Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page.

2 Accused Womans Lawyers Try to Keep Notes Husband Says She Wrote Out of Evidence BITTER FIGHT IS WAGED OVER GRACE "DEATH LETTERS" Prosecution Frying to Show Woman Had Notes Written to Cast Suspicion on Fictitious Friend—Typewriter Experts Called. Continued From Page One d’.-iussmg me admissibility of these letters. Solicitor Dorsey contended that the letters were, not communica tions between husband and wife, be cause Eugene Grace had had no hand In their preparation->ave possibly a mechani- a’ one -thti' the p eparation an i the mailing was done by Mrs. Gra< e. Mr. Rosser raid that tne state would have to prove this more clea-iy before the letters could be admitted that the burden of proof was upon the state and not the defense Woman’s Lawyer Escapes Grilling. Mr-. Daisy Grace achieved an impor. taut victory when her chief attorney, • Luther Rosser, placed upon the stand by the prosecution, was upheld In de clining to answer any questions con <erning his knowledge of the type writer at the Grace home upon which was said to have been written the mys terious and sensational "alibi'’ letters. Solicitor General Hugh M. Doisey sought to question Mr. Rosser in an evident effort to prove that there was s typewriter in the Grace hottie, and that Mrs. Grace might have written upon ft the letters signed by Grace which told of their happiness and of Grace's departure and of the "bum that he took home from the station sfter seeing her a war. Ihe obvious inference was to connect Mrs. G.ace with these letters through hei use of the typewriter. Rosser said; I decline io answer any question loncerning the typewriter because it would be a violation of confidence with my client.” The judg* upheld the lawyer, and the prosecution, balked once more, again delayed Its promised production oi the sensational "alibi” letters " hich ' H ,<ays. were forged. While the trial went on, Eugene Grace fumed at the Piedmont sanitarium. Jhe superintendent said he was no worse this morning than when he < anv* to Atlanta from Newnan two days ago. and was perfectly able to be taken to court. He was kept in the sanitarium aw ail ing word from his counsel to attend the trial again. The prosecution will probablv < its case today. The defense will be yery brief. The case w ill reach the jury either tonight or early tomorrow, and the verdict should be known before io morrow evening Mrs. Grace May Take Stand Today. A, large a crowd as usual was in the court room today when the case opened More women than on former days were present, expecting to heat Mrs. Grace tell her own story on the stand. Whether or not they will be dis. appointed remains to be seen, for coun sel for the defense refused to state when the case opened whetlifer they would introduce Mrs. Grace or any wit nesses whatever. They have kept the slate's counsel absolutely In the dark as to the line of defense. That the defense has made prepara tions to introduce witnesses in ease thev deem it necessary Is indicated by the fact that Mrs. Martha Ulrich, moth, vr of Mrs. Grace, has been put "under the rule” -and excluded from the court room during the proceedings. Mrs. I I rivh and Mrs. Louise Wilson, trained nurse of Mis. (trace, sit in an ante room near the court chambei all dav Grace Better, Says Lawyer Lamar Hill. Grace's personal i ouils' l. said today that Eugene was better to day and was expected to return to court At the opening of court today . Solii i tor Dorsey asked the court to make re newed effort to secure the presence of , <'lardnee B 11. subp'naed by the state 1 '4s a witness, who is quite ill. It being agreed that Hell was too ill to be pres **nt Mr. l.»<»rsey asked that it appear on the records that he desired Mr. Bell's presence to add a certain link to the chain of evident .■ Louis Wellhouse was the first wit ness called. He is in the paper busi ness. and connected wiili Paul A. Clem ents. a witness of yesterday. It was at his mother's suggestion that Wellhouse found out who was Mr. Clements’ attorney's Mr. Dorsey desired to swear Luther Rosser and put him mt the stand Mr Rosser objected to being sworn, but was put on the stand, nm on oath Another Victory For Mrs. Grace Mr. Rosser declined to ui-r.any questions. He was questioned as to whether he had a Smith Premier type writer obtained from Paul '’loments, the man who occupied the house at one time occupied by Mr ami Mrs. fl-ace, Mr. Ro*ser claimed immunity from testifying, as one of oiuns, i Mi Doisey said he wanted to bring out the fact that the Graces had such a type-I writer, obtained from Clements A sharp colloquy between Du: " and R ss r followed. Mi Rosser. :i 1•• witness chair, argued points of a w with ■ the court. Mr. Rosser escaped questioning ipon ih" ground that ills Information was | confidential a u between law.vet and > lietit. Paul Clements resumed tin stand He was asked whether or not he de clined to give d'Vvtive.s any informs-; uiii >i« to tiir ip. ar t- The defense, objected and «;<» sustained I * soil itoi is int oi rigtim, said ■ Mr. Rosser "He doesn't regard your honor's ruling " A l"ng argument, with I be jury pres ent. followed. Mr. Dorsey was making a strenuous effort to prove that the Graces possessed n typewriter formerly owned by Paul elements, and upon which two mysterious letters had been written. The context of these letters has not been made public, but they are q part of the state’s evidence to prove a carefully prepared plan to kill Grace tn'd provide a false clew to set the po lice on the wrong trail. The witness was dismissed without the stale having, gained the information desired Lewis Hill took the stand for the third time. He said that Mrs. Grace told him at Newnan on March & that site wanted to spend the night al her home in West Eleventh street. She knew at the time that her husband was at St. Josephs. Sensational Letters Now Looming Up. V\ Hues- identified a letter as one he had seen at St. Josephs on March 7, two days after tlie shooting It had been in an envelope identified by wit ness yesterday. The two typewritten letters were then shown him. He said one of them had been in the same en velope witli the note he had just Iden tified. No view as to the real impor tance of tlie letters could be gained ft am the questioning The state seems to place tremendous importance upon these documents. Mr Rosser asked whose handwriting teas on the note. Tlie state objected Witness could "lily state his opinion Defense tried to prove the note was written Uy Grace. Legal authorities were read to settle the point Witness had identified Grace’s writing yesterday. The steno graphic report was consulted, after a hot debate. The state was vigorously combatting any effort to have the writ ing on the pencilled uole identified as Eugene Grace's Witness was permitted to testify. He admitted knowing G'ace’s signature, but couldn't say as to his writing. Rosser Accuses Dorsey of Tyranny. Witness couldn't swear that signa ture to letter in evidence was that of Grace lie didn't believe it was He had nevei seen a lettei just signed "Gene." Ali he had seen had been signed “E. H Grace." The word "Giace" was ihe word by which lie could identify Grace's writing A half hour was consumed in a go ing whether ih<- witness could compare the letter with others known to be Grace's. Mr Dorses protested at tiie defense's producing title's of which the state bad not been informed. He claimed that the jury would be misled. Tne de fense would not state whether o not i thev intended to offer the letters in : evidence. Mr. Rosser insisted that he wanted t to show the witness Grace's signa. ui" and ascertain whether or not the pen cilled note was written by Eugene Grace The court seemed in doubt as to the‘proper ruling Mr. Rosser chaiged that Mr Dorsey was using the rule as the •grossest tyranny” against the defense Mr. Dorses said he merely wanltd •.lie rule of the statute on evidence ap plied. He didn't want the court to he confused. Defense Loses In Letter Fight. It came out in the discussion that one of lite mysterious '.‘lters, "Exhibit B." was one written by Grace to Paul Clements in reply to one written to Grace by t'lemegis It is presumed that Illis letter is merely in evidence ns a basis for comparison with a letter of real importune- and asserted to lie a forgery. Mr. Rosser said he wished to offer the witness one signature of Grace to refresh -his memory. He wished to make the witne.-s prove that he really did know Grace's signature. The cour' ruled against the defense and the wit ness was dismissed. C. A Beauchamp was the next wit ness Calls for "Bokamp" failed to get him Neither did calls for "Beecham.' He was not in the court house. The bailiff was sent to the Remington Typewriter Company’s office for him. Mrs. Grace Weeps At Sight of Letter The pencilled letter, which tlie elate Is trying to discredit, is a note written and signed by Eugene Grace to it’s ■wife, saying he whs .-.orry tor certain tilings he had done and expressing ills low for her. The state is trying to Keep the defense from proving tiie sig inatute tn be Graces. The brief typewritten letter, "Exhibit A," is also signed by Grace and is said to be a message of sinii ar nature. Tiie flt.-t trace of tears tn Mia Graces eves were noticed when the pent < led letter was handed to the w it- I tiess though it was not read. They iwe ed m the great brown eyes of the ' .■ cased woman and began to trickle down her cheeks She wiped them away witli a luce handkerchief and •ant low over the table. In u few mo merits site had recovered herself and . m.-.i ip. conversation with C. W. Hu’ av a p i', ate detective who has s.it bv lor s 1 at every moment of the trial A wa- taken white the bailiff scai lied ■ . the missing witness •' A io im mmp took the stand and n Hemuii-m .. | v-w rlt ci was paced on ambit kJ., ~ him VVilnr • aimed >" n- > typewriter THE ATLANTA GEORGIAN AND NEWS. WEDNESDAY. JULY 31. 1912. I MRS. GRACE AND HER MOTHER S • F? - 4- .IIP - ' W. jE ■> ■■■ i USHfk . WHK "Bw aw. JI mSms, I. -- I mBHmHHMe \\ M|B | i w I F- ' Mrs. Daisy Opie Grace, oti left, and her mother, Mrs. Martha Girich, on their way to court expei t. He had judged typewritten documents only 'from a salesman's standpoint He handled three ma chines Smith Premier, Monarch and Remington. He was shown the type written letter.-, Exhibits A and B. He said he hud been shown the letters be fore. AVitne-s had'examined letters unde: a microscope. He testified that tile two letters were W'itten on the same ma chine. because the letter "D" was light er on one side than on the other, and there were other marks to prove tiie statement. There were, no two use:! machines alike, any more than any two grains of popcorn are alike.' Witness said "B” was written first. They were both written on a Smith Premier, mode! 2 or model 4. On < ross-examtnation witness said lie believed the two were written on the same machine. No, he couldn't swear positively. Mr. Rosser offered him a document and asked whether it had been done on a Smith Premier. Witness couldn't say Tiie testimony was much the same as that of H. M. Ashe on the previous day. Witness admitted he couldn't tell which was written first. The ribbon might have been changed. He was dis missed. Says Grace Has Not Improved. Dr. Willis Jones, one of Grace's sur geons. was called to tile stand. Dr. Jones examined Grace yesterday. He was asked Grace's condition. De fense objected. His condition today was in elevant. The objection was over, ruled. Grace was absolutely paralyzed yes terday fiom his waist down. He has lost ground sim e March ■’>. A pistol wound was responsible for his condi tion Tiie bullet was still in the man’s body Dr Jones was dismissed. Tile state tendered in evidence a le gal document. Tiie defense objected and the jury was ordered out. it was a iga.-e signed by Grace and Mrs. John Kiser. Mr. Rosser held it was not rel evant Mr. Dorsey contended Hint the | signature of Grace had been proved. Mr. Rosser denied this. Mr Dorsey couldn’t remember which witness had proven the signature. Defense insisted the le.i.-’ was not in order. Mi. Dor sey Insisted tiiat it was. because it had stfpuini lons ar to the < aie of furniture and because it appears to have been written on January 9, 1912, and two days after tills, nt least, Mrs. Grace knew s .e was going to occupy 29 West Eleventh street. He wanted to prove that Mrs. Grace was responsible for the furniture and that she expressed more solicitude for its damage than she had for her wounded husband. Dorsey Says Site Thought Out Plans. Mr. Dorsey insisted that the woman was eo mercenary that she had thought out all her plans for shooting' Grace even before she left the Boulevard home, where the typewriter was at hand. He asserted that she had used the typewriter even then, long before the shooting, to forward her plans. He argued that her worry over her hus band's financial welfare and the dam age to the furniture was a matter of evidence in the chain against Mrs. Grace. He held that her use of doubled sheets, her oilcloth on the bed. was a m\r ’enary care for the furniture far above her love for her husband. "This itoman showed 100 times the solicitude for the furniture and property that she did for her wounded husband," de clared the solicitor." The court ruled out tiie lease Marriage Certificate Offered in Eiddence. The siate tendered a marriage cer tificate. The defense said it could not ! be offered as evidence, but offered no objection to the certificate being ten dered. It was dated at Now Orleans on May 10, 1911. It was shown to the jury. This was the real marriage, the ceremony performed in New York hav ing been, it is alleged, a false and Il legal ceremony. Mrs. Lewis Hill was sworn. She said Mrs. Grace told her. during the holi days. that she was going to leave her home on the Boulevard. Mr. Dorsey again desired to tender the noted letters as evidence, and again the jury was sent cut while the dis- 1 eussion ensued The papers In question were The lease of the Eleventh street home. Two letters. A and H. and their en velopes The letter "A" was in Irief, n« fo’ lows My D«ar Wife Daisy: After saving good-bye to you at the station today I ran into ar. old friend fellow of mine from Charles ton, S. C. He was down and out. My heart went out to him. He was dead broke. It is a pitiful story. He is out of a job. I’m go ing to take him home with me. give him a bath and let him sleep all night with me. He can wear a suit of my c'othes, for he is a tall fel low. I'm sorry I was delayed and missed my tain to Philadelphia, which will throw me a day late going and coming back You bring mother back to Atlanta with you instead of waiting for me to corne to Newnan. Hope you wrote to your mother. With all my Icvc, GENE. This letter was not dated and the text and signature were written on a typewriter. Th. note in pencil was then read to the court, it said, briefly: My Own Darling Wife: After I put you on the train I got left. I shall be a day late getting back. Shall bring you something nice. Dear girl, my friend is here at the house with me now. I’ve been telling him how sweet you are. I'm sorry for every thing I said. I shall be as good as I know how. With a billion kisses, GENE. This note w.is written and signed in I pencil. Declares Mrs. Grace Wrote the Letters. Mr. Dorsey argued, in tin absence of the jury, that lie desired to prove that these letters, written he contended, by Mrs. Grace and not by her husband, constituted a part of her plan to shoot her husband. He maintained that the typewritten letter had been written as j early as January. before the Graces I lift their Boulevard home, on the Smith Premier machine In that house. He as-erted that this letter, in the same envelope with tiie pencilled noli, : were sent to Newnan »n the day Grace 'v. as shot, ad<lr. ii to Mrs Daisy I Grace They went by mistake to Mrs i'leveland Orr. Was She Betrayed By An Accident? Instead of sending them l<> Mrs G .'ice, |,> (hem o Mrs H.ll .T Atlintu and the; w> re turned over to | Eug‘ in- Grace nt the hospital a:. : thence came into the hands of the state. -• It is the purpose of the state toprove that Mrs. Grace wrote these letters in the hope of fixing the murder of he husband upon this unknown friend who was. as shown in the letters, taken into his home. The failure to kill Grace and the accidental going'astray of the let ters sent to Mrs. Grace by herself, as the state claims, exposed the plot. Here’s the Plot As State Sees It. These letters constitute the most sig nificant testimony yet offered by the prosecution. It will be the purpose of the state to show that the letters were prepared by Mrs. Grace; that “the man. Grace’s friend," was brought into the letters so that suspicion would fall upon him (“Grace's friend”! when Grace's body was found. It is the claim of the prosecution that these letters were mailed by Mrs. Grace, went to Newnan and were sent back to Atlanta by Mrs. Cleveland Orr. of Newnan, and fell into the hands of Mrs. Hill. The letters reached Newnan the day Grace was shot, the postmark of receipt being 7:30 p. m. Mr. Rosser in objecting to the let ters as evidence claimed that no evi dence had been introduced which showed directly or by circumstance that Mrs. Grace wrote or supervised the writing of the letters. Mr. Rosser contended that the letters would show that they had been mailed after Mrs. Grace left Atlanta, which ruled 04tt the possibility of her having mailed the letters. When the afternoon session was re sumed Colonel Rosser again took up his argument seeking to exclude the letters as evidence. Branch Ma-kes Plea Against Letters. J. A. Branch, counsel for defense, then took up the argument. Mr. Branch had been a silent adviser in the trial prior to this. It was Mr. Branch's understanding that before documentary evidence could be introduced some reasonable basis should be shown. If the letters were spurious, chargeable to Mrs. Grace, as the prosecution claimed, -aid Mr. Btanch some connection between her and the letters had to be shown. Even if it were proven that Grace did not mail the letters that did not neces sarily mean that Mrs. Grace was the only person who could have mailed the hi. Mr. Branch brought out the further point that the letters were incompetent because Grace had furnished them to the prosecution, which was agaln't the law. T'ne law, claimed Mr. Branch, said that a husband could not "give evident e" against his wife. In hand ing over the letters Grace was "giving evidence” against his wife. Solicitor Charges A Diabolical Plot. Mr. Dorsey claimed that the physical circumstances —the fact that Eugene H. Grace was found shot, in a locked Ohm about 1 o'clock —made it impos sible for him to have mailed the Lt t"i;. In a fiery speech Mr. Dorsey went on to convince the court that the letter was a part of the "Res Gestae" —the Death Plot." The solicitor said that the admissi bility of the letters was founded upon such a well-recognized and fundamen tal principle of law that common sense should dictate that they be allowed. He repeated that the letters were a part of "a diabolical crime planned by this woman." Court Decides Letters Admissible. Judge Roan decided that the letters should be admitted. He stated, how ever. that if it were proved that Grace wrote tlie letters that he would in his charge direct the jury to disregard the letters. The admission of the tetters was a pronounced victory for the prosecution. This point was bitterly fought by both sides. In bringing out the intricacies <>f -tlie issue Solicitor Dorsey made an eloquent and forcifully logical speech. The letters were then read to the jury by Lamar Hill. The court said he had not intended to admit the (‘loments letter, a type written letter which was used to com pare the typewriting on the "friend” letter. Mr. Rosser asked that the jury be sent out while this point was taken up, and again the lawyers launched into an argument over the admission of this letter. States Loses As To One Letter. Mr. Dorsey, perspiring from his suc cessful efforts in th" previous case and the terrific heat of the afternoon, made an earnest appeal for the admission of 4he ('laments letter, to prove that the “down and out" letter had been written at tlie North Boulevard home of the Graces, long before the a.tual commission of the crime—at a time when the life insurance was in force. He wanted to show that Daisy had planned her crime long before its ac tual cornmissii n The court ruled against this letter, thus considerably weakening the state's case in so far as the proof that the Grace letter was written on the same machine is (or.cerned. Hut the jury heard the experts declare that both let. | ters "A" and "B” hud been written on | the same Smith Premier No. 2. Tlie admission of the two important letters probably means that the de fense will decide to put Mrs. Grave upon the stand tomorrow. The letters | add so much to the chain of circum stance that the defense will be forced to exercise every means to combat them But it has by no means been proven that Daisy Gnu e wrote or mailed the | letters in question. The court must I finally pass upon that, and unless it Is (dearly proven that she wrote them th<". will be thrown out by the court X H Rise’, the next wltm was vailed lb- testified to having leased the Eleventh street home tn Eugene < Ira i e He 1 tilled to the signa tq i v mil the lease and the fact that Mis. Gra .■ was present. The lease was tend.-', as evidence. It was not admitted Mr. Dorsey said he had sunur,i. n , j a woman, Mrs. L. T, Stallings, wli,, refused to appear. He desired th/ court to issue an attachment f . Office Doyle said he had offered '! Stallings a summons at the ittii, ’. today. She had refused to accept it saying she didn't w utu to g up in the ca?e. The court instructed the offi., deal gently and easily with Mrs S:., Ings, who was a refined lady, th, - licitor said. Detective G. C. Bullard, the offi. prosecutor in the case, was put (11 , stand. He saw Mrs. Grace first at ■ . Terminal station on the night of 5. He was not in uniform. Mrs. G, was met by friends. They got in and drove to St. Josephs. Neithvi .. . tectlve spoke to Mrs. Grave. Th"', f,. lowed in a cab. They got there ji;L afterward. Declares Wife Was First to Speak. Mrs. Grace went into a waiting r..,,'n He and Doyle waited out on th.- p.,1, He didn’t have a view of Mrs. from the porch. There was a lad. there. Mr. Kiser and Morri- 1'.i,.„ He was Drusen' at the meeting Grace and his wife. "Who was first to speak?” "She did.” "What did she say?" Mr. Rosser Objected. The jur" warn out again. It was the old question ut> again, of whether or not tm jur.. hear the statement that Mr- G , made the first reference to Gene's m .- sation against her. “The first words Mrs. Gnu . - , were. 'How -did this happen. G n ■ What's this you’ve been saying agiirro me?’” testified tiie witness, when jury was out of the room. "Mrs. Grace walked off to the of the bed and stood there. She not kiss him. "Grace said. 'Daisy, didn't you ;< me?’ She said, 'No, why should 1 shoot you? You're not in your right mind.’ "Grace said, 'Yes. you shot me rnd left me locked up.' "Mrs. Grace said. If you say : v again you’ll never see me again. “Grace said, 'Daisy I first thought you might have shot me in a dr. im. When you were ta'king in your sl.-e;,. this morning you were saying ‘Opi<. Opie. why did you come to take n>e back ?' " The defense objected to all this . n versation. Tlie state cared only f.r the first words spoken by Mrs Grace. The court ruled out all the conversa tion in the hospital except that part where she said “What's this you'r- say ing about me?” The defense then in sisted that the whole conversation I," heard, and this was agreed upon. Jury at Last Hears Grace’s Accusation. Mr. Bullard was then question as to Mrs. Grace’s acts and words at i " police station Mrs. Grace said Grave had tak. i quinine and two patent medicines to night before. .He had planned t" g" to Philadelphia that morning, but h" was sick that day. The jury returned at this point, and the solicitor took up in their present the questions about the Grace accusa tions. Mr. Bullard repeated 'o tin- j" the words of Mrs. Grace and his reply. This was the first evlaenve buoi. jury of Grace’s accusation against hi" wife. Mr. Dorsey then switch'd to 1 • police station evidence, without fol lowing up the further conversation tween Grace ano Dorsey at the hos pital. He ’had wim his Second g" point of the day in getting btfoi" th" jury the evidence that Mrs. 'Grace 1 asked Gene about his accusation, when, they contend, she t.ad not m- a it by any person. The state considei tnis a strong ciicumstan.' Witness described the "Third De gree" given Mrs. Grace at the ,-tai"'v. She said Gene Was in bed; looking a her when her dress was being buttoned by the negro servant. She said sb and Gene had gone to the theater the night before. Mrs. Grace had said that sin- I ,vl caled a cab that morning, ordering i' for 12:3(1. It came at 12:15. She said Grace was up and dressing at that tine-. She said her key to her room was us ually kept in the hall. .virs. Grace had said that Grave had called a doctor on Monday, as J. <'■ Ruffin had hit her on the arm Mr. Grace had wanted a doctor. sh» said. She had told him he didn't want a doctor, but just wanted to talk "lodg.' matters" with the physician. Sir h • told the servant to tell tlie doctor i go away, in case he came. She had said she had told toe ' vants not to clean up stair- until ’’ returned from Newnan, as was her > 0.-- tom. Mr. Rosser cross-examined. Mr. Bullard admitted having a i.i.'in orandurn bock he had used at th tlce hearing. Mr. Rosser road the report "f ’ justice hearing to show that wile " had added to his former statemei ■ "Now. you have told a half things you didn't tell then?" ask"G i 1 Rosser, Witness said he had reft'"-!: his nu mory since then. Ye-. h> sworn then that this was “all he kn" “I've '"ier| to make my memoi r H t ter,” admitted the witness. Mr R"- ' put him on the grill, showing th"' witness had studied the '•a < " c.i ': " since tlie justice trial II" sra' 1 witness a pitiless raking-over. Case Rests Case After Bitter Wrangle. Mr. Dorsey paid a i-ompliniem tectlve Bullard's ability aiid ab— hontsty. and ho objected Io Mr svr's confusing the witness by i ' K two questions. “My friend. Mr. Dorsey. !»-•>- < he was born with, and it will b‘ him like a ribbon when lie dies." Mr. Rosser. The ctowd laughed hy.-tcri -nil' Mr. Rosser's ridicuii' of th" witr ■ and th." bailiffs had ■r cibli- n qti" L ' the disturbers. Mr. D'*r-ey defended lite ’ against the "slurs” . f Mr Ih - endeavored to show that Mr. Bu" had a right to read the "leiics notes of the examination ' f M 1 J - ' Which h. I<- ■ Judge Roan was evidently losing P l ' tlencv at in. , .. glee between lawy rs. H -u. ■ i with a curt ri ntark thtit th< i tinning should be resumed. Mr. Bullard said Detective D ” rested Mis. Grace at St. .!"-■• pi - she had talked to Mr. Gra- ■ Ml Rosser tti>d to prov" b' 'ia Hess that tin Hill family l' l ' against the <> t< ■ 11(o' 11. 11.««" Mrs Grt'ev. Tin state olijet I'd -nd " tallied Witness said Mrs G u> - l< turned over to Grain* nttmii' he didn’t kno’.‘ this pusdivel' "The stale rests its <an ' I I iiirsi'i, at I 32 o'clock.