Newspaper Page Text
/ATT ' ~Af A ILT TZ”TXT Tk
DR. TALMAGE PINS HIS FAITH TO THE
DIVINE ACCOUNT.
- ---.
Evolution la InfldoMty —Attempt to Gnl
vnnlae Ml Old Besthen Doctrine Into
Ufa—SeientMe Absurdities to Drive On*
Ood and the Bible.
ICopyright, 1898, P ” SS A "°‘
WASHIMOTOX, Aug. Si. —The question of
human origin, so prominent nowin
tiflo and religious circle*. is discussed in
characteristic style by Dr.
discourse, in which he also advocates the
theory that aU the world’s progress has
Jornfthrough Christianity; text, I Thn
othv vl 20, “O Timothy, keep that Which
is committed to thy trust, avoiding oppo
sitions of science falsely, so called!”
There is no contest between genuine
soienoe and revelation. The same God
who by the hand of prophet wrote on
parchment, by the hand of the storm wrote
on the rook. The best telescopes and mi
croscopes and electric batteries and philo
sophical apparatus belong to Christian
universities. Who gave us magnetic teleg
raphy? Professor Morse, a Christian.
Who swung the lightnings under the sea,
cabling the continents together? Cyrus
W. Field, the Christian. Who discovered
the apsßsthetical properties of chloroform,
doing more for the relief of human pain
than any man that ever lived, driving
back nine-tenths of the horrors of surgery?
James Y. Simpson of Edinburgh, as emi
nent for piety as for science, on weekdays
in the university lecturing on profottndest
scientific subjects and on Sabbaths preach
ing the gospel of Jesus Christ to the masses,
of Edinburgh. I saw the universities of
that city draped in mourning for hjs death,
and I heard his eulogy pronounced by the
destitute populations of the Cowgate. Sci
ence and revelation are the bass and so
prano of the same tune. The whole world
will yet acknowledge the complete har
mony, but between what my text describes
as science, falsely so called,-And revelation
there is an uncompromising war, and one
er the other must go under.
At the present time the air is filled with
social and platform and pulpit talk about
evolution, and it is high time that the
people who have not time to make inves
tigation for themselves understand that
evolution, in the first place, is up and
down, out and out infidelity; in the sec
ond place, it is contrary to the facts of sci
ence and, in the third place, that it is
brutalizing in its tendencies. Ido not
argue that this is a genuine book, I do not
say that the Bible is worthy of any kind of
credence—those are subjects for other
Sabbaths—but 1 want you to understand
that Thomas Paine and Hume and Vol
taire no more thoroughly disbelieved tho
Holy Scriptures than do all the leading
scilfctlste who believe in evolution. And
when I say scientists of course I do not
mean literary men or theologians who in
essay or in sermon and without giving
their life to scientific investigation look at
the subject on this side or that. By scien
tists I mean those who have a specialty in
that direction and who through zoological
garden and aquarium and astronomical
observatory give their life to the study of
the physical earth, its plants and its ani
mals and the regions beyond so far as op
tical Instruments have explored them.
I put upon the witness stand living and
dead the leading evolutionists—Ernst
Heckel, John Stuart Mill, Huxley, Tyn
dall, Darwin, Spencer. On the witness
stand, ye men of science, living and dead,
answer these questions: Do you believe
the Holy Scriptures? No. And so they say
all. Do you believe the Bible story of
Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden?
No. And so they say all. Do you believe
the miracles of the Old and New Testa
ments? No. And so they say all. Do you
believe that Jesus Christ died to save the
nations? No. And so they say all. Do
you believe in the regenerating power of
the Holy Ghost? No. And so they say all.
Do you believe that human supplication
directed heavenward ever makes any dif
ference? No. And so they say all.
Herbert Spencer, in the only address he
made in this country, in his very first sen
- tence ascribes his physical ailments to fate,
and the authorized report of that address
begins the word fate with a big“F.” Pro
fessor Heckel,, in the very first page of his
two great volumes, sneers at the Bible as a
so called revelation. Tyndall In his fa
mous prayer test, defied the whole of Chris
tendom to show that human supplication
made any difference in the result of things.
John Stuart Mill wrote elaborately against
Christianity, and to show that his rejec
tion of it was complete ordered this epi
taph for his tombstone, “Most Unhappy.”
Huxley said that at the first reading of
Darwin’s book he was convinced of the
fact that teleology had received its death
blow at the hand of Mr. Darwin. All the
leading scientists who believe in evolu
tion, without one exception the world
over, are infidel. I say nothing against
infidelity, mind you. I only wish to de
fine the belief and the meaning of the re
jection.
Evolution IS Infidelity.
Now, I put opposite to each other, to
show that evolution is infidelity, the Bible
account of how tho human race started
and the evolutionist account of how the
human race started. Bible account: “God
said let us make man in our image. God
created man in his own image, male and
female created ho them.” He breathed
into him the breath of life, the whole story
setting forth the idea that it was not a
perfect kangaroo or a perfect orang ou
tang, but a perfect man. That is the Bible
The evolutionist account: Away
back in the ages there were four or five
primal germs or seminal spores from
which all the living creatures have been
evolved. Go away back, and there you
. will find a vegetable stuff that might be
called a mushroom. This mushroom by
innate force develops a tadpole, the tad
pole by innate force develops a polllwog,
the polllwog develops a fish, the fish by
natural force develops into a reptile, the
reptile develops into a quadruped, the
quadruped develops into a baboon, the ba
boon develops into a man.
Darwin says that the human hand is
only a fish’s fin developed. He says that
the human lungs are only a swim bladder,
showing that we once floated or were am
phibious. He says the human ear could
once have been moved by force of will just
to a horse lifts its ear at a frightful object.
110 jay* the human race were originally
webfooted. From primal germ to tadpole,
from tadpole to fish, from fish to reptile,
rom reptile to wolf, from wolf to chim
panzee and from chimpanzee to man.
? S a . l ? ybod y “ys that the Bible ao
eountof the starting of the human race
d^VV^Utlonlßt account of tho Btart-
Jj; ° ~u’ u an rnce are the same ac
rentaUom aPPamng misropre-
P ”j fer ’ if you will, Darwin’s “Origin of
tho Species to the book of Genesis, but
know you are an Infidel. As for myself,
as Herbert Spencer was not present at the
creation and the Lord Almighty was pres
ent, I prefer to take the divine account as
to what really occurred on that occasion.
To show that this evolution is only an at
tempt to eject God and to postpone him,
and to put him clear out of reach I ask a
question or two. The baboon made the
man, and the wolf made the baboon, and
the reptile made the quadruped, and the
fish made the reptile, and the tadpole made
the fish, and tire primal germ made the
tadpole. Who made the primal germ?
Most of the evolutionists say, “We don’t
know.” Others say it made Itself. Others
say it was spontaneous generation. There
is not one of them who will fairly and
openly and frankly and emphatically say,
“God made It."
The nearest to a direct answer is that
made by Herbert Spencer In which he says
it was made by the great “unknowable
mystery.” But here comes Huxley with
a cup of protoplasm to explain the thing.
This protoplasm, he says, is primal life giv
ing quality with which the race away back
in the ages was started. With his proto
plasm he proposes to explain everything.
Dear Mr. Huxley, who made the proto
plasm?
To show you that evolution is infidel I
place the Bible account of how the brute
creation was started opposite to the evolu
tionist’s account of the way the brute
creation was started. Bible account: You
know the Bible tells how that the birds
were made at one time, and the cattle
made at another time, and the fish
made at another time, and that each
brought forth after its kind. Evolution
ist’s account: From four or five primal
germs or seminal spores all the living
creatures evolved. Hundreds of thousands
of species of inserts, of reptiles, of beasts,
of fish, from four germs—a statement flat
ly contradicting not only the Bible, but
the very ABO of science. A species nev
er develops into anything but Its own Ape
ries. In all the ages* and in all tho world
there has never boen an exception to it
The shark never comes of a whale, norths
pigeon of a vulture, nor the butterfly of a
wasp. Species never cross over. If there
be an attempt at it, it is hybrid, and the
hybrid is always sterile and has no de
scendants.
These men of science tell us that 100,000
species camo from four when the law all
through the universe is that, starting in
one species, it keeps on in that species,
and there would be only four now if there
had been four at starting. If I should say
to you that the world is flat, and that a
circle and a square ate the same, and that
twice two make 16, I would pome just as
near the truth as when these evolutionists
tell you that 100,000 species came from
four. Evolution would have been left out
of question with its theory flatly contra
dicting all observation and all science had
not its authors and their disciples been so
set on ejecting God from the universe and
destroying the Bible that they will go to
any length, though It lead them into
idiotic absurdity. You see what the Bible
teaches in regard to it. I have shown you
evolution teaches in regard to it.
Agassiz says that he found in a reef of
Florida the remains of Insects 80,000 yean
old—not 8,000 but 80,000 years old—and
that they were just like the insects now.
There has been no change. All the facts of
ornithology and zoology and ichthyology
and conoholpgy but an echo of Genesis
first and twenty-first, “Every winged fowl
after hi* kind. ” Every creature after its
kind. When common observation and sci
ence corroborate the Bible, I will not stul
tify myaelf by surrendering to the elabor
ated guesses of evolutionists.
To show that evolution is infidel I place
also the Bible account of how worlds were
made opposite the evolutionist’s account
of how worlds were made. Bible account:
God made two great lights—the one to
rule the day, the other to rule the night;
he made the stars also. Evolutionist ac
count: Away back in the ages there was
a fire mist or star dust, and this fire mist
cooled off into granite, and then this gran
ite by earthquake and by storm and by
light was shaped into mountains and val
leys and seas, and so what was originally
fire mist became what we call the earth.
The First Cause.
Who made the fire mist? Who set the
fire mist to worldmaking? Who cooled off
the Are mist into granite? You have
pushed God some 60,000,000 or 70,000,000
miles from the earth, but he Is too near
yet lor the health of evolution. For a
great hile the evolutionists boasted that
they had found the very stuff ont of which
this world and all worlds wore made.
They lifted the telescope and they saw It,
the very material out of which worlds
made themselves. Nebula of simple gas.
They laughed in triumph because they
had found the factory where the worlds
were manufactured, and there was no God
anywhere around the factory. But in an
unlucky hour for infidel evolutionists the
spectroscopes of Fraunhofer and Klrchoff
were invented, by which they saw Into
that nebula and found It was not a simple
gas, but was a compound, and hence had
to be supplied from some other source, and
that implied a God, and away went their
theory, shattered Into everlasting demoli
tion.
So these infidel evolutionists go wander
ing up and down guessing through the
universe. Anything to push away back
Jehovah from his empire and make the
one book which is his great communica
tion to the soul of the human race appear
obsolete and delusive. But lam glad to
know that while some of these scientists
have gone into evolution there are many
that do not believe It, among them the
man who by most is considered the great
est scientist we ever had this side of the
water—Agassiz, a. name that‘makes every
intelligent man the earth over uncover.
Agassiz says: “The manner in which
the evolution theory in zoology Is treated
would lead those who are not special zoolo
gists to suppose that observations have
been made by which it can be inferred
that there is in nature such a thing ar
change among organized being* actually
taking place. There is no such thing on
record. It 1* shifting the ground of ob
servation from one field of observation to
another to make this statement, and when
the assertions go so far as to exclude from
the domain of science those who will not
be dragged Into this mire of mere assertion
then it is time to protest. ”
With equal vehemence against the doc
trine of evolution Hugh Miller, Farraday,
Brewster, Dana, Dawson and hundreds of
scientists in this country and other coun
tries have made protest. I know that the
few men who have adopted the theory
make more noise than the thousands who
have rejected it. The Bothnia of the
Cunard line took 500 passengers safely
from New York to Liverpool. Not one of
the 500 made any excitement. But after
we had been four days out, one morning,
we found on deck a man's hat and coat
and vest and boots, Implying that some
one had jumped overboard. Forthwith
we all began to talk about that one man.
There was more talk about that one man
overboard than all the 500 passengers that
rode on in safety. “Why did he jump
overboard?" “I wonder when he jumped
overboard?’l wonder if when he jumped
overboard he would liked to have jumped
back again?” “I wonder if a fish caught
him or whether he went clear down to the
bottom of the sea?” And/or three or four
days afterward we talked about that poor
man.
Here is the glorious and magnificent
theory that God by his omnipotent power
made man and by his omnipotent power
made the brute creation and by hi* om
nipotent power made all worlds, and 600
scientists have taken passage on board
that magnificent theory, but 10 or It have
jumped overboard. They make more talk
than all the 500 that did not jump. lam
politely asked to jump with them. Thank
you, gentlemen, I am very much obliged
to yodf I think X shall stick to the old
Cunarder. If you want to jump over
board, jump and test for yourselves wheth
er your hand was really a fish’s fin and
whether you were webfooted originally
and whether your lungs are a swim Mad
der, and, as in every experiment there
must be a division of labor, some who oxm
periment and some who observe, you make*
the experiment, and I will obeervel
There is one tenet of evolution which it
is demanded we adopt—that which Darwin
calls “natural selection” and that which
Wallace calls the “survival of the fittest.”
By this they mean that the human race
and the brute creation are all the time Im
proving because the weak die and the
strong live. Those who do not die survive
because they are the fittest. They say the
breed of sheep and oattle and dogs and
men is all the time improving, naturally
improving. No need of God or any Bible
or any religion, but just natural progress.
Not the Survival of the Fittest.
You see, the race started with “spon
taneous generation,” and then it goes
right on until Darwin can lake us up with
his “natural selection” and Wallaoe with
bls “survival of the fittest,” and so we go
right on up forever. Beautiful I But do
the fittest survive? Garfield dead in Sep
tember; Guiteau surviving until the fol
lowing June. “Survival of the fittest?”
Ah, no! The martyrs, religious and po
litical, dying for their principles, their
bloody persecutors living on to old age.
“Survival of the fittest?” Five hundred
thousand brave northern men marching
out to meet 600,000 brave southern men
and die on the-battlefield for a principle!
Hundreds of thousands of them went
down into the grave trenches. We staid
at home in comfortable quarters. Did
they die because they were not as fit to
live as we who survived? Ah, no, not the
“survival of the fittest!” Ellsworth and
Nathaniel Lyon falling on the northern
side; Albert Sidney Johnston and Stone
wall Jackson falling on the southern side.
Did they fall because they were not as fit
to live as the soldiers and the generals who
came back in safety? No! Bitten with
the frosts of the second death be the tongue
that dares utter it! It is not the “sur
vival of the fittest. ”
How has it been in the families of the
world? How was it with the child phys
ically the strongest, Intellectually the
brightest, in disposition the kindest? Did
that child die because it was not as fit to
live as those of your family that survived?
Not “the survival of the fittest” In all
communities some of the noblest, grand
est men dying in youth or in midlife,
while some of the meanest and most con
temptible live on to old age. Not “the
survival of the fittest.”
But to show you that this doctrine is
antagonistic to the Bible and to common
sense I have only to prove to you that
there has been no natural progress. Vast
Improvement from another source, but
mind you, no natural progress. Where is
the fine horse in any of our parks whose
picture of eye and mane and nostril and
neck and haunches is worthy of being
compared to Job’s picture of a horse as he
thousands of years ago heard it paw and
neigh and champ its bit for the battle?
Pigeons of today not so wise as the carrier
pigeons of 500 years ago—pigeons that
carried the malls from army to army and
from city to city, one of them flung into
the sky at Borne or Venice landing with
out ship or raH train in London. Look at
the great animals that walked the earth in
olden times—animals compared with
which in size our elephant Is a oat—mon
sters of olden times that swam the deep,
compared with which our whale la a min
now. Conies have learned nothing about
climbing, and the hounds nothing about
hunting, and the ostrich nothing about
hatching, and the oondor nothing about
flying, and the owl nothing about musical
cadences for 6,000 years. Not a particle
of progress.
And as to the human race, so far as
mere natural progress Is concerned, once
there were men 10 feet high; now the av
erage is about 6 feet 6 inches. It started
with men living 200, 400, 800, 900 years,
and now 80 years is more than the aver
age of human life. Mighty progress we
have made, haven’t we? I went into the
cathedral at York, England, and the best
artists in England had just been painting
a window in that cathedral, and right be
side it was a window painted 400 yean
ago, and there is not a man on earth but
would say that the modern painting of the
window by the best artiste of England is
not worthy of being compared with the
painting of 400 years ago right beside it.
Vast improvement, as I shall show you
In a minute or two, but no natural evolu
tion.
Look at China, where evolution has had
full swing for thousands of yean uninter
rupted by anything except hen and there
a mission station with this defunct book,
the Bible, but through the most of the
realm not interfered with. What has evo
lution done for China? Christian civiliza
tion gees In and builds a railroad; they
tear It up. For 1,000 yean the Chinese
nation, where it is not Invaded by the gos
pel, has not made one-five-hundred-mil
lionth part of an inch of advancement.
They worship the same gods of nd paint.
Just as always they drown the tanale
children as a nuisance. Just as always
they eat with chopsticks. So in India, so
in Arabia, so in Turkey, so everywhere
where the gospel has not made an invasion.
■volution Downward.
I tell you, my friends, that natural evo
lution is not upward, but it is always
downward. Hear Christ's account of It.
Fifteenth Matthew and nineteenth verse,
“Out of the heart proceed evil thoughts,
murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts,
false witness, blasphemies.” That is what
Christ said of evolution. Give natural
evolution full swing in our world and it
win evolve into two hemispheres of crime;
two hemispheres of penitentiary, two hem
ispheres of lazaretto, two hemisphere* of *
brothel. New York Tombs, Moyvnenalng
prison, Philadelphia Sefen DIMI> London
and Cowgate, Edinburgh, only, festering
carbuncles on the face and neck of-natural
evolution. See what the abpnt
the heart and then what evolution says
about the heart. Evolution sty*, “Better
and better and better gets the heart by
natural improvement.” The Bible says:
“The heart is deceitful above all things
and desperately tf&ked. Who okn
iff” When you can evoiv* fragranoe from
Tnaktdnr atwl can flTolva an nrafflirAn from
khntmw H U 1 fll
a basket of <mb apptattlMi you
can by natural evolution from the human
rffiVplnn sni_ii*ruM Ah am is dWfeanAm
natural evolution ia always downward; it
is never upward.
What is remarkable about thia thing is
it is aU the time developing ita dlahoneety.
In our day it is ascribing thia evolution M
Herbert Spencer and Charles Darwin. II
is a dishonesty. Evolution was knows
and advocated hundreds of years before
these gentlemen began to be evolved. Th*
Phoenicians thousand* of years ago do
elated that the human race wabbled out ol
the mud. Democritus, who lived 466
years before Christ—remember that—
knew this doctrine of evolution when ht
said: “Everything le composed of atoms,
or Infinitely smnll element*, each with a
definite quality, form and movemen’,
whose inevitable tu lon and separate, J
shape all different things and forms, lawt
and efforts, and dissolve them again tot
new combinations. The gods themselvct
and the human mind originated from suck
atoms. There are no casualties Every
thing is necessary and determined by ths
nature of the atoms which have certain
mutual affinities, attractions and repul
sions. ” Anoxinuwdcr centuries ago de
clared that the human ruco started at ths
place where the sea saturated the earth.
Lucretius developed long centuries ago, in
his poems, the doctrine of evolution.
It is an old heathen corpse set up in a
morgue. Charles Darwin and Herbert
Spenoer have tried to galvanise it. They
drag this old putrefaction of 8,000 years
- around the earth, boasting that it is their
originality, and so wonderful is the infat
uation that at the Delmonloo dinner given
In honor of Herbert Spenoer some 15 years
ago there were those who ascribed to him
this great originality of evolution. There
•he banqueter* sat around the table in
honor of Herbert Spencer, chewing beef
and turkey and roast pig, which, according
to their doctrine of evolution, made them
eating their own relations! Slicing up
their own cousins! Driving a carving
fork into their beloved kindred I - Dashing
Worcestershire sauce, bedaubing mustard
over their uncles and aunts! And while
Herbert Spencer read a patronizing lecture
to Americans the banqueters sat around
the table with their hands up, saying,
“Dew me, it is the voice of a god and not
ofa man!"
iTOlitlon a Heathen Doctrine.
There is only one thing worse than
English snobbery, and that is American
snobbery. I like democracy and I like
aristocracy, but there is one kind of
ocracy 1b this country that excites my
contempt, and that is what Charles Kings
ley, after he had witnessed it himself, call
ed snobocracy. Now, I say it is a gigantic
dishonesty when they ascribe this old
heathen doctrine of Solution to any mod
ern gentleman I
lam not a pessimist, but an optimist
I do not believe everything io going to de
struction. X believe everything is going
on to redemption. But it will not be
through the infidel doctrine of evolution,
but through our glorious Christianity
which has effected all the good that has
ever been wrought and which is yet to re
construct all th* D&tloii*.
What is that in the offing? A ship gone
on the rooks at Cape Hatteras. The hulk
is breaking up. crew and nassensers are
drowning. The storm is in full blast and
the barometer is still sinking. What does
that ship want? Development. Develop
her broken masts. Develop her broken
rudder. Develop her drowning crew. De
yelap her freezing passengers. Develop
the whole ship. That is all it wants. De
velopment. Oh, I make a mistake. What
that ship wants is a lifeboat from the
shore. Leap into it, you men of the life
station! Pull away to the wreck I Steady
there! Bring the women and children first
to the shore! Now the stout men! Wrap
them up in flannels, and between their
chattering teeth you can pour restoration.
Weil, my friends, our world is on the
rocks. God launched it well enough, but
through mispllotage and the storms of
6,000 yean it has gone into the breakers.
What does this old ship of a world want?
Development? There ia enough old evolu
tion In the hulk to evolve another mart
and another rudder and to evolve all the
passenger* and evolve the ship out of the
breakers. Development? Ah, no, my
friends, what this old shipwreck of a world
wants is a lifeboat from the shore. And
it is coming. Cheer, my lads, cheer! It
is coming from the shining shore of heav
en, taking the crest* of/ ten waves with
one sweep of the shining paddles. Christ
is in the lifeboat. Many wounds on hands
and feet and side and brow, showing ho
has been long engaged in the work of res
cue, but yet mighty to save—to save one,
to save all, to save forever. My Lord and
my God, get us into the lifeboat. Away
with your rotten, deceptive, infidel and
blasphemous evolution and give us the
Bible, salvation through Jesus Christ our
Lord!
Salvation! Let the echo fly
The specious earth around.
While all the armies of the sky
Conspire to raise the sound.
OAHTOR.XA.
Bssrsth. Ths Kind You Have Always Boagtt
i Will Be Sold
To the highest bidder for cash, before the
court house door, September 6th, the hand
some twelve room residence, in West
Griffin, known a* the J. D. Boyd place.
This place is lighted by electricity, has
electric bells, speaking tubes, water works
and every modern convenience, and is
located, in a handsome grove of natural
forest. The place contain* four acre* of
land. Perfect titles can be given. Sold
for thepurpose of division among the heirs
of the late Hon. J. D. Boyd. House open
for inspection on Monday and Thursday
mornings. Sale will bepoeitive. A great
chance to buy a beautlftil home.
ANNOUNCEMENT.
I hereby announce myself a candidate
for Alderman from the First Ward, and If
elected I promise to do what in my honest
Judgment to to the good of the greatest
number of tax payers, regardless of friend
or foe. Yours, etc.,
C. HOMER WOLCOTT.
FOR REIT.
The store room in Odd Fellows
building dost occupied by O. W. Clark
<fc Son. Possession given Sept. Ist
next. Apply to either Os tbe under
signed. Jmo L. Reid,
J. C. Brooks,
W. M. Thomas
, ... -3
To MOTHERS.
WE ARE ASSERTING IN THE COURTS OUR RIGHT TO
THEBXCLUBXVE USE OF THB WORD "CASTORIA,” AND W
I, DR
was the oriffsnater es ASTORIAf the same that
LAB M AB AB AW - E- **
oorne ana aoes now bear , on eueru
the fac-eimile ngnature wrapper.
This is the original “CASTORIA” uhieh has been used in
the homes of the Mothers of America for oner thirty years.
LOOK CAREFULLY at the wrapper and see that it is
thekMhaveotwaysbought - on the
and has the signature of wrap-
per. No one has authority from me to use my name except
The Centaur Company, of which Chas. H. Fleteher is President.
Do Not Be Deceived.
Do not endanger the life of your child by accepting
a cheap substitute which some druggist may offer you
(because he makes a few more pennies on it), the in
gredients of which even he does not know.
“The Kind You Have Always Bought"
BEARS THE SIGNATURE OF
insist on Having
The Kind That Never Failed You.
tm> aunua MaaMuiv. rr aoaaaMMT ariacarr. aacw vam ear*
■ '' w
—GET YOUH —
JOB PRINTING
DONE jftuT
The Morning Call Office.
i —JI_J -NHLJ,.±2j
We have Just supplied our Job Office with a complete line ol Btatiotert
kinds and can get up, on short notice, anything wanted in the way oi
-
LETTER HEADB, BILL HF/P8
STATEMENTS, IRCULARB,
NOTES,
MORTGAGES, PROGRAM I
JARDB, POSTED
DODGERS, ».a, MTV
We wny toe beat iue of FNVEI/OFEfi to rftenf : this trad*:
Aa attrAcdyt POSTER of any size can be issued on short notice
t ...
Our prices for work of all kinds will compare ftvorably with those obtained ton
any office in the state. When you want job printing oftany
call Satisfaction guaranteed.
■
work done
With Neatness and Dispatch.
1 , ,
Out of town orders will receive
prompt attention.
. .
■■ - ■ .
• --
J.P.&S RSawtell.