Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page.

/ 2 A 11 KARST'S SITNDAV a AN. LANYA. GA. S 'NUAV AUGUST 10, 1913. in FRANK AND CONLEY BATTLING EACH OTHER FORTHEIR LIVES Guilt of Slaying Little Mary Phagan Will Be Fixed Upon One of Two as Issue Now Is Drawk Study of Frank Convicts, Then It Turns and Acquits OF TRAGEDY Continued From Page 1. he had first paid him $200, which was withdrawn under promise to restore that sum later. THAT Frank had an understanding with Conley, whereby Conley was to return to the factory later in the afternoon on Satur day and burn the body in the basement furnace, but that Conley went to sleep in the afternoon and neglected to perform this service. THAT Frank, called to the factory early in the morning of Sunday, April 27, displaying great nervousness, and while on his way to the factory without having been informed of the dead, girl’s identity, declined, or at least failed and neglected, to look* upon her features at the undertaker’s, notwithstanding the fact that he later admitted her identity without having seen her dead. THAT at the factory, at the place of the crime, his nervousness continued, and that next morning (Monday), when called to the po lice station for further questioning, he had secured counsel to de fend him, notwithstanding the fact that he then had not been placed under arrest. THAT after having been placed under arrest and indicted for the murder, he persistently refused to meet his chief accuser, Jim Conley, face to face, or discuss any feature of the charges lodged against him. THAT in addition to the crime of murder, as set forth in the indictment, Frank is a dissolute character, practicing the most de praved and perverted crimes with persons of loose morals, and that Jim Conley, on more than one occasion, acted as “lookout” for Frank on the first floor of the factory, while unspeakable and un mentionable things were being enacted above. Jim Conley Is the State’s Principal And All-Important Witness. The State, in setting up the foregoing allegations, summoned as its principal and all-important witness, .Jim Conley, who already had made public affidavits to all of the charges set forth, except the one of perversion and the exact time of the crime enlarged. Conley, after four or five changed statements theretofore made, set up in his final statement on the stand many other seemingly minor details not contained in any previous statement. The foregoing is the State’s case in completed form, except that it yet will have the right to produce witnesses in rebuttal of the defense’s witnesses; the defense, in its turn, having the right to a further rebuttal of the State’s rebuttal. The defense has contended, or will contend: THAT Conley’s story is a tissue of frightful lies from start to finish, and that he himself really committed the crime charged against Frank, and that the defense will so demonstrate, THAT Mary Phagan was not killed as early as 12:05 on the afternoon of April 26, but was, as a matter ol fact, killed at least fifteen minutes later than that, if, as a matter of still further fact, she was not disabled hopelessly about that time, and actually killed even later. THAT if she was not killed previous to 12:05, as set forth, by the State, that contention being uncompromisingly claimed by the State’s own witnesses—Jim Conley and Monteen Stover—then Con ley's story is impossible and absurd, and Mon teen Stover's evidence entirely negligible. THAT Frank did not lure M&ry Phagan to the rear of the sec ond floor, or to any other place, for any purpose whatever, and that she was only on the second floor sufficiently long to get her pay from the hands of Frank, and that she immediately thereafter left the sec ond floor, going down to the first floor to meet her death at the hands of Conley. Dr'ense Holds Frank Had Nothing To Do With the Death Notes. THAT Frank never asked for or received the assistance of Jim Conley in disposing of the body of Mary Phagan, because he was in utter and entire ignorance of the murder until apprised of it Sunday morning, THAT Frank had nothing whatever to do with the framing of the notes found beside the dead girl, and that in support of such a charge the State has only the word of Jim Conley, intensely interested in shifting the blame from his own guilty shoulders anil on to the shoulders of Frank. THAT Frank never paid Jim Conley any sum of money for any purpose whatever on Saturday, nor promised him any sum for any purpose whatever, and that Conley’s word alone says that he did. THAT whatever nervousness Frank displayed, if he displayed any unusual or unnatural nervousness at all, was occasioned by the mysterious attitude of the officers notifying him of some unnamed trouble at the pencil factory, and that in support of his approxi mately normal frame of mind is the fact, proved by the State’s own witnesses; that he opened the office safe to look up the record of Mary Phagan, after having acquired knowledge of her identity, without tremor or hesitation whatever, setting the intricate com bination easily and opening the safe on the first trial. THAT his innocence of all guilty knowledge of the crime is further evidenced by his three hours’ perfectly normal work on his books in the factory on the afternoon of April 26, at which time, if the State's theory holds, Mary Phagan, with Frank’s knowledge, then was a corpse in the basement, dead at his mur derous hands. THAT Frank, instead of declining to look upon the face of the dead girl at the undertaker’s while on his way to the factory Monday morning, did, as a matter of fact, look upon her face and recognized her. Frank’s Counsel Has Not Sought by Him, the Defense Contends. THAT Frank had no counsel until after his retention at police headquarters had been publicly made known, and when ho was notoriously under suspicion, and that even then counsel was sent to him by some outside friends, and did not come at his invitation’ or by his direction. THAT Frank’s refusal to meet Jim Conley, his lying accuser, was natural and proper in the circumstances, and that such a course w r as persisted in by the particular advice of his counsel; that Frank was under no moral or legal obligation to discuss his case with Conley, or with any other witness for the State. THAT Frank, far from being a dissolute character, is a man of unblemished integrity, happily married; that he never has prac ticed depraved and perverted crimes, because such things would be and are entirely foreign to his nature; that he never has associated with immoral persons anywhere, at any time; that neither Jim Conley nor any other person ever acted as “lookout” for hint for any purpose whatsoever—and that every monstrous and untrue DORSEY SATISFIED WITH PROGRESS OF TRIAL; ' DEFENSE REFUSES TO MAKE ANY STATEMENT I am very well satisfied with the State’s case and do not see that the defense has dealt it any damaging blows in the evidence introduced to date. Saturday s developments were of no material advantage to either side. -SOLICITOR HUGH M. DORSEY. Neither Luther Rosser nor Reuben Arnold, attorneys for Frank, would make any statement on .the progress of the trial. Readers of Human Nature See Anything They Want, but Personal Equation Is Forgotten. charge or suggestion of immorality and degeneracy rests absolute ly and finally upon the unsupported word of Conley, and not other wise. THAT there has been no tenable motive assigned to Frank for the murder of Mary Phagan; that the girl was not sexually vio lated or in any manner lacerated; that Frank had only the most casual acquaintance with her, and that of a perfectly natural busi ness sort, and that he could not have had, and did not have, any reason whatever for desiring her death. THAT, in truth and reality, the motive prompting the murder of Mary Phagan was robbery upon the part of Conley, and that for the purpose of securing her pittance of money, contained in a mesh purse, he did murder her and concealed her body in the base ment. Theory of Crime as the Defense Holds Thai Slaying Occurred. THAT, as a matter of fact, Mary Phagan reached the National Pencil Factory on the afternoon of April 26 about 12:12 or 12:15; that she came up the steps directly to Frank's office, and received her pay for the time due her, in amount $1.20; that she at once de parted Frank’s office, without comment of any sort, and that Frank never saw her alive thereafter; that going down the steps, with her silver mesh bag in her hand, she had to pass Jim Conley, recently aroused from a drunken doze; that in attempting to get from the foot of the stairs, where Conley was sitting, to the door, some 20 feet away, she had to traverse a gloomy walkway, more than or dinarily gloomy at the time because the day was a legal holiday and the doors were closed, but not locked; that in traversing this walkway her back was toward Conley; that Conley, without money and craving more liquor, saw the unprotected little girl with the enticing silver bag in her hand, and surmising that she had been paid off by Frank upstairs, hit her a violent blow upon her head, snatched her purse from her hand, and at once threw her body into the cellar by way of a nearby open space, for fear of someone coming into the building; that likely the blow first delivered was not sufficient to kill, and that her actual death was hastened, or may have been hastened later in the cellar below, by means of strangulation, there being always there an abundance of the very cord employed or supposed to have been employed in that act. THAT after accomplishing his bloody deed Conley escaped by withdrawing the inside staple from the basement back door only a few feet away from the place where the dead girl subsequently was found; and that tracings of Conley during the afternoon of April 26 at various saloons about town show that he spent then an amount of money approximating that which Mary Phagan is sup posed to have had in her purse at the time of her murder. Conley Declared to be Jailbird And Notoriously Dissolute Character. THAT of all her possesions the purse alone, notwithstanding exhaustive inquiry, never was accounted for until the last day Conley was on the stand, when he stated that Frank had had the purse in his possession just after the murder, and that he had con cealed it in his safe. This allegation, the defense points out, is sustained, as are the other most damaging allegations, by Conlt/’s unsupported word entirely. THAT Conley, the State’s main witness, is a notoriously dis solute character, by his own admission seven times a jailbird, many times a liar, even under oath and on the witness stand, and admit tedly was “mistaken” in some statements made against Frank; that he did not begin to throw’ suspicion on Frank until after sus picion began drifting in his (Conley’s) direction; that his plea of wishing by his first silent course of conduct to “protect” Frank is not sound, bacause after he feigned disappointment that Frank did not “get him out of his trouble, as he had promised,” and de claring that he, therefore, intended to tell the “whole truth of the murder,” lie still persisted in his lies and falsifying to the at-l tempted damage of Frank, and found it necessary to issue three conflicting affidavits before he got one he thought might be de pended upon to stand up. THAT Conley began his statements with a lie—to the effect that he could not write—and continued lying steadily thereafter, but frequently canceling one lie in favor of another, as his first lies were shown to be useless and senseless. THAT Conley in revising his various statements was aided and abetted by various police officials, presumably anxious for the rewards offered for the apprehension and conviction of Mary Pha gan’s murderer, and that these officers pointed out to Conley the discrepancies as they arose from time to time, and that without this aid Conley’s story never oould have been made to hold to gether even as well as it did; that notwithstanding this prejudic ing aid, however, Conley’s story still is impossible and absurd, and of no account whatever against Frank. Defense Heavily Equipped to Sustain Every Contention, It Says. The foregoing, in general, is the theory of the defense, as already set up and as yet to be developed, and along that line it will fight its battle to the end. The defense is heavily equipped with witnesses to sustain its every contention, and these will be offered, in their order, to break down the contrary theory of the State, as hereinbefore outlined, and upon the relative strength of the two showings depends, of course, the verdict. Of absorbing interest now is the seeming determination of the defense to put Leo Frank’s character frankly and fearlessly in evidence. In a former article In The Sunday American several weeks ago I pre dicted that the defense would do this—and the then apparent determination- of the defense along that line shows no symptoms of having Ikvii deviated from in the slightest. When Conley made his additional unanticipated attack on Frank’s char acter from the witness stand, it was rather freely predicted about the streets that Frank aever would, after that, agree to have Ills character put in evi deuce. Under the law, the State can not put the defendant's character in evidence—if it is put in at all. it must be put in by the defendant voluntarily. Once in, however, it may be riddled by the State, if the State is able to riddle It. The determination, therefore, of the defense to put Frank’s character in evidence is being accepted generally as indicating an unfaltering confidence upon the part of the defense that Frank may be able thereby to overcome the terrible and prejudicial charge of degeneracy, as well as the charge of murder, both resting so largely upon Conley, am] Conley alone; and it also indicates a belief upon the part of the defense that the State already has done its worst in the matter of attacking Frank’s character. The fact that Frank is now engaged in refuting two charges instead of one makes his ease doubly unique in Georgia, as it is contrary to the un broken theory of the law heretofore. In Georgia, the courts uniformly have held that a man can not be tried for more than one offense at one time—that is, that he can not be charged with murder, and in the same trial be called to account for another felonious crime. The charge of degeneracy, however, got into the case without objection, and Frank's lawyers cross-examined the witness making it. The judge, there fore, although a motion was made afterward to strike out this evidence, ruled that it was too late to expunge it, and that it should go in for what it was worth. Defense Calls More Than Seventy Character Witnesses. This ruling, while in a way more or less unprecedv’-ted, was. in the main, by the public seemingly approved, upon the idea that it was fairer to both the State and the defense that the horrible charge, having been made, be thrashed out. Should Frank be convicted, It is practically certain that a new trial will be asked on this very point, and it is not at all improbable that Judge Roan will grant it, although this conjecture is purely and absolutely speculative, of course. The defense has summoned some seventy character witnesses, among whom are more than twoscore female employes of the National Pencil Fac tory, all of whom will swear, it is said, to the defendant’s decent and gen tlemanly conduct at all times in their presence and during their varied terms of service in tlie factory, running from one to five years. P.esides these, a score or more of Atlanta’s most prominent business and professional men have been cited torcome to court and testify in behalf of Frank’s good name. Rarely before, if ever, has there been as intense interest in a murder trial as there unquestionably is in the Frank case. The crowds attending the trial have been enormous, the officers finding it necessary every day to turn away hundreds of anxious would-be spectators. Public sentiment has swung back and forth—to-day inclined to believe Frank fha.vvbe innocent, to-morrow sternly the reverse. The jury, sitting there in the courthouse, day after day, has been the objective study of hundreds of- real and near analytical minds—and the answer? . Acquittal of Erank Likely Would Bring the Indictment of Conley. Every fellow answers for himself. The jury is imperturbable, unreadable, almost seemingly indifferent at times, indeed—but always keenly keyed to intense interest, nevertheless! One might as well undertake to read the riddle of the Sphinx as to read the riddle of the Frank case in the minds of the jury trying it. It looks us if it is a jury well above the average—and that is alxmt the beginning and the end of an intelligent guess as to what it will do. Judge Roan is as baffling as the rest of the case, too, when it comes to speculating upon w’hat he may or may not think of it all. He is rated one of the very best Superior Court judges in the State, un usually able, certainly fearless, and agreed to lie utterly fair and impartial. At times, his rulings have seemed to favor the defense, and at other times they have seemed to favor the State: but, withal, the public seems agreed that he is handling the case with an open and judicially just mind. Speculation as to the outcome of the trial is varied. There are those who can see nothing ahead but conviction, just as there are others who can see nothing but acquittal. If a ballot could be taken, however, those holding to the idea of a mis trial likely would be found in the majority, for that is the way the fight seems, to many observing minds, to be drifting. That section of the public generally credited with being calm poised, and desirous of seeing the right prevail, no matter which way it cuts, ap parently has suspended judgment. Extremists pro and eon still are talking™ themselves hoarse about town, however. The progressing inclination among the people seems to be to let the jury settle it, and then to call that as near right as abstract justice and human ingenuity can make it. Tn the event of an acquittal, the case ends. The State .has no appeal. It must win on the first round, or it loses for all time. The defense, on the other hand, if it loses, may move for a new trial, upon proper assignment of error in the first trial. The judge of original jurisdiction passes upon this motion—he may grant it or not, as his discre tion directs. The general policy of judges is to refuse motions for new trials, hut it is not an unbroken policy,'by any means. If the new’ trial motion is denied, the case goes to a court of review— either the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals. If one error or several lie found in the original rulings of the court below, the case will be remanded back for a new trial, the judgment thus having been reversed and set aside. Trial Judge is Considered Absolutely Fair and Fearless. Then the case begins all over again, practically as if it never had been tried. In the event of matters taking that course, Frank hardly could be tried again before next year, lftl4 % and perhaps not before spring. if Frank is acquitted, there is hardly a doubt that Jim Conley will be promptly indicted for the murder of Mary Phagan, and brought to trial later. In the event of Frank’s final conviction, Conley will be indicted as an accessory after the fact. This would mean a sentence of not more than three years in the State penitentiary for him. If Fiank is convicted, he can lie convicted only of murder—the jury will not lie i>ermitted, under the form of the indictment, to find him guilty of a lesser crime. The judge will have no discretion In sentencing him. If found guilty, without a recommendation to mercy, he must hang, un less the Governor dfiould subsequently interfere and order Executive clem ency. If he is convicted, and the jury “recommend him to the mercy of the court,” the court then wifi be obliged to send him to prison for life. The general opinion is that the present trial will run all of this week— that the best to be expected is that the jury may be given the case by Satur day night. After the evidence all is in, the case still will have to be argued to the jury. It is thought that Judge Roan will take the bridle off in respect of this, and both sides will be i>ermitted to go the limit. Mr. Rosser and Mr. Arnold will consume at least one entire day in argu ment. and Mr. Dorsey and Mr. Hooper will not take less time. It Is expected that Hooper will open for the State and Dorsey close, and that Rosser will open for the defense and Arnold close. The State has the opening and the concluding argument before the jury. If the jury makes a verdict quickly in this case. The American of next Sunday ought to carry it. If it makes a mistrial, or delivers a greatly delayed verdict, it seems certain at this time that neither of those facts can be made known before well into next week. It is estimated that the trial will have cost the County of Fulton ap proximately $10,000. if the case ends with this trial. If it deles not end with this trial, the eventual expense hardly can be intelligently anticipated now. By 0. B. KEELER. Leo Frank sits in the prisoner's dock and all men may read his face. A great many of them do. Here are two of the things they read: (1) No innocent man could re main calm under such fearful charges. (2) No guilty man could re main calm under, etc. Leo Frank admittedly was nervous and agitated the morning the^mur- der of Mary Phagan was discovered. There are two inferences drawn from that fact: (1) A guilty man naturally would be nervous. (2) An innocent man natural ly, etc. Leo Frank sits there in the prison er’s chair, under the scathe of the State’s testimony, ' apparently un moved. Leo Frank sits apparently unmoved as his attorneys attack the mesh of circumstance. So far as may be foretold. Leo Frank will sit unmoved under the fire of the State’s speeches and under the justification of his own counsel. And there will be at least two in terpretations of his oalm in the trial, as there were two interpretations of his agitation that April morning. Let’s take a bit of time off from bias and prejudice and try to get a little deeper into the psychology of the thing. Both Read Same Thing. Here is one who insists that an in nocent man. confronted with evident suspicion of a horrid crime, virtually admits guilt, or at least guilty knowl edge, by nervous agitation. “If innocent and ignorant of the crime, he should appear calm and eager to probe deeper into the mys tery,” says this one. And usually he adds: “I know I should.” And the same interpreter, speak ing of Frank’s attitude in the trial, says : “His calm is the effrontery of a cold-blooded murderer. In his place, and innocent, I could not listen un moved to the hideous charges aimed at me.” But here is a small breach of logic. This reader of the human mind would have innocence appear calm in Its surprise and agitated in its ex pected ordeal, prepared for weeks in advance. On the other hand, here is one who would reconcile agitation in April and calmness at the trial with absolute innocence. Is not that reconciliation equally open to the charge of illogicalness? Could not the Innocent accused properly have remained calm in the first steps of an investigation, he must have been sure would lead away from himself, and yet have been shaken by the manifest danger in the terrific circumstantiality of the case the State presented against him? Logic Seems To Double. It would seem that cold, mechan ical logic had at least two paths in which to stray from the truth when applied to Leo Frank’s attitude. And that is two too many for the clear intent of logic. The-Jjrouble is, the would-be logi cians seem always to overlook the one great point that sets at naught all mechanical logic, applied to crim inality. And that point is the Personal Equation. You note that the logician inevita bly says: “If I were in his place ” Right in the premise, then, the rea- soner injects his own personal equa tion into a consideration of Leo Frank and his actions and possible motives. He attributes to Leo Frank certain characteristics supplied by his own personality, adds the influence of mo tives whose effect on any other hu man being he could not possibly know, and then deduces a course of action and behavior, which he sets up as the logical one for Leo Frank. To conform to the laws of true logic, the reasoner must assume that among the 1 600,000,000 inhabitants of the earth there is one that is identical with himself in temperament, habits, disposition, environment, intellect—in fine, must have the same personal equation. That in itself would be an assump tion far outside the pale of absolute logic. But granting that, it would still re main to identify with that particular human being the person under consid eration. The chances of failure would /be, 1,600,000,000 to 1. And should the incredibly long shot win, there is yet another trap for the logician who says, “If I were in his place, I would do thus and so.” Experience Is Needed. Even with the suppositious advan- ^ tage of being acquainted with his own personal equation, the reasoner does NOT know what he would do under the stress of circumstances, UNLESS HE HAS TRIED IT. Eliminating, then, from the list of expert readers of the human face those who do not observe strictly the laws of absolute logic, we find that those qualified to pass judgment on Leo Frank by means of his April ag itation and his August calmness can be numbered quite conveniently as follows: O. Which logical conclusion, however, will in no way embarrass the several hundred thousand persons now daily engaged in flying in the face of a certain admonition, set forth in a cer tain Good Book, to wit: “Judge not.” 7 Get Your Canadian Home From the Canadian Pacific iWI % E will make you a long-time loan—you will have 20 years to pay for the land and repay the loan—you can move on , the land at once—and your Canadian lUgc/J farm will make you Independent. 20 Years to Pay Rich land for from $11 to $30 per acre. You pay only one-twentieth down—balance ie. 19 equal payments. Before your dual pay* ment comes due your farm will have paid for Itself over and over. This offer is directed only to farmers or to men who will occupy or Improve the land. WE LEND YOU $2000 for improvements. Tills $2,000 loan will help you In erecting your buildings, and you are given twenty years In which to fully repay this loan. You pay only the banking inter est of 6 per cent. LIVE STOCK ON LOAN BASIS The Company will advance cattle, sheep and hogs up to the value of $1,000 on a loan basis, so as to enable you to get started from the first on the right basis of mixed farming. If you do not want to wait until you can complete your own buildings and cul tivate your farm, select one of our Ready- Made farms—developed by C. P. R. Agri cultural Experts—with buildings complete, land cultivated and in crop, and pay for It In 20 years. We give the valuable assistance of great demonstration farms—free. This Great Offer Based on Good Land Finest land on earth for grain growing, cat lie. Log. sheep and horse raising, dairy ing. poultry, vegetables and general mixed farming, on or near established lines of rail way. near established towns. Ask for our handsome illustrated books on Manitoba. Saskatchewan ami Alberta free—mention the one you wish. Write to-day. GRAND EXCURSION AUGUST 19. Now’s the time to see Western Canada. Join this personally conducted trip to the land of grain and dollars! Special Canadian Pacific Land Train on great Homeseekers’ Excursion to Calgary. Al berta, leaves Chicago at 6:30 p. m. August 1ft via Soo Line. 25-day limit, VERY' LOW RATES. Enjoy a fine vacation; get your farm home if delighted. Special arrangements for farmers *of this section. Write or call at once. CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY Colonization Department JAMES T. PERSONS 22 Inman Building Atlanta, Ga. / ^.■ufig.vpgBu.waiiL .i".m ■ .iii 3 PAINLESS DENTIST Have your teeth treated at once. Make your bad teeth as good as new. My system of Painless Dentistry enables me to make your aching teeth sound with absolutely No Pain. If your teeth pain you. don’t delay. Come see me at once. Examination free. Lady attendant and ladies’ rest room. Crown and Bridge Work, $3, $4, $5 GUARANTEED TEETH a Set My Gold Dust Rubber Plate will not slip or drop. Guaran teed for 20 years. Fillings in Gold, Silver, Platinum and Porcelain, 50c and $1. PHONE MAIN 1298 Open Irons 8 to 8 — Sundays 10 to J TERMS TO SUIT ‘ Largest and most thoroughly equipped Sanitary office in thsf South. Entrance 73 t-2 Whitehall St., opposite Vaudette Theater, fourth door from J. M. High, over A. & P. Tea Store.