Newspaper Page Text
| -.SAVANNAH]
m
EH
PI
[J]
BJ
L
DA]
N
i
| N«. ist.....Voi xxii. THcnsmr kfbjvtvi,
?, JULY 15,
1834.
Wliole >o 4471
Swain's Panacea.
maVB BEEN appointed Audit by Ur. W.
sw»in to aeii hiB so much celebrated Medi-
it this place. A quantity has been receiv.
the Georgia from Philadelphia, and will
a by the box or bottle, at my Drug Store,
•r of Jefferson and St. Julian Streets.
• r ° AVGUST G OKMLEB.
Larch 10 57
Testimony and Documents,
ON THE MEMORIAL. OP NlNlAN Ei-iVVARD*
[coxtmcbu]
iii'.J
rk.
Ill
124.
August G. Oemler.
ij.nrurmt Store corner tf Jefferson and St
Julian Streets
j AS received by schr. Tassel, a fresh supply
I SWAIN'S so much esteemed
PANACEA.
also by other late arrivals, a variety of fresh
clei which hi abstains from mentioning, as
nunec's the public to possess sagacity enough
aessTthat CALOMEL, JALAP, 1U1UBAUU,
FOETID, and all the other delicacies "am-
„ithe index of the dispensatory may be
iced for and found in Drug Stores—j et a few
Lps not to be met with at every one, he of-
I y|2 j ^
Ihosphorus, Chlorate of Potass, Pyroligneous
Id Black Drop, James fever Powder, Bends
ttics, Spirits of Soap, Pumlgating Pastills,
r rrewood evaporating dishes, Glass Funnels,
lusted Measures, Retorts and Keceivers,
Tubes, Gss dottles, Thermometers, Hy-
neter, andl’luvimoter
Flower Pots.
larch IB 64 . ■
NOTICE.
FJlSONS having demands against the estate
I of Amos Douglass, late of Chatham County,
Lastd, will please to have their account* pro-
, attested and leave them at the bar of Col.
. Sheknan’s Mansion House, Savannah —
Ese who are indebted to the estate will be
led on in ten or fifteen days for settlement.
DAM1)TAYLOR, Jr.
Qualified Kx’or,
lear Waynesboro, May 24,1824
’ 28 ‘fcalSd
let of the Bunk of Edwardsville, and its
claims to public credit, did you know any
thing of its actual comli ion ?
A 1 had no personal knowledge of its
uRail s, my opinions Were bottomed on gen-
cal current report.
John S Harbour, of the House of Representatives,
sworn, at the reqntu of -lf»' Pedwardi.
Question by Mr C jok. .laVe jou had any con
versation with Mr Noble on thu subject of a con.
versation held between him and Mr Ed war is,
relative to the authorship of thu A. II publics-
tinusf if so, please to state what that conversa
tion wa9 , ' >
A I -1ft relate the circumstances under wlncit
such conversations were bold. Shortly after the
communication of the address of Gov. Edwuids,
1 read, with two members of th' Kentucky dele
gation, a letter printed it. the Richmond Enqui
rer, in Which Gov B is said to have declare.. to
Mr Noble that lie was not the author of those
quencebf Suc'hdlsaviiwal Mr" N oM?’ hid 'vTcd! 'e«er, to show it townomsneverit enn
to confirm lus abDointment in the Senate .1 ;«u rei ned, he had shewn it to Mr Edwards
the appearance of Mr Edwards's address
It occurred accidentally, while passingeach
otherui rhe large circular room, in tliecen
tre of the capital. It was very sh rt. 1
was going in haste into the Senate chambr .
Either replying to u question fiom me, t.
^ Did you not, about the name time, from some other person, for there.'were s*
wr.te to Die Secretary of the Treasury,sta- veral passing at the same time, JMr Noble
ting strong objections to the claims of this said, that Mi Edwarda had declared that
bank upon his confidence, and that of the he was not the author of the A B publics
public? ... _ tiona, and that he had supported hint in the
A 1 did some time before, soon after
this'hunk went into operation
Q Did you receive any reply from the
Secn-tary on that subject, by which you
ascertained that he received your letteV ?
A I did; and he* stated that, availing
himself of the permission expressed in
Thursday, at £,• m; arrive Monday, Wed*
Senate. In repeating that conversation. Ijnesday, and Friday at 10 p m.
»d Stt
i, >ud
irtii
if Jui
eph
isan
corn]
ioV.»
ref
; betid
l Jl
akel
eby I
icr I
ml a It
itl.ee
tveitji
lititlii
Itihri
radlng d
ilia
)f Fal
MH
tee*-
3d day d
jreuftl
ami I
issigns i;
InmotioJ
[tionerl
erest <3
i togei
idlntotl
dale,
eropti
, adm®
t*t to
other \
not i">t
ed-
ublisl
tast
a oop;
, moiii' 1 *!
payntei'
m M|
BOLL"
yount;
■rn
as appl'JJ
iry uf (
•ution oi
late ofC
itor
ulmoi# J
llturs 1
s?tfpl
itistrtititf
Ucant. ,
,n or W
je letten
sr one 1
day of
1ND, o' 1,
I-ounlJ
NO J ICE.
[iNE months after time, application will be
n.t ie to the Inferior poult of Effingham
nly,for leave to sell all the real properly be
ing to the estate of*the late Rev Jno Beck,
[ lying in said county, for the benefit of the
i anu creditors.
ANN HECK,
Administratrix.
nril 16 88
to confirm lus appointment in
anxious to know whether such disavowal • .1
been made for such a purpose. Under the fin
ence of that anxiety, 1 met with Gtn So u. in
this capitol, and heard him say that suet as *
the fact; that Gov E had disavowed On uUthnr-
ship of those publications; but it had . > eonnuo
tton with his vote, as he was his friend,and should
have voted for the Confirmation of Ins appoint-
ment in any event
Q Did Gen Noble say,at that i.me, tly*i he did
hot aelieve that disavowal was intended to have
any effect upon the nomination of Governor Ed
wards ?
A All that t know of it is embodied in my an
swer to the first interrogatory
Q Have you had any ronve'savton with .Mr
F.ikins on the same subject? if .•<>, please state
what it was, and when?
A 1 think at som* pe-iod of tune, shortly aftei
the Address of Gov Edwards was presented to'
tl>e House, and alter tlu* puotica.ion in the En
quirer, to which l have allu ied, Mr Elkins in
formed me in conversation, sougui by mys-It',
that he had heard Gov K incidentally remark,
upon reading this article in the Enquirer, in
hicli heis spoken of a» “Ninian Edwards of A.
plot iiieinory," that he a a* un nmre th> iu-
,r of that plot tiiaff the Editor of the .nquirer
reported it and in writing to the editor of
the Kichmoud Enquirer the letter in ques
tion, I represented it as if Mr Noble had
voted for Mr E. in consequence of that dis
avowal. It was the construction which i
>ut upon the support which he had given.
[ was not in the Senate during the time
that Mi E.'s nomination was pending. A
and Col Johnson. week or two afterwards, and when there
Q Were you at that time a Director of occurr d some leisure in the Senate, and in
the Butk of Missouri ? consequence of suggestions that Mr Ed*
A I was not till long after, say two ward-had only denied the authorship of the
o.-more. _ A B publications by way of avoiding tn im
thor of that plot
•—1 speak with more .preciseness of the conver
sation with Mr Elkins than ol‘that with General
Noble.
jaiul and Negroes for bale.
I HANDSOME pro; erty, unit cumbered, con-
histii g of Land and Neeroes, together with
ck of every kind, and the growing crop, a
inj» in all to about 12 or 15,000 dollars,
; in the upper country, and well ealculat
racoimtry Store—the soil well adapted to
[ultivation of Corn and Cotton, is offered for
i accommodating terms.
Stock, or good paper, well secured, will
t in payment,
r further particulars, apply to the Editor of
Georgia Journal,
ne19 145
NOTICE
IE Public are apprised, that the subscriber
I has titles to one half of a 50 acre tract of
on White Bluff, adjoining bin, and
[lately John Poullen's, now John Morrill's,
■ which the Administrate of the late Jas
, applies to the court for leave to sell as
of that estate—hi- titles are of prior date
bf record. All persons sre forewarned not
archaae oK respass on the premises.
II P WILLIAMS.
pe 17 m—$t!38
NOTICE,
INE months after date application will be
1 made to the Honorable the Justices of the
Sor Court of Chatham County for leave to
|i that Lot in Savannah known by the No
ttllissquare, Decker Ward, with the im
[ments thereon: And all that Lot in Savaii
itown by the No twenty-three, in L iberty
i with the Buildings thereon—being the
state of John Smith, dec’d, for the benefit
! heirs.
FREDERICK HERB,
Administrator.
15 114
Law Notice.
! public are informed that the Subscribers
tve located and formed a connexion in
onboro, Seriven County, t.a. Where one
sra may at all times be found except when
[sionally engaged elsewhere. They pur-
** a ttcnd the several courts of the several
■ f 8 r..^L r ' lven * Bur ^ e a( td Jefferson-also
I of Richmond, Warren and Emanuel. They
■by close applicatiqn, and a due attention
■ “‘Wtness of their profession, to merit and
?e a 8hsre of the public patronage. Mu-
I confided to their care will be thankfully
Fed and punctually attended to
JAMES B LEWIS
M JOSIAH S PATTERSON,
' 22 120
nfl
ei-n
BCtltPt
ed tu tl
DC di
i and
d oreditu
fileilifl
lerkso™
ecutur
f|P
iONI>» cC 1
sorgia—Chatham County
“• H-,n the Justices of the Inferior Court of
county sitting for ordinary purposes,
iipdd 8 whom it may concern,
i ERE AS Thomas R. Price, administrator
lot David H. Thompson, dec. has petioned
T honorable .the Justices of the Inferior
k sitting for ordinary purposes to be dis-
F a * ron > the administration aforesaid.
7 . ,e,a are therefore to cite and admonish
| singular the kindred and creditors of the
i®*' 0 file their objections, if any they have
mceon or before the 16th day of Sept,
erwise letters dismissors will be grant
Applicant
Pess the Hon. John Cumming, one of the
Fj| oi said Court this 16th day of March, A.
1»
62
S M. BOND, c co,
Q About this time, however, did you
ho< niako enmmuiiicntions in your paper
to the Public, strongly supporting the
claims of the Bank of Missouri to the pub
lie coiifid,nee ?
A 1 made very few, if any : I do not
remember one.
Q Was is not your opinion, that that
bank was entitled to confidence?
A It was, most decisively, ' After my
fi at an ival at Wnrhington City,in 1820,1
hud spoken to M>- Crawford in favor of the
Bank <>f Missouri. After that bank hBd
stopped payment, and re-nlutions badoeen
submetted inthelinuse of Representatives
JOHN S BARBOUR.
on the
For Sale,
§ MME Negro Fellow. Apply at this Of
w i*0
Thomat H Benton, of the Senate,
part of Mr Cmwjord
Question by Mr Forsyth- Wer* v u not well
acquainted with th<- ootiiitctjun of Mr Edwards
with the EdwS'dsville Bank l
A From general report only. I never did a-
ny tMisiness with him in tlia' cha-acter.
Q Do Vmt know that he mud. etfor's, from
th*-establishment of the institution tt‘.i its failure,
to keep up its credi with the uuo'ljp?
A what I know personalty the p-.ihlication
in the St. Louis Erquirer, ot which 1 was an ed
itor.
Do you know whether the statements in
that,publication are cornet ?
[To this question Mr Cook objected# The
Committee decided thr t it might he put.]
. A 1 very well remember my opinion at the
time that the publication aaS made It was,
that the publication would give a credit to the
bank, to which it was not entitled. In confor
mity with that opinion, ai-d from no other mo
tive than to countervail tit- effect ot that ptihli-
cati >n, I wrote anaiticle, which \va9 published
either in the same paper, or in one next sue-
cceding, (but 1 think the same,) in which I gave
some of the reasons which induced me to be.
lieve that the Bank was nut entitled to the ere
(lit which Mr E. gave to it in his publication. I
have no^scen that article since, hut the facts
and circumstances rest upon ti y mind, and lam
stil ot the opinion that I then was.
Q What were the facts on which this
opini >n was formed?
A The first was one leading fact, which
I had from general report, that a majority
of the stock wnsheltl by two or three stock
holders who were persons of little or no
property. The stockholders to whom I al
luded were Mr Robei t Latham and Gen
Payn, the latter of whom was reputed to
cover stock for the Messsrs. Johnson, of
Kentucky Mr Latham was generally re
ported to be insolvent partnet of a firm in
Kentucky—I think eithcrLatham dj* Broad-
head. or Morehead; and that he was insol
vent I am certain, havifig been employed
as a lawyer to collect debts from him. The
Messss. Johnson were generally reputed to
be in bad pecuniary circumstances. The
stockholders having a majority ofthe stock
could change the Directors at any elec*
tion i This circumstance deprived the
bank of credit in my eyes Another cir
cumstance which made me believe that the
publication of Mr Edwards would give the
Bank a'Credit which was not due to it, was
its silence upon prints necessary to be
known, such as the pecuniary stability of
several of the Directors. Mr Smith, one
of the Directors, of whom a high charac
ter is given in that publication, was gener
ally reputed to be without property or very
recently insolvent. Dr Joseph Bowers,
of whom a high character is also given
was a speculator lately arrived in the
country,claiming ant] talking of much pro
perty. but, as was h -lieved, without solid
foundation. The other directors, with
the exception of two or'three, were gener
ally renuted to own b>f little property
and to hold a majority ofthe stock. Ano
ther circumstance to the prejudice of the
bank, was my Mief "hat it could not do a
business which would d 'fray its expenses
and support it owing to the little com
merce existing in the place where it was
established.
Quest '! h-i y- You state that
M K - V; tion in the
Si |,o . E Mr Craw-
f<»rd o n that pa-
Crawford, and .diet ed to give him, in wri
ting, the pteviour statements which we had
made,-verbally, in favor of the bank. Mr
Crawford declined receiving anostatement
Irom us. His precise words I do nut re
member, but he declined ts king from us
any thing like vouchers to shield him from
responsibility, stating, I think, that the
con espondeiice would show that every
thi'ig was fair, and that he had proceeded
on sufficient grounds,
Q Wnich bank fpst failed to pay specie
pieferrrd against the becietaiy tf the T tea*
sury by Niuii-n Etiwa>di>.
8. BUROll.
Ch. Clk. Ofiiu- Hu. ul Reps.
June 16. 1824.
List ot Departures and Arrivals of the
Jduil between h ushivgton and Edwards- '
vdte.
(^Arrangement mails 1818 and 1819 1
VVasr.in t--n—Leave Sunday,Tuesd iy.fud
proper curiosity, I asked Mr Nubl- wheth
er lie had made inquiries of M Edwards
which led to the disavowal ? \1- Noble
then stated to me particularly his conversa
tion with Mr Edwards. He said that the
disvo-x al was wmdly voluntary on the part
f Mi Edwards ; that he had pledged his
honor that he was not the author of the A
B publications but M: Noble had intended
to vote for him before lie. Iieatd this disa
vowal; that lie had, before heating it made
a motion in the Senate to take up his nom
ination ; that Mr Edwards, in that same
conv*. satfon, spoke honor blj of Mr Craw
ford; spoke well of bis management ot the
upon the subject its failure, and of the finances, and of his relief to the western
public dcpoMte in it, myself and Mr Scott, debtors. The second and full conversation
epresentative from Missouri, went to Mr was the same as has been detailed before
the committee by Mr N«ble in his testimo
ny. The first w.ts short and impet feet
and sosiight, that Mr Noble with difficulty
could recollect it when (have since men
tioned it to him.
Q. Do you not know, that the represen
tations which you have stated were madt
hy you to the Secretary of the Treasuty,
against the Bonk of Edwardsville, were
contradicted by those of-Mr Edwards and
Col Johnson?
A. I do not know that they were,
To. its notes, the Bank of Missouri or the THOMAS-H' BENTON.
Bank of Edwardsville? Abrham Bradley,jun. sworn, on the part
nf Mr Crawford.
per w
l A
q A. i;ie
A The Butk ofMissouri. But I have
been informed and believe, that the Bank
of Missouri had assets at the time of its
stopping specie b-iyment, to an amount be
yonti the claims upon it that it has settled
all these claims, either by paying them
securing them to be paid—while -he Bank
of Edwardsville has neither paid or secu-
ed its debt to the (J. States.
Q At what time were you employed to
codec debts ag»inst Mr Latham ?
A 'Sometime before I came to Congress,
in 1820.
Q Do you nr do you not know that Gen.
Pavn is reputed to be, and do you not be
lieve him to be.amongst the wealthiest men
in Kentucky?
A. 1 h-ive always understood that he was
a man of large property; bnt the general
report was, that that the shares in his name
w-*re really the property of the Messrs
Johosons.
Q. Do you or do vr.u not know or believe
that Messrs. Johnsons were at that time al
so considered among the wealthiest men in
Kentucky?
A All die imformation which I had up
on the subject,represented them to be en
gaged in la-go and critical moneyed enter
prises, and that their pecuniary credit was
most uncertain.
Q. Do you not know that Report Pogue,
another Director in the Bank of Edwards
vide, was at that time engaged in large
mercantile concerns, and of unsuspected
credit? . -
A, I knew Mr Pogue as merchant, and
his credit and standing were very good
Q. William Kenney, JosophConway,and
Abraham Pricket, were also Directors
Were not these gentlemen all at that time
of high respectability, and of considerable
unincumbered property, so far as your
knowledge extends ?
A I knew them all personally, Mr Kin
ney was always represented to me as a per
son of considerable properly. I never
heard theothprs so spoken of I knew no
thing about incumbrances on any of their
pst-Hes. They were all respectable.
Q. Do Joseph Bowers, another Director
is gpoken of by Mr Edwards as a gentleman
of respectability. Was not that his gener
al character, at that period ?
A. 1 was. But, my objection to Govei
nor Edwards's publication, was, its omit
ting to speak of the pecuniary circumstan
ces »f the directors and stockholders.
Q. Were the dirrectors and stockholders
liable beyond the amount of the stock paid
in ?
A The Bank of Edwardsville was an in
corporated Bank, and I suppose, of course
they were not.
Q What was the canversation jou had
with General Noble, which induced you to
write the letter in the Richmond Enquirer,
in r-ilation to that conversation p r \
A I had two conversations with Mr ffo
ble upon the subject of his conversation
with Mr Edwards. The first, tout) after
Q. by M- Forsyth. In Oct. 1819, what
was the shortest time in which a letter
come by the mail f-om Edwaidsvilie to
Woshingtim?
A I have examined the contracts,and am
unable to g'tate.
Q Could a letter have come, at that time,
n less than twenty daysP
A It is difficult to answer with certainty;
but according to my best information* I
should say it could not.
Q Have you made out a list of the arri
vals and departnres of the mail between
this city and Edwardsville? Is the paper
now shewn to you such a list?,'’and is it
made out according to the best information
you possess?
A It is. I have made it out from the con
tracts, in all its items, saving one, and that
I have stated from the advertisement of the
Post Office Department, for a contract
which is the route from Wheeling to Lnu-
iavile. The mail takes a longer time to
come from Edwardsville than to go there,
Q Do the dates on the bills of the mails
sent, which appear on the quarterly returns,
ascertain the time of the departure of the
mailsf
A They always ought to do so?
ABM. BRADLEY, jun.
Extract from the 1 it patre of the original"Account
of the mailt sent from the part office at Edwards-
viUe," for the quarter beginning the I fit October
1819.
Fsedericlttuwn-—arrive Sunday, Tues
day, at2 p m; leave Monday, Wednesday,
Friday, at 10 a m; LeaveBuuduy,Toe-day,
Thursday, at 8 p m;.t rive Monday, Wed
nesday. Friday, at 9 a in.
Cumberland—arrive Monday, Wednesday,
Friday, at 8 p mi leave Saturday,Tuesday,Tliui-a-
day, at 3 a m; Leave Tuesday, Tl.ui day, Satur
day, at 9 a m; arrive Fiiday, Monday, Wednes-'
day, at 8 p m.
Brownsville—arrive Tuesday, Thursday, Sat
urday, »i 8 p m; leave Fi iday, Monday, Wednes
day, at 4 uiDj Leave Wednesday, Friday, Mon
day, at 3 a m; arrive Thursday, Saturday, Tues
day, at 9 p m.
Wheeling—arrive Wednesday, Friday, Mon
day, at 4 p mi leave 1 hurtday, Saturday, t ties-
day, at 8 amt Leave Wednesday, Monday, Fri
day at 5 pm; arrive Thursday, Saturday, Tues
day at 7 a m.
Shelbyville—arrive Tuesday, Thursday, Sat
urday, at 10 a mi leave Friday, Monday, Wed
nesday, at 2 p m i Leave Tuesday, Thursday,
Saturday, at 11 a mi arrive Friday, Monday.
Wednesday, at 1 p m.
Louisville—arrive Tuesday, Thursday, Satur
day, at 8 p mi leave Friday, Monday, Wednes-
n , at 9 a m.
tairdstown—arrive Tuesday, at 8 p ro< leave
Wednesday at 5 a m- Leave Wednesday at 5 a
m; arrive Tuesday aifl p m.
Shawneetown—arrive Saturday at 10 a m|
leave Saturday at 2 p m: Leave Saturday at 2 p
m; arrive-Saturday at 10 a in.
Kaslcaskia—arrive Tuesday evening; leave
Wednesday morning: Leave Wednesday at 6 a
m; arrive Tuesday at 6 p m.
Cahokia—arrive Thursday at 2 p mi leave
Monday morning; Leave l bursday at 3 p mi ar
rive -
Madison c. h. or Edwardsville—arrive [no
e]i leave [no time—cannot find Contr.tx]
George Sweeny,sworn,on thepart of Mr Ci awford,
Q Are you aclerk in ike City Host officer
A 1 am
Q Look at the post-mark on this letter. What
is the date there marked?
[Here the witness was shewn the letter from
Mr Craw lord to the Cashier ofthe Bank of Ed-
wardsvtlle, dated 1st Nov 18.9.
A The day appears to be the di but of what
month canuot be discovered.
GEO SWEENY.
Date To what office
ofthe thelett'rs were
bills
1819
Oct 9
. sent.
Goloonda, Ill
Brownsville
English Prai re
Cane Girardeau
Waterloo, III
Edwards cty
Elvira. Ill
Southward
Framklin, Mo
F.ustwaid
Kaskaskia
Bellville.lU
St Louis
Nashville
St Genevieve
13 St Louis, M T
16 St Miohnel
Albior. Ill
Carmi, III
New Haven
Nashville
Southward
New Orleans
F.astward
Kaskaskia
Belleville
St Louis
New York -
20 St Louis
10
Letters. Paid Free
unpaid, letters. letters.
9. c, d, c, No.
0 434
0 12}
0 12}
0 37
0 20
0 18} r
18}
2 50
0 18}
27 47
0 62}
0 06
0 18
0 25
0 37
0 '6
0 >5
0 12}
0 37}
0 18}
0 25
3 00
0 50
15 48 1 50
0 12}.
0 12
0 06
0 25
0 12
■0
Washington, 5th July, 1819.
Dear Colonel: Y out a of the 2c ult-
came to hand this morning.
The circumstances connected with tho
Bank ot Edtvardaville, as developed in the
two le;ers ot Governor fidwaids, submitted
by you to my perusal, will recaive due con
sideration,
I am much surprized at the contents of
his first letter to ypu 1 am g* atifi.-d with
the explanation you have given him upon
that subject. With Governor Edwards (
had no personal acquaintance before the last
winter. The opinion which I had of the tal
ents and integrity, from the official corres
pondence which had been carried on be
tween us both in the War and Treasury De
partments has been confirmed by personal
acquaintance.
The different subjects upon which he
had occasion to ask my opiniou or decision,
during the last session of Congress, were
fairly anti candidly stated; Ida comments
upon them were judicious, and it afforded
me great pleasure to be able, after due ex
amination and reflection, generally to co-
iocide in opinion with him. The gentle
man who has stated that I was unfriendly
to Governor Ed wa-ds, has entirely mista
ken my feelings and motives of action.
Certainly every thing wnich occu-red be
tween the Governor and myself whs deci
dedly calculated to inspire feeling- of a ve
ry different character. 1 had every reason
to be satisfied with him, and hope that no
thing occurred on my part to produce dis
satisfaction with him with any part of my
conduct.
I believe the only difference, of opinion
that occurred between us Was in relation
to the eligibility to office of a minor. In
that case,invouldliave afforded me great
pleasure to have thought with him, inas
much as it would have enabled me to have
aided in doing an art highly acceptable to
my friend Col.M’Ke*. My inability to
coocur with him in opinion was cause of
regret, and not of complaint. I had, there
fore, no possible cause of hostility with the
Governor, and asure you that I never felt
any thing like hostility to him.
I remain, with sentiments nf the highest
respect, your f> i**hd and most obedient
servant, WM H. CRAWFORD,
Col. Rioh’d M. Johnson.
P. S. I return you Gov. Edwards’* first
letter.
To be Continued.
The within i9 a true extract from an or
iginal paper, headed " Account of mails
serif from the post office at Edwardsville,
III. 1819,” furnished to the Comiiiitte ap
pointed bv the House of Representatives nf tor
the U. States, to investigate the chargesi fdyw
EXECUTOR OF
Francis Jalineau.
A LL persons having any demuo- aagainst the
estate of Francis Jalineau, dec are request
ed to deliver them in, properly attested, on or—
before the first day Of .October next All ac
counts not presented previous-to tha day, will
be ietuaeApayment by the undersigned execur-
Ht«ir.tkA9TDH,
MM-