Newspaper Page Text
wm
• ts
mmiWig.
m&
i <*-.j@«fijk;
ffiiiiMfflBWimm
'
IpPi . . .-£*,
ISftf/
ggwssi
lYiii tiVim
“^“-.~ w -" ”- v
PUBLISHED WEEKLY BY COBURN & DWINELL EDITORS.
VOLUME 10.
-i -Msnssi*.
ROME, GA., TUESDAY MORNING, JANUARY 9, 1855.
TERMS-S? 00 PER ANNUM, PAYABLE IN ADVANCE.
W- PP
ts AN-ERRONEOUS EraSA that disease
THE PHANTOM.
BY SUYA.nO YAYLOR.
Again
In the old fkniluni ant,
And shade and sunshine ehasa each tfthor
O’er the carpet at my feet.
But the sweetdnStSr’Si Arms hare wrestled up*
trends
In the steatitMt* Hud are past,
And the willow traHa its branches lower
Than when
I'M* theta last.
Yahshitfe wholly
out the haunted reoth "
fill the houso that once ITaS j6ym,
SRcmco and with gUtoth.
faces,
the doorway <
Voices, that Wake the sweeter musio
Of one that Wow 13 datnb.
Heouv _ _ ,
‘though »*e diVnM in ‘be UciUaUj cured.
The coat-* of the stomach by Wtffctlnuea use ot
"nauseating mixtures, frequently become SO
touch disordered that the digestive /uacfvoa is
Wn'enWy ,»>red'—the result of which is dys
pepsia, nervousness, cholics. alternate diarrhtea
and costiveness. flatulence, nightmare, etc., cte.
Would it hot. therefore, be very de* Arabic tapes-
sess a Te'tfeedy, which being appliwi extern ally
Vould excite the absorbents to increased action,
‘and thus carry off through this medium, the
'deleterious principle which is the direct cause
•of the disease? Surely every thinking mah
Will admit that this would not only he the most
■plraeant. but bv fat the safest means to effect
the desired end.' The almost superhuman cures
performed by the Arabian physicians in the
days of old were mainly effected by this course
•of 'treatment, and the ingredients of which It.
G. FARRELL'S CELEBRATED ARABIAN „ ■ .
LINIMENT is combed, are extracted froM. Twin tofif«M gladaa ewl 1 ,
rare plants peculiar to Arabia. This great Lin-
•intent (which is bow to be had of most rc«T<
table druggists and merchants in every tOtvr.
\he United States) is daily effecting cures wich
seemed beyond the power of medicine to
tro!—consumption, bronchitis and liver
plaints in their first stages, nervous affection?,
indigestion, enlargement of the spleen, - —
'ulotts tumors, goitre, etc., etc., are frtf^ _
•gored, and ofwoy* relieved hy its use. It is un
surpassed as an anodyne—relieving severe pains
in a few minutes after its application, it soothes
the irritated nerves, and produces that delight
ful tranquility so grateful, to the nervous inva
lid. Sprains, bruises wounds, burns, sore
throat, chilblains, rheumatism, sun pain, etc.,
•etc-, are specially cured by it- and for nearly all
ailments in horses or cattle, requiring an exter
nal application, it is an effectual remedy.
Look ont for Counterfeits) ^
The public are cautioned against Another
counterfeit, which has lately made ^appear-
^ance. called W. B. Farrell's Arabian LiaBWM,
the m«>«t dangerous of.all tb© counterfeits* be*-
,|us having the name'of Farrell, many
l — it in good faith, without the knowl-
a counterfeit exists, and they'Will per-
discover their error when the spuri-
sture has wrought its evil effects.
genuine article is manufactured cnly b;
1, Farrell, sole inventor and proprietor, ap<
bolesata druggist, No. 17 Main street. Peoria,
Illinois, to whom all applications for Agencies
be addressed. Be sure yon get it with
letters 1L G. before Farrell's, thus—II. U*.
FARRELL'S—and his signature on the wrap-
•per. all others are counterfeits.
Crold by Kendrick A Pledger,
G. B. F. Mattox,
CL Brown.
Brunner Jt Moyers,
Robert Batter. Wholesale Agent, Rome
and by regularly authorized agents throughout
Melville
Mt Hickory
Coosa P. 0.
Summerville
Price 25 and 50 cents, and $1 pet Lottie.
AGENTS WANTED in every town, village
and hansirt in tbe United States, in which one
is not allready established. Address IT: G. Far
rell as above, accompanied with good reference
as to character, responsi
NEW FALL GOODS-FULL SUPPLIES.
WILLIAM SHEAR, AUGUSTA. G.V.,
TI AS rccelred from New York, hi? Full rfu'p—
JLa[die* of Fancy and Staple DRY GOODS,
•embracing a large and splendid assortment, sui
table fbrthe Fail and Winter season, among
which are
Rich feney colored SILKS, in great variety of
style and of superior quality ;
Rich Paris printed DELAINES, and Fancy all
Wool PLAIDS;
Lupin's cord, white and black MERINOS, and
plain col’d DELAINES;
A very large supply of small figured all wool
printed DELAINES, for Children, of new and
beautiful styles: /
English and American Fancy PRINTS, in a
great variety of styles;
Eaaperior Seoleh Fancy GIXGAAMS, ofnew
l and beautiful Winter styles:
Elegant Fresh EMBROIDERIES, embracing
Ladies’ COLLARS CIIEMIZETT, TJNDER-
SLEEYES and HANDKERCHIEFS, ofnew
and tplendid styles:
Ladies' Black and Colored CLOTH CLOAKS
and TALMAS of the latest styles;
Ladies’ Rich Embroidered and Plain Pari3 Silk
Velvet CLOAKS:
A large supply of Ladies’, Misses and Children’s
HOSIERY of the best make :
Ladies' -and Gentlemen’s superior Gauntlet
Gloves;
ies and Misses Merino and Silk VESTS;
Gentlemen’s and Youth's Silk and Merino
SHIRTS and DRAWERS;
fhe hired to hear;
They braid\h6 h»e in summer garlands,
Whose Rowers to her were dear.
And still, her footsteps in the pa&hge>
. Her blushes at the door,
Her timid words of maiden welcome,
Uottrt hack to me ©wee more.
JUad alt forgetful of my sorrow*
Unmindful of my pain,
I think she has but newly left me,
And soon will tome again.
She stays without, perchance, a moment
To dress her dark brown hair;
I hear the rustle of hergannente, .
Her light stepwfi the «tai?!
G RoWtSttg LcaJrt \ control thy liuriuft;
Lest eyes profane shonhT see,
My cheeks betray the rush of rapture
Her coming brings to me!
She tarries long; but to! a whisper
Beyond tho operi door, - •
And, gilding through the qhlot 3ffanifiC>
A shadow on the floor! • *
Ah! ’tis the whispering pine that calls me.
The vine, whose shadow strays;
And my patientheart must still await her,
Nor thido her long delays-.
But my heart kick with weary waiting,
As many a time before ;
Her foot is ever at the threshold, .tv
Yet nevr passes o’er, f
SPEECH dr.
hSn, a. h. Stephens, of Georgia.
Delivered ia the Houtc of Representative*,
December 14,1854, in reply to the Remark* of
Mr. Mace, of Indiana, on giving notice of his in
tention to introduce a Dili to rettore the Mittou-
ri Compromise. \ _
Superior Welsh, Saxony, Gauze, Silk Warp and
Heavy Shaker FLANNELS*;
Superior English, Colored FLANNELS, for
Ladies Backs; f
English and American Canton FLANNELS, of
extra quality:
A very large supply of MOURNING GOODS,
for Ladies’ use. of a superior quality;
Superior 12a-4 LINEN SHEETINGS and Pil-
k-w Case LINENS;
Superior 8-4 and If by 4 Table and Damask
DIAPERS, some of Extra quality:
&ek Damask TABLE CLOTHS and NAPKINS
some of extra size;
Scotch and Bird’s Eye DIAPERS* extra fine,
for children’s wear:
Heavy Scotch DIAPERS and HUCKABACKS
for Toweling;
BsperKW Whitney and Merino BLANKETS, of
extra size and quality.
Bwperie* CRIB BLANKETS,
Also a great variety of other seasonable attl-
rieu suitable for Family and Plantation use.—
The public are respectfully invited to call and
examine the assortment.
W. S. especially solicits'a call from his long
cos tine ed friends and patrons, and assures them
that no exertion on his part shall bo wanting to
supply them with the latest and most desirable
eiyeis of GOODS, at the lowest prices,
nor. 14, 1854.
HIGH CARPETS AND CURTAIN MATE
RIALS.
W ILLIAM SHEAR, Augusta Ga., has re
ceived from New York a large supply
English BRUSSELS CARPETS, of the best
quality and of new and elegant styles;
" h VELVET CARPETS, of new and
id styles;
ten THREE PLY, INGRAIN and YENE-
Bicfc CHENILLE RUGS, to match the Car-
Printed CRUMBS CLOTHS, in patterns and by
the yard;
Rich Colored DAMASKS and DELAINES, for
Curtains, with Gimps and Tassels to match ;
Rich Embroidered Lace and Muslin CURTAINS
and some at very low prices;
EMBROIDERED MUSLIN, for Curtains; by
the yarrl :
WINDOW SHADES, of beautiful styles;
Bnperior FURNITURE DIMITIES and fine
COTTON FRINGES:
Gilt Cornices, Curtain Bands, and Brass and
Plated Stair Rods:
The public are respectfully invited to call and
examine the assortment, nor. 14.
BLANKETS AND NEGRO CLOTHS.
’tXTTLLIAM SHEAR, Augusta Ga., fespect-
II folly invites the attention of Planters to
his large supply of NEGRO BLANKETS aDd
NEGRO CLOTHS, which he is prepared to sell
at very low prices* nov. 14.
LAMBERTH HOPKItfS,
WlBSMVSE & CBJEHISSIOI MERCHANT,
AUGUSTA, GEORGIA.
7, ‘bi. ly—«
Sr. STEhSkkSSaid: .. :
Mr. Chairman: on takihg the fioCE, off this
occasion, it was not my purpose, nttr is it my
purpose now, to reopen or to go into a discus
sion of the general ffiefitspf the Kansas Nebras
ka bill which was passed at the last session of
Congress. The gentleman from Indiana (Mr.
Mace) came forward On yesterday, and, in a ve
ry formal manner, announced the determination
for the future, opponents to that measure. He
peal is their policy. Prohibition Of slavery is
un to be put upon Kansas and Nebraskfc.-^-
I considered the merits of the question as set
tled at the last session. I consider them as
settled now-. Revolutioil never'goes backwards
—always forward. The argument in and out
of Cchgress, and throughout tho Uhion, on the
great movement made by the National Legis-
latnreon this quession, was then conclusive;.
and; by the passage of that bill we took a grand
step id that progress which characterizes this
age- there acker will be any backward iriorii-
ment in this niatter=at least in my. opinion.—
I have no apprehensions On that score; and I
repeat, thatl do not risefor the purpose of open
ing, or again canvassing, the merits of tho
Nebraska-Kansas bill. But the gentleman from
Indiana gave utterance to some remarks tq
which I deem some reply propeb Hfi SCc’rhcd
to think and argne that tho late elections at the
North conclusively showed that the pnblic sen
timent there, by the late elections, had passed
the sentence of public condemnation Oh the
bill referred to, and demanded its immediate re
peal. He spoke of that as a fiied fact The
gentleman from Maine, [Mr. Wasliburn] who
succeeded him in the discussion, indulged id
the same line of argument. Now, I Wish to
state to these gentlemen, to this committee, and
the country, that I draw no such inference
from the iate elections. It is true that the
results were reiy astonishing to some, though
not to me, and took many men, in and oat of
power, hy surprise. ' , _
I ask the honorable gentleman from Indiana
how he reaches the conclusion that .these elec
tions set the seal of the public condemnation
upon the friends of the great movement of tho
last session? I believe, Mr. Chairman, that
thefe Was no man more zealous in his opposition
to the bill then passed, not e^en excepting the
gentleman from IndianahimEolf, than yourself;
and you Will pardon me, sir, the illustration.—
Even you, sir, from the city of brotherly love,
are no longer returned to the seat which you
have filled with so much ability, and in which
.you have voted with tne on many qaestions of
pablfc policv^alwaysexcepting this particular
measure, h o wl ask the gentleman from Indiana
Whether that ia a proof that the people pfPhila-
adelphia agree with him and with you; Mr.Chair-
man ? I might argue, following his line, thatjtbis,
year defeat, was the seal of reprobation on your
course. But, sif, the truth is, your course on
that bill, I take it, had but little to 'do in your
defeat one way of the other. Again, Mr. Chair
man, my honorable friend from another district
in Pennsylvania, who site to my right, [Mf.
Heieter,] with Whom I had a conversation at the
last Ec-sioU just pfevious to th passage of tho
bill, and Who Was quite as iCalous in his oppo
sition as yon or tho gentleman from Indiana,
has also been defeated in the canvass for re-
election. Ido not recollect the majority against
him. I have not attempted the Herculaneum
excavating process of ascertaining the depths
to which he has been fadfted in this popular
irruption—the majority against him I do not
know, bnt it was decided. The gentleman
from the first district of Pennsylvania, [Mr.
Florence,] who voted for and ardently sup
ported the measure, has been re-elec tcdi I also
see that the gentleman from tho Berks district
[Mr. Jones] has been again returned. Another
gentleman from Pennsylvania, [Mr. Packer,]
and an advocate of tho Kansas Nebraska bill,
ha* been returned. In fine, I find that some
who have Voted for it and somo who have voted
against it have been returned to Congress.
Why, sir, In Pennsylvania a gentleman ran for
Governor who was known to be opposed to tho
bill, and a gentleman ran for Canal Commis
sioner on the opposite ticket, and was known to
be in favor of the measure* Tbe opponent of
the bill was elected by thirty seven thousand
majority, While its advocate was elected Canal
Commissioner Ly, I believe, one hundred thou
sand majority. NflW, What is to ho legitimately
inferred from this slate of things? Certainly,
not that tho people of Pennsylvania had put
their seal of reprobation upon Nebraska. I
should infer that the Nebraska qaesliwn had
nothing at very little US do with the election—
it was an element only in tbe canvass. Now,
when the gentleman wishes to appeal to tbo
results of an election as evidence of anything,
ho must admit that the question claimed to be
decided by it ought to be the sole, leading and
paramount/ question in the canvass. If such
be tbe case, appeal can be made to the result.
But when you find a Nebraska man elected
Canal Commissioner of Pennsylvania by ono
hundred thousand majority, and an anti-Ne
braska man elected Governor by thirty-seven
thousand majority, it simply shows that this
oueation could havo had very little to do with
the results. How was it in Massachusetts ?
There is tho honorable gentleman from that
State, [Mr. Goodrich,] who was alluded to yes-
todKyih dffWicotion with tho gentleman from
Indiana, Ah Associated with thoso who {pit up
the Kansas and Nebraska Emigration Society.
There it another, [Mr. Elliott,] who bathe here
and took the lead in favor of tho repeal of tho
ftrgftivc slave law; and tho gentleffiah who sits
immediately In my rear, [M. Walley,] who,was
distinguished in his opposition to tho bilL-aU
were sealons in their opposition to tne brlr, ill
were candidates for ra-oleetion, and all were left
at home. All, sir, foil before the destroying
angel whieh came in the night, and they knew
notwhenee foe Wow came. It eertainly did
not oome frort,yhb’fffiaAsfr ‘tO.whiphthegentle
man from Irfffiana" alludes, for if the am-No-
braakaites strffck down suoh men as those to
whom I have referred, they did not back their
friends ns we do onrs down Sonth.
Mr. Chairman, now let mo tom to the State
.of Hlinois. I allude to her with pleasure, for I
believe there was not a single Northern State
where foe principles of the Nebraska bill were
ao opdh and widely promulgated and considered,
And So fairly represented and met as in that
State. The distinguished Senator who had the
charge, of foe bill in the Senate, stood in the
front of foe battle* never giving ground, never
yielding an inoh, and foe distinguished and
gallant gentleman npon this floor, [Mr. Richard
son,] who had charge of ithere, met the people
.of D.iinois.pVexy wWo on IlS riMfrfts. . If there
is a State North which teay be appealed td as
one where there was anything like a contest
on foe question, it was Illinois. And what was
tho result? There were bnt three men from
that State who voted for foe Nebraska bill, apd
S oW we have four Nebraska men-from Illin6i?.
1 seems Nebraska gained strength .by. discdSs
iOn there. We haa but three men before, anc
heW We.havo got four.
Mr. Washbnrne, of Illinois. Will tho
man tell-me .what the popular vote of
was upon the Nebraska question ?
Mr. Stephens.' The only test of the
votoiu foe entiro State of Hlinois that
npon that question, was npon the State Treas
urer, and the Nebraska candidate carried it by
a Uurge majority—three th usafid Majority, I
have-heard. In Congress Nebraska gained one
member; .. - - .
Mr. Waqhbflffr. f fonst 'cdWe'fit.iny friend
from Georgia in, regard to tho fact of the vote
in Illinois upon State Treasurer. It is true that
Mr. MoOre> foe Nebraska man, was elected, I
have seen it stated, by aboat .eighteen hundred
majority. But it should be stated, ft connec
tion with that, fact, that foe man ‘ Whb ran
against him—Mr. Miller—wax not known in
foe southern pirtof foe Stpte as a candidate,
and was not voted for it All iff that part of the
State. [Langhter.]
Mr. Stephens. I suppose not
. Mr. Woshbnrn. And I will say farther, that
if Mr. Miller had received his party Vdte in
that part of foe State where he was not known
as a candidate, he wonld have been elected by
somo five or six thousand majority.
Mr. Stephens. Well, sir, I do not think the
people of Hlinois could have been exceedingly
offended and ontraged hy this measuro, if they
did not take the trouble to have their candid
ates in opposition known. And yet, the gentle
man from Hlinois wantfc to Bare ns believe that
if they could only have haa their candidates
known, they wonld bare beon elected by five or
six thousand majority.
Mr. Washburn. I will state to the gentle
man that the candidate regularly nominated
declined, and the other candidate was brought
outoniy.a short time before the election.
Mr. Stepa'cns: Then I can only say that
tbeir candidate ran before ine p'dpuldt deifipn-
stration had got hold of him, [laughther] dtid it
only shows that the first candidate saw tho
band writing npon tbe wall, and was more pru
dent than foe last one. [Renewed Laughter.]
Mr. Richardson. With foe perm,issten of foe
gentleman from Ge.drgld, I will idphe .a single
fittitection. My colleague states.foatMr.Mooro
was elected treasurer of Illinois, because his
opponent was not known as a candidate in foe
southern part of foe State. Sir, foe facte are
against my colleague. It is true that in some
of foe Southern counties he received bnt few
votes; jlnt it is also true, that in all foe connties
h.o received some, so that it was known that Mr.
Miller #SS a candidate in all the connties in
fobSUtA.
While i ain hp, l Wdht id S&W. fob rCdSdn
frhy foe first candidate declined. He was nom
inated as foe Republican, Fusion candidate, and
was brought out by that party. And I hesitate
not here to declare foot if he hod continued in
this field he wonld have been beaten by more
foafl toil .thousand votes. But foe candidate
Wnd tfas bfdiight out attest was indorsed by all
foe leading WhigS id foe State; a§ a tibund, rad
ical Whig. t Hq waS run by the Whigs and sup*
somo at Mr. Dlx: some at the turning out of
- . R^59Sf.£ 3 - oftho
?^W-?jsLlg
NUMBER II.
Bronson; somo at tho drganlsatlon of the Cab
inet—sorhe at ofio thing, and some at another.
Somo said oho th'lhg, and somo another. There
was gonoral discontent and djssatisfactioh-—
whether rightfully or wrongfully n fs 'hot my
purpose now to discuss. Bert foe Administra
tion had pursuod suoh a bourse as to make a
largo party of malephto'hts—men bent upon
breaking oh thfhgk—foie class foe North Caro
lina than'’elutefoe ‘ Ramshacklesfoe designo-
ti6n )s a good one. Yes, sir, it was Genoral
Malcohtoht and foe groat party of tho ‘ Ram-
shackles’ that triumphed at tho North at foe
lato elections, and not the onti-Nebr&skaits.
But the gentloman from Indiana refered to
the Sonth. He said he wanted the members
from tho North to get on the same high stand
that the Representatives of foe South occupied.
I suppose he intendod what ho said in this chh-
neotion as a compliment to the Sonth, inas
much as ho wanted his people to occupy foe
same position; but if I comprehend what he
said, I do not receive it as a compliment He
said that Southern members npon this floor first
ascertained the wishes, and then voted upon all
S ueations, as their constituents wished—that
joy would rtaud by foe interests of their con-
Stifoentsaqd represent their, wishes.—Sir, I say
to foe gentleman that I think ho is just as muoh
mistaken in this as he was in reference fo fob
popular elections of foe North. I can speak,
however, only for myself. It is Hot true, that;
in my coarse as a member of this House, Hook
solely to what my oonstitnents wish. The first
question that addresses itself to. my Mind, is,
firhefoet apy measure presetted hero, is tight.
I Sena no letter^ hoifle t6 khow what they foiflk
there aboat it, I never have and never shalL
I consnlt my owii judgmentand act accordingly.
If I think a measure is right, that it is proper,
that it is jusL I vdto for it; and if I do not, I
vo’te pgainst it Upon fob merits of every ques
tion I ate responsible to my cohstiuents; and
whod I go homo to them, an intelligent and pa
triotic people, if they do not approve my con
duct, they can send opotber ip my place. Sir,
I believe that that is foe general position of
Southern men.
Hat foe goPtleteift Ikys that whbn Southern
teen’s measures oro vetoed, they raise their voi
ces in tones of founder until they carry ’them.
Sir, l do Pot Believe there ever- was a Southern
meastffe Vetted. I do not recollect one. The
South has never asked any thing from your
GOverhment that called' for a veto. There is
fob difference betwoon ns. The South asks hut
few favors from you. It is a class of gentlemen
from tho North who ask aid from foe Govem-
teenL Why, we never coteehore in that atti
tude. Let me ask the gentletead tfBefi v any
teea$firp from foe SOufo was ever vetoed ? when
foe South ever askbd anything fo&t required
the exercise of foe veto power ?
Now, sir, upon foe subject of internal improvo-
ments*which the gentleman alluded to, has foe
South eVed Asked legislative did in that parti
cular ? I do not speak nOw fiectioqally, or
against foe North ; bat look at foe whole nulo
ry of.dttr Government. .Who is it that is con
stantly appealing herb fbR legislative aid and
legislative patronage ? Who d$ks fdf fishing
bounties ? Who ask for protection to naviga
tion ? Why, the people of tho South, if they
were permitted to use or employ foreign vessels
in their coast trade would be greatly bonefitted
thereby. But American shipping must be pro
tected, and who is it that asks that protection,
arid not only on shipping, but almost every Id l}o thc.ir, riiast<;rs by voting Tor Nebraska
thing else? U"hd is it that wants a duty upon against their wishes. No, sir, it te the. gen-
icai » nig. lie was run by tbe Whigs and sup
ported by fob Fosionists, which accounts for his
receiving 6d heaVVa vote Hi. he did. .
Mr.-Stepneiis. Then the ini.errlijilidii of foe
gentleman on my left, [Mr. Washbnrne,] after
all, amounts to bat very little. He says Moore
was elected by eighteen hundred majority.
That is quite enongh for my purpose.
1; HdW mdfcii was Mr. I*ibrtie’S
Mr. WashbrirricJ:
majority?
Mr. Stephens. It te dot tedterial to nib what
Mr. Pierce's majority was. The popular vote
in Illinois at the recent election was in favor
of sustainingfoe principle df foe Nebraska bill.
That is my point. I do not cafe iVHethef fob
wqjority was eighteen hundred, of five tllriSarid,
or eighteen thousand. Iam willing to take it
at eighteen hnndred. I beard that it was three
thoosand. Tbe gentleman has heard that |t
was eighteen hundred; but foe difference is
immaterial It is given up that a majority
was in favor of the principle of tho Nebraska
bilL So mach for the popular condemnation
there.
Now, then, take the State of New York—for
I mast be brief upon this point. There was
bnt one candidate for Governor in foat8tato,
who was openly and avowedly in favor of foe
repeal of foe Nebraska bill. I mean Mr.
Clark* New York gave bat few votes npon this
floor, for foe bilL I think it is generally con
ceded; that if foero is any State in the Union
on that question,
Now York. Well, sir,
anti-slavery organiza
tions; with its Syracuse convention; where
every thing Was dene that could Bo diJdo to ral
ly the freemen of fob North, as it was said;
With Its emigration sdcidty ; with all this, how
many votes did Mr. Cibfk get? Not more
than one-third of. the rotes of foe State. Clark
got one hundred and fifty-odd thousand votes,
-^Seymour got tottlo thfoe hundred less—one
hundred Oita flf*ty*odd thousand votes j nHd Ull-
nlann and Bronsotl; together, received about
the samo „ number, oiie nlindfed and fifty-odd
thousand more. So foot in the great State of
New York, whorb this qticslioii Wils ndado pre
eminently a test; ih tbo‘recent election, net
One-third of foe fate of the State Were given
for tbo anti-Nebraska candidate: And yet foe
late election in New York te held upas ti pop-*
ulnr demonstration in opposition to 'fob pfiriCD
pie of the Nebraska bill. Sir, ho Such ooticld*
sion call od drawn; and tho samo may bo said
in reference to tho elections in Pennsylvania, in
Now Jersey, in Michigan, in Indiana; so far as
furnishing any popular demonstration upon this
subject, they amount to nothing.. No porson
can draw any legitimate inference from tham ;
to this
in reference
i question. Somo say it Was
foo ntt|
the Know-Nothings; somo say it was tho Tom-
perCttCft nfon; and some say it was foe' bnti-
NebriUkaitcs, that caused tbo defoat;
Sir, 1 am not preparod to say what it was that
caused these, to some people, ho strange results.
—I anl Inclined to think that tho man down in
North Carolina was about right, when ho said
it WaS general Malcontent thatcausodit. Somo
were diseantchfod because fff tbo appointments
of tho President to office; somo itcro discon
tented because it WdS jtept'oper to Cerfd such a
man as Mr. £fOdle if) Madrid; some Wore dis
contented because it was wrong to ae'xbl Such a
man as Mr. Belmont abroad; some WOW dis
satisfied at the appointment of Mri Yrffom;
coal ? Who npon iron ? Who upon Woolen
goods ? Who npon shoes, hats, leather, cotton
fabrics—everything ? Why. it te the industri
al interests of the North. We of the South, it
te tnie, sometimes grumble aud complain ; but
the. great majprity of the people of the Sriuth
‘ consider in Soriie IH-.
the support of
ever come up
and ask any aid froril the Government of the
United State! ? Tho ebristant prayer of foe
Sririlh to yoti Hd? been to stay yridr. haqds. All
that we ask of you is, keep your hririda out of
our pockets. That is all that the South asks,
and we do not get even that It is true; sir,
that in my own State we have asked some little
favors, bnt very few. Some years ago we ask-1
ed that yon should take the obstructions out of
the mouth of the Savannah river—not obstruc
tions that nature prii foqrej bnt foat wero put
there during the revdldtidndry. war, to keep ont
a foreign fleet—put there not by" the citizens of
foe State, bnt by public authority. It seems to
rii rlothing bnt right and just that the General
Govorririiont shduld rerifoVe.those obstructions ;
bnt we have asked in vain for that The gen
tleman says that -the Representatives of the
North come here arid pass river and harbor bills,
whieh are vetoed, and the wishes of their con
stituents are thereby defeated. Well, sir, we
have some rivers in the Sonth quite os naviga
ble „as those in Indiana^, but when did Georgia,
df South Carolina; dr Virginitt; Of foe Sduth
generally, come aria risk Congress to Clear ont
foose rivers t .
Now, Mr. Chairman, I am not going Into a
discussion of this question of internal improve
ments, or the constitutional power. I am going
to address a plain, common sense argument in
reply to the gentleman from Indiana, who said
that When tho South asked anything Shd gdt it,
df that wheii a Sdutbem measure was Vetoed,
the South thundered and fohndered upon this
floor, nntil she got what she wanted, while Nor
thern measures were defeated by vetoes. I re
peat, that a Southern measure has never been
vetoed; Hut Row does the gentleman stand
when he coniriS Hof6 ritid asks ni, ont of the
public Treasury, td blbdri ont the riVers in his
State ? I will state here, in passing, that I be
lieve Congress b«U the constitutional power to
clean ddt harbors; arid construct roads when it
id rieceisarjr dither fof foe Cdllection of tho pub
lic f evenue; Hr for military purposes. I did what
I could last Congress to get the iteprovenient of
Boston harbor; os well as of various other har
bors that Ibdlievo to be necessary for tho col
lection of the revenue: I was alsd in favor of
removing the obstructions iri the Mouth of the
Mississippi river. ThiS id Sufficient to show my
general position on this subjdct; , Now, a few
words on the material matter alluded to by the
gentleman, the improvement of Western rivers.
In foe State of Georgia, we havd rievef ask
ed for any harbor improvement except for foe
removal of those obstructions at tho mouth of]
the Savannah river, and wo never got that, as j
I have stated. We have never asked the Gen
eral Government to clean ont oar rivers. Bat
wo have a country of hill and volley, and we
have to got to market with our products—for
we grow tome things in Georgia for market,
notwithstanding that, in the opinion of the gon-
tlemari front Indiana, wo are a Heaven accused,
slavery ddoMod land—wo grow some produets
ia Georgia, I say; for market,-and how do we
got them to market ? ( Do wo come herd and
ask aid of the General Government? No, sir.
Why, in my State, we havo upwards of a thou
sand miles of railroad in full operation. How
did wo obtain it ? We took our surplus capital;
and with it wo bought human labor, human
energy, hone and sinew—wo bought’tho strong
arms of our own citizens, as well os of foreign
ers, to could and dig down the hills and fill up
the ValldjrSj ttndlay down tbo superstructure of
Ottf railroads—wo bought the iron, when wo
could gdt it; in this country, and wo wont abroad
for it When wo conld not got it here, and not
withdbiridittg all that, when wo . brought our
irori itffofoo country, we had to pay duty upon
it to’ thd Gortefo! Government. Twenty mil
lions of dollate Have b’o'ori spont in Georgia in
constructing highway's to our markots. This
te tho way wo got ditr thousand miles of railroad.
So far from oomirig horo and receiving assist
ance from tho Govci'riiiicnt, wo havo actually
had to pay a tax for thd privilege of bringing
our Iron into foo' counter. Goorgia has paid
not loss tbnn a million and it half of dollars, as
a duty on iron, into tho Treasury for tlio privi-
logo of building hprfowrt Works of internal im
provement. Now, X Would a*k any candid man
—I wonld: th'e' g'cn'tleirfori himself—if it te
just, not’ohly fotrfx GTecWgia for tire privilege
of constructing bfor Wghways, but thou to take
these' Very taxes that wo havo paid, to open
riveri iri Indiana 1 It (E/cSriot fftriko tiro thud
that is very just I am speaking now to men of
common somo. I am not talking of what you
oari constitutionally fid. Is it not an nnjost
Kbifso pf pofrer to oo it, even if you have foe
yiwer ?
The gentleman from Ohio, [Mr. Campbell]
told ns foe other day, what the 'great West’
wonld do. I have a grout respect for foe groat
West, and I will do'every thing which I think
right and proper, and just, to dovelopo foo ro-
sources of that section of foe country. I, t iym
willing, os I hove said, to. open foe rtopth rif tho
Mississippi, because the State of LQuisikria'cari-
not do it, and take tho fiflags out 6f foa!t great
river. But when I am Appealed to to clear out
every little river, and open up every little fioV-
bor, and make works of improvement through
out the country, or in any soction of it—I do not
care which or what—barely because foe people
Af. rtch 'seotiofl w/i’i't It, and send men hore to
ask and vote for it, I aty ft u uriJiit'tA dispose
of foe public money in any such way, ana I
shall not do it I ask every man now, who
looks on these questions as he should, if it is
not manifestly unjust ?
NoW, tho gentleman [Mr. Mace] says, in
speaking of foe Missouri cdMprbrfiteq,, that by
the Missouri compromise, slavery had been pro
hibited north of 36 deg. 30 min.,and foatilaVe-
ry was to exist south of 30 deg. 30,min. I wish
to corrept the gentleman. The South h/te nev
er asked that'shivery should ho extended By
this Govermrierit any whero sonth or north.—
The Missouri compromise of 1820 never estab
lished such a principle-unever. The act of
1820, hy which Missouri was to have come into
foe Union, but never did, prohibited the existence
of/slav'ery north of 36 deg. 36 min.; but it te
said nothing at all on foe subject south of font
line. The Sonth never asked such a guarantee.
Tho guarantee which foe South, has asked, and
which has been,.established Sri fori passage .'df
foe NebraskahiUy arid whicn foe South VHn
never yield, was simply that the people on eve
ry foot of American soil, north or sonth, east
or west, shall, when they come to form their
State constitution, do as they please npon the
question of African slavery, and shall come in
to foe Union either with pr 'without it, as they
shall then determine for foemselvek. The So
does not ask yoa that a slave State shall Be
mitted from Texas, unless the people there so
determine.' Wh.at.we insisted Ori iri foe Texas
annexation resolutions .Was, ’that Abe pedple
there might be permitted to kettle this matter
for foeuteelvea. And this te Ml the guarantee
we secured; all that we then - asked ; all that
•we asked in 1850; Ml that we asked ia the Ne
braska bill, and. what we will ever maintain te,
In some things I was surprised ot.jjio.gen
tleman’s speech yesterday; for I recollected
very well foe remarks ho made with reference to
his Nebraska bill before it passed, and tho
amendment which ho offered. I beg to call his
attention and tbe attenticn of tim House t*> foe
report of bis remarks—ntede th foe 22d of
May, tho Saturday before it passed:
“Mr. Mace moved to,frisert in the, Aral'sec
tion ‘and tho TemtoriaV vegislMtfreiiBainiaVe
foe jtqr'Wfr ‘to Admit at .'exclude Silvery at any
time by law.' He said He offered foe amend
ment in good faith, and for foe purpose of tes
ting foe sincerity of members from tbe western
States, and more especially tbe sincerity of
those of the delegation from Indiana, who wero
to vote in favor of the bill.
“Mr,English. If foe.nraendtft.nl he adop r
ted; will triy cftjieaguo give ’foe bill bis support?
Mr. Mace. IwilL”
Mr. Mack. What'r&ftSpns did I give?. .
Mr. Stephens. .Tliepnly reasons hegaVe.Me
those I have read. He, said' that na offered
the amendmet in good faith, for the pur
pose of testing the sincerity of memboro, and
more especially foe sincerity of the membprs
of the delegation 'from Indiana ^rho voted in
fiivor °f the bill; and he said that if it was ad
opted—that te, if the Legislature'should have
foe power to settle tbe question at any time, .he
would vote for the bilL Now, he wants to de
prive the Legislature, or tho people in conven-
tiorijfrot^ cVerbeing empowered to settle, A* foey
want to do it, at aft. Fcrii'i'pa when the peo"p|e
do settle, as they now BaVe thejiower.to do it*
he may yot sanction it, notwitnlitariding they
may adopt a slavery constitution. • '
- Mr. Mace. Did the gentleman vote for my
amendment ?
_ Mr. Stephens. I did not, and for the reason
S ven, that by the hill we had given the people
. | the ppwer that we conld under the constitn r
tiori; We c'oitia riot grant more, arid they conld
' Vfiose two races, te tlic best for both of them;
riot exereike more if we had grdrited it. We
had done all we could on oar port, and we could
not give them more. The government of the
Territories, in my opinion, devolved upon Con
gress, in the first instance, it was our duty to
govern them, or provide governments for them.
T 4.. iL« * » —_ J — a.!•
in that respect, and come into tbe Union either
with or without slavery as they wish. I say, sir,
that te the southern doctrine; and I say, also,
that it te American doctrine. That te what I
mean by national doctrine.
The gentleman [Mr. Maco] said yesterday
ne was a national Mari: Nitiorinl! Wh^. sir,
ho te against his own section. Not only is he
agMnst the South, but he is against his own peo
ple. According to his doctrine his own peo
ple cannot be trusted in the Territories.—
He must be their guardian, a self-constituted
protector, no sriys that fop Mqriibers pf Con
gress set up to bo Master! df their constituents',
that they did not know what their coristitue* ts
wanted, and that they came here last session
0
tho
say
tleman himself who wants to be master,
whom ? Of his fellow citizens! He and
men who embrace his doctrine virtually
that when tho peoplo go from the North or
South intoa Territory they become unfit to gov
ern themselves. This te what the gentleman
said about nia^ers:
. u The doctrine sought lo he established now is
this, .that we come up here as the masters of the
peddle, that we code here not hound to consult
with therii at ail, arici'that we may pass laws
which we know they will disapprove of, and
then call npon them, as loyal subjects, to ac-
quiosce in our acts and cease their grumb
ling/
The geiilieiridri. Says that that is whftt fre.do:
braska?' because he says the people there,
will have it if we do not Why does he then
propose to pass a law for them which he. knows
they will disapprove of, and then call on them
os “loyal subjects to acquiesce in oar acts, and
cease their grqmbling ?” He says that when
men go from Massachusetts, or Indiana, or from
Ohio, or from Georgia, and get direr iritd the
Territories, they sbMl not govern themselves as
they please, hut as we please. We, foe Ne
braska men, on foe contrary, tredt them as free
men, as our*equate; and let tHerii do os they
please. Whd, theii, dre tile Master!, or would-
be-masters ? I say, sif, it te that class of men
who set themselves up as tho only sdfe guardi
ans, protectors, and law-makers foir hied who
have no choice in their election, and to whom
they are in no way responsible. Oh, but. tho
gentleman says, pass this bill, say, by law, that
Slavery never shMl go into tHese Territories,
arid then foe pedjfle can dd just ak they please,
just as they did in Iowd; ttrid can form State
constitutions agaiiffili ilayefjr; *8 Iowa did, and
Horde iritb the Uriidd al thdt State did. Why,
sir, the gentleman’s idea of liberty on the pdrt
of foe people to do as they please is very much
like a story that I heard told by the late Jus
tice McKinley, of foe Supreme Court. Thein-
clddiit dccur’red iri Lexington; Kentucky, I be
lieve. A Mdrilb'er of Congreks froM trial State
• « • L. .L
the fdrM of burning hup
ly they got up n, torch-li;, .
to his house; Arid as they were going Mong with a
great deal df M noike and somo confusion,” some
person on the side-walk, not partaking of foe
feelings of tbo crowd, but believing it to be an
outrage rather, whispered this opinion to a man
next to hiM. dne of the rowdies in the pro,
eeksion, who oveffieard thd remark; stopped
up arid said to hiM; “What te ihat yod kay?”
“You think that this is a great outrage, doyriu ?”
“Tjion sir,” re
plied his questioner, “I want to let you know
that this tea free country, and that we will do as
wo d—=d pleftso, and you shan’t say nothing I”
"Laughter.] That is the way tho gentleman [Mr
dace] would freedom to the Territories.
Oh, yes, ho will mako it a free Territory. H,e
will havo his way, and tho people foere “khrtti’t
Bay nothing. Ho would givo them precisely
that sort of freedom whlrSh closes tHtj rpdutti of
freomen. That sort of liberty H6 tfo'iild have
whieh says to freomen, “You shMl dons Ipleaso
—it is a free country, it is trite; but I will have
my way, and yon shall riot kay a word. 1 ou
shall pot elect Whitfield, ofitiiy map whq Wdujd
favor tho introduction of Slavery.-” [Latigh-
tor *] . .
Now, sir, the gentleman [Mr. Maco] yester
day notified tho country, and notified foe House
'that Nebraska nevor should oome in as'a slave
State. This is plain and direct language. It
presents tho issue fairly. It is bringing up font
question which has beon forico sottiod by this
country. And, without pretending to speak
rophetioally, I will venture tho opinion, that
j- Nebraska como hero with a slavery constitu
tion, sho will be admitted; and fop groat body
of these gontlomou who ocoupy foe position of
tho gentloman from Indiaria; rf ill He' at that tiMe
burled so deep under popular condemnation,
that their voioes against it will never reach the
CapitoL A groat national principle te involved
in this question which foo pooplo of this coun
try nro riot a going to' igrioro. National mon
will bo Sont from tiro North as well os from tbo
South. Mon will bo sent to Congress wlio SWrid
upon pVirioiplos, arid wiil not “back.and fill,
and be on ono principle for on'd #e'ek, and ono
o mrftfri, <jrfu tip'on another prip-
montb, and ono'
as raridfrf and radicMly ns ho bus. iri it
oVe'tt tftV ?f here, mriy yet voto for tref ad
Hit uslave State. -
prist,
Ission
ers at least foot they can exercise under &A
Constitution. So far os my vote was concerned,
I gave foe people all foe power that they could
exercise under foe Constitution. Wc could not
give them more, and why should the gentleman
have asked to give them more ?
■' The gentleman, from Indiana said that he
would Vote in faifo to give fo°.P.?d*6te of these
Territories power W adffiit slaver^; But now hi
comes fOrWardand wants to deprive them of
power of passing any law by which slavery-may
be tolerated. I did not know then whether
Kansas would be a slve State or not. I do not
know whether it will be or not, but this doesnot
make the slightest difference in m^ vo te. Men
may indulge in whiteycr Specpltijons they
please, .if Kaiilas, should home Here -with a
constitution exclding slavery, and ask admis
sion into the Union as a State, whilo Iam a
member npon this floor, I should vote for her
admission. At least that feature inlier constitu
tion will notcause roe Jto vote Against admission*
j voted for'the admission of I >wa, and I have
Voted for foe admission of .'every northern
State, since I have occupied a seat upon this
floor, when I have been in my place. I was not
here when California was admitted, but I de
fended ber admission.
I want gentlemen from the North., and tite
gentleman troniIndiana, to understand the South
or at least the position of some of her Represen
tatives. "We stand upon principle. We do not
advocate a Measure to-day, because it votes
money idtd foe pockets of our constituents, or
He'cftriso it te fqVorcd bjr them or advances their
interests, and llion io-MorroiV array ourselves
in opposition to it, because we think a different
result follows from its operation, but we stand,
particularly on this question, upon foe fixed
and immutable principles upon which the Con
stitution itself rests. In jthe beginning, in the
right bd come into the Union with such institu
tions os she, republican in their character, might
adopt Missonri was denied admission, and the
South did reluctantly consent that slavery
shoMd be excluded north of 36° 30’, provided
Missonri should come in as she pleased: EiU
Missouri was again denied admission—sho did
not come in under this act of 1820. I will not,
however, go over this ground again now. Tho
North would not adhere to foe principles of foe
act of JL8?0; When .foe strife gf .1856 Became
intolerable, when foe ship of State seemed
aboat to go down, and when Southern mon
wero still standing dri deck wllH flag-staff in
thefr hriridS dptfealing id ildffoerii patriots to
come td foe resene, and stand upon the old
platform, occupied by them when foe Missonri
question arose—that te the State-rights doc
trine of letting each State settle this matter for
itself—whether in accordance with the wishes
of the North or Sonth—it was then that this
principle, incorporated in foe Nebraska^ bill,
was first ^Stdbliahed. ^ This principle' now fot-
■ lows the Americaiiflag wherever ii floats, wheth
er in California, Utah, New Mexico, or south
ern Texas. The same stars and stripes, drifo
tho some principles inscribed upon their broad
folds, no\V wave fay npon Kansas and Nebraska!
Lot them go, kiiit togeiHSF, ode aria inseparable,
over evory foot of American soiL This, sir, te
my wish, and this, sir, I think, will bo the re
sult; I therefore say to the gentleman from
Maine, [Mr. Washbnrn,] that he wiil not- live
to Sde the day, in my opinion, when this great
Movement; folk resolution in AMericanp'dlltlcs:
tjfffl ever roll BacktrardS: Its co’di58 vfijl rather
be dd^iara. There .are SoMe
which I wish td allude.
icr topics to
Why is it that gentlemen object so much to
foe introduction of slavery into Kansas, if foe
people of that Territory desire it to go foere?
When I made a speech at the last session, upon
this sabjcct, I stated foat I tfould. vote for the
principle df tflloriiitg tiie‘ people df any section
df the HHdiltiy to comeiiilo' the Union and form
Institutions as they please. This I said when
I knew there might be twice as many people
there from the North os from tho South, and
foe chances of emigration I knew would gr atly
preponderate in favor of foe North. I am will
ing, now, to abide hy that prinoiple. I have
no desire to deprive foe people -pf any State
or Territory in our common country of tin
right of addptirig srioh institutions for tbeif got-
erriderii; rfoeti tKoy boc.dtHe States; as they
please: It IS anti-AMcficHd; and entirely at
war with tho spirit of thfe' rtjfe'; about which wc
hear so much. I ask why the peoplo of any
and I am prepared to argue that question with
foe.gentleman-, here or anywhere. Take th#
negroes in- Indiana, toko them in the North gen
crally, and-coropare their condition with those
of.foe South. . Take them in Africa; take them
anywhere on the face of the habitable globe:
and then take them in tho southern .States, and
the negro population of the Sonth are betrer off,
better fed, bettor clothed, better provided for,
enjoy more happiness, and a higher civilization,
than tho same race has ever enjoyed anywhere
else on the Lice of tbo world. Could ffowatyl.
the philanthropist, who lias left an undyini
fame for hte deeds of humanity, have tokej
tho some number of. African? from their native
country and raised them from their Wbcrou#
condition .to that of tho.f>l/iv<;? of the.South, he
wonld -Have added mnebto that stature of im
mortality which, in hte day, he erected to him
self. It would have greatly added to that rop r
utation, .which now sanctifi.csd»i.< memory in the
hearts and.affections, ofbroankind. ,
Look at £1m three millions of Africans as y#q
find them in, foe South: and where is the man so
cold-hearted, aad cold-bioodod, as would wish
to put them in the condition .that their forofa.
"tbers were, or their kindred now are in Africa?
What has done so much for these people but that
which is so much denounced by inconsiderate
fanatics;men and women, too. who find fault
with what they know npthingjnbont?
Again :.ta}:e onr negroes, arid) compare their
condition with that of the free negroes of the
North. I have the result of the Census return?
before me, find from that it appears that the
Increase of.the free people of color in the Uni
ted State?,from 1840 to 1850’, was only ten
nine-five hundredths percent. This shows that
their condition cannot be very good, or desira:
ble : and to this increase is to be added too, the
fugitive slaves, and those who have been em
ancipated. With all these sources of increascj
has only been ten and ninety-five hundredths
■per centum Sfsffij&ij
Now, howisXfc with the slaves, the dowh-trod-.
den, the abused, the half-starved slaves? Their
increase, .during the. same ppriod, was twenty-
eight and fifty-eight hundredths. Is thci^
any such result to be preened at foe North
where they ara free ami left to themselves?
How can your missionaries ip philanthropy and
crusaders in benevolenc-account.for-iL
But some people say that slavery is a curse to
the white man. They abondon the idea that
it is a curse to the negro. They say it weakens,
impoverishes, nnd„demoralizqs a State. Leiui
see. They say foere can he no high social, mor
al, or material development under the institu
tion of slavery. I have, before me some statis
tics on .this point,-statistics relating to materi
al development.,. Eut r beforeJaliuding to them)
I will say upon the subject of morals, that Tsaw
a table of crimes made out in foe' Census Office
for 1850. From those, statistics it appeared—I
speak from mepnfry; .1 have not the paper be-
fore me-r-tijat the number of convictions for
crimes of every grade, in Massachusetts, the
land of “steady habits,” and where we hear so
much oftho immoral effects of slavery, with %
a population under one million, was several
thousaud : while in foe State of Georgia, with a
population not so great,, the similar convictions
ifre less than one hundred.. Isay, yheo, npon
"the score of crime, upon the score of morals. I
am ready to compare my State with that of Mas .
sachusetts, or a ay one ofthe free States. Where
then, is the moral curse which arises from slave
ry?
A.feyr fac.ts in reference to physical develop
ment. I had occasion, some time since, for an
other purpose than the present, to look a little
into the statistics of Georgia, compared with*
those of other States. I selected the State of
Ohio, because it was one of the most prosperous
of tne North—often styled, and perhaps, justly
too, the giant of the West. According ( to.th3
pensiis returns iri 1856, Ohio -had of improved
lands 9,851,493 acres—Georgia had only 6.378,
479 acres, the cash value of the Georgia land
so improved and under culture was $95,753,445^
while the cash value ofthe Ohio lands was re
turned at $358,758,603—Ohio hod nearly one
third more land in a state of improvement :han
Georgia had; and returned at more than rffrraqi
times the cash value of the Georgia lands:
whole population of uhio was l,908,4SrfT?Qi9
whole population of Georgia, white and black, -
was 905,999.- The population of Ohio; therefore
was more than double that of Georgia. Here
yve see her free labor more than double in num
ber, working one third more land, worth, by
valuation, more than three times that of Geor
gia. f From these elements it might not be sur
prising, to sea her agricultural products greatly,
exceeding foose of Georgia, without resorting
to the ‘ curse of slavery’’to account for it But
how stands the facts ? bhio produces the fol
lowing articles:
IjTHeat.
Buckwheat
14,<S7;3o{bnatS0 cts $11,589,880
638,060 “ 40 “
255,224
Indian corn
59,078,695 «
30 “
17,723.60S
Ryo
425,918 “
50 “
212.959,
Barley
' 354.35S •*
50 “
177,179
Oats
13,472,742 “
25 «
3,368.182
Pea3 & beans
60,168 “
$1 “
60.168
Irish potatoes 5,051,76? “
40 “
2,025,107.
Sweet potatoes. iS7,9?i
50 *[
Tobacco .
10:454,449 lb's
-7 “
731,811
Clovetscott
-^103,197 bus $4 “
412,748.
Elax ,
446,932 lbs
10 “
44,633
Iftrixseed
1S8,880 bus
75 “
141,664
Maple sugar
4,5S8,209 lbs
6 «
275,292
Molasses
197,308 gals 35 “
69,057-
Wine
-48,207 “
$1 «
‘48.207
Gard’n products return’d in monoy, value 214,004
Orchard “
it - . ■
u
« 695,921
Aggregflto _ * *$3S;t"7,o95
_inis' list includes nearly every agricultural
or Id any aspect of foe question, is tlioro any
roaSoil for depriving them of such right? Is it
for tho sake,of humanity that gentlemen are not j
willing for tho peoplo of Kansas to nsjsigti ill6
African foe same condition there foal He occu
pies in tho Gdqfo'; If foej' folnk itbest to do so? I
Are gentlemen willing to degrade their own |
race by not permitting them to vote upon mat- j
tors relating to their own govormuout, while
they are endeavoring to elcrato tho negro to
the standard of tho white man f You may de
grade tho white man, but you cannot raiso the
negro to foe Ip'fo'i j-dii ffurposci. It is impossi-
product ofthe earth in that State except hay,'
which is omitted, because in Georgia thorn is
no return for fodder, which in that Stato an
swers the same purpose of hay in Ohio, as fool
for stock. Tho quantity of each product pro-,
dneed is given from the census tobies. Tim
values run out are such as arc believed to be
foe' usual ntcriigo. ■i-aliiup? df each ,article
thatState, except foe products of gardens ilt.d
orchards, which are token from the tables—no
Other values are put upon the products in the
tables. Tho estimate above stated is believed
to be a fair one. Now let us take up the re
turns for Goorgia and place upon them a like
estimated averago value. Hero we have :
Wheat 1,0SS,534 l>u. at$l 00 $l;03S.. , i.'»t
Indian cq'fti. 3(J ; #3p,099 “ 50c. 15,010,019.
CJdtldti—bales 499,001 40tMbsat So 15,970,912
Rice , 38,950,fi!}l lbs: at 4c„I,55S,0'J2
Peas arid beans 1,142,011 b'u.nt $1 00 1.142,011
Sweet potaoos G,9S6.42S “ “ 25c 1,716,607,
Irish potatoes 227.37S “ “ iiOc I13.6S0
Gats _.V 3.820,044“ “ .3*7ic 1,432.516,
Cane sugar 1.642 hlrils 1.0001PS fie.’
Molasses 216,150 gallons at 25c. 54.0.>:
Orchard products of C2.
Garden products of 76,500
AggrtVritli
An amount so far from falling under that of
Ohio as might have been expected, actually ex-
Ble. You havo to revorso a law of nature first.
en may indulge in philanthropic speulations
os much ns they please, but here te foo great
i in mu table law of nature, and thoy cannot avoid
it XhM not hero to argue whether decrees of
foe* Most High aro right, wise, and jiiif. Tbero
is a dfferericp; ti vast difference; Hftflbltehed by
foe Creator*botwoori tne different races of men,
coeds it above u qnnrter of a million, without
extending the Georgia list to rvo, barley, to*
bacco. and otbor articles which are produced in
that Stato. Away, theii, with this prating cry
about slavery’s paralysing'the energy of a peo
ple, and opposing tho development of the re
sources of. a country. - ;
If I were to take the statistics of any othor
State, and go through them iri foo same way, I
have no reason todoubt thntan equally favorable
result to Ceorgia would follow. I took the
Stato of Ohio, notes auy disparagement to her,
hut to show that even in the South, where they
say tbo soil is sterile, anil the population inert,
and curbed, with slavery, as it is said to hel
Georgia; w.itli ono half of the population, and
am
SjpfP H . filljiW WWWWBP pqpulation,-»»
For myself, I.boliove that IIo who made us all only tw'o thirds of tho value of land, oxcecds
is just, and that Ho made tho white man ns He in agricultural products by ono quarter of a
mado him, and that lie made the ricL-L' rii Ho j million of dollars, the great giant of the West
made hint—-for. ^jsc and jiiStrfiUjldscS: , Somo ~Now, then, if the people of Kansas, foe peo-
Vessolfrffti riftido for honor and sonic for dialion- plo of Nebraska, or the people of any other
of; o'rio star differeth from another stnr in mag j portion of our Territory, going from old Mas-
riitudo ns well ns in brilliancy. I believe, too, j sachusetts, going from New York, or from.In-
thht the system ol' government, as adopted by ; diana, or from the South, learning and consnlt- 4
the South, defining tho statu* or* relation of I frig wisdom from the past, and profiling bf #^-
wm
mm
,,.......