Newspaper Page Text
The College Man—He Rarely Has
“Original Ideas’’ and Still More Rarely
“Power of Judgment.”
The Man Who Is Only “a Spoke” Most Be Used as a Spoke- -The
Man Who Is an Orange Must Expect To Be Squeezed.
(Copyright, 1913.)
If you saw the King of Carrion—a vulture—beating his wing
As he fled to his bitter eyrie—and the prey from his claws aswlng
Was a child—a little maiden—a girl—would you dare stand by
Unwhipped by all human feeling* ‘till he vanished through clouded sky?
] AH, never! A shot quick sighted—a bullet that whips and stings,
And a quick, kind death for the maiden 'neath the pall of the broken wings.
it is quite certain that they have no leaning toward drunkenness,
if their characters are good, and if it is not convenient to keep
them at home.
The two classes that may well go to college are the very dull
and those that are moderately dull. The very dull need four
years to learn the very little that a boy learns in college. And
the moderately dull might as well be college graduates as not—
since it is probable that they will never be much.
The boy of real power and ability is unjustly treated when
he is sent to college.
He has in his brain an active machine that under college
rules is forced to go slowly. And an active brain WILL NOT
00 SLOWLY; it will get into mischief if it is not kept fully oc
cupied.
You may say of college life, as the French proverb says of
travel, that it FORMS youth, when it does not DEFORM youth.
“Let voyages foment la jeunesse, quoad iIs n» la deforment pas."
The trouble with the average college boy is that he spends
four years, picking up the FOUNDATION of an education—and
then spends the rest of his life satisfied with the foundation.
Education is not reading; education is THINKING.
You might read all about all the lives of all the great men
that ever lived—and you wouldn’t be any more of a man unless
you had THOUGHT INTELLIGENTLY concerning what you
had read.
Lincoln had read perhaps a half-dozen good books. But
over every word and every sentence and every idea HE HAD
THOUGHT. His brain wasn’t stuffed. It wasn't fed ENOUGH,
it was true, but IT WAS FED. And Lincoln was able to write
the Gettysburg address that no college graduate that the coun
try has yet produced could equal. Even as a mere boy, express
ing to the public his desire to be elected to a trifling office, he
was intellectually, in power and thought and judgment, far
ahead of the college graduate whom our friend describes as one
possessing original ideas.
The greatest curse that can be inflicted upon a young boy
is the curse of conceit. Unfortunately, oollege and the reading
of a few books fills with conceit a great many of the boys who
amount to little—and they are a majority.
The graduate comes out of college, having read this book
When daily you see the vulture In the ranks of the underpaid—
The carrion crow of low wages bearing off prey, afraid,
Cowering, tortured, screaming, doomed to a grewsome death,
A death of slow-hung agony, of shame, of tortured breath,
Will you Are no shot at the cause of It all ’till the pitiful price Is paid,
And Vice, secure In it* clouded nest, feasts high on the soul of a maid?
—L. L.
and that book, and he imagines, poor little creature, that he is
superior to the man who walks along the railroad track looking
for loose spikes and really paying attention to his work.
Unhappy are the sons of the rich who reach manhood with
out being made to realize that they must work and think for
themselves.
Unhappy also are many of the thousands sent to college,
taught to IMITATE the ways of the rich, filled with the foolish
ambitions of the rich, relying for success upon the childish,
easily-broken and forgotten friendships of college days—and
then kicked out into the world, to find that a college graduate
with a pen in his hand sitting at his desk is no better than any
other boy able to multiply, add, divide or copy in a fair hand
writing.
If the college boys of this country want to form a union,
let it be not a union for compelling employers to pay them more
than they pay somebody just as good as themselves.
Let the college graduates form a union FOR THE CONTIN
UATION OF THEIR EDUCATION, WHICH WAS ONLY BE
GUN AT COLLEGE.
Let the boys determine to finish, in their hours of leisure, at
about the age of seventy, the education of which the foundation
was laid during the College years.
Such a union would be a benefit to boys, and, above all, it
might be of use to the nation.
We really need in this country men WITH ORIGINAL
IDEAS AND POWER OF JUDGMENT, and we have very few
of them, indeed.
And of these few, a very trifling and insignificant minority
come from the colleges.
Our friend says some college graduates are only spokes in
a wheel.
So they are. But that is not the employer's fault. It is the
fault of the human spoke.
If a man IS a spoke, he must expect to be USED as a spoke.
If he is a human orange, with only a little juice in him, he
must expect to be squeezed.
Spokes are for wheels and oranges are for squeezing.
This is a practical world.
Better civilization will give better opportunity—beginning
before birth, and the human spokes and oranges will be fewer.
James Kinney, a college graduate, a man with “a degree,”
wants to form a college graduates' union to get for the gradu
ates decent pay.
His view of life represents the view of thousands. So we
print his letter in full gladly—with comment of our own not en
tirely agreeing with the college graduate view.
Editor Atlanta Georgian:
Sir—It would give me consid
erable pleasure If you would write
an editorial on the following sub
ject:
"THE COLLEGE MEN’S MUTU
AL BENEFIT ASSOCIATION."
Nowadays business men are sur
feited with greed and the desire
for their own aggrandizement, with
no thought of their employee, ex
cept as an hireling serving the
employer’s unjust end* These
employer* are merely spoken In a
commercial wheel that may be
replaced at any time It make* no
difference whether or not one
spoke 1* more polished than oth
er* so long as the wheel hum*,
and the operator In the form of the
employer or stockholder Is bene
fited. System, or custom, or both,
rules the business world. In thl*
respect the college man, with his
original Ideas and power of Judg
rnent, Is greatly handicapped. His
promotion Is governed more by
length of service than by merit.
He Is bound, as It. were, by the
shackles of system and a machlne-
llke existence. As a concrete case,
take the transportation companies,
which embody system In Its most
advanced form. It seems to be an
established fact that, notwithstand
ing college men constitute a very
large number here, yet the cleri
cal forces of these companies are
the least paid of any similar forces.
It Is no trouble for a degree man
to secure employment with these
companies, but what doaa he re
ceive for his skill? A mere pit
tance. In other words, the highest
type of organization Is ever crying
lor the college man, yet will not
pay him a Just wage With few
exceptions, the positions of any
Importance that are held by col
lege men to-day have been ob
tained not through merit, but
through Influence, political or oth
erwise A line state of affairs for
him who ha* spent the beat four
years or more of his life and thou
sands of dollars besides In prepara
tion.
The only remedy, to the writer's
mind, lies In organization. If the
Justification is well founded for the
existence of labor unions, then
why not for a college men's mutual
benefit association ? Both have the
same thing In common—the de
mand for a Just wage for their
services. Alone the laborer or
tradesman Is at the mercy of an
employer. In unionism, however,
he finds added strength and the
power to protect his Interests. So
It will be with the college man
when he unites with his fellow col
legians in the one common cause—
that of securing a Just wage for
his services.
Assuring you that I will deeply
appreciate the full Insertion of
this letter in your paper, and If
convenient, an editorial, thereon,
and welcoming the co-operation of
other collegian* In the foundation
of such an association, I have the
pleasure to remain.
Tours very truly,
JAMES KIN NET
About a labor union especially for college men we say NO.
Men are MEN, and if they are going to unite they should
unite as MEN and not as separate individuals with a piece of
sheepskin neatly painted.
It would be well, as this newspaper has often said, if the
young man in the black coat and patent leather shoes holding a
clerk's position had BRAINS ENOUGH TO UNITE WITH ALL
HIS FELLOW CLERKS FOR MUTUAL AID AND PROTEC
TION.
The ideal union would be a union of intelligent men at the
ballot box, voting for better conditions.
Strange as it may seem, now that we have a republic and
universal suffrage, men actually COULD solve their material
problems with the ballot if they would.
But we still cling to the stupid methods of the Middle Ages;
we still believe that prosperity can come only by uniting in
guilds, to get all we can for ourselves and give as little as pos
sible to others.
Let Mr. Kinney, if he has the power, start a union of men
who work with their brains, clerks, et cetera, if he thinks he can
make a success of it. We doubt his success. Such men lack
solidarity and class consciousness.
As for Mr. Kinney’s view of the college graduate and his
superior ability, we can not agree with him.
The college graduate has no ORIGINAL IDEAS as a rule.
Reading for several years what OTHERS have thought, said
and done does not create “original ideas.”
And the college man, as a rule, has NOT ' power of judg
ment.”
On the contrary, the boy out of college is usually lacking in
judgment as he is in original ideas.
Judgment is born of EXPERIENCE—it does not come
through hearing what other men have done—although all infor
mation is valuable.
The ordinary boy out of college is a BOY, in the full sense of
the word. He has missed four years of his manhood, having
spent most of that amount of time “rah-rahing” with boys,
wildly excited about football, baseball and rowing, singing about
his alma mater—about as far removed from real life and real ac
complishments as the Grand Llama of Thibet.
If the average college boy had “power of judgment” and
“original ideas” he would know better than to take a position
as clerk in a tr. tsportation company. He would have judgment
enough to get a Job helping at something with a future.
Those unable to go to college often pity themselves, but they
need not do so. The four years that a boy spends in college,
from nineteen years to twenty-three years of age, are as a gen
eral rule wasted, when nothing of worth happens.
Two classes of boys may perhaps safely be sent to college, if
By REV. CHARLES F. AKED
Written for The Atlanta Georgian.
T HE worst thing about the
"white slave traffic act” Is
its title. No such phrase
ought to have been employed. It
Is Inaccurate and misleading. It
throws a person off the track In
discussing the rights and the
wrongs of It. And In such cases as
those of Diggs and Caminettl It en
ables a cavtler to say they are
prosecuted under a law which was
never Intended to apply to offenses
like theirs. It supplies Caminettl,
If he is correctly reported, with a
reason for saying, “I am not a
white slaver and I will not plead
guilty to such a charge."
Mr. Mann, the author of the act,
is to blame for giving such a title
to the statute. Every man In Con
gress who voted for it is to blame.
It Is strange that such a phrase
was allowed to pass the officials of
Congress.
Section 8, the final section of the
act, reads: “That this act shall be
known and referred to as the
white slave trafvc act.” But the
description of the act with which
it opens—as every act of Congress
opens—Is vastly different:
An act to further regulate
interstate and foreign com
merce by prohibiting the trans
portation therein for Immoral
purposes of women and girls,
and for other purposes.
That Is a sane statement. One
can understand It. And it does
not fnlsrepresent the purpose of
the statute. Diggs Is not a white
slaver, and It is absurd to say that
he Is. Caminettl would not
plead guilty to white slavery, and
a plea of guilty under this statute
would not he so Interpreted except
by uninformed persons who have
not read the act and have been
carried away by Its unfortunate
title.
The Real Purpose.
The real purpose of the act needs
to be better understood. And the
details of the Athanasaw case
ought to be widely known. Good
men and women ought to know
what powers the United States
Government has taken to Itself.
And the other kind of men and
women do well to ponder the risks
they run.
The case of Louis Athanasaw
was carried on appeal to the Su
preme Court, of the United States.
And the language of the Supreme
Court flings a blazing light upon
the amazingly wide comprehensive
ness of the new law. These are
the facts:
An Atlanta girl saw an adver
tisement for chorus girls. She ap
plied and was taken on at a salary
of $20 a week, with board and
room in the theater. She was sent
from Georgia to a place in Florida
—and this armed the United States
for her protection. She came
within the reach of a law which
deals with “Interstate commerce.”
She arrived at the Florida town in
In the early morning, and at lunch
on the first day, she testified, there
was “smoking, cursing and such
language that I couldn’t eat.” In
the afternoon Athanasaw, the man
ager of the theater, came to her
room and made Improper proposals
to her. At night she was required
to go Into the “boxes.” Here again
she found “smoking, drinking and
cursing.” There were four boys In
the box where she sat. One saw
that she was both Innocent and
frightened. He had pity on her;
threatened to go for a policeman,
and got her out of the place un
harmed.
This Is the whole story, and upon
these facts the jury found Athana
saw guilty. The Judge sentenced
him to six months’ Imprisonment.
The Instructions given by the
judge to the jury Included these
striking words:
The question here Is of In
tent ; what was the Intent with
which defendants brought her
here? That she should live an
honest, moral and proper life?
Or that she came and they en
gaged and contracted with her
for the purpose of her enter
ing upon a condition which
might be termed debauchery or
might lead to a condition of
debauchery?
Intent Important.
The Supreme Court found that
these Instructions were perfectly
proper. In the view of the high
est court of the United States a
man is guilty under this so-caUed
white slave traffic act when he
places a girl in conditions which
are likely eventually to lead her
into immoral conduct—If he cross
es a State line to do it, and has the
full intention of Ills acts. And the
Supreme Court went further and
added these striking words:
Granting the testimony to he
true, of which the jury was the
judge, the employment to which
she was enticed was an effi
cient school of debauchery of
the special Immorality which
the statute was designed to
cover. _____
\
Small wonder that the court de
clared the act to have a “more
comprehensive prohibition” than
that which we call “white sla
very !” Induce a girl to take a
position as chorus girl, or waitress,
or anything else where she has to
put up with “smoking, drinking
and cursing,” where she has to g*
aronnd with boys out on the spree,
where she has to resist Improper
proposals—and take her across a
State line to this end—and the law
can now pounce down upon you 1
While this Is the scope of the
act, and while this Is the carefully
thought-out design and purpose of
the act, it Is ridiculous to call it a
white slave traffic act, and stffl
more ridiculous for persons to ga
on saying that It ought not to be
invoked against such offenses as
those of which Diggs and Cami
nettl are accused.
“Segregation” Failure.
The exceeding breadth of the act
illustrates a world-tendency. In
every country In the world there
Is dissatisfaction with condition*
which allow of the exploitation of
women for the passions or the
profit of men. “Segregation,” for
instance, it Is now recognized, has
failed In every city on earth. And
every thinker knows that as a pol
icy it has failed. The change that
has come over hnman thought la
embodied in the newest legislation
of a score of widely separated na
tions. The best brains and the
largest hearts in our own city see
this clearly. During an Interval
In the Diggs trial the other day,
the ablest lawyer In court whis
pered to me: “Can you really
grasp the changed attitude of the
public mind toward offenses like
this? Try to Imagine such a trial
as this five and twenty years ago!”
One can not imagine It. But it is
part of a movement wide as the
civilized world.
England moves along with the
rest of the nations. The white
slave act which the British Par
liament has passed is what It pro
fesses to be—an act directed
against the real white slaver. And
Great Britain has brought back
the whipping post. The man who
entraps and holds or sells a girl
and makes his profit out of her is
now tied up and lashed with the
“cat.” There was a stormy debate
In Parliament when this was pro
posed. Men of the “Oh-make-the-
scoundrels-happy” school cried out
against the inhumanity of it. One
of them asserted that no jailer or
prison warder would be found to
“brutalize himself” by carrying
out such a sentence. And sturdy
Will Crooks, a labor member, and
the Idol of hundreds of thousands
of British workingmen, arose lu
his wrath. It is a matter of com
mon knowledge that many of the
men who engage In this nefarious
trade In London are natives of the
south and southeast of Europe.
Crooks shouted: “If there Is no
jailer willing to do It, you can send
for me. And If Pm on my summer
holiday I’ll pay my expenses home
for the pleasure of putting my
mark on the back of some Infamous
foreign scoundrel who enslaves
English girls. And when I'm
through with the Job Ill find a
hundred honest workingmen who’ll
take It up without any pay but the
satisfaction of protecting the Eng
lish home.”
Flogging Revived.
It was a Government measure,
and the bill as Introduced provided
flogging gs a punishment on the
second conviction only. Parlia
ment took the matter out of the
Government's hands, amended the
bill to Include flogging for the first
offense, and carried It by a great
majority. My friend Philip Snow
den, member of Parliament for
Blackburn, one of the most bril
liant men in the House, “the
prophet of the labor movement,"
voted for the flogging clauses. His
not less brilliant wife, when she
was here in America a few months
ago, declared against the flogging
clauses for which her husband had
voted. And she did it on the
ground that under the law only
men are to be flogged—not women
guilty of the same offense. She
feared that such a provision would
tend to throw the trade in girls
Into the hands of women. Whether
Mrs. Snowden would flog the wom
an-fiend, the frightful creature who
joins with men in running down
girls and In debauching them, was
not made clear.
Will the day come In America
when we shall be willing to flog
men for this hateful crime? And
even discuss as a possibility the
wisdom of flogging women, too?
IF THE LAWS THAT WE
HAVE ABE ENFORCED. THE
NEED WTLL NEVER ARISE!
THE ATLANTA GEORGIAN
Published by THE GEORGIA / COM PANT
At 10 Hast Alabama fit Atlanta, Oa
Entered a* aeoorxl-clauf* matter at poatofflea at Atlanta, undar act of March 3, 1171
Subscription Price— Delivered by carrtar 10 centa a week By mall, If*.00 a yaar.
Payable in Ad van tie.
The Vulture’s Nest
Rev. Charles F. Aked
Writes on
“White Slave Traffic Act”
a Misnomer.
The Law’s Purpose Explained by Dr. Aked,
Noted San Francisco Divine and For
mer Pastor to John D. Rockefeller in
Cleveland. > -
EDITORIAL RAGE The Atlanta Georgian THE HOME RARER
J