The Times and state's right advocate. (Milledgeville, Ga.) 1833-1833, March 06, 1833, Image 2
'TIMES,
STATE KJUaiT’S ADVOCATE.
VaKITKSAXS PF.I H. .
IfIT.f.r.IXJEVILLE, MARCH o, 1q33.
etJItSELVES.
With pleasure and gratitude tve acknowledge th
increasing patronage extended to our paper. L%e
ry mail brings us additona l subscribers. More than
fifty were handed us last week. Not a day passes
that we do not receive anxious entreaties to perse
vere in our course, with the assurances of encour
agement and support. This is not only cheering to
us as individuals, but gratifying as patriots. V\ e are
as much pleased with the favorable reception of our
doctrines as with the bright and consoling pros
pect of ample remuneration tor our time and laboi.
In publishing the Times, our chief aim is the pub
lic weal, and wo desire [tecuniary benefit only as it
enlarges our means oi doing good. 1 lus is not the
time for people to bo absorbed in selfishness, lib
erty and its blessings arc in jeopardy- War and its
miseries arc threatened us, and it is the high and im
perious duty of every individual, who has a heart ca
pable of loving country and appreciating truth and
justice, to enter boldly into their defence, unawed by
power, unbiassed by interest, and regardless of eve
ry private consideration, to peril life, fortune, every
thing but honor, against the unholy crusade contem
plated by Federal Despotism. lie, who is unwilling
to do this, is not a fit conductor of a public press.
An Editor is called upon to make more than ordi
nary sacrifices. If he is incapable of this, let him
seek some other vocation, that requires not the ex
ertion of ceaseless and devoted patriotism. As tar as
it regards ourse! vc3 we are prepared for any sacri
fice to secure the people’s rights and the triumph of
correct principles. All that we ask is the necessary
patronage to sustain us in our efforts. W e are more
than ever devoted to the Itepulican doctrines ; we
are more than ever convinced of the great necessity
of maintaining them. Our attachment to them has
increased because of the violent war now waged up
on them, and the assassin-like-blow aimed at their de
struction by base deserters, and the simultaneous
hack-sliding of the old supporters of Republican
principles. Where now are those papers, that in
times of yore helped to boat back the invaders of the
Rights of man ? They have joined our enemies and
are our most formidable opponents, because they war
against us under our own colors.
•* In the tnidil of life wo are ii» death.’’
This passage from Scripture, could not bo more appropriate
than it3 application to the melancholy fate of Chari.es W. W sh*
ington, Esq. late of Macon who, in a moment, was snatched
from earth to eternity and found a watery grave!—To it was con
sign.’d a worthy man, in the prime and >»gor ol life, and of use
fulness to himself and society. In the absence of an obituary of
the deceased, we aubjoin the particulars of this melancholy event.
Mr. Washington, a mr. Murphcy, and a slave, (our pressman)
were passengers in the stage on Friday !‘**i for Macon, via
Clinton- lu jh.x* Walnut creek, nt the usual lord it
was forced by the strength es the enrront below the lord, cam*' lit
contact with a log or tree - danger was apparent, ami they com
menced to escape, and succeeded, except mr. Washington, who
could not swim ; he got on top of the stage, and was washed off
and was not afterwards seen or heard. Three horses were also
drowned. On Saturday the deceased was found, carried to Va
con, and interred on monday, attended by a large concourse of
citizens. The ffcage and mail were also taken out of the Creek
on b'ftturdsy. Wc have heard of several deaths by the falling of
trees, during the storm on Friday, and much damage to property.
It mn*t have an end*
For ourself wc can declare with the most unfeign
ed sincerity, that no man in this State—that no citi
zen of this Republic, wherever his domicil may he, is
more devotedly attached to the Union of these States,
' is more ardent in his aspirations for its perpetuation;
that none can desire more fervently the safety of the
liberties of the people every where than we do—hut
tve must say, with equal candor, that we differ widely
Irorn many of those, who profess the same devoted
ncss of patriotism, as to the host and safest plan of
securing the many blessings we have derived and
must still continue to receive from the honest and
trusty administration of the Federal Government.
It would be disingenuous not to allow that those
who difler from us are actuated by the same honest
conviction of the wisdom and safety of the policy
they propose, to attain the same common object in
view of all men who love their country, and who feel
an interest in the great struggle which is now pend
ing before the great tribunal of public opinion ; and
yet we are presumptuous and bigotted enough to be
lieve that our party alone holds and follows the true
political faith, the eventual adoption and adhesion to
which by the people of the United States can secure
their political salvation. We feel the more confi
dence in what we say, since we are supported in our
position by the enlightened experience of past ages—
by the long practice of our government and by the
lnjdi authority and oracular responses of some of the
greatest Statesmen of the Republic.
It is not that we desire a dissolution of the Union—
it is not that our feeling of favoritism or dislike to
wards particular individuals (for we trust we shall
never indulge either to the detriment ofour country)
would move us to incur the risque of a civil war in
the attempt to throw off the yoke of slavery im[>oscd
upon us by the North—it is not that wc believe the
Union ought to be dissolved at this time at all haz
ards, nor that we should melt the chains of our bond
age by the fury and ilame of civil war, and last of all,
it is not that tve either fear or desire, ever, any of
those disasters, that we would declare with all the
fravity of solemn and deliberate conviction that the
mo.v of these States is, and of right occur to be,
dissoluble. It is to guard against the horrible
evils we have enumerated, that we would wish to
have this great conservative principle of our govcrji
ment to stand as the pyramids of Egypt, “amidst the
wreck of matter and the crush of worlds."
The naked recognition of the right, with the settled
conviction that it would be resorted to in case of the
exorcise of powers not granted to the Federal gov
ernment, could. in no instance, fail to prevent the ne
cessity of recurring to the arsenic remedy of Judge
Barbour. The known admission of the existence of
such a right would be the surest guarantee against
usurpation. But if we were of a contrary mind, and
eovtld behove that, like the fabled Upas tree, h Would
pokou every of government w til an 'as reach
still a regard for truth and sincerity would impel us
to the recognition of the doctrine. It is as incident
to the nature of the government under which we
live as death that belongs to the condition ot man. —
The conviction that the Union of these States must
have an end will have the same solutary influence
upon the conduct ofour rulers, as the certainty of a
dissolution of this mortal coil ol ours does have upon
the moral man in preserving him free from taint and
corruption. Make the period of man’s life co-exten
sive witli time that never ends, and you arm him
with a consuming power that must overwhelm eve
ry feeling of humanity and eradicate every principle
of justice. It is the certainty that a few short years,
perhaps a day or an hour, may terminate las exist
ence, and that he may he called to render an account
of his stewardship to his Creator, that he is kept in
the path of right conduct. So it is with the govern
ment of the Union, the creature of the States. Once
confer immortality upon the Union or admit that it is
perpetual and indissoluble fiom the very nature of
its existence, and you give the Federal arm the sword
of the Seraphim with which to immolate the liberty,
independence and happiness of the people of these
States. We appeal to the common reason and uni
versal experience of mankind for the truth and jus
tice of these remarks.
SECESSION.
Many men pertinaciously and wickedly proclaim
that Secession is not permissible—that it is not con
stitutional, for the reason that the Constitution of the
United States is silent upon the subject and docs not
mention the i iglit nor any thing of kin to it. Would
tliese men persuade the people that they have no
rights, save those which are secured to them I»v that
instrument in direct terms? And is the history and
theory of the Federal government so imperfectly
comprehended, that these dogmas are to obtain cred
it even with the most illiterate, but many times, the
most patriotic and best intentioned citizens of our
country? Lamentable is the truth, that there are
men who will utterthis sentiment, knowingatthe same
time that it is unblushing mendacity alone which
gives it currency. If this doctrine were not the
foulest heresy that ever crept into a free government
and defiled and polluted the sources of freedom, by
what tenure, we would ask, do our citizens pursue
their daily avocations and enjoy many privileges, the
dearest, because the most necessary, which the Con
stitution of the United States is an utter stranger to?
To what will this world of ours come ? Are there
no means of moral force to deprive this Polyphemus
in our government of the power of doing harm ?
Can we not drug his mischievous propensities into
insensibility for n time, if not to dcstoy his active
functions forever ?
W e would ask these advocates of unlimited des- ]
potic power, how the State governments exercise
those rights which are not secured by name in the
Federal Constitution ? Do the States hold them at
the sufferance of the general government? Slavish
minions! You would say, yes, if you dared to be
tray your real views by a direct, intinseiled answer
to the question ! What is the meaning of that part
of the Constitution which affirms that all those pow
ers, which have not been surrendered by, nor pro
hibited to the States, are reserved to the States res
pectively? Has the right of secession been surren
dered ? Shew it in the Constitution. Has it been
prohibited to the States ? Point out the clause in
that instrument which interdicts the exercise of the
right. If those despots, who would tear our liber
ties to tatters with the thunder of the cannon for the
peaceable exercise of a Constitutional authority,
can shew no other reasons for the denial ol the right
of Secession, than their own audacious assertion,
that it is not secured by n ame in the Federal Consti
tution, let them remember that the eyes of the peo
,,!<> can not always be blinded, and that they will take
three-fold vengeance upon those, who have basely
betrayed their confidence.
“ Now in ike names of all the Gods at once,
Upon what meal doth this our Catear feed,
That he is grown so great ?"
The Heroes of the Revolution toiled and suffered
to little advantage if the product of their labors is
now to be swept away by the besom of destruction
and the fair fabrick of their most anxious hopes is to
be razed to its foundations by the fierce dragon of
civil war. The whole country is in a fearful com
motion, and a single spark of violence cannot fail to
spread the flame of domestic discord far and wide.
It is a fatal error to suppose that the attempt to co
erce the State of South Carolina into submission to
the usurpations of the general government will onlv
be oppose< 1 by the dominant party in that common
wealth. We have been no idle spectator of passing
events ; and we have observed with the most in
tense interest and painful solicitude the impressions,
those events have made upon the public mind here
and elsewhere, and we speak in the majesty of truth
and the soberness of reason when we say that the
first blow struck in South Carolina will unite the
yeomanry of all parties in the South against the foul
and odious attempt to reduce a sovereign and inde
pendent State to slavery and tame submission to the
decrees of a military despot. May tiie lightning of
Heaven scathe the Head of him who strikes the first
blow at the heart of Liberty ! May the fate of Ixion
be his !
And for what are our liberties to be immolated,
our happiness sacrificed and our prosjjcrity blighted?
Are they to be submerged in a struggle to maintain
them against the powerful invasion of a foreign foe ?
Are they to be imperilled in warding off the blow
aimed at their destruction by the uplifted hand of
the patricide ? Nothing of this is alledx'ed • 1 the
edict of war against Freedom—that glorious inheri
tance bequeathed us by our fathers, who fought the
battles ot the Revolution—nothing has prompted
the resolution to demolish every vestago of inde
pendence now reinaing with the people of the South
but the blood-thirsty and ruthless spirit of revenge
which the President harbors for one single man who
is domiciled in this unhappy region. He is deter
mined to pour out the phials of his wrath upon John
C. Calhoun, and the lives, tHb liberties and happiness
ofour people are to be forfeited and surrendered
to appease the vengeance of the President.
“A common danger provinces unanimity.’'
The whole Southern region is now- fully aroused
from its slumbers, and preparing to encounter the
fearful preparations which are being made to sub
due the liberties of our people, and bring them un
der the domination of the President and his Tariff
minions. However much they may have been op
posed to Nullification, as too airy and metaphysical
in its texture <fc feeble and ineffectual in its remedi
al character, they are not prepared to abandon the
more simple, efficient and natural relief from op- 1
pression, to he obtained by a resort to secession. ~
The abandonment of tliu right by the peo[J# of the
agricultural States would be a virtual surrender of
their lives, their liberties and their property. It is
not surprising therefore that the Proclamation ot the
Federal Executive should have met with such un
qualified and indignant reprobation throughout the
entire Southern country.
Now and tiien we catch the sound of a “ still small
voice” from the little band of Federalists, scattered
here and there, calling upon Congress and the peo
ple to rally round the standard of Monarchy, hoist
ed by Andrew Jackson, and borne by Daniel \V eb
stcr. Yes! that man, the bitterest reviler of the
President, the most clamorous opposcr of his former
republican measures, is now the main prop of the
administration, and it is asserted with much confi
dence that he will shortly be one of bis Constitu
tional advisers!!
Wherefore did the people of Georgia vote for
Andrew Jackson? Was it not to hinder and pre
clude that very event which is now about to take
place ? Alas! for poor human nature ! \Y here
shall we now look for good faith ? The man, who
was loved, honored and revered for his supposed Ro
man virtues, is now exhibited to us in all the naked
deformity of Punic baseness. Well.—wc live to
learn, and experience teaches us. All of us, even
the wisest, are liable to be deceived, but we. South
erners, have been most wofully gulled.
'slt. ADAMS,
This gentleman tells a story, in his speech against
the reduction of the Tariff", about Gil Bias and the
[lions mendicant, as furnishing “ the most perfect
emblem of Nullification.” We will not fatigue our
readers with a repetition of the story, the bearing of
which upon that doctrine is just as little discoverable
as his Ebony and Tor az toast at Baltimore was un
derstood, when he had to enter into a long explana
tion of it, to make the subject intelligible, lie is,
without qualification, reservation or exception, the
most intolerably ridiculous learned man we have
ever known or read of. Too much learning has made
him mad.
Mr. Adams wishes to know, whether there are
any measures by which a State can defeat laws
[•assed by Congress. Can lie so soon' have forgot
ten Georgia and her brave and talented Champion,
Geo. M. Troup? Why- did not some true son ot
Georgia remind that Quixotic Statesman of his
Presidential edict of war against Georgia for refus
ing to obey laws passed by Congress ? Why did
they not bring to his recollection the craven cowar
dice; which chilled his blood and deterred him from
executing his threat against Georgia, when he was
talking so grandiloquently about quelling rebellious
Carolina by force? Let John Q. Adams lead
the myrmidon army. He would re-cross the Poto
mac with more dispatch, than ever Xerxes flew over
the Hellespont. Wc know, he must tremble to his
centre, when lie beholds the tiger eye of that son of
Georgia, who startled the Tyrant, when lie was seat
ed on his pantomime throne. A mad-dog would as
soon look upon water as Mr. Adams would be con
fronted with Geo. M. Troup. He would as certain
ly have the hydrophobia.
Mr. Adams says, if it he the case, that a State
may evade the enforcement of the laws passed by
Congress, that it is time to seek for some other form
of government to live under. “ Murder will out.”
We have no manner of doubt that this Tory Ex-
President would be delighted to live under some
other form of government. His father before him
had the same over-weening desire, and our readers
all recollect the old adage, that what is bred in the
bone will stick in the flesh. Do we not know that
both father and son were always in favor of monar
chy, and that they wrote books upon books, in which
they advocated the British form of government and
pronounced it the most perfect in the world ? We
have many such men among us, if they dare avow
their sentiments. These Proclamation men—bloody
hill men, and Tariff’men are all of the same way of
thinking with the two Adams. They are all Tories
of :!'c worst stamp. Let the people be on their guard
against them, unless they want King, Loans and
Commons, instead of President, Senate and House of
Representatives.
Tltonms Jefferson Randolph.
Wc hardly know in what terms to speak of this
gentleman’s course in the Virginia Legislature to
wards South Carolina—-towards that munificent and
generous State, which so promptly subscribed ten
thousand dollars towards the discharge of the debts
of Thomas Jefferson, his grand-father, and the pur
chase of the estate, of which that recreant off
spring of a worthy and illustrious ancestor is now
in the occupation and enjoyment. This man pro
mises to arm himself to exterminate his benefactors
from the face of the earth! Base monster of ingrati
tude! Would you then suck the blood of those who
gave you meat, drink and comfort? Go, vile man,
in search of that, for which you thirst, as the weary
traveller in the arid desert for the water brook !
Perhaps we have given utterance to feelings
which had better been smothered, for the sake of the
greatest statesman and the purest patriot that ever
lived. But wc could not repress our indignation,
when we read Mr. Randolph’s letter to the Rich
mond Whig. Unless he repent and soften and pu
rity his heart, we consign him to the shades of Ere
bus. We would not breathe the atmosphere with
such a man for the treasures of Potosi. Docs the
land, which gave us birth ml nurtured and educa
ted us, shelter such an ingrate?
We have no objection to Mr. Randolph’s honest
political opinions, be they what they may. He may
l>e opposed to Nullification. He may reject the
doctrine of Secession, and preach unlimited Submis
sion and unredeeming slavery, but in God’s name—
in the name ot all that is just and generous, shed not
your benefactor's blood! Rather stand, for endless
ages, at the bar of Rhadamanthus and drag his con
demned culprits down to the pits of darkness, and
thro’ flames of torment, than l>e guilty of one act of
base and unmitigated ingratitude!
“He that cxiilteth himself shall be abased.”
Does tlic President of the United States deem
himself -jo impregnable, that he may commit any
enormity upon the liberties of the people and defy
their wrath? The indignation of the people is slow
in gathering against a man. who has helped to light
the battles ot his country and gloriously conquered
her enemies, but when it bursts in all its condensed
strength and confined blackness, destruction must
await him and his wicked counsellors. The Presi
dent has already achieved his own dishonor by his
unsteady policy, and it he would longer continue to
•tupon his bastard throne, set him beware that no
drop of freeman’s blood is spilled. He tnav yet
find his riiuti s. All patriotism, inagnamiiniiy and
daring are not confined to the age and country
ot that brave Roman.
I he President’s popularity was at one time com
itinuiliuc andextensive, but Hu now drooping and
decayed, and his name will be mentioned with
sad regret. He will be scorned by all freemen
and “be cast, like the loathsome weed, away." He
lias ventured too much upon hi# high standing with
the people. There is no tree so deep rooted, that
may not lie overturned by the tempest. The storm
is now lowering over his devoted head, and he must
fall a victim to its tremondous out-pourings. A
timel v recantation ofhis errors and a sincere contrition
for their commission may reconcile the people to
him during the remainder ofhis term of service. It
mav be, that such is his design in furnishing Iris creed
on the fourth of March. That day may yet tear oil
the mask of hyprocrisy.
Ttie Coalition !ioug again.
The Richmond Whig foretold a few weeks back
that, as the Globe had to hold its peace about de
mocracy, State Rights &c. since the Proclamation
had been published, it would return to the old cry of
“a Coalition” again. Sure enough, the last number
of that paper, received here, makes the charge upon
Mr Clay and Mr. Calhoun. Every tiling in the
bleared vision of this reprobate, which may clash
with the views of the President, assumes the form
and appearance of a Coalition, the alarm given ac
cordingly, and our ears are dinned with the cries of
“ a Coalition! a Coalition!”
If Mr. (.’lay had not stepped forward and held out
the Olive Branch of peace, the Globe would have
denounced him, as a hardened and reckless enemy to
the Union and happiness of his country If Mr.
Calhoun had refused the hand of fellowship and good
feelings, thus nobly extended, the Globe would have
decried him as a disorganize!' and traitor. Do what
they will, this prostituted press will, in the over
flowings of its own baseness, attribute bad motives
to good deeds performed by any body clso but Jack
son and his Swiss recruits.
Oh ! most admirably drawn picture.
Mr. Clayton, of Deleware, in his speech upon the
bloody bill", has drawn a most striking portrait of
Gen. Jackson, without designing it for him. It was
a most lucky hit. lie says, he agrees, that the mor
tal blow to our liberties may be struck by a hand
which has been indebted to us for existence. The
shaft, which shall stretch the American Eagle bleed
ing and lifeless in the dust, must be feathered only
from its own pinions; and oil! how bitter will be the
curses of men, in all ages to come, against the trai
torous heart and parricidal hand of him who shall
let loose that fatal arrow from the string ! And,just
Heaven ! blast the arm of him who lays his hand up
on the hilt of his sword to cut the cords of Liberty
and Union!
cottcmr.ss.
The latest advices from Washington City speak
in a very desponding tone of the prospect of a modi
fication of the Tariff upon any terms, and it is confi
dently anticipated that the bloody bill will pass both
Houses of Congress by large majorities. We shall
know the fate of the Union in a few days. The great
i debate, so long and so anxiously expected between
Mr. Calhoun and Mr. Webster, has terminated. —
Letter writers from the City of Washington, who
generally note and describe such contests with more
than ordinary minuteness and interest, speak of the
efforts of both men as being powerful in argument
and eloquence, but yield the palm of victory to Mr.
Calhoun. They do not consider .Mr. Webster's as
equal to his speech on Root’s Resolutions. The one
is called the harvest, the other the gleanings. He
did nothing more than amplify upon the generalities
of Mr. Rives’speech. That gentleman lias thus be
come authority for Daniel Webster. Mr. Cailiotin’s
speech is spoken of as a most transcendent effort and
as having fully realized public expectation, which
was at its utmost pitch.
lACKSOS’S THREAT.
M any respectable gentlemen have concurred in
stating that the President, in conversation upon the
measures now progressing to coerce South-Carolina
openly declared that he did not wish to harm the peo
ple of that State, but that “there were about a dozen
worms within its limits, he must and would crush.”
We will not make a single reflection upon the lan
guage. Read it, freemen, and decide upon it for
yourselves!
The ConslitiiiloimUst.
What a pestilent sore that must be which cannot
bear touching. A short time since we commended
to the perusal of o ir brother of the Constitutionalist,
a simple sentence from Gov. Troup’s letter, and
fbrtwith he flies into a furious passion at our ad
vice. We did but hint in all gentleness at the pos
sibility that the enforcing bill and the Proclamation
suited the Editor’s taste, and suggested that be might
not object to convincing South Carolina of her he
retical doctrines at the point of the bayonet. When
hey! presto, the vials ofhis wrath are unsealed and
incontinently poured forth upon our devoted head,
lie asks us it we did ‘really saw’ him flourish the
cudgels in behalf of our apostate Senator at Wash
ington. Ay, did we. We “really seed” (per
haps that phrase may tally with his philology) him
spirting his ink, in defence of John Forsyth’s doc
trine, that the sovereign people whom he so ungrate
fully, and grossly misrepresents,’had no right to
speak through their delegates in Convention other
wise than ins master chose to direct. In the full
flow of his indignation 100, our irascible brothei
proffers to our acceptance a spare pair of Iris specta
cles—-doubtless to aid our defective, optics in dis
covering that the true state rights’ doctrines are
contained in the Proclamation. No, \<>, Friend
Guieu—verily we must decline so n.a. nauimous an
offer, lest we too mistake t! side of the fence where
wc ought to jump, and find ourselves unexpectcdlv
check by jowl with the blue light federalists, for
whom wc now, entertain, (as you did once,) a most
wholesome antipathy. Wc would much rather you
should mount the additional pair, and study said let
ter again. There is more in it than is “dreamt of in
your philosopy.”
“Why give you me this shame.”
Was it not enough that the pride of Georgia should
be humbled by the unholy alliance of three men,
who would fain degrade her to the condition of a sub
missive slave to the phrenetic and imperious master
who wields the mace of Federal authoritvat the seat
of the central government ? Are there none anion
us who will dare every tiring that is honorable, and
war with the relentless enemies of our liberties i
Shall it be said that Georgia Ik,wed doi at
shrine of power and worshipped the golden calf *
Does the spirit of IWS animate the bosoms of her
sons no onm ? Or are they fallen, degraded and
disgraced ? Hus the Southern Ranner, the phren
zvot Jackson idolatry, furled the streame, J Stale
or | U< 7' * humiliation ofourl
State pride, when «e resd their remarks, beaded
•‘General Jackson"ia their paper of the 23d liking.
Added to the impulse, we feel to vindicate our
selves from the unsparing and relentless denuncia
tion of all those who are arrayed in hostility a
gainst the most laithless depositary of the public
confidence, imprinted upon the page of our national
history, we feel it an imperious duty, we owe to our
patrons and the character of our State, to repel the
unfounded and grossly aggravated imputations cast
upon those independent and patriotic spirits, who
have laid aside every interested consideration, and
ventured boldly and fearlessly forth in defence ofli
berty and equal rights. The Southern Banner fixes the
stain of ingratitude upon all those who have arrayed
themselves in opposition to the Proclamation and the
sei kit which dictated it. Does a government or a
people owe that man a debt of gratitude, who, for
selfish and malign purposes, would willingly immo
late our liberties and plunge us into all the miseries of
servitude? Admit that lie is entitled to the full
share of all the glory claimed for him by the South
ern Banner, (and we would not obscure a solitary
ray of it) are wc to permit him to poison the source
of our liberties, Ac bring destruction upon our jieople?
We humbly apprehend that the Southern Banner has
entirely mistaken public gratitude; & we would beg
him to review his Cicero. Even that persecuted
man, who had conferred everlasting benefits upon
his country —who had received, as did afterwards
our illustrious Washington, the title of “ Father of
his country,” and who was at one time exiled from
the land which gave him birth, and afterwards most
inhumanly butchered by a tyrannical usurper, who
dreaded the power of his eloquence, never pushed
the law of public gratitude to half the extent that the
Southern Banner does. We had far better never
been born, if, because a man has conferred a favour
upon another, be is to be allowed to make a slave of
him, else to be branded with the epithet of in-rati
tude.
The Southern Banner has not correctly constru
ed the letter of Gov. Troup. lie docs not sav that
secession is not constitutional, but only that the con
stitution docs not expressly provide for such a reme
dy of our grievances. He contends that it is one of
the reserved rights, and is as justly ranked with them
as any other. Does the Banner believe that all or
any of our reserved Rights are Constitutional?
Give us your honest and deliberate convictions upon
that question.
”?leUiinku thou nrt more honest now, than
wise.”
The Editor of the Standard of Union, with all the
simplicity and amazement manifested by the rustic
when he was told that “ the Dutch hail taken Hol
land,” announces to his readers a most wonderful
and strange admission of a Tariff' man—and that
no less a personage than Governor Dickerson of
New Jersey ! Already must the imaginations of
our readers be wrought up to the highest pitch, who
have not had the pleasure of beholding the Stand
ard of Union, to learn what this admission is,
so recently and unexpectedly made by a Tariff max
of such dazzling eminence as Gov. Dickerson. Wo
should have been pleased, beyond every thing that
we can imagine, to have seen the astonishment of the
Editor, when he first jumped upon that most extra
ordinary of ali. admissions, from a Tariff max !
“There must have been speech in his dumbness, lan
guage in his very gesture; he must have looked, as
tho’ he had heard of a world ransomed, or one des
troyed.”
But we will not keep our readers in longer sus
pense. We copy this eighth wonder in the lan
guage and emphasis of the Standard of Union.
“Wc find one admission in Mr D’s letter which we do not
recollect, heretofore, to have heard or read as coming
Irom a tariff man—it is this:—“A very small portion of
the citiseris of the Eastern, Western, or Middle ftatos
are engaged in manufactures; —they hare to jmy Ike
same prime for manufactured, article s, foreign or do
mestic, that arc paid in the South !’ There is nothing
new tons in the foregoing proposition but the course
from whence it comes—a tariff man.”
Is there a man in this boundless empire of ours,
whether he be a statesman, politician, lawyer, doctor,
planter, merchant, mechanic or what mot, who has
read speeches or newspapers, that does not know
that this unprecedented admission for a Tariff
man was urged a thousand and one times by the ad
vocates of those run-mad “American System" men,
as the most conclusive and irrefragable argument
that the Tariff* was equal in its ojrerations and did
not bear more oppressively upon the South, than it
did upon the North, East and West the reason be-
alledgcdby the Tariff men, that all consumers, .
in whatever quarter es the Union they were to be
found, paid the same price for articles, whether of
foreign or domestic manufacture. And the Editor of
the Standard of Union never before knew that the
Tariff men had admitted that proposition !
The South has always contended that she pays
more than cither of the other sections of our Union,
they less ! Why ? Wc will lot Mr. Crawford an
swer for us. lie says,
Ist. Because there are no manufacturing esfiblwh
ments hi those States, consequently no local market cre
ated. 2d. Because none of the tailoring class are em
ployed by means of the Tariff. 3d. Because capitalists
have invested no capital in them. Anri 4th, wc are at a
greater distance from the workshops which supply •»
with the necessary articles. The freight, insurance,com
missions, and other necessary expenses, enhance th»
price of those articles to the consumer in the Southern
States, in a higher degree, than in the tariff States. I»
these four particulars, the tariff is more oppressive to the
citizens of the Southern States than of the tariff States.
RII.HO KS.
Among the many rumors mentioned by Corres
pondents from Washington City, wc notice that
Mordecai Moses Noah, King of Israel is expected to
establish a newspaper in that City, and that Blair,
the Editor of the Globe, is to be displaced and kick
ed out of the Kitchen Cabinet, and that the “Ho*
veil-born Amos” has forsaken his compeer in all the
meannesses of [political truckling and huckstering.
\\ elook far a tremendous explosion at the Palace af
ter the 4th of March’ The smoke already begiiwt®
issue from the Etna that there lies concealed. ” 0
hope that the evil-doers alone may perish in the ex
plosion, and that the faithful and honest servants ol
the public mav not onlv be saved but richlv reward
ed.
I’ro«rc«* of Principle.
Wc extract the above paragraph from the N. I-
Courier and Enquirer, as indicative of a growing
spirit of lilterality among our Northern fellow-citi
zens towards the sufferings and complaints of MT
sister State and the measures adopted by her ij’
throw off" the burthens of Federal legislation. M
tliough the Editor condemns South Carolina in
points, ly passes yet severer censure upon Long****
and tin/ President, who would spill noble sad
blood, the one actuated by bam- lucre nun
oilier eager to glut bis vengeance ujanu Mi t***' 1
Mill, enemies.