Newspaper Page Text
EDITORIAL RAGE The Atlanta Georgian the home pAnRR
ur Rights, All Our Rights and Nothing But Our Rights
n
The Administration’s second note to Germany is notable
for ita self-restraint and pacificatory tone—which is to say, it is
I notable for its sanity.
President Wilson has neither forced a quarrel upon a nation
1 desirous of remaining friendly, nor has he withdrawn any de-
| mands which the United States had a recognized right to present
From the beginning of this controversy The Georgian has in-
0 B
! *feted that our Government should stand for Our Rights, All Our
Rights and Nothing But Our Rights.
In the main this note, the first to be signed by Acting Secre-
! tary of State Robert Lansing, conforms to this principle.
The Georgian has urged that the note should be pacificatory
in tone.
In fact, it is eminently so.
The Georgian has insisted that there were matters involved
in the case of the Lusitania that could not be determined off-hand
by the dictum of the United States, but must be left for future
discussion.
The note in fact opens the way for further consideration of
every mooted point.
The Georgian protested against anything that should savor
of an ultimatum.
The note invites "assurances” but does not close the door
upon arguments. Nothing further removed from an ultimatum
in tone or substance could be imagined.
The Georgian said recently:
Tt is announced on behalf of the Administration lliat the
note on its way to Germany "by no means closes the way to
ending the question by peaceful means. M
We hope this Is true. It certainly ought to he true. Tt
would he one of the great crimes of history for any note to he
indited by the United States which would close the doors to
. peaceful negotiations over a question of national rights upon
which even loyal Amerieans hold two opinions.
It is unjust for the United States to demand of Germany
the surrender of her right to prosecute her war upon the ocean
in the only way left to her. But that the refusal of Germany to
make this tremendous concession should be even thought of as a
:
I
|
/ *
fe.
cause for our declaring war ought to he unthinkable.
It is quite obvious that this note is not at all what Mr.
Bryan’s action seemed to suggest.
It is equally obvious that it opens the way to temperate dis
cussion of all points at issue.
It employs no word or phrase that can be construed as a
peremptory demand that Germany abandon at once and for all
her submarine attacks upon the commerce of the Allies.
■f
On this subject the note merely seeks to suggest the more
humane and generally accepted methods of such attack.
On the contrary, the paragraph which touches upon the
vexed question of the "war zone" does so with such tactful sug
gestion of German good faith that it may well be quoted as illus
trative of the conciliatory phraseology of the whole:
“The Government of the United States can not admit that
the proclamation of a war zone from which neutral ships have
been warned to keep away may be made to operate as In any
degTee an abbreviation of the rights either of American shipmas
ters or of American citizens bound on lawful errands as passen
gers on merchant ships of belligerent nationality. It dons not
understand the Imperial German Government to question those
rights. It understands it, also, to accept as established beyond
question the principle that the lives of noncombatants can not
lawfully or rightfully be put in jeopardy by the capture or de
struction of an unresisting merchantman, and to recognize the
obligation to take sufficient precautions to ascertain whether a
suspected merchantman is in fact of belligerent nationality or is
in fact carrying contraband of war under a neutral flag.’’
All OUR
OUR
WTRAL (p? mMUTWH
IGHTS; \^W4RTS:
AND NOTHING BUI
Otm NEUTRAL RIGHTS.
That this paragraph should be followed by a request that Germany give assurances
that her position is as understood by the United States is but reasonable. In connection
with the reference to the representations made in the note of May 1 5, it seems to consti
tute a milder restatement of the case in a way that may offer a graceful method of retir
ing from those paragraphs of the first note that were harsh in verbiage and untenable in
purpose.
It is notable that President Wilson once more bases his contention upon the broad
ground of humanity. Of the original demands made by the United States he says that
this Government
"relies in these representations upon the principles of humanity, the universally recognized
understandings of international law, and the ancient friendship of th.6 German nation.”
We yield to no one, not even to the President, in our devotion to the principle of
humanity.
It is in the service of humanity that The Georgian has fought against such a presen
tation of the American case as would provoke war—for war is the negation of all hu
manity.
The President is right to protest in the name of humanity against all the inhumane
acts of this war—not against only a few which have impressed themselves especially
upon his conciousness.
But he must remember that when we intervene diplomatically we must ’ ave the
rights recognized and stated by international law in mind.
Every day, every hour, in this savage war the principles of
humanity are being violated by every participant. This is the
deplorable fact that exists and which the people of the United
States would gladly do away with if they could. But in moving
effectively as a government to prevent such acts we must have a
recognized right to intervene. Our action must be based upon
defined and accepted principles of international law.
If we confine ourselves to these recognized rights, and seek
to defend only our rights as neutrals, we may, and probably will,
establish ourselves in such a position of justice and authority that
we may hope eventually to help materially in bringing this war
and all its inhumanity to a conclusion.
But if we take an extreme, a biased, or in any way unjusti
fiable position, we shall only be regarded as a partisan, and not
as an unprejudiced arbitrator.
Apparently the Administration policy is not far from the
program outlined by Mr. Hearst in this signed editorial:
“LET US STAND FIRMLY IN DEFENSE OR OUR JUST
RIGHTS, EVEN THOUGH WE MUST MAINTAIN THEM BY
FORCE OF ARMS, BUT LET US NOT PRECIPITATE THE
COUNTRY INTO AN UNNECESSARY WAR BY GOING BE
YOND OUR OWN RIGHTS AND DEMANDING THE PRIV
ILEGE OF DICTATING TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES IN MAT
TERS WHICH HAVE NOT YET RECEIVED THE DEFINI
TION AND SANCTION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.”
Our just rights are not difficult of statement. So far as
rights at sea are concerned they are succinctly set forth thus in
the same editorial:
“We can not require that German submarines shall cease to
attack British ships or French ships or Italian ships, but we can
demand, and stand ready to enforce the demand, that German
submarines cease to attack American ships.”
But prior to that time The Georgian thus sharply defined
the limitations upon the United States’ right of interference:
“We have a right, and it is our duty, to question Germany
forcibly and with determination in regard to the attack upon the
Gulflight, in regard to the attack upon the Cushing, in regard to
the avowed policy of sinking merchantmen in the war zone
around the British Isles without proper investigation of their
nationality.
“These are questions in which Americans are interested—
nrofoundly, anxiously, vitally interested.
“But we have no right to question GERMANY’S USE OF
SUBMARINES IN HER WARFARE UPON BRITISH COM
MERCE.
t ”It is no possible business of ours whether Germany sinks
British ship with torpedoes, with mines or with gunfire.
‘ ‘ These are not matters between America and Germany, but
SOLELY MATTERS BETWEEN GERMANY AND GREAT
BRITAIN.”
The President's note leaves the Administration in a position
—if it chooses to take it—of basing its future contentions purely
upon these absolutely defensible and tenable rights. To that
extent the President is to be congratulated. And if he will main
tain that position in the future both the President and the coun
try will be doubly fortunate.
Mr. Bryan, whose precipitate retreat from the Cabinet was
supposed to portend a peculiarly intemperate and provocating
note, is left in a most embarrassing position.
How it could have been possible for him to sign the first note,
which was threatening, and refuse to sign the second, which was
mollifying, must ever remain a mystery.
The American people ought now to be able to look forward
to the proper assertion of the rightful demands of the nation in
stead of the extreme and unreasonable demands of the original
note, now deliciately set over, if not indeed fully eliminated.
With such a statement of our case which shall assert Our
Neutral Rights, All Our Neutral Righls and Nothing But Our
Neutral Rights, we may expect a peaceful and just settlement of
the pending questions.
The German nation, for its part, must realize that such a
note as this second note embodies and expresses the united senti
ment of the American people, and will be maintained by every
man of our citizenship.
>man Suffrage to Aid State and Nation
i
f
I AM a believer In woman suf
frage. While I am opposed
to proceeding by an amend
ment to the national Constitu
tion. because 1 think it a matter
which the representative States
should determine, I am, neverthe
less, fully committed to the belief
that woman suffrage is not only
right in theory but beneficial in
active practice.
We have had woman suffrage in
my State for more than twenty
years 1 entertain no doubt that
Its tsndency is all for the good—
for the advantage and benefit of
the body npliUc generally I a pi
t that boos of tbs evtia
ftulte sure
By WILLIAM EDGAR BORAH.
and none of the tendencies which
the opponents of woman suffrage
so often prophesy and seem great
ly to fear have resulted from suf
frage in our State. On the other
hand, I can see much good result
ing from it.
Of course, woman suffrage is
not a panacea for all the ills of
the body politic, it will not elimi
nate all evils or prevent all bad
practices There will be incompe
tent officers, corruption in office,
unwise legislation so long as the
human race lingers on the hither
elde of the millennium
But. woman suffrage is, never
theless. * dusunot substantial at«a
in nay Judgment, toward the les
sening of the evils and bettering
the conditions of politics. Her in
fluence in politics, like her Influ
ence in every sphere of life in
which she moves, is for the good.
Both Just and Wise.
1 feel quite certain that those
who have closely observed the
effect of woman suffrage through
a number of years will pronounce
it both Just and wise I am equal
ly sure that If the question in my
State were left to the male vote
alone woman suffrage w-ould be
continued there
I saw a statement the other dav
that In those States where woman
suffrage prevails the better class
of women do not take part In
polities and do not vote, while the
more undesirable or wholly unde
sirable do take part and do vote.
I am sure that this is not true.
While sneaking about the ques
tion of not voting, allow me to call
your attention to the fac^ that In
a late Presidential election In one
of the most populous States of the
Union, a State where woman suf
frage Is now up for consideration,
more than 100,000 voters remained
away from the polls.
Investigation disclosed that the
greater portion of those who re
mained away were business men
who could have voted with but
little inconvenience, living In
thickly-settled communities—no
such shameless betrayal of the
duties and obligations of cttlzen-
shUJ even proportions u.y, uus
be charged to the "better class"
of women In any suffrage States
If I had my way about It I
would forfeit a citizen's right to
vote when through no reasonable
excuse, he failed to meet this
prime obligation of citizenship.
That would be far more sensible
than to make the right to vote
depend upon sex.
Will Not Condone Wrong.
You may argue until dooms
day that women are no better
than me and have n» higher
Ideals and will vote about the
same way, yet a political gather
ing will Inevitably act upon the
theory that It Is not safe to rely
upon the woman
wrong or ratify
transaction.
Permit me here to say In Ibis
connection that while as good
wowau as Uva age sincerely op
to condone * a
l questionable
posed to suffrage and while men
disinterested and patriotic are op
posed to suffrage, and most sin
cerely so, yet it ts nevertheless
true that everv evil and vicious
Influence in politics is opposed to
woman suffrage.
There was a time in the history
of governments when it was not
so Important that women' be per
mitted to vote, for the business of
the government was largely that
of defending by force against op
posing foes. But the business of
the State In these days is far
otherwise. There is no phase of
our social life, practically no
sphere of being Into whlchthe
State does not Intrude and about
which politics does not obtain.
Meral Questions Now Arise.
Almost every conceivable ques
tion is now settled In the domain
of politics. The question of the
ears and grewti and education of
the child, the sacred circle of the
home and family, birth, education,
marriage are looked into, super
vised, directed and molded by
the State. Everything in these
days for weal or woe feels the
Impress of politics. Nothing Is
too sacred or too small tor the
State's consideration, and In Its
last analysis practically all great
questions of to-day are moral
questions.
Politics has, therefore, entered
Into woman'* domain, usurped the
place which once was supposed
to be practlcaTIy under her do
minion, antLwhy are women, un
der such circumstances, denied
the most potent Instrument for
effectuating results In politics—
the ballot?
The supreme question of the
future In this reaublic Is that ‘of
rearing a citizenship commensu
rate In moral and physical stam
ina with the tremendons obliga
tions which shall rest upon that
citizenship.
And I maintain that In the
question of the rearing of citi
zenship, in the making of the laws
and especially the customs and
practices whioh shall shape and
mold the lives of the citizens, we
can not, we dare not. deny our
selves the wisdom, the Intuition
of woman, and under present
conditions »h® can only poake that
wisdom and InttlitJon effective
through the ballot.
It is woman’s duty to be there
and it is man's duty to give her
the most effective instrument of
warfare when she goes there,
Give her the ballot. It will pot
degTado her and she win not dis
honor it It is the only really ef
fective Instrument **
war far*. . -.
'I I t'<
i I 1
< It
I h
• V