Newspaper Page Text
•;&*
1 *
■Mi
, eon*
Tress to
the House was written,
Q Did you not, immediately after Mr Craw-
f(.- ,i’j report was made*»;Congress. and ttWbM
you left this city, state to Mr Campbell, ot'Ohio,
that vou then had twenty nr thirty pages pre-
iko-s'I ag-iinst Mr Crawford? Mate What conver-
s.ui'.n took place between yott anti ilr. Camp-
. bj.ll, .on that sohji-ct . , ' . .
.? I think it was tm the morning I leu this
city, that l met with Mr Campbell, who intro-
duced a conversation concerning this report of
Mr. Crawford’s, by asking me whether 1 had
" seen the report, and appeared, From the remark*
which he made, to consirter that report* its con
taining an attack uponrme. He spoke of its be-
mg presented at so late a period of the session.
to the course of the conversation, I mention*
ed t<k.him, that l considered it, on this last ac-
V.iuid, a* being very ungenerous, or words to
tiiat effect. I stated to him that 1 had, during
last summer, received information that I was to
be attacked at the then ensuing session of Con-
KM-sss arfcl l think it is probable I suted t him
the particulars of that information. Thinking
it s iv probable that l may have stated it, I will
now repeat what tlte information was. In trav
elling through Kentucky last summer, In Ilua.
aetsrille, I received a confidential communica
tion from'Virginia, stating that I was to be at-
tacked, as is before alleged; that Gov Coles,
of Minot', Was ,-xpected to co-operate in the
attack, i d advising me to come on a week or
two b'ToreUie meeting oTCongress, to be pre
pared hr it. lit consequence of this inlorma-
• lion- and not expecting to return homo for •'•me
considerable time, I wrote to Mr Cook to call
upon Gov. Coles upon the subject. And ‘have
since seeii n correspondence between Mr. C»ok
hi d *lr. Cole-, on the kobicct, which I mention,
Mokiuae it affords to any-win* may be inclined to
make a further inquiry, the means of ascertain-
ing the troth of the Act. Under sn-expectation
11nis produced, Iliad been engaged in writing, 1
■ - and in preparing for the warf .re-which I ex
pected u aa to come on, and 1 believe t stated
that tact to Mr. Campbell. IVru.w that J alluded
V it, in speaking to him, but there is nothing
copied into my address that 1 had previously
written with that view. In consequence of thr
impr. -siou which Mr Campbell's conversation
fifr up<in my mind, that he thought I orght to
tv»s- cr Mr Ctawford’s -tatrmeui, I wrote hack
to him, while on my journey, that I siiould dot so
-the first leisure time I got, ami intimated that I
did not expect to occupy more th to three h.'ur-
in.doing it f J.i not know whether he received
the letter, but 1 expect that He did
Q Did von not stale, in that conversation,
to M Campbell, tiiat you had written
(tveaijr or thirtyqwgea mgtffost Mr- Cratv-
funl which ym» could not complete uftliK
Jyuugd- to Wheeling, lor want of docu-
nurii's which yon expected tn fi id there?
} a. i dll not eco'lect that I made such a
?ii.eut o M Campbrll; but I think i
oi ule sotun allusion to what 1 li»«l written,
*!-tf. stated'some things, in general term
could reach New Origins about the 15th of
May; bin iv>it w:is fft cu-lamiy; and, t
think sho had not arrived.' . „ •
Q. You say it was ejected ” What
d volt mean by that expression ?
A. I waited upon the President, in con
sequence of a wish he had expressed for
my early departure; and, ih conversation
with him, he requested me to go to the Se
cretary of the Navy, and ibquire about a
vessel to carry tno out on the mission. 1
called on the Secretary of the Navy, who
called iu Oounulore Rogers to coneu't up-
on the suiQCt^sndj from them, I under
stooiltthat Hie vessel, in which it was con-
eluded I should go, had not arrived, but
was, shortly thereafter, expected. Coin
Rodgers spoke of some repairs which would
have to be made upon a vessel; made some
calculation* ae to the time these repairs
end the voyage to New Orleans Would take;
and. in this way. *• it was estimated that
ihe vessel could probably reach New Or
leans by the middle of Mny.or between that
time and the t*t of June.”
Q You stopped at Wheeling, then, in
stead of at Washington for your own per-
sonal convenience r
A I left here because it was necessary
to attend to my business at Baltimore, and
a part of my business at Wheeling, which
was in the route to my own home, that I
intended to visit previous to my departure.
Q. I see, by referring <o your Address,
that, in addition to the numeets of the
Washington, Republican, there are ten
numbered documents, from No.l to No. 10.
Were not all these documentsiti jour pos
sesion at the time Mr Crawford’s report
was made to Congress?
A. They-ware not. I had oo expects
tinn of such an attack as was contained in
Mi Crawford's report—and had made no
preparation in anticipation of such an at
tack as constitutes the subject of that re
port in relation to myself.
Q. Which of these documents were then
in your possession?
. AirXhsd No, eleven (ll}—I had, also,
Nn f—Ihad the paper from which No. 3
is taken —all among tny pane's, but hut
collected for any purpose of attack. I may
have had some of ihein in the published
documents but, I think I had,at that titne,
none of diosedocuments in my possession.
I was preparing to leave the city, and, if I
had had any printed documents but tny
own. presume 1 must have returned them;
and, my own, (had sent to Mr. Cook. Nu
lling was collected or prepared for the
Admitting.my preMiaUm* to meet, and Hu- j subject of my memorial, or to be used for
•fer‘itiinatio:i tv repel, an attack that I had ary such prorpftsejUU after Mr Cook fur
nished roe-Hte copy of the report.
Q Did you send your address by
from Wheel in-?
«x;*ect:d o'dtFIntve Ueen made upon me;
tfii '. I cannot suppose that 1 could have at*
•ted’ti him any thing like preparation hir
Wie pi ticolar casern Mr Crawford’s report,
wii.cb was aiiRifty uuexpscted to mr.
Q. by M- F«r*v"th. in one of Ihe A- B.
publications,which ompuny yuui memo,'
rial to tb<*House of tteiiresentatives, you
r efer-t arirsiwtH-wt i cL csUiog'thirpublic at
tcition to suppression* by 'he Secretary of
T'essury, which produced an mvestig.v
mad
the Treasury, which prV
tion in that tlosse. Do v«o allude, in this
pa t ofiyour publication, tu the snide which
was the foitndsttou of what you eail. ia your
add eif, the A. B. phd ? ■
£THe Committee d cided that this ques-
it«*fww> ins-imissiMi-J
Question by~ Mr rVsyth, When did
Jai * *rh iVafidingi after leaving this city,
on the 44lli of March last ?
'/ Answer My impression is, that I arriv-
V'd 1'iere uq die first Sunday in April,
W.h'.yh .was 'he 4ih day oft hat month.
Q Wliei* dill yob leave Wheeling ?
A I. have no distinct recollection of the
jv -vi-' 1 A»y, hut tniak it was on or about
WS—f April.
,Q Did jus apple to the President of .the
rted States nr the Secretary of State be
fore ynu left Wa-hington,for permission to
'. t reioain here, for a short time, for the pur-
«fdefending ymiraeif f om the accu-
tcarion wfuch yna und&rstood Mr Crawford
tobave brought against you ?
A. l.did not- 1 have never seen the Pres-
ide<tt;«nce I saw the report of Mr Craw
foj4 jo Congress.
Q Was there any ‘-hing in your instruc-
tio i* whjch prevented you from remaining
in. Wasbiogton'which did ont vqii illy ap‘
p»y m y mr retaaioing at Wheeling, on tuis
Aw.mesi?
A. I had no Written instructions at that-
tiaj. Bat the President had 'sprewd
giy at anxiety that ( should get iff as s .oi,
AST'saible—and the arrangement was, that
1 •diosld leave this city. *o as to attend to
ay uvrnburiars-i. tnd be ready to meet the
vessel at Near Orleans net the 1st of. June
pt farthest, which was to cariy me out- In
conformity to which, I left this city on the
®4‘b; went to Baltimore to settle ^ome pri
v*te business, sad, also, today in some ar
tides which ( intended .to take to Mexico.
I af- /vWards went to Wheeling, where I
»!*« hid.private buriitent t* attend t«-con
aeeted witka part of my busiuess in‘BsUi
mono.
Q Y et knew then, that you, weie not ex-
purred to leave the Coiled States till the
ts< Jane.
A- T**e arrangetBent wa«, that I should
reach New Orleans by the 1st of June at
farthest—aad this Jen me but little time.
- , COb«d«rw*g the extent of my business, to
qrrittge hay private affairs, preparatory to
..;>jgai , »g;|o Meitco. t did not believe, at the
fime, nw do I yet believe, that the Presi-
deat farivafd have consented to ipr staying
fur the purpose suggested by Mr Eprsy th. -
Q. Wasnot the vessel in which you were
dqea»birk,.^a jiJ^burse of preparation far
* he-^fWge. (irhpa you left this city ?
A. vfilte vessel had arrived here, I did
itc It .iraa expected that she
f The Committee decided this to be an
inilirnner question j
Q. D • y-»u know when that Address ar
rived in Washington?
A I do not know, but presume it must
have arrived hero the latter part of the
week before it wa* presented to Congress-
After it was writen in pyrt,it was detained
for -owe time, with the hope that I should
have been able toi bttin a document I avail
ted, from the residence of the Hon. M
Ruggles, about ten miles from Wheeling
—to which residence I sent twice to pro
cure it. It was kept open from the para
to
j*aph preceding the last on pige 24 of the
printed address. ( Had intended to have
pursued the subject farther at that time;
but,from indisposition, from the want of the
document I desired, and from my anxiety
not to be longer detained, I concluded no
to do so and { referred to the ABpublica
tiona in consequence thereof. I had to have
a copy of it made, which would of itself,
have occasioned some delay, and this wa-
increased by waiting for the document a
bote alluded to. I sent on the copy of such
part as was ready, as I believe, the mail
before the original was forwarded. I think
I enclosed it to Mr Cook. When 1 left
Wheeling, my intention was, to avail my
selfbf the earliest opportunity of making
an additional defence: and I did not ex
pect .to be able to make a full defence un
til I could reach Kdataidsville, where !
hoped to find some of the documents that
would establi-h t!-e truth of my statements.
Oh e*.j journay, at Siiawneemwn, in FI
Uiiois, 1 found my publication of 1819
announcing my intention to retire from
the Bank of Ed'wArdsvilie, from which
place I transmitted that publication
this city; and after my arrival at Ed
wardsvde, F wrote another address
the House of Representatives, and had
obtained documents to accompany it,
which I was prepared to transmit when
the Sergeant at Arms arrived at try house
—intending, if Congress bail adjourned,
to get the same inserted in the National
Intelligencer, if 1 could.
Q. Did you transmit the original of your
addre-s by mail ? ar d, if so, whendid you
put it into the post office at Wheeling?
A. I did.hot pul it.into the post office
myself; 1 gave it to a gentleman to put in
forme—the post office being at a consid
erable distance from my lodgings—and I
expect he did so, in time for its arrival b^re
in the latter part of the week before it was
presented to Congress.
Q. Who wgs that gentleman ?
A. It was some one of the gentlemen a-
bout the house where I stayed, but 1 do'
not recojlect which one.
Q- On what day of your stay at Wheel
ing, did you deliver it to him ?
At. ( have no recul lection except from
the calculation which { thing l then made
as to the probable time of its arrival here,
sod I. therefore, suppose it must have been
about the lOfhor !2th of the moittli.
arrive the latter part of lliat week ? ’]
4. I knew from the time l delivered it
to be put in.the mail, that it couid not at-
rive before that time—and I intended it
should arrive by the due course of mail.
Q. Do you know when the topy of your
Address was finished ?
A. ( do not know the particular day}
but I think that the copy, so far as one was
made, was sent on by the first mail afte>
it was finished. And lhat it* was sent in
the mail before the’original was sent-
Q Please to read this address in the
Washington Republican of January 20,
1823, signed A B, and addressed to Gales
& Seaton. I* that the publication t< which
you refer in one of the A B publications
communicated with your AddreBS, (paged-
of that Address )
A- It ia
Q Werey-m not just about to leave Ed-
wvdsville when the messenger fiom the
House of Representatives arrii ed ?
A 1 expected I should have left it for
New Orleans in About three days
Q Do) you find, in your examination
of the office of the Receiver, any lettei
from the Secretary of the Treasury, t<-
which that conversation could possibly
refer, which you had With Mr Stephen
son* after your return from Congress,
respecting the letter he is -aid to have
written on 12th October, except the let
ters of the first of November, 1819, and
the 20th April, 1820?
A 1 did not
Q I remind you that in the 4th quar.
ter af 1819, there was a deposite of up.
ward* of £50,000, made by Mr Step
henson, in the Bank ofEdwardsville.and
I ask you whether you think it possi
ble he could have referred in that con
versatinn. to the letter of the 20th of
April) 1820?
A. At the time of that conversation I
did not know what depositee he. had made
after 12th October, 1819 nor to what
amount. I think it pos-iblo he may have
referred to the letter of April, 1820, al
though l consider that the letter of the
1st November, 1819 was t e letter writ
ten in consequence of the R ceiver’- Irt-
ter of tho 12th October preceding. The
letter of November directB the Receiver
to deposite the money he should have in
his hands nu the last day of the month,
iu the Bank of Edwarilsvi1lc ;but I think
it contains no express order in regard
to future deposites A letter of the same
date was written by Mr Crawford to the
Csshier of thut bank, with an enclosure,
and the paper I hove presented to the
committee was delivered to me by the
cashier of bank , as being that enclosure,
from which it would appear that both the
Receiver at Kaskaskie and at Edwards
ville had been directed to make their fu
ture deposites iu the Bank of Missouri,
until otherwise ordered And it appears
by the letter of the 20th, April, that the
Receiver fit Edwardsville’ was specially
directed to make his deposits in the
Bank of Edwardaville, Being the Presi
dent of the Bank, to the cashier of which
the letter was' directed, he may have sup
nosed he was bound to take notice of the
information which it U natural to suppose
he must have received concerning the or
der contained in that enclosure. But these
are all circumstances which have come to
tny knowledge since -tlte conversation al
luded to, and I cannot undertake to say
what Irtter it was the Receiver referred
to in that conversation,
Q. Do you know that in January amt Februa
ry, 18.0, notwithstanding this circumstance, he
lid make deposites inthe Itank of Gd-vardsville?
A I do not. I was at Congress during the
time spoken of, and I have no recollection of
having known at.y thing al that time concerning
his deposites; all I know on the subject is from
reee t publications. I am under the impression
that, during the winter succeeding the letter of
1st November, either Col Johnson or myself was
written to on the subject of the enclosure above
spoken of, but my recollection is so indistinct
that I cannot speak with any certainty about it.
Qt It is stated in an account current of Benj
Stephenson with the United States, printed
with Mr Crawford’s publication, ordered to be
printed on the 11th of May, No 13, that there
was cash depos'ted in the dank of Edwardaville,
on the 31st January, 18-0, amounting to £2,526
82, and in another account, No 14, that there
was cash deposited in r the same bank, by Ste
phenson, on the 29th February, £2,881. If
these statements are true do yqu now think it
q, Does it emttairt any direction to the He.
v tVe. 'io dcpoiitc mumya n, .lift lia: k of Mi
souril .
.YTthinf not. I have already stated that I
believe it is silent as to his futu>• deposite, afu ,
the one therein specially refe> red-to.
Q. The letter to the ltecc-ivei ,'of 1st Novem
ber, and the enclosure of which top speak, dif
fer in this respect. That part of the ci.closur,
which relates to the Bank of Missouri, is not
found ia the litter to the lleceiver. Is there
not this difference f
A The letter which I saw at the Land Office
at Kdwurdsvid- from’ Mr. Cray,ford to the Ue
ceiver, of Nov. 1st, 18 9, I feel confident con
tains no directions to make' the deposite in tin
Hunk uf Missouri, but is silent, as 1 have before
stated, as to future depos'tes.
Q. Could the Receiver, ifhe had seen this en
closure, have doubted about the propriety of
continuing his deposites, with the letter of 1st
Nov in Ins hands?
A I think lie could.
Q In giving your advice to the Receiv
er inMlte Fall of 1819, did you give it in
the character of his friend* or as a person
holding a high place in the government,
with a view to promote the public interest ?
A; At that time 1 had lost confidence'll)
banks generally, so much so that 1 did not
with to be heldrcopossible lor any bank.—
I advised, the Receiver as a friend to him,
and also with a view to free myself of all
esponsibility fur the bank, by placing
things in such a situation that Mr Craw
ford could act in the case as lie should
think fit on his own responsibility, leaving
the funds in the Receiver’s hands entirely
to his control.
[T<» be Continued.2
Latest and impoitnnt from Spain.—
We are informed by out uifentlyit corres
pondent of the Boston Courier, that the
ship Coral arrived at that port on Sunday
last, from Gibraltar, bringing letters from
Cadiz, dated the 22d of May. In one of
these it was stated as certain that 25 000
troops were to enter^ Spain immediately,
and tiiat severnl regiments had been urder
ed from Carthagena to Cadiz, where pre
paratic.ns were making to receive them.
“The movements (it is added) m Spain
with the recent events in Portugal, lend
many to believe that all is not well,' and
that war is brewingV
jy. Y. Evening Post.
jig ..•
FREDERICK S, FELL,
ctrt eiURTKn. V
UAL.
SAVANNAHY
*ATUR»>Y EVENING, JULY- io l8 ,|
iril " -'ft. skilW-
The i-.Bsis drums at the diptier. tV . j
ville. Liberty Couirty,*mthe 5th in.t L'll
•eceived, aud shall appear in uur nett. ^
The Baltimore Morning Chronicle ,
transferred to Mr. William Pechin. f 1
veteran at tho bnnines*, having been the ri,
etor and publisher, many years ago, of the i!
more American, The Chronicle hRsbecnj*
Ionian. MrPcchis, we understand, "
to make it an independent print.
prop-
* Not a word from Washington has been s
bout Edwards returning the £ 11,225, f ur ,
he has rendered mv service. Would it
well for the Attorney General-of the
States to commence a suit against the «. t
ter for the recovery ofthis money f
Mr. Crawford left Washington on the
nit, on his wsy to tlis North. Ills speedy a
tation to perfe l health is now certiun l llK j]
will be 4bie to tak , upon •himself thr high <U
the people sre about calling upon him toperfd
with a renovated constitution, ^
Yellow Fever.—A strong case, in proof
that the Yellow Fever is contagious, is
given in the London papers, in'the chse of
the British vessel of war, (be Banm She
went from Sierra Leona with 107 E trot
peons, iu apparent gobd health,*and before
her arrival at the island of Assenaion,
where she was bound, she lost 13, and af
terwards 20, by the ywllow lever—and 99
were seized with it She found the islami
in health, and there had been no death tor
two years. Soon after she arrived the Yel
low Fever broke out, and of 20 men in one
fort, 16 died, besides 4 women and 5 child
ren.
Selected frcm Tontit drank on the
FOURTH OF JULY.
At St Aunnsw's Parmu Gklkbiutiox Jj
The St Andrew’s Company,
enpt Smith, nssemblcd at their mutter i
whence they walked in procession to the'
accompanied by visitors from Churlestc
Oration complete ‘with ardent patriotiin
finished eh.quenae, was delivered by Mn
lip*, Esq
The procession then returned tot In-
House, a sslu e of twenty-four guns wm
and at 3 o’clock the party sat down to an
lent dintiei provided for the occasion
Among the tonsil drunk mere the fothuinf,
d partment, has saved millions of dollars tm
United Mates
, Albert Gallatin - The experienced
and profound fi-inncier; the fVlen’ tliU fell nL
bottrer of Jeff' rson and Madlcdii.in th«c*J
Republicanism. In this' lan'd of equal right),
meets opposition as a.candidatn for iSe t
Presidency, because *nit a .Ydtive " The (
stitutlou makes i.o surh distinction, the nti
fri-wn onitsiUtberabiy , v r- • >
Ottr~Kx SinUtbr, Judge Smith.—Me has cl
the state -ome ser iCt> i’he mist w.ilchfan
has contrived to throw around him will sodu
dissipated, and he will appear in ids true li^iv
Having heretofore had occasion to tqen
lion the state of Mr Secretary Chawford’*.
heallh.it may be proper to say, that he re
moved, with his family, yesterday, to «i
country residence, three miles f>otn the
City; that he is rapidly recovering, and
expects to set out in* day or iwn on a jour
ney, from which the complete re-establish
ment of his hfcallh is confide-fly anticipa
ted. JYat. Int 1st June.
the Missouri question, be w.-s lumve'.Vohj
anil his • t piitr\ is anxious Id vu.du tee itsU< fi
the chm-tr-.-of iii;:ratitude totvaids him.
J\finian.Ediaaid*,- tb icrgus of the Tree
It is t- him we t o mdub'ed for the investip
into the,conduct of tie Secr .Ury of the Tr
ry, tl»r resiittoF which has terminated so i
oly to Mr C'rswjnWl and the nntiou !
IVm K Crawford— Like the Quaker’^
pence, the harddr he is rubbed the brig
shines . |j
I’UIU.IO SENMAtSmi rostorI
The Washington light iufun.ry CompMj.l
Boston Statc-Bman represents, ‘*ffiunp9«.fI
most entirely of Republican young men, J
through good and through evil report, lot
and in peace. i<s members have always sup?,
ed the constituted admici-trutnrs of air iuhm|
government.’
paraded in
One Hundred Thousand Dollar Prize.
Various have been the person’s named, as
the holdor-t of the great prizo of One II,in
dred 'Thousand Dollars, drawn ou Thurs
day last in the Grand State Lottery, and citizens Were invited llr Ingalls preaidedj
anl.t in oh.r a . ■» M.d.» Diltno sisted by Col. Gerry Fairbanks, David Hem
sold in shares at Messrs. Cohens’ 'Office.
We are now enabled tb inform uur renders,
that one of the shares (n quarter^ is owned
jointly by Mr. A. Hickerson hod 3«>hn H
Clarke of Fauquier County Virginia, wlto
oo their arrival in town yesterday after
noon, realized their good fortune by re
ceiving the cash at MesservCohens’ Office,
on presentation of their ticket.
Baltimore Jim’r. 2nd inlt.
possible that the letter of the 20th April was ihe
letter alluded to in that conversation before
mentions with Stephenson? ,
A 1 still think it oossible. Hi* own letter be
ing silent on tlte subject of the future deposites,
he may have thought that that would iiave justi
fied him in continuing to make those deposites;
and yet, from the enclosure above referred to,
Mr Crawford may have intended to prohibit
their being made there I have already stated
that my-impression is, thatCol. Johnson, or my
self,^-received aletter on the subject of that en-
closure, and 1 supose the enclosure and the Re
ceiver’s letter together may have occasioned the
latter some uncertainty how he waste act.
2 You speak of your impressions concerning
a letter to yourself or Col Johnson. By whom
was that letter written?
A. My ympremnn is that it was written by the
President of t he Bank, who was also the receiv-
Q* You iutetided, then, that it should ji. jxjy,
ef. Col Johnson’s brother-in-law holding a ve
ry large portion of the stockof that bank, he
has been principally relied upon for some years
past to mske all negotiations with Mr Crawford
concerning it tiiat nave been made here, snd-we
have generally, had conversation upon the sub
ject when he has had to act in those cases. If I
received the letter, no doubt it was communica
ted to him; and if he received one, ;t is equally
probable that it wits shewn to me :
Q- Do you know that Uie Receiver at Ed-
war.Jsville ever saw that pappr, catted the en
closure in the letter of 1st Nov ? .
A Of my own knowledge, I do not, but-I
should think it very strange if he had not seen
it, he being the Presid-nt'ofthe Bank.
Q- In examining the records in the Receiver’s
office, did you see a letter from Mr.. Craw ford of
the 1st November? '
Public indignation.—Di.vid and Robert
Shields have be**n tried at Pafis. (Ky.) for
the murder of M’Cormatyk. Contrary , to
all expectation, they were pronounced not
guilty! The trial occupied nine day-.—
The Muysville Eagle speaking of this re
suit, says, “our respect for the great- palla
dium of personal liberty, (the trial by ju
ry) induces as. to forbear comment qjuch,
however; is the strengthref public feelirij;
in Bourbon, that on Friday night last, the
jurors were buried in effigy, and the
Rogue's March beat over the grave.
CHARLESTON, July 8.
FIRE.—The sloop I/apiil, Capt Swa
SEYj lying at Gibb* <Sj" Hurper’s warf, was
discovered to be on fire about. 3 o’clock
yesterday morning—fire sopposed to have
communicated through the foundation of
the chimney in the forecastle; Every ex
ertion was made to.extinguish the fames,
but in vain—they spread so fast that it was
impossible to save any tiling except, some
of the sails apd rigging.
firm, enlightened and independent cinte-J
c Missouri question, Ik- w.-a him*
.” Oh the 14th J.une, tbit ecu;
f that city, for the purpoieofre
ing a standard iron, their distinguished fclf<i«
tiien Dr. William Ingalls, a "firm k undrvisj
democrat ” Afi^sr tlie coi)cln*ion of the
mony.tiie company partook of apelegante
tainment r.t Concert Hall, to which alviui
and Andrew Dunlap, Esqrs au Vice Presi^j
Among the guests Wire the Mayor of llo>
Chief Justice Parker, the Hon. William I
of Bath, Hon Ashur Ware, of Portland, I
Triifton, ed Uapgor, and ltarney.aiitith r “
Among the roasts drank on the ofcasiwl
obsi rve the following:
National 'Peeling* and National PirtnaA
Mai they never be surrendered to local prej
Ces, or ’* e Vacriticed i o family aggrandisemu'
H'm H. Crawford- lie has.been faitbW
every trust; ra«v his rewards equalHVmr
wi //• Crav'foril—Hia tongue in nott.' - f
lytic to speck trniA, -nor his ; cs too buw
nisiinguish b> tween love of country and lonl
«//’.. . ... |
Win. II. Cro-ir/orJ—The school-mMtcJ
Georgia; may lie. soon have the United •'
for his tchool, and the citizen* for h' s ,,A
yVtn. U. Crawford— \ bii,,ht dtampletop_
lie officers ; his official performances IimJ
critical investigation of a well appointed Scr4
nizing Committee—should fate close his I
death, which may heaven avert, his /riendi >■
carefully femould him from Clay.
We have a strong presentiment, though f
indications at present do not seem to just'fjj
that another resignation will take place «r
the Presidential candidates, and that Mr
will reap the benefit of it. If our oonjef
should be realised, the election will to cert
go to the House of Represedtatives, and «
we do not think he can be elected, it bnn'J
probable that he will- obtain his full prof
1 uf the 24 voted.—’Nerfttk Herald,
The Pilot Boot Gazette returned thin
morning, having cruised upwards of 600
miles east and west in search of the ship
Delta, from Savannah, withuut success.
The steam boat Nautilus, chartered for
the purpose, went to sea last evening in
pursuitofthe ship Delta, which lost her
rudder on Cape Hatteras ^Capt. Rogers,
of the Canada, navigator.. ( ,. . . ,
{ Jf. Y;QaHi QOtAu/t.
SHIP WK W8:
PQRT OF SAVANNA?!.
Anniyxu,
Schr Flora, Tom$rson, Rieeboro, 2 days-
E L ship Louisa Matil^ ,Wood^Nev Vj>J
Brig Ocean, Marshall, New Yo&, •'"
J®"
Tbs ship Louisa Matilda* erased the JW
m.
■ iv
0 ,
i ( ; V ,
4
Brig Panthea, Bradley, NewYorV- jgj
Schr. Panppe, Norris, Charleston,