April 19 41—- ‘de
ed, at Wartlieus!
April 19
if
ELI CUMMINS,
JOHN WICKER,
TllOS. WICKER,
A. ARMSTRONG, Jr.
Trustees.
41—4t
L IST OF LETTERS remaining in the Post Of
fice at Louisville, Ga. on the 1st April 1832, and
if not taken out before the 1st July next, will be forward
ed to the General Pott Office as dead letter*
Allen, Waddle
Allin, Joseph
Atieway, Elijah
(Jon. Justices IuTr Court,
Bucket, Ned
Brown, Robert
Belcher, Phillip
Beall, Andrew Hi
Bates, Mrs. Ann
Cross, Isaac S
Campbell, Levi
Coule, Ebenezer J.
Cannon, S.
Davis, Willianl
Fowler, Jesse
Gay, Barnabus C* ,
Gillingham, & Co. Mesaro, Taylor, David G.
Goodown, Jacob W, 8 True, Lewis
Loudon, Mrs. Wineford
Murphey, William 3
Marshall, Joseph 2
Mountain, Thomas
McKigneV, Thomas
Pipkin, Henry B«
Price, James
Phillips, Joseph J.
Paridise, Capt John D.
Patterson Miss Catherine M
Itonaldson, William
Ronaldson, Andrew
Bpann, Henry
Sanford, Benjamin
Stoddard, Nathan T.
Taylor, John
Gordan, William
Hudson, John B,
Hughes, Demsy
Johnston, Jesse
Johnson. William
Knight, John
April 19
Tillman, Robert I
Williams, James
3 William, Jefferson
Wells, Thomas
William, Mrs. Sally
JOHN BOSTWICK, P. M.
471s .41—3t
A LL persons indebted to the estate of Martha Free
man. late of Monroe county, deceased, will please
make immediate payment, and those having demands
against, said estate,-are reques'edto present them within
the time prescribed by law.
COLLIER FOSTER, Ex’or.
April 19 41—6t
A DMINISTRATOR'S SAL!
at the lat« residence of Edward f reeman,
W ILL RE SOLD, at the late residence uf Ab
ner M’Garity, late of DeKtJb county, decease^
on Friday the first day of June next, all the perishable
property of said deceased, consisting of Stock of all kinds.
Corn and Fodder, Plantation Tools, Household and
Kitchen Furniture, and other articles too tedious to me$«
tion* Terms at sale.
MARY M’GARITY, Adm’rx
JOHN M’GARITY, Adm’r.
Aprfl 19 M—tds
IN WILKINSON SUPERIOR COURT,
April Term, 183%
Lewis Bond, )
vs. > RULE NISI,
Martin Hays* ) For foreclosure qf Mortgage*
Georgia—To the Superior Court of Wilkinson coda w
T HE petition of Lewis Bond, respectfully s|:fefcet
that on the tenth day of April in the y<
hundred and twenty*>seven, Martiii Hays of i
etn
ear eight eta)
skid county,
NOTICE.
^ LL persons indebted to the estate of Edward Free-
executed his mortgage deed on a certain parcel < r iot or
land lyingand being inthe 4th district of Wilkinson com*
ty, and distinguished in the plan of said district by tk- ;
number two hundred find forty six, it being the lot
land whereon Mkrtih Hays OrW lives, and said lot of
land Whereon.he has built 4 mill the tetter to,secure tL.
payment of thrdfe promissory notes; the first dated ’la-
10th January 1826, payable one day after date u. l.tv. *
is Bond, or bearer, for $301 32: the second dated ri#*
22d January 1626, payable to Lewis Bond, or tearc:
one day afterdate, for f 12 6/jj the third dated rh: IS:/?
July 1826, payable twenty days after date to R ct
Newell, or bearer, for $7# I4|; which said tnor g ,•
now due-—It is therefore ordered by the Court. That
the principal, interest and cost be paid into C^m‘ v. i V o
six months froto the date of this rule, or in dc anl: : r- t
that the equity of redemption of the said Mar l IV'
in and tosa d mor’yag d premises, he fi< r ever bar r. - o
.s rule
f Court.
oe t k ir
man, late of Monroe county, deceased, will pleese
make payments without further delay—and all persons j f .reclosod—I: is further t r .tered.
having demands against the estate,'will present them ! lished according »o » R w .*> -be - ,
duly attested in strict compliance of the law, and witinq; A ’rue extract from the icr
Juetime. WHELM AN DURHAM, ! cr Court, that dav of Api ■* V' -
Adm’r. witiuh^ > v >r o r.exed.j * JERK^ll^j Ql’k*
April 1
f:<on or er:-
Ud